| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
1281. Punished for being aggressive. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Baal Roo wrote: Noc Tempre wrote: Why should two players with equal KDR and Warpoints/Death ratio receive *significantly* different margins? It's just like MCC AFKing, the reward for showing up is dwarfing the reward for doing well. Becau...
- by Noc Tempre - at 2013.04.30 22:25:00
|
1282. If your stoked about Planetary Conquest raise your hand - in General Discussions [original thread]
Can I shoot the people who raise their hands? I feel like being a killjoy.
- by Noc Tempre - at 2013.04.30 16:43:00
|
1283. Punished for being aggressive. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Why should two players with equal KDR and Warpoints/Death ratio receive *significantly* different margins? It's just like MCC AFKing, the reward for showing up is dwarfing the reward for doing well.
- by Noc Tempre - at 2013.04.30 15:16:00
|
1284. Punished for being aggressive. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Reframe the question: Under what circumstances DOES it make sense to use protogear?
- by Noc Tempre - at 2013.04.29 21:52:00
|
1285. Punished for being aggressive. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Baal Roo wrote: Noc Tempre wrote: Baal Roo wrote: Noc Tempre wrote: Baal Rool wrote: Prototype gear exists as a high end tool for tanking extra damage, packing on extra modules, etc when you NEED the edge to win big important bat...
- by Noc Tempre - at 2013.04.28 04:55:00
|
1286. Punished for being aggressive. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Baal Roo wrote: Noc Tempre wrote: Baal Rool wrote: Prototype gear exists as a high end tool for tanking extra damage, packing on extra modules, etc when you NEED the edge to win big important battles. Why should the END GAME gear be pr...
- by Noc Tempre - at 2013.04.28 04:51:00
|
1287. Punished for being aggressive. - in General Discussions [original thread]
William HBonney wrote: Eurydice Itzhak wrote: I don't know EXACTLY how well you're doing and how many times you're dying but I certainly agree rewards HEAVILY favor doing poorly in cheap suits. In my tank I can go 20-0 (in skirmish) with up...
- by Noc Tempre - at 2013.04.28 04:46:00
|
1288. Punished for being aggressive. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Justin Tymes wrote: Noc Tempre wrote: Baal Roo wrote: And? That's not a very fun reward, especially with how many cheap (read: unavoidable) ways there are to die instantly in DUST. Then don't use proto-gear? I still don't see the...
- by Noc Tempre - at 2013.04.28 04:44:00
|
1289. Punished for being aggressive. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Baal Rool wrote: Prototype gear exists as a high end tool for tanking extra damage, packing on extra modules, etc when you NEED the edge to win big important battles. Why should the END GAME gear be profitable in what basically amount to tra...
- by Noc Tempre - at 2013.04.28 04:42:00
|
1290. Punished for being aggressive. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Baal Roo wrote: Noc Tempre wrote: Sloth9230 wrote: Noc Tempre wrote: The situation right now is 2x the risk is 1.2x the reward. Don't risk anything you aren't prepared to lose. That's not the point. To be long term profitable, the...
- by Noc Tempre - at 2013.04.28 04:37:00
|
1291. Punished for being aggressive. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Baal Roo wrote: And? That's not a very fun reward, especially with how many cheap (read: unavoidable) ways there are to die instantly in DUST.
- by Noc Tempre - at 2013.04.28 04:35:00
|
1292. Punished for being aggressive. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Sloth9230 wrote: Noc Tempre wrote: The situation right now is 2x the risk is 1.2x the reward. Don't risk anything you aren't prepared to lose. That's not the point. To be long term profitable, the increase in reward has to at LEAST matc...
- by Noc Tempre - at 2013.04.28 04:32:00
|
1293. Punished for being aggressive. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Justin Tymes wrote: ALM1GHTY STATIUS wrote: Sloth9230 wrote: Noc Tempre wrote: His point is that rewards are not proportional to performance. Instead they are flattened by bringing the top down. IRL the curve goes the other direction, ...
- by Noc Tempre - at 2013.04.28 04:16:00
|
1294. Noc - in General Discussions [original thread]
Icy Tiger wrote: Garrett Blacknova wrote: Just so we have the relevant info: http://www.dust411.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/MercPackTerms.jpg Merc Pack was originally promoted as a "credit" of all Merc Pack contents on every reset AND...
- by Noc Tempre - at 2013.04.28 03:40:00
|
1295. Punished for being aggressive. - in General Discussions [original thread]
His point is that rewards are not proportional to performance. Instead they are flattened by bringing the top down. IRL the curve goes the other direction, which makes this further unintitive.
- by Noc Tempre - at 2013.04.28 03:33:00
|
1296. Noc - in General Discussions [original thread]
Spademan wrote: I dont understand it. When you preorder a game, you don't get two copies of it, you get one. Why should you get the aurum back? Especially when there was a statement some time back that the final aurum reset has happened. The...
- by Noc Tempre - at 2013.04.27 23:24:00
|
1297. Noc - in General Discussions [original thread]
Mavado V Noriega wrote: Icy Tiger wrote: You said you "didn't expect to pay AUR for a beta". Last I checked, you also didn't expect to get your SP/Items back. Here is the thing. Please, look at it from a business viewpoint, not BS victimi...
- by Noc Tempre - at 2013.04.27 23:00:00
|
1298. Noc - in General Discussions [original thread]
Icy Tiger wrote: You said you "didn't expect to pay AUR for a beta". Last I checked, you also didn't expect to get your SP/Items back. Here is the thing. Please, look at it from a business viewpoint, not BS victimized stuff. You bought AUR....
- by Noc Tempre - at 2013.04.27 22:44:00
|
1299. $150/150Euro for the box - in General Discussions [original thread]
Snaps Tremor wrote: Noc Tempre wrote: Iron Wolf Saber wrote: Noc Tempre wrote: I could understand if it was "Blah blah's X", but tieing the entire amarr racial set of BPOs to a $150 box is a poor move. The book is about 90$ alone. ...
- by Noc Tempre - at 2013.04.27 22:43:00
|
1300. $150/150Euro for the box - in General Discussions [original thread]
Icy Tiger wrote: Noc Tempre wrote: I could understand if it was "Blah blah's X", but tieing the entire amarr racial set of BPOs to a $150 box is a poor move. Noc, do you understand basic business techniques? Look at the EVE items. They ...
- by Noc Tempre - at 2013.04.27 22:41:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |