| Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 |
81. Who here has video game honor? - in General Discussions [original thread]
REMNANCY 1 wrote: I have over 6000 kills and a legit 5.0 KDR and lead one of the best corporations in Dust i'm serious about "strafing" Well, you certainly aren't doing your corporation any favors in this thread. You talk about the good of ...
- by Philipp Achtel - at 2013.04.07 20:54:00
|
82. "Breach Of Contract Criminal Timer" for AWOXING - in General Discussions [original thread]
Did this really warrant two threads?
- by Philipp Achtel - at 2013.04.07 19:16:00
|
83. Should heavies be allowed to use Light weapons? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Alina Heart wrote: So the Heavy should be allowed to wield light weapons but the other suits can't use Heavy weapons.... Great logic guys, makes so much sense. Are you for real? Do you understand the concept of "heavy" and "light"? I sinc...
- by Philipp Achtel - at 2013.04.07 19:08:00
|
84. Should heavies be allowed to use Light weapons? - in General Discussions [original thread]
90% of threads on this forum: "Should [insert play style I don't use] be allowed?" The answer is of course, no.
- by Philipp Achtel - at 2013.04.07 13:24:00
|
85. AWOX Players ... Is This An Exploit? - in General Discussions [original thread]
DustMercsBlog wrote: A Kick or Forgive option after a TK resolves this. It also stays true to the lore as malfunctioning clones were disabled in Templar One. Autokick should be automatic after three friendly kills. -100 SP is also a deterrent ...
- by Philipp Achtel - at 2013.04.07 13:14:00
|
86. Her Majesty's Imperial Immobile Infantry Heinous Misconduct Accusation And... - in General Discussions [original thread]
Lance 2ballzStrong wrote: sorry but TK'ing is the dumbest sh*t ever. Even worse than AFK farming, as they're not costing teams clones. "OH NO YOU'RE AFK!! WE'RE LOSING BECAUSE OF YOU!!! QQ"... but hey, TK is just fine cuz it's for lulz... Gr...
- by Philipp Achtel - at 2013.04.07 12:47:00
|
87. Tanks are not OP - in General Discussions [original thread]
BOZ MR wrote: Do you run tanks ? No. Than stop writing non-sense comments. Yes, clearly only the tank runners are allowed to make nonsense comments in this thread. I think that sums up this thread for me. I've made my points and we're just...
- by Philipp Achtel - at 2013.03.31 20:37:00
|
88. Tanks are not OP - in General Discussions [original thread]
Mavado V Noriega wrote: Ppl complain and QQ about tanks sitting in the redzone yet u want to take away their defensive abilities more and wonder WHY alot of tankers sit in the gayest spots far away then QQ about it. When tanks were actually tan...
- by Philipp Achtel - at 2013.03.31 20:16:00
|
89. Tanks are not OP - in General Discussions [original thread]
SoTa PoP wrote: I am not a tanker. I'm a Heavy. And AV nades carried by all members in a squad is indeed a replacement for main AV weapons. I was using the hypothetical "you". I know you don't run tanks, but you're defending their terrible a...
- by Philipp Achtel - at 2013.03.31 20:08:00
|
90. Tanks are not OP - in General Discussions [original thread]
SoTa PoP wrote: Let me translate then. AV nades are a secondary weapon that can be used as a main weapon against very large and expensive toys. This takes away from the necessity or even value of the Forge or Swarm. I.E. could just make it a mu...
- by Philipp Achtel - at 2013.03.31 19:53:00
|
91. Tanks are not OP - in General Discussions [original thread]
Otavio Martins wrote: My tank got 1392 shields and 9925 armor and freaking infantry can still destroy it. Quoted to reinforce that tank drivers will never be happy until they are invincible. Actually, not just "unhappy". They will never stop...
- by Philipp Achtel - at 2013.03.31 12:04:00
|
92. I've noticed quite a few proto players quitting if they die too much. - in General Discussions [original thread]
I really want to agree with you, but I disagree with your use of . It's typically supposed to mark sarcasm, but I don't see the sarcasm in "So there you have it. Those are my 0.02 ISkies about quitters, and AFKers." ...
- by Philipp Achtel - at 2013.03.31 02:42:00
|
93. Tanks are not OP - in General Discussions [original thread]
SoTa PoP wrote: Philipp Achtel wrote: I would think a more experienced player would have more perspective than this, but I suppose not. Where exactly should the balance be, do you figure? Exactly how much SP should it cost to "balance" AV gr...
- by Philipp Achtel - at 2013.03.31 02:11:00
|
94. Tanks are not OP - in General Discussions [original thread]
Sev Alcatraz wrote: I'm maxed shield tanked, I have a 8k sagaris, it's sad when militia swarms send you running...5.6 million sp into Hav means nothing now =\ Edit: if you didn't know tanks had there passive resistant nerf Down to less them 8%...
- by Philipp Achtel - at 2013.03.31 00:35:00
|
95. Stacking resistance mods - in General Discussions [original thread]
Now, I've noticed that static bonuses (such as shield extenders) are not affected by stacking penalties. Is this an oversight, or is it intended that four azeotropic shield extenders give you 4x748hp?
- by Philipp Achtel - at 2013.03.28 21:21:00
|
96. Stacking resistance mods - in General Discussions [original thread]
Let's say I stacked four 15% damage resist mods onto my dropship. There's a few ways I can see this working: Number 1 (additive - unlikely): 15%+15%+15%+15%=60% Therefore, you take 60% less damage, or 40%. If you had 1000 shields, you now hav...
- by Philipp Achtel - at 2013.03.28 20:00:00
|
97. Armor vs. Shields.... - in General Discussions [original thread]
WyrmHero1945 wrote: When going armor you have the benefit of equipping damage mods. On top of this, logi repair tools and triage nanohives repair armor, not shields. We don't need yet another "buff for something I happen to use". Just reco...
- by Philipp Achtel - at 2013.03.21 23:41:00
|
98. What is the point of splash damage on swarm homing missiles? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Lasarte Ioni wrote: There was a time when ppl did that, so they nerfed the SL dmg against infantry to a point where you could take a volley to the head and lose less than half your shield, but ppl kept complaining and they removed the dumb fire...
- by Philipp Achtel - at 2013.03.21 23:33:00
|
99. PG/CPU on dropships - in General Discussions [original thread]
DUST Fiend wrote: Garrett Blacknova wrote: Mobile spawn point. Thought that was obvious from the fact that its core "problem" for every other conceivable role is the inclusion of a CRU. Also still waiting on Pilots being given a "team spawn...
- by Philipp Achtel - at 2013.03.10 19:03:00
|
100. So I lost a Sura!!!!! BULL - in General Discussions [original thread]
Winscar Shinobi wrote: .....and yet another reason why there should be a wipe for full release. That or they should just give you items back that were lost because of things on their end. Like my friend quill said up there, he logged into t...
- by Philipp Achtel - at 2013.03.10 18:54:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |