| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 [100] 200 300 |
1981. Yet again, infantry deciding the fate of tanks - in General Discussions [original thread]
KING CHECKMATE wrote: Spkr4theDead wrote: Canari Elphus wrote: So thats why you stopped playing before 1.7 hit? Lol Since CCP started the daily SP bonus for signing on, I haven't missed a single day. When did I ever stop playing? ...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2014.02.16 03:00:00
|
1982. Yet again, infantry deciding the fate of tanks - in General Discussions [original thread]
Canari Elphus wrote: So thats why you stopped playing before 1.7 hit? Lol Since CCP started the daily SP bonus for signing on, I haven't missed a single day. When did I ever stop playing?
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2014.02.16 02:58:00
|
1983. Yet again, infantry deciding the fate of tanks - in General Discussions [original thread]
Draxus Prime wrote: Tanks in a nutshell Cost of ADV dropsuit 5x hp of proto heavy 5x speed of scout massive dps massive range do you see a problem here? So what tank fit are you basing that on? It's a tank, you expect it to have a dropsuit...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2014.02.16 02:57:00
|
1984. Yet again, infantry deciding the fate of tanks - in General Discussions [original thread]
KING CHECKMATE wrote: Spkr4theDead wrote: Never able to adapt to anything? lol okay Clearly, it's infantry that hasn't been able to adapt. Tankers NEVER adapted. They cried until CCP broke AV-Tank Balance their way. And now think they...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2014.02.16 02:55:00
|
1985. Yet again, infantry deciding the fate of tanks - in General Discussions [original thread]
Awry Barux wrote: Fewer slots with more powerful modules = better than more slots with worse modules. Which makes adding HP useless, because that cuts down on defenses, and in the case of armor, rep ability. Fewer turrets? The new rails a...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2014.02.16 02:51:00
|
1986. Yet again, infantry deciding the fate of tanks - in General Discussions [original thread]
ADAM-OF-EVE wrote: Spkr4theDead wrote: ADAM-OF-EVE wrote: Darken-Soul wrote: ADAM-OF-EVE wrote: what gets me is there are awesome tankers in dust from pre1.7 who prevailed who don't speak up and this leaves us with the rubbish tanke...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2014.02.16 02:44:00
|
1987. Yet again, infantry deciding the fate of tanks - in General Discussions [original thread]
Gavr1lo Pr1nc1p wrote: A compilation of quotes that Spkr4theDead wrote: Infantry should only be able to kill tanks if they equip a proto assault forge gun, 2x complex damage mods, and have at least 3 of them being together. In the low slots...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2014.02.16 02:43:00
|
1988. Yet again, infantry deciding the fate of tanks - in General Discussions [original thread]
Darken-Soul wrote: ADAM-OF-EVE wrote: Darken-Soul wrote: ADAM-OF-EVE wrote: what gets me is there are awesome tankers in dust from pre1.7 who prevailed who don't speak up and this leaves us with the rubbish tankers (yes Spkr4theDead th...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2014.02.16 02:42:00
|
1989. Yet again, infantry deciding the fate of tanks - in General Discussions [original thread]
Gavr1lo Pr1nc1p wrote: Spkr4theDead wrote: Gavr1lo Pr1nc1p wrote: Spkr4theDead wrote: Why? Why should I have to fit my tanks the way someone else wants me to? ARRGGGHHH!!!!!!!!!!! the irony is killing me!!!!!! What irony? NOO...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2014.02.16 02:42:00
|
1990. When do we see Amarrian & Minmatar Vehicle Models? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Infantry won't allow them into the game. Nor will they allow the turrets.
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2014.02.16 02:38:00
|
1991. Yet again, infantry deciding the fate of tanks - in General Discussions [original thread]
Gavr1lo Pr1nc1p wrote: Spkr4theDead wrote: Why? Why should I have to fit my tanks the way someone else wants me to? ARRGGGHHH!!!!!!!!!!! the irony is killing me!!!!!! What irony?
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2014.02.16 02:36:00
|
1992. Yet again, infantry deciding the fate of tanks - in General Discussions [original thread]
Canari Elphus wrote: Spkr4theDead wrote: Canari Elphus wrote: Michael Arck wrote: Okay playing along with this class separation thing to make a point. Tankers are the ones to blame for getting tanks to the current state that they are...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2014.02.16 02:35:00
|
1993. Yet again, infantry deciding the fate of tanks - in General Discussions [original thread]
Darken-Soul wrote: Spkr4theDead wrote: Darken-Soul wrote: Spkr4theDead wrote: Bojo The Mighty wrote: You don't speak for the dead You speak for the spammers Spammers? Last I remember, there was a problem with MLT spam. I don't use...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2014.02.16 02:35:00
|
1994. Yet again, infantry deciding the fate of tanks - in General Discussions [original thread]
Lightning Bolt2 wrote: Spkr4theDead wrote: This is why vehicles and AV are always in such a state of flux, CCP. You listen to mainline infantry, without talking to the pilots. And by that, I mean a lot of us. Get dedicated dropship and tank ...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2014.02.16 02:34:00
|
1995. Yet again, infantry deciding the fate of tanks - in General Discussions [original thread]
ADAM-OF-EVE wrote: Darken-Soul wrote: ADAM-OF-EVE wrote: what gets me is there are awesome tankers in dust from pre1.7 who prevailed who don't speak up and this leaves us with the rubbish tankers (yes Spkr4theDead thats you) dictating the...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2014.02.16 02:32:00
|
1996. Yet again, infantry deciding the fate of tanks - in General Discussions [original thread]
Darken-Soul wrote: Spkr4theDead wrote: Bojo The Mighty wrote: You don't speak for the dead You speak for the spammers Spammers? Last I remember, there was a problem with MLT spam. I don't use MLT. Don't group me with those people. I've ...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2014.02.16 02:31:00
|
1997. Yet again, infantry deciding the fate of tanks - in General Discussions [original thread]
Darken-Soul wrote: ADAM-OF-EVE wrote: what gets me is there are awesome tankers in dust from pre1.7 who prevailed who don't speak up and this leaves us with the rubbish tankers (yes Spkr4theDead thats you) dictating their poor views on chang...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2014.02.16 02:29:00
|
1998. Yet again, infantry deciding the fate of tanks - in General Discussions [original thread]
Bojo The Mighty wrote: Spkr4theDead wrote: Bojo The Mighty wrote: You don't speak for the dead You speak for the spammers Spammers? Last I remember, there was a problem with MLT spam. I don't use MLT. Don't group me with those people. I...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2014.02.16 02:28:00
|
1999. Yet again, infantry deciding the fate of tanks - in General Discussions [original thread]
Awry Barux wrote: Spkr4theDead wrote: Michael Arck wrote: Okay playing along with this class separation thing to make a point. Tankers are the ones to blame for getting tanks to the current state that they are in, not infantry. That do...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2014.02.16 02:27:00
|
2000. Yet again, infantry deciding the fate of tanks - in General Discussions [original thread]
Bojo The Mighty wrote: You don't speak for the dead You speak for the spammers Spammers? Last I remember, there was a problem with MLT spam. I don't use MLT. Don't group me with those people. I've been tanking since Chromosome.
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2014.02.16 02:26:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 [100] 200 300 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |