| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
901. How turned off are you from the monthly-shifting FOTM meta? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Iron Wolf Saber wrote: As an omni soldier I am always FOTM. remember when back in 1.6 I asked you why the rail rifles had a need of such good hipfire. I said it was another flavor of when the tac ar was op. your response was a basic stfu ab...
- by Tech Ohm Eaven - at 2014.02.22 21:10:00
|
902. Tanker hypocrisy - in General Discussions [original thread]
The Attorney General wrote: Tech Ohm Eaven wrote: av grenades are useless as a primary. adds you to red star list. The truth comes out, Tech Ohm wants to not give up an anti infantry weapon but he still wants to smash vehicles. Someb...
- by Tech Ohm Eaven - at 2014.02.22 01:09:00
|
903. Hey BAD FURRY, Wanna Bet? - in General Discussions [original thread]
BAD FURRY wrote: Auris Lionesse wrote: How do you determine who wins. when the other guy rage quiets dust for life hey theres a dude said he killed your tank with just standard av grenades that true or bs? just asking since I lol an...
- by Tech Ohm Eaven - at 2014.02.22 00:32:00
|
904. Tanker hypocrisy - in General Discussions [original thread]
The Attorney General wrote: Tech Ohm Eaven wrote: no. I know Bad Furry and an AV grenade is "usefull" for three things in build 1.7 1 wasting isk 2 wasting CPU PG 3makeing Bad Furry and other tankers say LOOK! an IDIOT! with av grenades.....
- by Tech Ohm Eaven - at 2014.02.22 00:19:00
|
905. Tanker hypocrisy - in General Discussions [original thread]
The Attorney General wrote: Galthur wrote: Um, look at AV grenade damage. Hypocrisy? I haven't seen a single AV grenade kill this build not to mention the fact I haven't seen one thrown. I killed Bad Furry with an AV grenade Wednesday. ...
- by Tech Ohm Eaven - at 2014.02.21 23:04:00
|
906. Tanker hypocrisy - in General Discussions [original thread]
CLONE117 wrote: no1 is even trying to av at the current point in time. the few ppl i do see using av are pretty successful. ive been aving for quite a while as well with my unspecced av. basically its a mlt free suit with adv swarms and std av...
- by Tech Ohm Eaven - at 2014.02.21 22:57:00
|
907. CCP, your game devolved more than a bit over the two years. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Cat Merc wrote: ZDub 303 wrote: Cat Merc wrote: ZDub 303 wrote: "Here is a sample of what we could have done if we didn't make the mistake of developing this on the POS3" ... This was on the playstation 3 dude... That was all prob...
- by Tech Ohm Eaven - at 2014.02.21 01:23:00
|
908. T-minus 8 days until March... - in General Discussions [original thread]
Ripley Riley wrote: Darken-Soul wrote: Taking 3 months to address it is the reason it went so poorly. That is a failure on CCP's part, but not the reason for it happening. The poor vehicle/AV balancing could have been avoid if the changes...
- by Tech Ohm Eaven - at 2014.02.20 17:40:00
|
909. Would you be willing to wait? - in General Discussions [original thread]
da GAND wrote: Logi Stician wrote: Philipp Achtel wrote: da GAND wrote: Now this is a question mainly for those that support CCP and believe that they can succeed. What if at fan fest there is no PVE, no open world, no player market,...
- by Tech Ohm Eaven - at 2014.02.20 02:57:00
|
910. when will DUST be launching? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Cmdr Wolfe wrote: a simple question for a simple player because after spending some time playing this game it is clear that it is still in BETA and isnt ready for release.. so when is offical release? also from what iv heard through other pl...
- by Tech Ohm Eaven - at 2014.02.17 01:02:00
|
911. Yet again, tankers decided the fate of AV - in General Discussions [original thread]
True Adamance wrote: Atiim wrote: This is why vehicles and AV are always in such a state of flux, CCP. You listen to mainline tankers, without talking to the AVers. And by that, I mean a lot of us. Get dedicated AVers and infantry, not just ...
- by Tech Ohm Eaven - at 2014.02.17 00:38:00
|
912. 1.8 Confirmed for Feb. 18th 2014, Get your wallets ready! - in General Discussions [original thread]
NextDark Knight wrote: Link to the post, https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=142282&find=unread Some kind of verification here with content, https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=1815641#post1815641 ...
- by Tech Ohm Eaven - at 2014.02.16 20:30:00
|
913. Tankers prepare your Anuses - in General Discussions [original thread]
Tailss Prower wrote: CuuCH Crusher wrote: Racro 01 Arifistan wrote: CuuCH Crusher wrote: Guess where my forge is going once the AV buff happens. You have limited time... you should make the most of it. you do know that hitting a ta...
- by Tech Ohm Eaven - at 2014.02.16 20:15:00
|
914. Collection of reasonable ideas to fix vehicles and AV - in General Discussions [original thread]
slow tanks down to 19m. fixed.
- by Tech Ohm Eaven - at 2014.02.16 06:57:00
|
915. Hey CCP why are Tanks so FAST?? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Gavr1lo Pr1nc1p wrote: Matticus Monk wrote: Spkr4theDead wrote: Go to Call of Duty if you don't want to deal with vehicles. Stop ruining the game for those that want a more varied experience. *facepalm* Pretty much says it all right ...
- by Tech Ohm Eaven - at 2014.02.16 06:47:00
|
916. Potentially troubling news for DUST 514 - in General Discussions [original thread]
Baal Roo wrote: Tech Ohm Eaven wrote: Buster Friently wrote: Th3rdSun wrote: http://www.slashgear.com/playstation-3-has-2-4-years-left-in-it-according-to-sony-11316546/ So if CCP is sticking to their guns of being "laser focused" on d...
- by Tech Ohm Eaven - at 2014.02.16 00:02:00
|
917. Potentially troubling news for DUST 514 - in General Discussions [original thread]
Buster Friently wrote: Th3rdSun wrote: http://www.slashgear.com/playstation-3-has-2-4-years-left-in-it-according-to-sony-11316546/ So if CCP is sticking to their guns of being "laser focused" on developing for the PS3,this game is most defi...
- by Tech Ohm Eaven - at 2014.02.15 23:40:00
|
918. Hey CCP why are Tanks so FAST?? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Debacle Nano wrote: Tech Ohm Eaven wrote: Its unbalanced when a tank can go so FAST. This is not The FAST and the Furious 514. Infantry moves at 5m to 7m. Reduce the tanks speed to 19m Problem solved. We really just need webifiers. It...
- by Tech Ohm Eaven - at 2014.02.15 23:10:00
|
919. What would save this game at fan fest? - in General Discussions [original thread]
da GAND wrote: Tech Ohm Eaven wrote: da GAND wrote: Meknow Intaki wrote: Something!!! Anything!!! Something about pve or Anything about a way to make more isk I'm the markets and trading =ƒÿÇ I understand how it feels right now wa...
- by Tech Ohm Eaven - at 2014.02.15 22:35:00
|
920. Hey CCP why are Tanks so FAST?? - in General Discussions [original thread]
NK Scout wrote: Tech Ohm Eaven wrote: R F Gyro wrote: Tech Ohm Eaven wrote: Hey CCP it looks like LYING. "We reduced infantry speed and bonuses from modules due to frame rates" Anyone remember when kin cats were 25% instead of 12%?? ...
- by Tech Ohm Eaven - at 2014.02.15 22:28:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |