| Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
61. Announcement:Factional Contract Changes Introduction - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Better late then never. Next time cite your sources too though.
- by Noc Tempre - at 2013.10.18 17:47:00
|
62. Statement from CPM0 - "State of affairs : Communication & Trust" - in The Council's Chamber [original thread]
Medic 1879 wrote: So has this charter been finished yet? Probably yes, if you go by the third definition .
- by Noc Tempre - at 2013.10.17 17:28:00
|
63. Vehicle Changes and Beyond - Part 3 - in General Discussions [original thread]
Where is this? Nearly at 30 pages of feedback now (none of which is feedback of the feedback from Wolfman). Even the sweet nothings from Logibro dried up weeks ago. The community had their opening statements, ball is in CCP's court.
- by Noc Tempre - at 2013.10.17 11:23:00
|
64. Why is the Easiest role in Dust rewarded the most? - in General Discussions [original thread]
ReGnYuM wrote: Bojo The Mighty wrote: They are an easy role But go hate something else. Team with Logis wins and you know that. They are in high demand, and according to the laws of Supply and Demand, they will be handsomely rewarded for wh...
- by Noc Tempre - at 2013.10.11 03:34:00
|
65. Bring life and a healthy dose of stupidity back to the forums!!! - in General Discussions [original thread]
Sleepy Zan wrote: Noc Tempre wrote: Where did this resurgence of faith come from sleepy? alcohol EDIT: lots of it I thought we had talked about this. There is no platinum trophy for a B.A.C. at 100%.
- by Noc Tempre - at 2013.10.10 08:33:00
|
66. Bring life and a healthy dose of stupidity back to the forums!!! - in General Discussions [original thread]
Where did this resurgence of faith come from sleepy?
- by Noc Tempre - at 2013.10.10 08:31:00
|
67. Paying yet Grinding Anyway - Discussing Boosters - in General Discussions [original thread]
Master Jaraiya wrote: Noc Tempre wrote: stuff herpaderp *troll face* Noc Tempre wrote: In your argument boosters simultaneously are and are not selling SP How is this my argument? Your suggestion is altogether selling SP Your F2P ...
- by Noc Tempre - at 2013.10.07 18:13:00
|
68. Paying yet Grinding Anyway - Discussing Boosters - in General Discussions [original thread]
Master Jaraiya wrote: "Show of hands, who buys the SP boosters and then stops at less sp than the boosterless cap?" If you do this, that is on you! Don't waste your money! That would be like going and buying a large Meat Lover Pizza, then thro...
- by Noc Tempre - at 2013.10.07 04:38:00
|
69. Why the vehicle changes are wrong - in General Discussions [original thread]
CharCharOdell wrote: These are simply standard tanks. Look at the way they're being set up - just like drop suits. I seriously doubt Wolfman would go out of his way to make tiered modules and turrets the same as infantry and leave the hulls wit...
- by Noc Tempre - at 2013.10.06 09:57:00
|
70. Why the vehicle changes are wrong - in General Discussions [original thread]
Mobius Wyvern wrote: In the worst case, we're not getting these before 1.7, and they've been reiterating that they're showing these to us this early to get as much feedback on them as possible. One way or another, this demonstrates a movement ...
- by Noc Tempre - at 2013.10.06 07:23:00
|
71. Why the vehicle changes are wrong - in General Discussions [original thread]
CharCharOdell wrote: Ii swear to god I'm the only need here....y'all need to spend 14 hours on excel comparing tank fits, turrets, modules, etc. I factored in EVERYTHING and tanks will be like this: 90% of tankers will find them even weaker but...
- by Noc Tempre - at 2013.10.06 04:43:00
|
72. Why the vehicle changes are wrong - in General Discussions [original thread]
Breakin Stuff wrote: J Lav wrote: I am astonished at some of the changes - ie. the elimination of passive shield regen - That's just mental. The one thing I do get is the reduction of slots. But with that decrease, there needs to be potent ...
- by Noc Tempre - at 2013.10.05 22:19:00
|
73. Why the vehicle changes are wrong - in General Discussions [original thread]
To Logibro, If shields aren't going to be delayed from recharging based on infantry fire, what's the point of the mechanic at all? It won't make a lick of difference in a vehicle vs vehicle fight. This proposed fix takes vehicle shield delay from...
- by Noc Tempre - at 2013.10.05 18:32:00
|
74. Calculations of post re-balancing standard tank's speed nerf~ slow as Enforcers - in General Discussions [original thread]
Madruger = King I miss my gold sagaris...
- by Noc Tempre - at 2013.10.03 05:27:00
|
75. Am I the only one - in General Discussions [original thread]
It's the new matchmaking. You must be a nutless player to be matched with them so consistently. #CCPLogic
- by Noc Tempre - at 2013.10.03 04:47:00
|
76. Shield tanks will continue to be inferior - in General Discussions [original thread]
Iron Wolf Saber wrote: Exmaple Core wrote: In their new update on how their ruining our vehicles somehow even harder than they have done, they continue to claim that shield tanks are made to hit and run, and armor is made to stand and slug i...
- by Noc Tempre - at 2013.10.03 04:15:00
|
77. Is CCP ever going to listen? - in General Discussions [original thread]
VEXation Gunn wrote: Michael Arck wrote: You doing it again. There are ways to get your point across. You seemed agitated. You seemed as if IWS was in some black room and you were a cop questioning him for murder. You didn't express your po...
- by Noc Tempre - at 2013.10.03 03:59:00
|
78. Best part about the future vehicle changes - in General Discussions [original thread]
They actually didn't say they were going to do that. You'd think so, but never assume CCP won't be dicks for their own ego's sake.
- by Noc Tempre - at 2013.10.03 03:57:00
|
79. Crowd Sourcing New versus Old Stats - in General Discussions [original thread]
What's the point? How do old vehicle stats affect the proposed changes?
- by Noc Tempre - at 2013.10.03 03:56:00
|
80. Vehicleers, Remain Calm. - in General Discussions [original thread]
BobThe 844-1 CakeMan wrote: Alldin Kan wrote: Noc Tempre wrote: Here's a thought experiment. New madruger with two of those fancy 60% resists and the 150 hp/s from the heavy rep, even under fire. And the madruger has a damage mod. Hel...
- by Noc Tempre - at 2013.10.02 22:41:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |