| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] 8 9 10 20 |
121. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Bring Back Initiative - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
1. Adding Pilot suits stats - Slots worked out, Only Sidearm slot, no grenade slot, no equip slot, 1a. Pilot suit role bonus skill - Possibly 1% per level to Shield/Armor HP - Cant do PG/CPU because cant call in invalid vehicles 1b. Racial skill...
- by Lazer Fo Cused - at 2015.01.17 19:24:00
|
122. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Bring Back Initiative - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Godin Thekiller wrote: Lazer Fo Cused wrote: 1. LLAV now has new skill again - 99% reduction in PG needs of all remote repairers - Basically means it can fit on heavy remote reps too 1a. ECM Burst module skill is 5% reduction to sig profile...
- by Lazer Fo Cused - at 2015.01.17 12:54:00
|
123. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Bring Back Initiative - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
1. LLAV now has new skill again - 99% reduction in PG needs of all remote repairers - Basically means it can fit on heavy remote reps too 1a. ECM Burst module skill is 5% reduction to sig profile, target breaker mod has no skill bonus yet 1b. Pi...
- by Lazer Fo Cused - at 2015.01.16 18:51:00
|
124. Large Missile Launcher Reload Skill - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
CCP Rattati wrote: As part of the vehicle rebalance initiative, I will be posting a special thread on every turret, where we can discuss the details. 1. Will that be soonish or after the HAV rebalance thread?
- by Lazer Fo Cused - at 2015.01.16 13:07:00
|
125. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Bring Back Initiative - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Godin Thekiller wrote: 6: It didn't come directly out the turret, although it did come out of the front, and went the other way. It should had went 180, but there was a bug that wouldn't let you. Again, it was a bug. Also, the difference betw...
- by Lazer Fo Cused - at 2015.01.16 13:05:00
|
126. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Bring Back Initiative - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
True Adamance wrote: Lazer Fo Cused wrote: True Adamance wrote: See above. The 75mm M3 was considered enough to combat the Tiger I's....however this was proven false. Tigers had superior armour and fire power from the 88mm they were arm...
- by Lazer Fo Cused - at 2015.01.16 13:01:00
|
127. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Bring Back Initiative - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
True Adamance wrote: See above. The 75mm M3 was considered enough to combat the Tiger I's....however this was proven false. Tigers had superior armour and fire power from the 88mm they were armed with and could bust the Sherman's with relativ...
- by Lazer Fo Cused - at 2015.01.15 21:22:00
|
128. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Bring Back Initiative - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
True Adamance wrote: Lazer Fo Cused wrote: Breakin Stuff wrote: Awesome, basically it's my proposal, only with vehicles buffed from the original numbers, and using current AV, of which only swarms would not be useless. You buffed the sag...
- by Lazer Fo Cused - at 2015.01.15 21:04:00
|
129. New Large Turret Idea - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Hector Carson wrote: Lazer Fo Cused wrote: 1. So you make every other anti vehicle turret obsolete Pretty much, but its mainly for taking out dropships 1. Boring 2. Do not want
- by Lazer Fo Cused - at 2015.01.15 20:57:00
|
130. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Bring Back Initiative - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Godin Thekiller wrote: Lazer Fo Cused wrote: Godin Thekiller wrote: [quote=Lazer Fo Cused] 6. Remote reps are area of effect to remove the dodgy targeting system 6a. Remote reps can rep as many vehicles as is in the AOE, the rep rate it...
- by Lazer Fo Cused - at 2015.01.15 20:56:00
|
131. New Large Turret Idea - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
1. So you make every other anti vehicle turret obsolete
- by Lazer Fo Cused - at 2015.01.15 20:44:00
|
132. just a vehicle turret idea - prob not a good one - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
True Adamance wrote: Hector Carson wrote: I think what he is trying to say is making a new set of turrets that are specifically for Vehicle vs Vehicle thus keeping the skies and ground clear of vehicles if need be, but make them more expensi...
- by Lazer Fo Cused - at 2015.01.15 20:34:00
|
133. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Bring Back Initiative - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Thaddeus Reynolds wrote: Lazer Fo Cused wrote: 1. Logi DS need a kick out button 2. Specalized hulls work on a role bonus and then a racial bonus, this can be upto 3 skills max - Tweek to the LLAV skill 2a. Either 2 bonus skills for its rol...
- by Lazer Fo Cused - at 2015.01.15 20:32:00
|
134. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Bring Back Initiative - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Breakin Stuff wrote: Awesome, basically it's my proposal, only with vehicles buffed from the original numbers, and using current AV, of which only swarms would not be useless. You buffed the sagaris and surya. The two most powerful units ever,...
- by Lazer Fo Cused - at 2015.01.15 20:24:00
|
135. just a vehicle turret idea - prob not a good one - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
1. Vehicles again go back to having no purpose
- by Lazer Fo Cused - at 2015.01.15 20:07:00
|
136. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Bring Back Initiative - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
1. Logi DS need a kick out button 2. Specalized hulls work on a role bonus and then a racial bonus, this can be upto 3 skills max - Tweek to the LLAV skill 2a. Either 2 bonus skills for its role and 1 racial or vice versa - This is seen in infant...
- by Lazer Fo Cused - at 2015.01.15 20:05:00
|
137. [Idea] Vehicle damage variable. - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
1. No - Not having an AR kill what is supposed to be a 'Heavy attack unit' described as a 'Heavily armored unit' 2. You havnt used blasters have you? They are like the opposite of the HMG and they miss the target all the time and the accuracy it ...
- by Lazer Fo Cused - at 2015.01.15 19:46:00
|
138. The Lock-On Vehicle Missile Launcher - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
1. I dont want it 2. I can aim 3. I have skill and can aim again 4. It makes a turret a no skill weapon 5. I can aim
- by Lazer Fo Cused - at 2015.01.15 19:24:00
|
139. Dropship Perspective on a Swarm Launcher Problem - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
1. We need countermeasures 2. Warning system should be standard in all vehicles 3. Possibly missile markers on your radar signalling direction?
- by Lazer Fo Cused - at 2015.01.15 18:21:00
|
140. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Bring Back Initiative - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Godin Thekiller wrote: [quote=Lazer Fo Cused] 6. Remote reps are area of effect to remove the dodgy targeting system 6a. Remote reps can rep as many vehicles as is in the AOE, the rep rate its self will be divided by as many vehicles which ar...
- by Lazer Fo Cused - at 2015.01.15 12:43:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] 8 9 10 20 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |