| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
1661. Needed changes for tanks, 1.8 - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Justice Darling wrote: This sounds good, but what we needs is a way to Jam, Web and Nos or Neut them so they cant run away target us or really do anything that would make them useful with out support, on top of the isk price increase. Agreed...
- by Tebu Gan - at 2014.02.15 20:46:00
|
1662. Tanks - 1.8 changes - in General Discussions [original thread]
Delta 749 wrote: Or you know, replace the large blaster turret with a large plasma cannon type turret I've made numerous posts on that subject, I'll be sure to link my turret thread as well if anyone is interested. This though is a start, as...
- by Tebu Gan - at 2014.02.15 19:35:00
|
1663. Tanks - 1.8 changes - in General Discussions [original thread]
Takahiro Kashuken wrote: lolambush - Cant nerf vehicles because of 1 mode Tanks are balanced in PC Generally anything can be OP in pubs If tanks are in a much better place for a competitve mode then what happens when you nerf tanks for pub ...
- by Tebu Gan - at 2014.02.15 18:51:00
|
1664. Tanks - 1.8 changes - in General Discussions [original thread]
Identifying the Problem Tanks need to be fixed before they go implementing a infantry patch. Makes no sense to do all this infantry work, when infantry are struggling (namely ambush) to deal with tanks, or I should say, the sheer number of ...
- by Tebu Gan - at 2014.02.15 18:42:00
|
1665. Needed changes for tanks, 1.8 - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Identifying the Problem Tanks need to be fixed before they go implementing a infantry patch. Makes no sense to do all this infantry work, when infantry are struggling (namely ambush) to deal with tanks, or I should say, the sheer number of ...
- by Tebu Gan - at 2014.02.15 18:37:00
|
1666. if tanks aren't fixed in 1.8, then what's the point? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Agreed that tanks need to be fixed before they go implementing a infantry patch. Makes no sense to do all this infantry work, when infantry are struggling (namely ambush) to deal with tanks, or I should say, the sheer number of tanks. I think t...
- by Tebu Gan - at 2014.02.15 18:27:00
|
1667. The problem with tanks is that they're too damn strong without r... - in General Discussions [original thread]
Cat Merc wrote: Hunted down a tank, got close without it seeing me. I quickly thrown 3 packed AV grenades and managed to get off two swarms. He had 1/3rd his shields up and then just activated a resist mod. I was using a proto swarm with trip...
- by Tebu Gan - at 2014.02.13 22:49:00
|
1668. AV Respec - in General Discussions [original thread]
DMH Bond wrote: So Im in a match being harassed by an attack drop ship and decided to bring out my CBR7 SL fit w/ 2 complex damage mods. I watched the ADS take 3 full volleys from SL's from me and another SL AVer and 3 FG rounds from 3 heavies ...
- by Tebu Gan - at 2014.02.13 22:40:00
|
1669. Cease Chinese Production - in General Discussions [original thread]
OMG, it all makes sense now. I've wondered why a game with so much potential could fail so horribly. MADE IN CHINA. Not usually a good thing to have associated with your product. (totally joking here btw)
- by Tebu Gan - at 2014.02.13 22:35:00
|
1670. big corps go negative - in General Discussions [original thread]
Jake Bloodworth wrote: God forbid someone have a bad game. So many variables... Troll fittings, over zealous blue berry militia injectors, drunkeness, your incredible skills. Drunkeness, that's my go to excuse.
- by Tebu Gan - at 2014.02.13 22:20:00
|
1671. Tank Spam vs Protostomping - in General Discussions [original thread]
Stupid Blueberry wrote: Adelia Lafayette wrote: Counter with your own tank spam? If that doesn't float your boat or the other suggestions you pretty much are just going to have to wait it out till the next balance run by ccp and see what hap...
- by Tebu Gan - at 2014.02.12 21:36:00
|
1672. Tank Spam vs Protostomping - in General Discussions [original thread]
I assume you are talking about ambush. I would suggest finding a nice hole at the edge of the redline, and wait it out. It's the BEST counter to tanks. lol
- by Tebu Gan - at 2014.02.12 21:35:00
|
1673. Personally I Hate PC - in General Discussions [original thread]
COVERT SUBTERFUGE wrote: As soon as you feel obligated to log on to a game, you're a sucker. FW kicks the **** out of PC; same game mode, FF on, increased standings, gives gear that lets you spec earlier into stuff, get to do it when I choose. ...
- by Tebu Gan - at 2014.02.12 13:25:00
|
1674. New hotfix to matchmaking - in General Discussions [original thread]
Seems some say it's better, some say no change. Can we get some clarification on what exactly it was you changed, that should result in better matchmaking? Still need to check it out, tonight at peak time.
- by Tebu Gan - at 2014.02.11 18:50:00
|
1675. New hotfix to matchmaking - in General Discussions [original thread]
CCP Saberwing wrote: Yep, this was a bug fix. Let us know your feedback - are the games balanced? Hopefully it's helped resolve a lot of the team in-balance issues! Team in-balance, like stacking teams on one side and loners on the other typ...
- by Tebu Gan - at 2014.02.11 15:34:00
|
1676. New hotfix to matchmaking - in General Discussions [original thread]
Repe Susi wrote: So does anyone see improvement on this now it's deployed? Wonderin the same thing
- by Tebu Gan - at 2014.02.11 13:41:00
|
1677. New hotfix to matchmaking - in General Discussions [original thread]
"Oh yes, deploying a hotfix to help improve Matchmaking and unbalanced teams today. Bring on the feedback post-downtime!" Dust twitter
- by Tebu Gan - at 2014.02.11 13:37:00
|
1678. *Shakes fist* - in General Discussions [original thread]
Cat Merc wrote: I want a Quafe Gallente Assault Damn you Caldari Master Race! Why do you have all the special assault suits? Cause we are awesomer than you.
- by Tebu Gan - at 2014.02.11 13:32:00
|
1679. My Final Message To The AV Community.(Maybe) - in General Discussions [original thread]
Mortedeamor wrote: Takahiro Kashuken wrote: Mortedeamor wrote: lola very moronic thread prior to 1.7 and after 1.1 there was no way to adapt to the av. also if ccp buffs av its not because its underpowered more like people like you promot...
- by Tebu Gan - at 2014.02.11 13:22:00
|
1680. Immediate OBs in Planetary Conquest games - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Ignoring the other idiot posters, agreed, it is an unbalanced mechanic that can drastically change the course of the game in just the first few seconds. Some might call it fair play, since you would have had to get EVE support in the first place...
- by Tebu Gan - at 2014.02.11 13:04:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |