| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 |
5621. My take on 1.5 (what we have heard so far) - in General Discussions [original thread]
Jenza's Pants wrote: kids cry when crutches are kicked out from under then. I for one welcome the FINITE amount of ammo. Its something I requested long ago, when I was tanking. LOL You were a tanker? You sure don't sound like it, seeing ho...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2013.08.28 04:02:00
|
5622. To the people who say tanks are stupid for blowing up supply depot - in General Discussions [original thread]
General John Ripper wrote: Spkr4theDead wrote: Chunky Munkey wrote: negative49er wrote: We don't want people switching to their Av So I'm Sorry That's okay. We'll just hog your small turrets when we run out of ammo & hives. ...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2013.08.28 03:59:00
|
5623. To the people who say tanks are stupid for blowing up supply depot - in General Discussions [original thread]
DJINN leukoplast wrote: negative49er wrote: We don't want people switching to their Av So I'm Sorry You will likely change your tune when you have to watch your ammo count and restock on ammo. Coming from the guy that only ever comp...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2013.08.28 03:58:00
|
5624. To the people who say tanks are stupid for blowing up supply depot - in General Discussions [original thread]
Bittersteel the Bastard wrote: Blaze Ashra wrote: Bittersteel the Bastard wrote: LCB Holdings wrote: I would till blow supply dots and just recall when my ammo is at 1/3 And you would be a c*nt for doing so. >Goes to suggest tha...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2013.08.28 03:57:00
|
5625. To the people who say tanks are stupid for blowing up supply depot - in General Discussions [original thread]
Master Jaraiya wrote: negative49er wrote: We don't want people switching to their Av So I'm Sorry Why not hold off the reds until your own team can come and hack the Supply depot? I guess that would make too much sense! Ever try to k...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2013.08.28 03:55:00
|
5626. To the people who say tanks are stupid for blowing up supply depot - in General Discussions [original thread]
Bittersteel the Bastard wrote: Lurchasaurus wrote: it amazes me how much everyone says they NEED supply depots when 99% of the time when i see one they are red with enemies resupplying av weps n nades...... i guess you dont really like them...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2013.08.28 03:54:00
|
5627. To the people who say tanks are stupid for blowing up supply depot - in General Discussions [original thread]
Flux Raeder wrote: negative49er wrote: We don't want people switching to their Av So I'm Sorry Not enough apparently, you **** over your whole damn team when you do this selfish bs. I shouldn't have to die just to get another clip cause...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2013.08.28 03:52:00
|
5628. To the people who say tanks are stupid for blowing up supply depot - in General Discussions [original thread]
Beren Hurin wrote: YOU dnn't want the enemy switching to AV, but if YOUR team needed AV you would yell and scream at them... Tanks are primary AV...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2013.08.28 03:41:00
|
5629. To the people who say tanks are stupid for blowing up supply depot - in General Discussions [original thread]
Sotapopthegrey gay wrote: Tanking (easy mode.) LOL Tracking swarms Tracking AV grenades (homing nuclear baseballs) And you say we're crutch users. We don't have homing turrets.
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2013.08.28 03:40:00
|
5630. To the people who say tanks are stupid for blowing up supply depot - in General Discussions [original thread]
Bittersteel the Bastard wrote: negative49er wrote: Michael Arck wrote: I still think it's stupid though. Retake the objective. Why destroy a supply depot when the opposing team might pull a rabbit out of the hat that requires you going to...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2013.08.28 03:39:00
|
5631. To the people who say tanks are stupid for blowing up supply depot - in General Discussions [original thread]
Chunky Munkey wrote: negative49er wrote: We don't want people switching to their Av So I'm Sorry That's okay. We'll just hog your small turrets when we run out of ammo & hives. LOL NOT ANYMORE when 1.5 drops.
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2013.08.28 03:36:00
|
5632. To the people who say tanks are stupid for blowing up supply depot - in General Discussions [original thread]
negative49er wrote: We don't want people switching to their Av So I'm Sorry I'm not sorry.
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2013.08.28 03:35:00
|
5633. the plan: make vehicles **** - in General Discussions [original thread]
Cyrius Li-Moody wrote: sensationalise 514 Do you drive?
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2013.08.28 03:33:00
|
5634. IWS challenged us to make a proto tank! Heres mine - in General Discussions [original thread]
The Robot Devil wrote: I think the suit and vehicle bonuses are done wrong. Every suit and vehicle should have bonuses and they should reflect the race and purpose of the item. Standard HAVs should have about two types per race. Each race shou...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2013.08.28 03:30:00
|
5635. IWS challenged us to make a proto tank! Heres mine - in General Discussions [original thread]
[quote=The Robot Devil Just because the vehicle is a prototype doesn't mean that it has to have more slots and resources. [/quote] Fine Your PRO suits have 3/2 or 2/3 slots, 250/180 or 180/250, 200 CPU, and 85 PG.
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2013.08.28 03:28:00
|
5636. IWS challenged us to make a proto tank! Heres mine - in General Discussions [original thread]
I'll try an armor hull. 3 H / 5 L 310 CPU 3042 PG 1311 Shield 4100 Armor Shield Recharge 11.0 HP/S Hull skill will be +2% PG per level Name? Excalibur
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2013.08.28 00:43:00
|
5637. Market sales, specifically boosters - in General Discussions [original thread]
Anybody have a clue as to the frequency of them? I'd like to be able to buy two 30-day passive boosters for 40k Aurum, instead of one 30-day and one 7-day.
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2013.08.28 00:32:00
|
5638. Vehicles Need Capacitors! - in General Discussions [original thread]
Daalzebul Del'Armgo wrote: Please just take out all vehicles and redo them with capacitors and it will solve your problems ccp. With capacitors in vehicles and having everything draw off caps even turrets. you would get a better balance from ...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2013.08.28 00:00:00
|
5639. IWS challenged us to make a proto tank! Heres mine - in General Discussions [original thread]
ZDub 303 wrote: The original intent of the developers was to create a risk vs reward scenario to balance the tiered dropsuits and vehicle frames, its clear however that this does not work. Of course it won't work, because people want to sol...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2013.08.27 23:53:00
|
5640. IWS challenged us to make a proto tank! Heres mine - in General Discussions [original thread]
gbghg wrote: The very idea of a traditional proto vehicle revolts me, it would be so unbalanced and would lead to rudiculous levels of qq on the forums, not to mention that it would just turn vehicles into an even more expensive version of that...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2013.08.27 23:51:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |