| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 |
1741. Just Nuked An HAV - in General Discussions [original thread]
Atiim wrote: GeneralButtNaked wrote: Atiim wrote: Why have I not been informed about the power of these missiles? Because real tankers know they are garbage. Define "Real Tanker" Meaning "not you"
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2014.03.21 18:57:00
|
1742. I think we can all agree 1.6 AV vs vehicles was way better - in General Discussions [original thread]
Black SlaverX wrote: 90% of the playerbase is infantry. Before: ~90% of the playerbase was not sh-t on by the vehicle balance Now 10% of the playerbase is content. You know what to do CCP. Because swarms were OP.
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2014.03.20 17:57:00
|
1743. Who do we blame for not getting our weapon sp back? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Beren Hurin wrote: Spkr4theDead wrote: Beren Hurin wrote: What makes you think you deserve it? Why didn't you save some? Whats wrong with the 1-3 million you just got? How the hogwash did you spend ALL of your weapon SP in stuff you don't...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2014.03.20 17:47:00
|
1744. Who do we blame for not getting our weapon sp back? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Beren Hurin wrote: What makes you think you deserve it? Why didn't you save some? Whats wrong with the 1-3 million you just got? How the hogwash did you spend ALL of your weapon SP in stuff you don't want now? What makes you think it's reason...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2014.03.20 17:37:00
|
1745. Why even make a trailer so overly-hyped ? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Ace Boone wrote: It sickens me how pre-rendered this is. Did CCP at one point actually have the budget to make something look that good? Or did they just hope it would pick up enough steam for them to be able to update their game faster? Not w...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2014.03.20 17:10:00
|
1746. Get rid off 3rd person view on tanks. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Takahiro Kashuken wrote: The dark cloud wrote: Takahiro Kashuken wrote: So far we have a number of excuses why it should be taken away tho remember in BF3/4 all vehicles have 3rd person camera and no one ever had problems putting C4 on th...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2014.03.20 17:07:00
|
1747. Dust's tank warfare > BF tank warfare - in General Discussions [original thread]
Ydubbs81 RND wrote: I'm not saying that Dust's vehicle gameplay surpassed BF's vehicle gameplay. But in BF, it is truly about who sees who first. The customization is somewhat limited. As opposed to BF, where there are several different ways to...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2014.03.20 17:05:00
|
1748. Advice to CCP about events - in General Discussions [original thread]
CCP, don't make events happen so close to each other. You'll burn through your ideas very quickly, and then the only events you'll have is when entirely new stuff comes out, such as a new role suit or entirely new weapon. This happened to Bioware...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2014.03.20 17:03:00
|
1749. GG CCP - in General Discussions [original thread]
The dark cloud wrote: Well done i cant even break a armor tank anymore with a proto forge+2 damage mods on it. So tell me why should i keep playing this game? Its literally unplayable at the moment with the current tanks. -tanks cheaper then d...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2014.03.20 16:58:00
|
1750. Get rid off 3rd person view on tanks. - in General Discussions [original thread]
The dark cloud wrote: There is no reason for tanks to have a 3rd person view. That camera makes it near impossible to sneak up on a tank cause he can see you clearly from the side and at a certain degree from behind the tank. Gunners on tanks c...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2014.03.19 10:08:00
|
1751. Let's Play A Game! - in General Discussions [original thread]
Atiim wrote: The Challenge, is to find as many things wrong with the post as possible. Winner get's a special prize! The Post: CCP Frame wrote: Sorry, but after a lot of playtesting sessions we encountered major issues with Pterodactyl ba...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2014.03.19 05:46:00
|
1752. A Scientific Analysis of 1.8 AV vs Shield Vehicles - in General Discussions [original thread]
HiddenBrother wrote: Funny. That's how most people try to solo a tank. That's how most people try to destroy a tank, period, with the Starter Fit, nevermind an ISK suit with at least Darkside CBR7s. Then you add trying to solo a tank, when ...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2014.03.19 02:48:00
|
1753. Tank thoughts from a tanker. - in General Discussions [original thread]
You're a tanker? I've never seen you before. Did you pick up tanking when 1.7 came out?
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2014.03.19 02:44:00
|
1754. Tank thoughts from a tanker. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Scout Registry wrote: Alena Ventrallis wrote: I think proto swarms are actually right where they need to be. Haven't touched my Proto Swarms in 3 months. They're utterly useless at Proficiency III. Would you like to borrow them for a...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2014.03.19 02:43:00
|
1755. Vehicle Modules - in General Discussions [original thread]
Dauth Jenkins wrote: Takahiro Kashuken wrote: - Reduction in effectiveness That already happens when 2 are on at the same time Dont see how a 2nd mod would increase fitting costs or even make the active shorter and cooldown longer Ye...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2014.03.18 19:20:00
|
1756. Sorry AV, CCP didn't listen. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Takahiro Kashuken wrote: Iron Wolf Saber wrote: Talks for a hotfix is ongoing. This is the one issue I keep slapping them with. Rest of the hotfix talk is going to depend what breaks on patch day. lolcpm Like you lot are going to do a...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2014.03.18 19:19:00
|
1757. Just another railgun tank thread - in General Discussions [original thread]
Ghosts Chance wrote: MarasdF Loron wrote: Ghosts Chance wrote: MarasdF Loron wrote: I have to say that I have tanked since chromo as well and I agree they don't activate their hardeners if they don't see anyone coming but come one 1...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2014.03.18 10:47:00
|
1758. To all cry babies! - in General Discussions [original thread]
Big Burns wrote: PLEASE STOP COMPLAINING ABOUT TANKS! They are not "OP", you are just "UP". Every match I play, since the release of 1.7, I hear people complaining about tanks. This is why I think you should shut up. If you are complaining abou...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2014.03.17 21:25:00
|
1759. Evidence that Jihad Jeeps are more OP than Particle Cannons - in General Discussions [original thread]
Kekklian Noobatronic wrote: Atiim wrote: Spkr4theDead wrote: Suicide LAVs are a scrub tactic. HAVs are a scrub tactic. +1 That's pretty much /thread guys. We're done here. Lol have you tried tanking?
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2014.03.17 21:21:00
|
1760. Evidence that Jihad Jeeps are more OP than Particle Cannons - in General Discussions [original thread]
Atiim wrote: Spkr4theDead wrote: Suicide LAVs are a scrub tactic. HAVs are a scrub tactic. LOL K, so wanting a different playstyle is a scrub tactic. Got it.
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2014.03.17 21:20:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |