| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 [10] 20 |
181. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Bring Back Initiative - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
True Adamance wrote: Again want to point out if Rattati cares where he can take inspiration from in terms of tank design. The WW2 American Tank line up is brilliant. M4 Sherman Medium Tank (Standard Hull) is the perfect example of the Madruga...
- by Lazer Fo Cused - at 2014.12.31 14:17:00
|
182. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Bring Back Initiative - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Breakin Stuff wrote: Lazer Fo Cused wrote: Breakin Stuff wrote: It's cherrypicking when you pick out only things you don't like and ignore every other relevant thing in a post. So yes, you cherry pick. There's enough examples on the foru...
- by Lazer Fo Cused - at 2014.12.30 18:14:00
|
183. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Bring Back Initiative - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Breakin Stuff wrote: It's cherrypicking when you pick out only things you don't like and ignore every other relevant thing in a post. So yes, you cherry pick. There's enough examples on the forums that anyone not utterly monofocused on one par...
- by Lazer Fo Cused - at 2014.12.30 16:05:00
|
184. To Rattati: anti-infantry large blasters. - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
1. Rattati thread has gone to hell and back 2. Skirmish 1.0 had a reason for vehicles other than to slay, if your team could slay and push up just whack the null cannon instead for 5mins and destroy it to keep the game going, tho you would lose ...
- by Lazer Fo Cused - at 2014.12.30 13:56:00
|
185. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Bring Back Initiative - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Alaika Arbosa wrote: Breakin Stuff wrote: Hey Alaika you're arguing with a wall. Neither Laser or Spkr are ever interested in actual debate and discussion on vehicle balance. for them it's the DOMINATING GODS OF THE BATTLEFIELD or it's not ...
- by Lazer Fo Cused - at 2014.12.30 13:35:00
|
186. MLT BPO Ferroscale and Reactive Plates - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
1. How about all the MLT BPO vehicle modules while we are at it - Might aswell use throwaway vehicles since they are already at that point, save me some ISK
- by Lazer Fo Cused - at 2014.12.29 20:53:00
|
187. [Ideas] Turrets defend other installations that are under attack - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
SirManBoy wrote: I don't know about you, but I'm fed up with tanks targeting defenseless supply depots for cheap WPs. I would like to see the turret installations respond to these attacks in the same way that they respond when they are themsel...
- by Lazer Fo Cused - at 2014.12.29 19:12:00
|
188. Vehicle anti-theft module (no more thieves, please) - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
1. No to module 2. All they need to do is steal PS2 version of locking
- by Lazer Fo Cused - at 2014.12.29 19:06:00
|
189. Nova Knife Damaging Tank - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
1. Minja with proto knives wrecks HAVs 2. If thats scientific proof then why does my railgun only fire to 300m and not 6000m? 3. If thats scientific proof then why do the large missiles not kill infantry in a 10m radius?
- by Lazer Fo Cused - at 2014.12.29 13:18:00
|
190. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Bring Back Initiative - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
DeathwindRising wrote: Lazer Fo Cused wrote: DeathwindRising wrote: Lazer Fo Cused wrote: Breakin Stuff wrote: You are aware that you can dance between shots of a large blaster, right? It's doable in a sentinel. 1. Thats because...
- by Lazer Fo Cused - at 2014.12.29 13:14:00
|
191. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Bring Back Initiative - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Breakin Stuff wrote: Sir Dukey wrote: CCP Rattati wrote: A necessary reminder, those who are not going to read the proposal and have nothing constructive to say, should not comment in this thread. Thanks. Dude, you haven't replied once...
- by Lazer Fo Cused - at 2014.12.29 13:11:00
|
192. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Bring Back Initiative - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Alaika Arbosa wrote: Lazer Fo Cused wrote: Alaika Arbosa wrote: DeathwindRising wrote: EDIT: tanks cant operate effectively without infantry support. they never have. yet we want them to be solo machines in dust that do everything ...
- by Lazer Fo Cused - at 2014.12.29 13:08:00
|
193. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Bring Back Initiative - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Alaika Arbosa wrote: DeathwindRising wrote: EDIT: tanks cant operate effectively without infantry support. they never have. yet we want them to be solo machines in dust that do everything on their own with zero support . i see heavies d...
- by Lazer Fo Cused - at 2014.12.28 18:58:00
|
194. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Bring Back Initiative - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
DeathwindRising wrote: Lazer Fo Cused wrote: Breakin Stuff wrote: You are aware that you can dance between shots of a large blaster, right? It's doable in a sentinel. 1. Thats because the L Blaster has dispersion and that it is down t...
- by Lazer Fo Cused - at 2014.12.28 18:52:00
|
195. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Bring Back Initiative - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Breakin Stuff wrote: You are aware that you can dance between shots of a large blaster, right? It's doable in a sentinel. 1. Thats because the L Blaster has dispersion and that it is down to luck if your shots actually hit, accuracy is long...
- by Lazer Fo Cused - at 2014.12.28 16:17:00
|
196. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Bring Back Initiative - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Breakin Stuff wrote: Gunnlogi base tank for a "proper" fit starts at 5 IAFG shots. I tested this with an HAV pilot when I was looking to see if Heavy Damage mods changed TTK (they don't). I've had gunnlogis refuse to pop after dumping two maga...
- by Lazer Fo Cused - at 2014.12.28 16:16:00
|
197. Ccp clean up trello. - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
1. Told you so 2. Will end up like the IRC part 2 3. The forums should be the only place for ideas and suggestions and espc any dev posts on any ideas they want to look at, trello should have just been used for the roadmap
- by Lazer Fo Cused - at 2014.12.27 18:16:00
|
198. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Bring Back Initiative - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Breakin Stuff wrote: Stuff [/i] 1a. Sentinal, Scout, Assault, Logi are not sidegrades - If Enforcer goes to 3/2 for 'glass cannon' then stick with basic HAV and dont bother wasting the SP or ISK 1e. Im not going to let in 400m broken swarm...
- by Lazer Fo Cused - at 2014.12.27 18:13:00
|
199. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Bring Back Initiative - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Breakin Stuff wrote: Why dont you get off your ass and provide numbers and feedback that is useful rather than trying to shout everyone down? - I have done, but the numbers already existed in Chrome/Uprising builds Between you and spkr the c...
- by Lazer Fo Cused - at 2014.12.27 16:12:00
|
200. There is an issue with The Major Laser Warbarge - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
1. Major Laser warbarge strike requires 5k WP 2. It causes over 35k of damage - It wipes out CRUs in 1 hit 3. Its about 250m in size so if your still your dead 4. No HAV currently will be able to survive a strike like that unless you are on ...
- by Lazer Fo Cused - at 2014.12.27 13:30:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 [10] 20 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |