| Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 |
41. It Should Take Three - Four AVers To Take Out One Tank - in General Discussions [original thread]
knight of 6 wrote: okay, I've been avoiding this post like the plague but I do have one question. what does the reloader do? does he just sit there enjoying the view pressing one button on occasion? are you so desperate to make it 3 people in...
- by Ranger SnakeBlood - at 2013.12.18 17:29:00
|
42. It Should Take Three - Four AVers To Take Out One Tank - in General Discussions [original thread]
What if we take a page out of the old Planetside book which had 2 main tanks the Light tank which i guess in Dust would be the MAV it would be a fast moving (for a tank) that uses a medium sized turret it would be balenced around 1 guy so it can b...
- by Ranger SnakeBlood - at 2013.12.18 00:13:00
|
43. It Should Take Three - Four AVers To Take Out One Tank - in General Discussions [original thread]
Knight Soiaire wrote: Just because there aren't 3 people inside the HAV, doesn't mean the Pilot isn't using teamwork. Your squad is much better off outside your HAV, because they can take out AVers that are camped in areas a HAV cant reach. ...
- by Ranger SnakeBlood - at 2013.12.17 23:08:00
|
44. Nerf all assault variants of the other assault rifles - in General Discussions [original thread]
One would still die while reloading also it apears the CR has spread while ADS even i found this to be unusual havent done any actual test to see the patern but it can miss when right on target and hit while off target by a bit which is either ter...
- by Ranger SnakeBlood - at 2013.12.17 17:57:00
|
45. Why does everyone want to nerf the CR when the RR is way better? - in General Discussions [original thread]
The thing is iam kind of worried what the rusult of a nerf to the CR would be currently its got high dps with a small mag and spread to boot it seems now if they nerf DPS and it keeps spread and its low mag capacity then its getting very close int...
- by Ranger SnakeBlood - at 2013.12.17 17:53:00
|
46. Is it just me or are we all dying A LOT MORE - in General Discussions [original thread]
I started out dieing more than usual but have recently switched to using a standard minmatar logi suit and lol its beastly compared to my min assualt iam tired of getting killed by logies with 2 or if proto 3 times the amount of hp and more dmg pr...
- by Ranger SnakeBlood - at 2013.12.17 03:52:00
|
47. Let's Discuss Webifiers! - in General Discussions [original thread]
Baal Omniscient wrote: Ranger SnakeBlood wrote: Sounds good but a little situation like very situational, what if it has a 50 to 60% speed reduction even on DS i dont think this would make em drop out of the air as the trusters would still b...
- by Ranger SnakeBlood - at 2013.12.17 02:45:00
|
48. A compromise?? - in General Discussions [original thread]
OK this is the only issue with tanks there is not problem with the tank as a whole apart from one little thing it can be used effectively by one guy but cant be killed by one guy this is simply not balanced that not up for debate or arguing how to...
- by Ranger SnakeBlood - at 2013.12.17 02:11:00
|
49. Let's Discuss Webifiers! - in General Discussions [original thread]
Sounds good but a little situation like very situational, what if it has a 50 to 60% speed reduction even on DS i dont think this would make em drop out of the air as the trusters would still be effective but the maneuvering trusters would be runn...
- by Ranger SnakeBlood - at 2013.12.17 01:36:00
|
50. [Feedback] Rifle balance doesn't make sense - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Aeon Amadi wrote: Stephen Seneca wrote: Jaysyn Larrisen is correct. Gallente AR is the best at short range, there is no denying that. Using Gallente tech means you will always have a tendency for CQC and shorter ranges and highest dps. The ...
- by Ranger SnakeBlood - at 2013.12.17 01:01:00
|
51. (Feedback 1.7)AR AIMING. - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Well i did notice some anomolies while using the Combat rifle (the burst one) that for now iam writing off as spread on the weapon, ive noticed a few times iam on target and the rifle does not hit and no hit markers, another time it hits and does ...
- by Ranger SnakeBlood - at 2013.12.17 00:51:00
|
52. One beautiful thing about 1.7 - in General Discussions [original thread]
It may seem like unity and the likes but i fear to say this is because that if a LAV so much as taps a freindly tank thats moving it explodes.
- by Ranger SnakeBlood - at 2013.12.17 00:34:00
|
53. Allow tank pilot to be on small turret. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Flix Keptick wrote: You know that we would have no blindspots right? We would be way more powerfull than we are right now. Well that would be intensional if a take requires multiple people to operate it effectivly then its ballenced against ...
- by Ranger SnakeBlood - at 2013.12.16 23:36:00
|
54. Allow tank pilot to be on small turret. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Vulpes Dolosus wrote: Next you're going to want a passenger to man my Python's turret. Where was this suggestion when AV was OP? You're just butthurt that you can't insta-pop vehicles anymore. Let CCP rebalance tanks and AV and stop with thes...
- by Ranger SnakeBlood - at 2013.12.16 23:31:00
|
55. Allow tank pilot to be on small turret. - in General Discussions [original thread]
+1 best solution to it should take more than 1 AV guy to kill a tank.
- by Ranger SnakeBlood - at 2013.12.16 22:58:00
|
56. Remove blasters from tanks? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Perhaps if ther is either a spread added to the gun or lower the rof and buff the damage by the same amount lowering the rof would in theory at least lower its effectivness against infantry the main turrets should not be anti infantry but anti veh...
- by Ranger SnakeBlood - at 2013.12.16 20:30:00
|
57. remotes are the new AV crutch - in General Discussions [original thread]
calvin b wrote: Spkr4theDead wrote: Now you don't even have to detonate them yourself, all a tank has to do is run over them and it gives boom. Way to give infantry another crutch. Still don't understand what is so hard about finding a tan...
- by Ranger SnakeBlood - at 2013.12.14 23:59:00
|
58. remotes are the new AV crutch - in General Discussions [original thread]
Spkr4theDead wrote: Ranger SnakeBlood wrote: Seriously a tanker complaining about AV in 1.7, it has to be sarcasm or a joke i hope at least. Do you not know how to read? I bet you'd be pretty angry if infantry had invisible claymore mines ...
- by Ranger SnakeBlood - at 2013.12.14 23:52:00
|
59. i'm sorry, I'm a fangirl. looking for channels, discussions. - in General Discussions [original thread]
virgindestroyer7 wrote: Leonid Tybalt wrote: Why not start one of your own? Make it a rule that it has to be an active chatterbox of a channel and silent types get booted out. I could, but I don't really have anyone on Skype. A ingame...
- by Ranger SnakeBlood - at 2013.12.14 23:50:00
|
60. remotes are the new AV crutch - in General Discussions [original thread]
Seriously a tanker complaining about AV in 1.7, it has to be sarcasm or a joke i hope at least.
- by Ranger SnakeBlood - at 2013.12.14 23:30:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |