| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 |
1481. A counter to the "stupid" known as - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Pocket Rocket Girl wrote: 3) if you get taken out easily you need to learn to drive better We've been doing this for a long, long time, through multiple games, too. AV is utterly broken as it is. It's not a deterrent, it's a nuclear end-...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2014.12.13 15:35:00
|
1482. Vehicle Modules Brainstorm. - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Tesfa Alem wrote: Right now we are looking at the reintroduction of tanks wich may have more slots, yet our current modules are based upon low slot counts for tanks. How can we rectify this? The biggest issue will be module stacking. The gameb...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2014.12.13 15:31:00
|
1483. Vehicle Modules Brainstorm. - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Because you can't already put 3 damage mods and 4 plates on a Gal assault. Stacking for me, no stacking for thee. Double standards all the way.
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2014.12.13 15:27:00
|
1484. Before Remote Explosives get Nerfed into pure AV... - in General Discussions [original thread]
So... another AV weapon...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2014.12.13 15:25:00
|
1485. A counter to the "stupid" known as - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Atiim wrote: Lazer Fo Cused wrote: 3. Its never been easier to take out vehicles False. You don't know what you're doing.
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2014.12.12 17:22:00
|
1486. [Hotfix Echo] Sagaris - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
DeathwindRising wrote: 1. partial module cooldowns for partial use. Should've been this way since the beginning. 2. limit all active modules to one per vehicle You could fit more than one rep tool, more than one scanner, more than one nan...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2014.12.12 17:21:00
|
1487. A counter to the "stupid" known as - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Alaika Arbosa wrote: Wilhelm Klingspor wrote: GLOBAL fils'de RAGE wrote: the flying tank. AV nades should insta-kill DERP ships! If you disagree with me you must be a puppy killing ****. Well, bring fido to me then. Come on, 1 Grena...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2014.12.12 17:17:00
|
1488. A counter to the "stupid" known as - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
BL4CKST4R wrote: Lazer Fo Cused wrote: Atiim wrote: Lazer Fo Cused wrote: 3. Its never been easier to take out vehicles False. 1. You must be bad with AV then, i know i dont have a problem with it and the tools availible dish out ...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2014.12.12 17:16:00
|
1489. 1.10 is Where Dust Should Have Been at Uprising 1.0 - in General Discussions [original thread]
LUGMOS wrote: Lazer Fo Cused wrote: 1. Pilots say no and vehicles are going backwards To some extent. Vehicle parity needs to be a thing and old roles (Marauder/SLAV/LLAV/Black Ops HAV/LDS) need to be reintroduced. Black Ops HAV not as muc...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2014.12.12 17:11:00
|
1490. How many lockboxes do you have? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Too many since the only other Aurum I'd put into the game is for another respec if future vehicle skills and hulls are worth it.
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2014.12.12 17:05:00
|
1491. ECHO vehicles stats spreadsheet. - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
DarthJT5 wrote: Spkr4theDead wrote: Pokey Dravon wrote: True Adamance wrote: Ew God no. Have you even worked out those EHP values? 20% more armour and 20% armour resistances per level? On a 5885 Hull? Thats 5885 *1.2 = 7062 modifi...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2014.12.11 22:12:00
|
1492. ECHO vehicles stats spreadsheet. - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Pokey Dravon wrote: True Adamance wrote: Ew God no. Have you even worked out those EHP values? 20% more armour and 20% armour resistances per level? On a 5885 Hull? Thats 5885 *1.2 = 7062 modified again by 20% 7062 * 1.2 = 8474.4 then...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2014.12.11 21:40:00
|
1493. [Hotfix Echo] Sagaris - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Atiim wrote: See Spkr? What I told you in-game was true. Keep complaining that AV is underpowered.
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2014.12.11 20:13:00
|
1494. [Hotfix Echo] Sagaris - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Pokey Dravon wrote: Spkr4theDead wrote: Pokey Dravon wrote: Spkr4theDead wrote: Pokey, have you ever tried tanking consistently? If not, what makes you think you know the direction vehicles should go in? We just tell you how to destroy...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2014.12.11 19:58:00
|
1495. In context of Marauder tanks having drawbacks compared to std.... - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Isa Lucifer wrote: Spkr4theDead wrote: And no, a Marauder should have no drawbacks compared to a STD tank, until the siege module is activated. Then I'll accept a 50% reduction in movement speed. This isn't WWII when tanks had to move slowly...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2014.12.11 19:41:00
|
1496. In context of Marauder tanks having drawbacks compared to std.... - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Isa Lucifer wrote: The-Errorist wrote: I rather have increased firepower reserved for enforcers and defense reserved for marauders. So there are 2 different types of Heavy HAVs? I thought there was HAVS and then Marauders. I do not reme...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2014.12.11 19:38:00
|
1497. In context of Marauder tanks having drawbacks compared to std.... - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
And no, a Marauder should have no drawbacks compared to a STD tank, until the siege module is activated. Then I'll accept a 50% reduction in movement speed. This isn't WWII when tanks had to move slowly or not at all to score a successful hit. Thi...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2014.12.11 19:30:00
|
1498. In context of Marauder tanks having drawbacks compared to std.... - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
The-Errorist wrote: Isa Lucifer wrote: I will express my opinion of how Marauders should be here instead of creating another post Marauders should have a Bastion module like in EVE https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I4jQENEsbdk The Bastion...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2014.12.11 19:29:00
|
1499. [Hotfix Echo] Sagaris - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
DarthJT5 wrote: Tune in for our next episode of Everyone hates Spkr!! Brought to you by Dust 514 Forums Yeah, because I won't compromise enough on vehicles for infantry to be satisfied.
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2014.12.11 19:26:00
|
1500. [Hotfix Echo] Sagaris - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Pokey Dravon wrote: Spkr4theDead wrote: Pokey, have you ever tried tanking consistently? If not, what makes you think you know the direction vehicles should go in? We just tell you how to destroy us, not the direction infantry may go in, unl...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2014.12.11 19:25:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |