Pages: [1] 2 3 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
1st Lieutenant Tiberius
0uter.Heaven
1070
|
Posted - 2014.02.11 08:45:00 -
[1] - Quote
I don't know if this is working as intended for CCP and the rest of the PC playing community seems less vocal about it so hey what the heck I'll try and get my voice out there.
This needs to change, having an OB dropped on your MCC or ground spawn as you call in dropships and stuff; its not cool. This is how it works; when you deploy into the PC game there is 10 minutes of warbarge time during which the orbiting satellite is active, once its active a capsuleer can dock on it granted there are no contesting forces. Now, with the current system this means that as long as the capsuleer docks for at least 3 minutes before us Dust Bunnies start the match (when the warbarge timer hits 0:00) the Capsuleer's team can drop an EVE strike on the enemy as their deploying in their ground spawn and MCC.
This has become a legitimate tactic in PC games and frankly its starting to become silly, it needs to go. I'm sure (I hope) other people agree with me on this.
I have not yet reached a good state of mind to discuss Orbital Bombardment as well as other issues in Planetary Conquest games because whatever CCP does, I roll with the punches, its the only way to keep yourself sane with this game, but if anyone out there has an opinion regarding this post and lets talk about it.
I digress,
To CCP; Change it so that satellites can only be docked on AFTER the 10 minutes at the warbarge are up, so at worst the only OB to hit us will be 3 minutes into the game if we are lacking counter EVE support.
The Sinwarden
|
Mad Syringe
ReDust Inc.
83
|
Posted - 2014.02.11 11:44:00 -
[2] - Quote
There is a very simple solution to your problem, use decoys!
We had a PC where we anihilated the enemy Vehicles (DS + whole squad) at the start of the match.
Next match against the same opponent, they adapted, and called in an lav + 1 cheap suit at the start of the match... we wasted that OB on the lav and they spawned what they needed without further problems...
You need to adapt and stop whining...
Whining doesn't leed to improvements, adaptation does! |
Aikuchi Tomaru
Subdreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
1749
|
Posted - 2014.02.11 11:55:00 -
[3] - Quote
There's an easy solution: Get your own Eve pilots.
Sign up for Caldari FW and defeat the evil Gallente Overlords!
|
Parson Atreides
Ahrendee Mercenaries EoN.
954
|
Posted - 2014.02.11 12:32:00 -
[4] - Quote
Mad Syringe wrote:There is a very simple solution to your problem, use decoys!
We had a PC where we anihilated the enemy Vehicles (DS + whole squad) at the start of the match.
Next match against the same opponent, they adapted, and called in an lav + 1 cheap suit at the start of the match... we wasted that OB on the lav and they spawned what they needed without further problems...
You need to adapt and stop whining...
Whining doesn't leed to improvements, adaptation does!
zzzzz Any time someone doesn't like an argument they suggest it's whining. Let's go back in time and take every bit of feedback ever given and dismiss it completely by calling it whining. Where would the game be now?
Come up with legitimate counter-arguments.
"The unexamined life is not worth living."
RNDclan.com
|
Tebu Gan
Dem Durrty Boyz Renegade Alliance
563
|
Posted - 2014.02.11 13:04:00 -
[5] - Quote
Ignoring the other idiot posters, agreed, it is an unbalanced mechanic that can drastically change the course of the game in just the first few seconds.
Some might call it fair play, since you would have had to get EVE support in the first place, and not to mention, hold the station. Is it not enough that they will get an OB every 3 minutes on top of earned OBs. I like that EVE actually plays a big part of PC, but that part shouldn't be that HUGE.
Those OBs can make or break a game on their own, seems a bit much to allow one right from the git go. It would be nice if we could start a match normally, get everything setup, get in our places, and then boom, OB. The damn things are devastating enough, that you don't NEED one right at the start. All that is is icing on the cake.
Agreed on starting the timer, AFTER battle has started.
Nuff Said
|
Lt Royal
Subdreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
2708
|
Posted - 2014.02.11 13:10:00 -
[6] - Quote
Yep, another broken mechanic for a broken gamemode. I hope CCP seriously rethink how to fix Planetary Conquest before they open it all back up again.
Gÿ£GÿàGÿP Subdreddit Recruitment Video Gÿ£GÿàGÿP
|
CLONE117
planetary retaliation organisation ACME Holding Conglomerate
663
|
Posted - 2014.02.11 16:03:00 -
[7] - Quote
now theres a new reason for me not to play or enter any pc matches what so ever. on top of my several others. |
1st Lieutenant Tiberius
0uter.Heaven
1077
|
Posted - 2014.02.11 18:40:00 -
[8] - Quote
Tebu Gan wrote:Ignoring the other idiot posters, agreed, it is an unbalanced mechanic that can drastically change the course of the game in just the first few seconds.
Some might call it fair play, since you would have had to get EVE support in the first place, and not to mention, hold the station. Is it not enough that they will get an OB every 3 minutes on top of earned OBs. I like that EVE actually plays a big part of PC, but that part shouldn't be that HUGE.
Those OBs can make or break a game on their own, seems a bit much to allow one right from the git go. It would be nice if we could start a match normally, get everything setup, get in our places, and then boom, OB. The damn things are devastating enough, that you don't NEED one right at the start. All that is is icing on the cake.
Agreed on starting the timer, AFTER battle has started.
Yeah I'm just going to ignore the Inexperienced and Uninformed.
Honestly its a simply fix, satellite goes live once Dust Bunnies Deploy into the game, not the warbarge. But as other avid PC players know, this is only one issue regarding planetary conquest currently; but I think it is an issue that is extremely prevalent and I would think relatively easy to hotfix
While you're at it CCP; Vanity items, just sayin
The Sinwarden
|
Arkena Wyrnspire
Fatal Absolution
9290
|
Posted - 2014.02.11 20:34:00 -
[9] - Quote
Aikuchi Tomaru wrote:There's an easy solution: Get your own Eve pilots. Disagree.
Speaking as someone who has had orbital supremacy in the majority of the PC matches I've played, I think it's a terrible and cheap mechanic.
Being able to randomly destroy everything on spawning can cripple a team, and there is very little you can do about it.
ZATARA CARRIES US ALL
Lenin of the glorious armoured revolution
MAG Raven
|
Awry Barux
Paladin Survey Force Amarr Empire
494
|
Posted - 2014.02.11 20:36:00 -
[10] - Quote
This is just spectacularly bad game design, and a perfect example of how to construct the Dust-EVE link in such a way as to infuriate one side by making their success heavily predicated on events of the other game. |
|
1st Lieutenant Tiberius
0uter.Heaven
1079
|
Posted - 2014.02.11 20:37:00 -
[11] - Quote
Arkena Wyrnspire wrote:Aikuchi Tomaru wrote:There's an easy solution: Get your own Eve pilots. Disagree. Speaking as someone who has had orbital supremacy in the majority of the PC matches I've played, I think it's a terrible and cheap mechanic. Being able to randomly destroy everything on spawning can cripple a team, and there is very little you can do about it.
He obviously either; has not played very many PCs or hasn't played PCs at the level in which we are used to Arkena. I'm not trying to sound elitist, but when you're fighting top tier corporations suddenly every little thing matters.
Every second lost during initial deployment can be detrimental and decisive to which team will win the game.
The Sinwarden
|
Thor Odinson42
Molon Labe. General Tso's Alliance
2771
|
Posted - 2014.02.11 20:42:00 -
[12] - Quote
1st Lieutenant Tiberius wrote:Arkena Wyrnspire wrote:Aikuchi Tomaru wrote:There's an easy solution: Get your own Eve pilots. Disagree. Speaking as someone who has had orbital supremacy in the majority of the PC matches I've played, I think it's a terrible and cheap mechanic. Being able to randomly destroy everything on spawning can cripple a team, and there is very little you can do about it. He obviously either; has not played very many PCs or hasn't played PCs at the level in which we are used to Arkena. I'm not trying to sound elitist, but when you're fighting top tier corporations suddenly every little thing matters. Every second lost during initial deployment can be detrimental and decisive to which team will win the game.
Getting beaten right out of the gate is very hard to overcome. In many cases you could just back out, it's over.
It's a cheesy mechanic that they have commented was unintended. As most know it's the warbarge time and being able to connect to the district during that time that allows this.
It's really hard to believe how much PC is ignored with the amount of ISK it generates. I wonder what's the time spent by CCP on BPOs and their impact on the economy vs the time spent on PC.
ML Director
Eve Toon - Raylan Scott
|
1st Lieutenant Tiberius
0uter.Heaven
1083
|
Posted - 2014.02.11 20:47:00 -
[13] - Quote
Thor Odinson42 wrote:1st Lieutenant Tiberius wrote:Arkena Wyrnspire wrote:Aikuchi Tomaru wrote:There's an easy solution: Get your own Eve pilots. Disagree. Speaking as someone who has had orbital supremacy in the majority of the PC matches I've played, I think it's a terrible and cheap mechanic. Being able to randomly destroy everything on spawning can cripple a team, and there is very little you can do about it. He obviously either; has not played very many PCs or hasn't played PCs at the level in which we are used to Arkena. I'm not trying to sound elitist, but when you're fighting top tier corporations suddenly every little thing matters. Every second lost during initial deployment can be detrimental and decisive to which team will win the game. Getting beaten right out of the gate is very hard to overcome. In many cases you could just back out, it's over. It's a cheesy mechanic that they have commented was unintended. As most know it's the warbarge time and being able to connect to the district during that time that allows this. It's really hard to believe how much PC is ignored with the amount of ISK it generates. I wonder what's the time spent by CCP on BPOs and their impact on the economy vs the time spent on PC.
lol I know right, they're saying BPOs are market breaking yet the perpetual accrual of ENOURMOUS amounts of wealth in a system where, not only profit is ensured, but assets are untouchable as well.
If CCP is trying to create an In-game economy the logical thing to do would be an ISK wipe, wonder how people will feel about that statement
The Sinwarden
|
Arkena Wyrnspire
Fatal Absolution
9295
|
Posted - 2014.02.11 20:52:00 -
[14] - Quote
Thor Odinson42 wrote: It's really hard to believe how much PC is ignored with the amount of ISK it generates. I wonder what's the time spent by CCP on BPOs and their impact on the economy vs the time spent on PC.
According to CPM Hans, the isk generation of BPOs makes PC isk generation look like abject poverty.
ZATARA CARRIES US ALL
Lenin of the glorious armoured revolution
MAG Raven
|
Thor Odinson42
Molon Labe. General Tso's Alliance
2773
|
Posted - 2014.02.11 20:53:00 -
[15] - Quote
Because there is such a low percentage of players participating in PC I think they believe it can wait. But I'd wager that a vast majority of the ISK in Dust resides in the corp wallets (or spread amongst directors) of 5 or 6 corps and less than 200 players.
I guess it works for America, perhaps it will work with Dust.
ML Director
Eve Toon - Raylan Scott
|
Thor Odinson42
Molon Labe. General Tso's Alliance
2773
|
Posted - 2014.02.11 20:54:00 -
[16] - Quote
Arkena Wyrnspire wrote:Thor Odinson42 wrote: It's really hard to believe how much PC is ignored with the amount of ISK it generates. I wonder what's the time spent by CCP on BPOs and their impact on the economy vs the time spent on PC.
According to CPM Hans, the isk generation of BPOs makes PC isk generation look like abject poverty.
Then why aren't there a bunch of BPO billionaires out there? I know one guy.
I know quite a few PC billionaires.
ML Director
Eve Toon - Raylan Scott
|
1st Lieutenant Tiberius
0uter.Heaven
1087
|
Posted - 2014.02.11 20:59:00 -
[17] - Quote
Thor Odinson42 wrote:Arkena Wyrnspire wrote:Thor Odinson42 wrote: It's really hard to believe how much PC is ignored with the amount of ISK it generates. I wonder what's the time spent by CCP on BPOs and their impact on the economy vs the time spent on PC.
According to CPM Hans, the isk generation of BPOs makes PC isk generation look like abject poverty. Then why aren't there a bunch of BPO billionaires out there? I know one guy. I know quite a few PC billionaires.
The problem is very, very apparent and yet unspoken of. Maybe its because, as you said, such a small population of players actually play PC, because PC is so abhorrently broken. And because PC is so abhorrently broken, no-one but a small population of players actually play PC and because of this; the very apparent problems with PC are unspoken of.
It is truly a vicious cycle.
The Sinwarden
|
Arkena Wyrnspire
Fatal Absolution
9297
|
Posted - 2014.02.11 21:01:00 -
[18] - Quote
Thor Odinson42 wrote:Arkena Wyrnspire wrote:Thor Odinson42 wrote: It's really hard to believe how much PC is ignored with the amount of ISK it generates. I wonder what's the time spent by CCP on BPOs and their impact on the economy vs the time spent on PC.
According to CPM Hans, the isk generation of BPOs makes PC isk generation look like abject poverty. Then why aren't there a bunch of BPO billionaires out there? I know one guy. I know quite a few PC billionaires.
I'm not disagreeing with you. Simply in terms of the larger economy, apparently.
As it happens, I argued against Hans with the lack of forthcoming statistics. It's one of the Dust Scussion Skype channels, I'm not sure if you're still in those but if you are you can read the backlog.
ZATARA CARRIES US ALL
Lenin of the glorious armoured revolution
MAG Raven
|
Thor Odinson42
Molon Labe. General Tso's Alliance
2774
|
Posted - 2014.02.11 21:02:00 -
[19] - Quote
1st Lieutenant Tiberius wrote:Thor Odinson42 wrote:Arkena Wyrnspire wrote:Thor Odinson42 wrote: It's really hard to believe how much PC is ignored with the amount of ISK it generates. I wonder what's the time spent by CCP on BPOs and their impact on the economy vs the time spent on PC.
According to CPM Hans, the isk generation of BPOs makes PC isk generation look like abject poverty. Then why aren't there a bunch of BPO billionaires out there? I know one guy. I know quite a few PC billionaires. The problem is very, very apparent and yet unspoken of. Maybe its because, as you said, such a small population of players actually play PC, because PC is so abhorrently broken. And because PC is so abhorrently broken, no-one but a small population of players actually play PC and because of this; the very apparent problems with PC are unspoken of. It is truly a vicious cycle.
No doubt. I've tried to get some threads going in general discussion, but the masses just think PC players are all glitchers who use modded controllers and mouse and keyboard at the same time.
ML Director
Eve Toon - Raylan Scott
|
Thor Odinson42
Molon Labe. General Tso's Alliance
2774
|
Posted - 2014.02.11 21:03:00 -
[20] - Quote
Arkena Wyrnspire wrote:Thor Odinson42 wrote:Arkena Wyrnspire wrote:Thor Odinson42 wrote: It's really hard to believe how much PC is ignored with the amount of ISK it generates. I wonder what's the time spent by CCP on BPOs and their impact on the economy vs the time spent on PC.
According to CPM Hans, the isk generation of BPOs makes PC isk generation look like abject poverty. Then why aren't there a bunch of BPO billionaires out there? I know one guy. I know quite a few PC billionaires. I'm not disagreeing with you. Simply in terms of the larger economy, apparently. As it happens, I argued against Hans with the lack of forthcoming statistics. It's one of the Dust Scussion Skype channels, I'm not sure if you're still in those but if you are you can read the backlog.
Yeah, I've been apart of those and spent some time discussing ISK payouts and such with Hans.
It's hard to keep up because Cat Merc spams the **** out of those channels, lol
ML Director
Eve Toon - Raylan Scott
|
|
1st Lieutenant Tiberius
0uter.Heaven
1088
|
Posted - 2014.02.11 21:13:00 -
[21] - Quote
Thor Odinson42 wrote:1st Lieutenant Tiberius wrote:Thor Odinson42 wrote:Arkena Wyrnspire wrote:Thor Odinson42 wrote: It's really hard to believe how much PC is ignored with the amount of ISK it generates. I wonder what's the time spent by CCP on BPOs and their impact on the economy vs the time spent on PC.
According to CPM Hans, the isk generation of BPOs makes PC isk generation look like abject poverty. Then why aren't there a bunch of BPO billionaires out there? I know one guy. I know quite a few PC billionaires. The problem is very, very apparent and yet unspoken of. Maybe its because, as you said, such a small population of players actually play PC, because PC is so abhorrently broken. And because PC is so abhorrently broken, no-one but a small population of players actually play PC and because of this; the very apparent problems with PC are unspoken of. It is truly a vicious cycle. No doubt. I've tried to get some threads going in general discussion, but the masses just think PC players are all glitchers who use modded controllers and mouse and keyboard at the same time.
Its because there is such a HUGE learning curve when comparing Pubs to PC. There is a difference between Pub Gungame and PC gungame.
PC is mostly for a small population of particular types of players or, on rare occasions, breed newer players who have PC gungame
and when I say PC gungame, I dont mean simply knowing how to shoot your weapon and kill somsone; but having a form of initiative as well as an understanding on how to win the game
The Sinwarden
|
Thor Odinson42
Molon Labe. General Tso's Alliance
2778
|
Posted - 2014.02.11 21:22:00 -
[22] - Quote
Team deploy is needed in a big way. There should be a pub match mode that allows team deploy.
You could set up a team just as you do for a squad currently, but they could only deploy into FW, PC, and a new pub match gamemode (a seperate skirmish). They could make the payouts higher in the team deploy game mode to give incentive to players to play in the team mode.
They also need to redo the mechanics in PC to make the battles spin up sooner. Like 30 minutes to an hour instead of 24-48 hours. These steps right here would do a LOT for PC competition in six months.
There are plenty of players with the SP and the overall knowledge of Dust to get competitive in PC. The problem is the learning curve of PC. That step is like going from PeeWee football to the NFL. The beta corp battles really prepared people for PC in a way that I doubt CCP thought of. We've been doing PC for 7 months now, but most of the ML guys started doing corp battles in Nov/Dec and we were being the curve then.
The lack of team deploy is a glaring issue.
ML Director
Eve Toon - Raylan Scott
|
1st Lieutenant Tiberius
0uter.Heaven
1090
|
Posted - 2014.02.11 21:31:00 -
[23] - Quote
Thor Odinson42 wrote:Team deploy is needed in a big way. There should be a pub match mode that allows team deploy.
You could set up a team just as you do for a squad currently, but they could only deploy into FW, PC, and a new pub match gamemode (a seperate skirmish). They could make the payouts higher in the team deploy game mode to give incentive to players to play in the team mode.
They also need to redo the mechanics in PC to make the battles spin up sooner. Like 30 minutes to an hour instead of 24-48 hours. These steps right here would do a LOT for PC competition in six months.
There are plenty of players with the SP and the overall knowledge of Dust to get competitive in PC. The problem is the learning curve of PC. That step is like going from PeeWee football to the NFL. The beta corp battles really prepared people for PC in a way that I doubt CCP thought of. We've been doing PC for 7 months now, but most of the ML guys started doing corp battles in Nov/Dec and we were being the curve then.
The lack of team deploy is a glaring issue.
Agreed, I've thought long and hard on how to teach newer players the skills needed to perform well in PC but the only way to do that is by putting them in PC games, but that comes with the risk of (at least in 0.Hs current state) jeopardizing scarce assets. Pubs are in no way good training for PC games and neither is FW at its current state honestly.
+1 Agreed team deploy is a necessary addition to this game
Also check out this thread I made ages ago that I recently bumped and see what you think about, I'd really appreciate it.
The Sinwarden
|
Thor Odinson42
Molon Labe. General Tso's Alliance
2780
|
Posted - 2014.02.11 21:41:00 -
[24] - Quote
I made it a favorite, I'll keep it bumped.
ML Director
Eve Toon - Raylan Scott
|
1st Lieutenant Tiberius
0uter.Heaven
1094
|
Posted - 2014.02.11 21:43:00 -
[25] - Quote
Thor Odinson42 wrote:I made it a favorite, I'll keep it bumped.
Thank you kindly sir o7
It's a simple request really, hopefully CCP at least reads all these ideas and considers them.
I absolutely love this game and I don't know how many other people can say that without a heavy heart like I can, I just want this game to continuously improve
Signed, a less than bitter vet
The Sinwarden
|
Thor Odinson42
Molon Labe. General Tso's Alliance
2780
|
Posted - 2014.02.11 21:47:00 -
[26] - Quote
1st Lieutenant Tiberius wrote:Thor Odinson42 wrote:I made it a favorite, I'll keep it bumped. Thank you kindly sir o7 It's a simple request really, hopefully CCP at least reads all these ideas and considers them. I absolutely love this game and I don't know how many other people can say that without a heavy heart like I can, I just want this game to continuously improve Signed, a less than bitter vet
Same here, I'm a Dust crackhead.
I would like nothing better than to keep my corporation growing, but the way that PC is it's smarter to hire ringers or recruit players and pay them salaries to improve your chances to win.
Taking the passive ISK accrual from the districts away takes some of the drama away from the "land". Make the ISK generation come from the fights and not from locking or clone sales.
There is so much about PC that hurts this game more than helps it.
ML Director
Eve Toon - Raylan Scott
|
1st Lieutenant Tiberius
0uter.Heaven
1094
|
Posted - 2014.02.11 21:55:00 -
[27] - Quote
Just so Logibro doesn't lock this for not discussing the OP topic I will reinstate the proposed fix:
Make it so a district satellite only comes online after us Dust Bunnies delpoy into the actual game, not the warbarge.
I now open this thread to discussion about PC and its issues!
Thor Odinson42 wrote:Make the ISK generation come from the fights and not from locking or clone sales.
I like this idea, I think there needs to be a different incentive to owning land and a countermeasure to limiting how much land a corp/alliance can own based on how many teams they can field at any given point in time.
Honestly I kind of like the way PC games can come daily or every 2 days (depending on districts owned that is) having PC battles occur every hour on the hour might be overwhelming to even the most no-lifing corp in Dust. But I have yet to think of an alternative.
The Sinwarden
|
Sylwester Dziewiecki
Interregnum.
268
|
Posted - 2014.02.11 22:04:00 -
[28] - Quote
It's weird that you reporting such game breaking mechanic so late..
I'm here since may 2012, my EVE alter ego is Nosum Hseebnrido.
|
1st Lieutenant Tiberius
0uter.Heaven
1097
|
Posted - 2014.02.11 22:06:00 -
[29] - Quote
Sylwester Dziewiecki wrote:It's weird that you reporting such game breaking mechanic so late..
I agree and am ashamed that it took me so long to muster up the attention span and time to post this. Honestly I am also surprised that I'm the only person thus far to report on this issue (I might be wrong but I used the search tab before posting)
But, better late than never I say, wouldn't you agree?
The Sinwarden
|
Sylwester Dziewiecki
Interregnum.
268
|
Posted - 2014.02.11 22:15:00 -
[30] - Quote
1st Lieutenant Tiberius wrote:Sylwester Dziewiecki wrote:It's weird that you reporting such game breaking mechanic so late.. I agree and am ashamed that it took me so long to muster up the attention span and time to post this. Honestly I am also surprised that I'm the only person thus far to report on this issue (I might be wrong but I used the search tab before posting) But, better late than never I say, wouldn't you agree? Sure I do.
We missing in Dust God-like bug hunters, that can spawn things for purpose of testing some mechanic and can work with EVE bug hunters that test things on SISI server.
I'm here since may 2012, my EVE alter ego is Nosum Hseebnrido.
|
|
|
|
|
Pages: [1] 2 3 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |