| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 |
5601. Easy fix for tanks selfishly destroying Supply Depots - in General Discussions [original thread]
Assert Dominance wrote: Lillica Deathdealer wrote: Lemme get this straight... You want tanks to destroy other vehicles, keep infantry off you, defend every objective, and defend that supply depot for you? In the first place, someone needs to...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2013.08.28 17:30:00
|
5602. Easy fix for tanks selfishly destroying Supply Depots - in General Discussions [original thread]
Assert Dominance wrote: Takahiro Kashuken wrote: Assert Dominance wrote: Buff the shields to 20,000 and armor to 100,000, gg selfish tanks. If the enemy team wants your tank gone they will destroy it whether the supply depot is there or n...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2013.08.28 17:20:00
|
5603. Easy fix for tanks selfishly destroying Supply Depots - in General Discussions [original thread]
NAV HIV wrote: Assert Dominance wrote: Buff the shields to 20,000 and armor to 100,000, gg selfish tanks. If the enemy team wants your tank gone they will destroy it whether the supply depot is there or not. Dont punish infantry because of y...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2013.08.28 17:19:00
|
5604. Easy fix for tanks selfishly destroying Supply Depots - in General Discussions [original thread]
Takahiro Kashuken wrote: Assert Dominance wrote: Buff the shields to 20,000 and armor to 100,000, gg selfish tanks. If the enemy team wants your tank gone they will destroy it whether the supply depot is there or not. Dont punish infantry be...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2013.08.28 17:17:00
|
5605. Easy fix for tanks selfishly destroying Supply Depots - in General Discussions [original thread]
Dubber Rucky wrote: Add fuel as a consumable at supply depots. Now tanks protect supply. Run out of fuel.....sitting ruck. LOL when you accept having to refuel your dropsuit, I'll take refueling my vehicles. Next
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2013.08.28 17:15:00
|
5606. Easy fix for tanks selfishly destroying Supply Depots - in General Discussions [original thread]
Cody Sietz wrote: Assert Dominance wrote: Cody Sietz wrote: Wait, is this becoming a problem now? It takes like 45 mins for a tank to kill those things. Little under 30 seconds but good try Ain't no blaster doin DAT! Now a rail tank....
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2013.08.28 17:15:00
|
5607. Easy fix for tanks selfishly destroying Supply Depots - in General Discussions [original thread]
Assert Dominance wrote: Buff the shields to 20,000 and armor to 100,000, gg selfish tanks. If the enemy team wants your tank gone they will destroy it whether the supply depot is there or not. Dont punish infantry because of your insecurities. ...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2013.08.28 17:02:00
|
5608. Vehicles in 1.5 and beyond! - in General Discussions [original thread]
crazy space 1 wrote: THE TRAINSPOTTER wrote: ammo depletion makes perfect sense i agree with it It also allowed for laser based weapons in the future to use NO AMMO, since that is the advantage they hold. Right now it's like every weapon...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2013.08.28 04:59:00
|
5609. Vehicles in 1.5 and beyond! - in General Discussions [original thread]
CCP Wolfman wrote: Buried in replies! Thanks for the comments guys. Remnant and I are reading and itGÇÖs given us things stuff to think about. I donGÇÖt have time to respond to everything right now but IGÇÖll quickly throw a few more details ...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2013.08.28 04:57:00
|
5610. We'll be getting proto modules, transport wps and dropship buffs in 1.5!!! C... - in General Discussions [original thread]
Blaze Ashra wrote: https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=1230146#post1230146 CCP Wolfman wrote: Buried in replies! Thanks for the comments guys. Remnant and I are reading and itGÇÖs given us things stuff to think about. I d...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2013.08.28 04:50:00
|
5611. 1.4 and 1.5 are complete jokes. - in General Discussions [original thread]
DJINN leukoplast wrote: Finite ammo for vehicles in one of the most win things CCP has ever done in this game, and I hope they stick with it. It will completely change the way vehicles treat the battlefield and how they work with their teams. ...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2013.08.28 04:46:00
|
5612. 1.4 and 1.5 are complete jokes. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Cosgar wrote: Jason Pearson wrote: Scout LAVs are broken, name one person who actively uses that. They really are a waste of SP and ISK. Every time I see a Callisto or Abron on the field, I laugh, same as I do with Enforcers.
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2013.08.28 04:43:00
|
5613. 1.4 and 1.5 are complete jokes. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Mary Sedillo wrote: Spkr4theDead wrote: Vespasian Andendare wrote: Because balancing is always a "complete joke" (to everyone wanting to keep their overpowered toys). Everyone posts these similar posts when balancing changes are introduce...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2013.08.28 04:42:00
|
5614. 1.4 and 1.5 are complete jokes. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Maken Tosch wrote: And once again someone is not happy about the patchnotes. Nothing to see here folks. We see this every month. You enjoy those MLT forge shots from CoD isAIDS?
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2013.08.28 04:39:00
|
5615. 1.4 and 1.5 are complete jokes. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Mary Sedillo wrote: Wow, a lot of hate tonight. Let me clarify. I am one of the best damn tankers around and can fulfill any role with the three turrets available. I prefer blaster, but I can go rail when the need arises. LOL at CPM who t...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2013.08.28 04:38:00
|
5616. 1.4 and 1.5 are complete jokes. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Jaysyn Larrisen wrote: Vespasian Andendare wrote: Because balancing is always a "complete joke" (to everyone wanting to keep their overpowered toys). Everyone posts these similar posts when balancing changes are introduced. People expect tha...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2013.08.28 04:36:00
|
5617. 1.4 and 1.5 are complete jokes. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Vespasian Andendare wrote: Because balancing is always a "complete joke" (to everyone wanting to keep their overpowered toys). Everyone posts these similar posts when balancing changes are introduced. People expect that their current OP setup s...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2013.08.28 04:24:00
|
5618. 1.4 and 1.5 are complete jokes. - in General Discussions [original thread]
TheAmazing FlyingPig wrote: Mary Sedillo wrote: It is obvious these people don't play their own games. They refer to graphs rather than actually referring to people in the role they are modifying. Who asked for ammunition for vehicles? It s...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2013.08.28 04:20:00
|
5619. [LEAK] Early peak at next weapons coming to Dust 514. - in General Discussions [original thread]
What are the first bunch of lines? EVE ship info?
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2013.08.28 04:08:00
|
5620. My take on 1.5 (what we have heard so far) - in General Discussions [original thread]
StubbyDucky wrote: Reported for, 16. Redundant and re-posted threads will be locked. As a courtesy to other forum users, please search to see if there is a thread already open on the topic you wish to discuss. If so, please place your comments...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2013.08.28 04:05:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |