| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 |
2281. reserved - in General Discussions [original thread]
Tebu Gan wrote: Takahiro Kashuken wrote: Way too long with alot of gibberish Speed is fine - Get a LAV instead Hardeners are fine, you miss out on fitting other things Rails are supposed to be high alpha long range Missiles are fine, ...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2014.01.29 11:32:00
|
2282. Are Tankers enjoying tanks? - in General Discussions [original thread]
True Adamance wrote: Spkr4theDead wrote: richiesutie 2 wrote: Spkr4theDead wrote: richiesutie 2 wrote: Considering 80% of tanks have blaster turrets and just mop up infantry, I don't. Should blaster tankers be considered real tank...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2014.01.29 11:30:00
|
2283. Are Tankers enjoying tanks? - in General Discussions [original thread]
richiesutie 2 wrote: Spkr4theDead wrote: richiesutie 2 wrote: Spkr4theDead wrote: richiesutie 2 wrote: Considering 80% of tanks have blaster turrets and just mop up infantry, I don't. Should blaster tankers be considered real tank...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2014.01.29 11:29:00
|
2284. Are Tankers enjoying tanks? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Operative 1171 Aajli wrote: richiesutie 2 wrote: Spkr4theDead wrote: richiesutie 2 wrote: Considering 80% of tanks have blaster turrets and just mop up infantry, I don't. Should blaster tankers be considered real tanks? What are yo...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2014.01.29 11:26:00
|
2285. Are Tankers enjoying tanks? - in General Discussions [original thread]
richiesutie 2 wrote: Spkr4theDead wrote: richiesutie 2 wrote: Considering 80% of tanks have blaster turrets and just mop up infantry, I don't. Should blaster tankers be considered real tanks? What are you mad about? That somebody had ...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2014.01.28 23:49:00
|
2286. Should shields have their Pg requirements reduced? - in General Discussions [original thread]
You see, there's something called balance. Shield auto-regenerates without needing any modules, while you need a module to repair armor. Everything already melts through armor much easier, why should shield have any more obvious advantages?
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2014.01.28 23:43:00
|
2287. MAG Pronounced Dead on 1/28/2014 @ 3p est - in General Discussions [original thread]
Ydubbs81 RND wrote: Moment of silence...... Maybe some of them will now come to Dust? Nobody cares what you have to say.
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2014.01.28 23:29:00
|
2288. Are Tankers enjoying tanks? - in General Discussions [original thread]
richiesutie 2 wrote: Considering 80% of tanks have blaster turrets and just mop up infantry, I don't. Should blaster tankers be considered real tanks? What are you mad about? That somebody had the audacity to choose a role different from yo...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2014.01.28 23:28:00
|
2289. Something happening to REs? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Piraten Hovnoret wrote: There is a post buy a dev somewhere about the RE sticking to lavs/tanks etc is a unintended flaw in the programming LOL yeah right
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2014.01.28 23:27:00
|
2290. Biggest fight ever going on in EVE right now :) - in General Discussions [original thread]
True Adamance wrote: Meknow Intaki wrote: http://www.twitch.tv/nick_fuzzeh <-- here's a link to the live feed. 1.7 fps 2170 players on grid Over 200,000 US dollars destroyed Been fighting most the day I hope one day Dust has day long ...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2014.01.28 10:35:00
|
2291. This is THE BEST IDEA to fix TANKs! Look CCP I fixed it! - in General Discussions [original thread]
Talryn Vilneram wrote: Kallas Hallytyr wrote: Talryn Vilneram wrote: Kallas Hallytyr wrote: Want to hack an objective? Use a ta- oh wait... That isn't killing something but yes that is the only thing you can't do unless you get out ...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2014.01.27 08:08:00
|
2292. Large blaster turrets removal? - in General Discussions [original thread]
8213 wrote: We have small turrets, which are primarily AI. Aren't large blasters a little much? I just don't agree with them. They're kind of unfair actually. Shouldn't small turrets be used for small targets, like infantry. And large for larg...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2014.01.27 08:06:00
|
2293. Remove jihad jeeps - in General Discussions [original thread]
devonus durga wrote: Aizen Intiki wrote: The most annoying thing ever? Trying to fight a damaged modded Gunnlogi, and then one of those ******* crashing into you, costing them 0 ISk, yet making you lose 500k. Stop allowing them to attach Re'...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2014.01.27 07:46:00
|
2294. Full infantry respec - in General Discussions [original thread]
Obodiah Garro wrote: Spkr4theDead wrote: You will be destroyed even if you spec into tanks. People like me rolling around do not allow red vehicles to exist. I can hit moving targets while moving. I can do it with rail. lol Lol you...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2014.01.25 13:18:00
|
2295. Full infantry respec - in General Discussions [original thread]
Slen Kaleth wrote: If they plan on adding bonus on suits that affect specific weapon types I think a weapon respec makes sense as well. I don't see a reason that SP shouldn't be given back.
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2014.01.25 13:05:00
|
2296. Full infantry respec - in General Discussions [original thread]
RKKR wrote: What exactly is the point of making the threads with the same points over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over again? What's your point?
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2014.01.25 13:03:00
|
2297. Full infantry respec - in General Discussions [original thread]
Obodiah Garro wrote: Spkr4theDead wrote: Now CCP is basically doing to infantry what they've already done to tanks. They're changing most things. Some of those things being changed will probably be the rail and combat rifles. Those rifles a...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2014.01.25 13:02:00
|
2298. Full infantry respec - in General Discussions [original thread]
Viktor Hadah Jr wrote: I just love how you pile all infantry into why category "infantry did not support vehicle respec's" I was mainly infantry and I wanted a respec because I had like 2mil sp in vehicles I did not need. If CCP wasn't changi...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2014.01.25 12:40:00
|
2299. Full infantry respec - in General Discussions [original thread]
Severance Pay wrote: Infantry didn't support a respec for tankers because infantry fought for equal rights to respecs. When they cry for respecs they cry for everyone. Also, we already got our respecs. At this point, they are so unnecessary bec...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2014.01.25 12:38:00
|
2300. Full infantry respec - in General Discussions [original thread]
Echoist wrote: If they were going to do a respec I'd say only the dropsuit command skills should be refunded, no reason to respec the weapons. How about the equipment? Playstyles and entire fittings need to change for 1.8.
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2014.01.25 12:34:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |