| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 |
501. Post the commando stats here! - in General Discussions [original thread]
Banning Hammer wrote: Exmaple Core wrote: Banning Hammer wrote: Exmaple Core wrote: Cody and Banning Hammer have differing amount of low slots for the proto suit, is it 1 or 2 low slots? ethire way, this is the most worthless and pathe...
- by Oxskull Duncarino - at 2013.07.02 14:12:00
|
502. Post the commando stats here! - in General Discussions [original thread]
NAV HIV wrote: Sorry bout the stupid question. But what Race is that under? Heavy and therefore only one racial option, Amarr.
- by Oxskull Duncarino - at 2013.07.02 14:05:00
|
503. Post the commando stats here! - in General Discussions [original thread]
As well as the suit just being a gimped pile of kitten, the prices for them is f'ed up. Standard Advanced Prototype Scouts, Assault, and Logistics --- 3,000 ISK 8,040 ISK 57,690 ISK Sentinel --- 3,000 ISK 13,155 ISK 57,690 ISK Commando --- 8...
- by Oxskull Duncarino - at 2013.07.02 14:04:00
|
504. [REQUEST] Prototype "Gauged" Triage Repair Tool - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Great work dude. It's a pleasure to read more good quality stuff from my fellow corp. mates. As ya know, I'm one of your heavies that requires all that close attention (cheers mate), and if you could get a tool to facilitate you in further keeping...
- by Oxskull Duncarino - at 2013.06.15 18:30:00
|
505. More FW Battles please! - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
+1 dude. Here's hoping CCP give a bit of love towards FW. Considering that one of the big sales points of Dust is that it's linked with EvE, FW is the connection and it is very rough at the moment. They really need to improve present mechanics lik...
- by Oxskull Duncarino - at 2013.06.10 16:53:00
|
506. Dust 514's mark on history has been made, too bad its a skidmark. Wikipedia ... - in General Discussions [original thread]
Salt2131 wrote: Mobius Wyvern wrote: Salt2131 wrote: INQUISITOR Pardus wrote: lol quoting Wikipedia as an actual source. since when was wikipedia an unreliable source? Wait nevermind, i know the answer As soon as it doesnt agree...
- by Oxskull Duncarino - at 2013.06.10 16:28:00
|
507. HMG Review (as unbiased as possible...I promise :D ) - in General Discussions [original thread]
Lance 2ballzStrong wrote: ChromeBreaker wrote: Lance 2ballzStrong wrote: ChromeBreaker wrote: Im against increasing the turn speed too much. If someone gets right up close to a heavy then they should have the advantage. This also helps...
- by Oxskull Duncarino - at 2013.06.07 17:48:00
|
508. HMG Review (as unbiased as possible...I promise :D ) - in General Discussions [original thread]
Lance 2ballzStrong wrote: ChromeBreaker wrote: Im against increasing the turn speed too much. If someone gets right up close to a heavy then they should have the advantage. This also helps promote team work a CQC weapon with a slow turn s...
- by Oxskull Duncarino - at 2013.06.07 17:34:00
|
509. Respec Again - in General Discussions [original thread]
ANON Illuminati wrote: Aikuchi Tomaru wrote: So they should allow a new respec because they nerfed the TAC and apparently AR in general are now useless? Yeah, this totally makes sense. actually the ar's arent useless. and the tac works ...
- by Oxskull Duncarino - at 2013.06.07 12:20:00
|
510. Respec Again - in General Discussions [original thread]
Delta 749 wrote: Cybus Trama'dol wrote: There are other AR's you know??? You wouldn't have thought it for the last month but they are there. I still specced into AR after my respec, you know why?? Cos I want to use AR's and I feel I can n...
- by Oxskull Duncarino - at 2013.06.07 12:19:00
|
511. Sticky:[Dev post] Corporation Roles - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
CCP FoxFour wrote: An update! :D Personnel Director will remain being named that as it's name matches the EVE name, and it will be the same role between the two games. This goes for accountant as well. Chief Operations Officer does need a new...
- by Oxskull Duncarino - at 2013.06.07 11:57:00
|
512. Forge vs Railgun - in General Discussions [original thread]
Radar R4D-47 wrote: danny12343331 wrote: Railgun-600m Forgegun-300m Must i say more? Game rendering of objects-299m Haha, yours is a fairly bad attempt to stir things up. Rendering is over 500m at the moment.
- by Oxskull Duncarino - at 2013.05.28 07:01:00
|
513. CCP to officially announce tac nerf at e3! - in General Discussions [original thread]
Centurion mkII wrote: CCP Remnant wrote: We'll be making some adjustments to the rifle ranges in the near future. We're currently testing the Rail Rifle and Combat Rifle internally (the two missing archetypes). Within the assault rifle class...
- by Oxskull Duncarino - at 2013.05.28 06:51:00
|
514. Forge vs Railgun - in General Discussions [original thread]
Mobius Wyvern wrote: Yeva Kalsani wrote: What should AV weapons do? Take 20 times as long to take down your vehicle, giving you plenty of time to instagib the infantry using them multiple times over? No, they should be balanced toward the ...
- by Oxskull Duncarino - at 2013.05.28 06:39:00
|
515. HMG Review (as unbiased as possible...I promise :D ) - in General Discussions [original thread]
Alaika Arbosa wrote: @Warlord I am guessing that you haven't noticed me refer to Heavies as "semi-mobile bollards". I really think CCP needs to look at making them react to LAV impacts the same way that bollards react to vehicle impacts. I.E....
- by Oxskull Duncarino - at 2013.05.27 19:10:00
|
516. No RESPEC... - in General Discussions [original thread]
Oxskull Duncarino wrote: Shotgun Rhino wrote: LOL temper, temper. You cool man! You can put the skirt back on. Haha, why thank you. And just so I'm not a total douche, here's how to do the ticket, for anyone unsure of the process Go t...
- by Oxskull Duncarino - at 2013.05.27 16:38:00
|
517. No RESPEC... - in General Discussions [original thread]
Shotgun Rhino wrote: LOL temper, temper. You cool man! You can put the skirt back on. Haha, why thank you.
- by Oxskull Duncarino - at 2013.05.27 16:26:00
|
518. No RESPEC... - in General Discussions [original thread]
Ryuichi Kakihara wrote: Shotgun Rhino wrote: Oxskull Duncarino wrote: No worries. It took over 24hrs from the time I sent in my ticket before I got an email stating they had received it and I was getting a respec. Not sure what has gone w...
- by Oxskull Duncarino - at 2013.05.27 16:12:00
|
519. No RESPEC... - in General Discussions [original thread]
Shotgun Rhino wrote: Oxskull Duncarino wrote: No worries. It took over 24hrs from the time I sent in my ticket before I got an email stating they had received it and I was getting a respec. Not sure what has gone wrong on your end. But havin...
- by Oxskull Duncarino - at 2013.05.27 16:06:00
|
520. No RESPEC... - in General Discussions [original thread]
No worries. It took over 24hrs from the time I sent in my ticket before I got an email stating they had received it and I was getting a respec. Not sure what has gone wrong on your end. But having a rant, or as you put it, presenting a reminder, a...
- by Oxskull Duncarino - at 2013.05.27 15:36:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |