| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 |
1461. Server is down? - in General Discussions [original thread]
CCP Frame wrote: Good news everyone! This has been now fully resolved. We pinpointed the hardware issue and got it fixed. Wow, that's almost too good news to be true. Thank you.
- by KEROSIINI-TERO - at 2014.12.22 02:38:00
|
1462. What if we had two types of running? - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Not saying that having three (four if you count crouch) movement modes is bad, but the current default move mode IS running , and the alternative is sprint. Dust soldiers won't resort to just walk.
- by KEROSIINI-TERO - at 2014.12.21 11:00:00
|
1463. Server is down? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Have you guys noted the time these problems start? Today it was roughly quarter past 02 AM eve time. I'd say the other nights were the same.
- by KEROSIINI-TERO - at 2014.12.21 02:43:00
|
1464. Server is down? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Confirming at the moment I'm writing: searches, deploys, loads BUT out of load "removed from battle"
- by KEROSIINI-TERO - at 2014.12.21 02:24:00
|
1465. No Death Until Clone Termination - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Incapping counts as a kill for most statistical purposes. Being down is a logical opposite to that. BTW I too agree that finishing a bleeder should grant some minimal WP.
- by KEROSIINI-TERO - at 2014.12.20 01:15:00
|
1466. No Death Until Clone Termination - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Yes, for if you get downed you earn a D. Note that there will be no clone loss for the team, of course.
- by KEROSIINI-TERO - at 2014.12.20 01:11:00
|
1467. Recent player surge - in General Discussions [original thread]
Something like this, yes.
- by KEROSIINI-TERO - at 2014.12.20 00:51:00
|
1468. Restock in battle bug - in Technical Support/Bugs [original thread]
Had a few times. Could be graphic related as if you cycle thru your suits all the grafs load up in close-up.
- by KEROSIINI-TERO - at 2014.12.19 03:33:00
|
1469. [BUG IN BUG FIXING:] "Location unsuitable" - in Technical Support/Bugs [original thread]
Hector Carson wrote: fixed Nope. Still flat plains and roads give unsuitable. Hills seem to have less problems, still.
- by KEROSIINI-TERO - at 2014.12.19 02:38:00
|
1470. [BUG IN BUG FIXING:] "Location unsuitable" - in Technical Support/Bugs [original thread]
There seemed to be a bug in game designers' bug fixing system. The - for no apparent reason - broken vehicle deployment denial bug "Vehicle request denied - Location unsuitable for deployment" was properly reported and for some miraculous reason ...
- by KEROSIINI-TERO - at 2014.12.19 02:07:00
|
1471. Proposal: Reduce Proximity Explosives BW Cost - in General Discussions [original thread]
I, as the most veteran proxy mine user of all Dust, initially thought: "well it's reasonable to let Proxies have some bandwidth. There'll be room for some extra. It might work. And it can be tuned down." Now I've given initial patch the benefit ...
- by KEROSIINI-TERO - at 2014.12.18 23:12:00
|
1472. The packed remote explosives appear to do zero damage - in General Discussions [original thread]
duster 35000 wrote: Fizzer XCIV wrote: Lol. The hitbox that determines how an RE is placed on a vehicle must be larger than the hitbox that determines damage taken to the vehicle... The explosion isnt even reaching the vehicle, even though ...
- by KEROSIINI-TERO - at 2014.12.18 22:17:00
|
1473. [Feedback] Auto Inertia Dampening. - in General Discussions [original thread]
I think there has been not a single person who has defended this change/bug.
- by KEROSIINI-TERO - at 2014.12.17 23:45:00
|
1474. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Bring Back Initiative - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Proposals of having a certain type of utility vehicle (like logistic or anti-mcc or anti-air to counter high position links) has merit. I'd like to see both of those, and that in turn would really create purpose for AV-tanks.
- by KEROSIINI-TERO - at 2014.12.17 04:13:00
|
1475. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Bring Back Initiative - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Breakin Stuff wrote: one player must be countered by one player. Period. a vehicle that allows one player to force three players out of the battle to deal with him is in no way balanced. People are screaming enough about sentinels. I want y...
- by KEROSIINI-TERO - at 2014.12.17 02:37:00
|
1476. Monetization suggestions - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Updated list: BPO/ QUAFE Great success. For the first time, a real success in cosmetic monetization in dust. The key here was that the suits are standard and combined with the fact that there already were similar versions of them they did not b...
- by KEROSIINI-TERO - at 2014.12.16 20:51:00
|
1477. I just found a strong box in my strongbox. - in General Discussions [original thread]
B O X C E P T I O N !!!
- by KEROSIINI-TERO - at 2014.12.16 20:06:00
|
1478. Tank Repping Is Out Of Control - in General Discussions [original thread]
Nah tank reps are nowhere near impregnable. IF at long range where tank can control it's position AND IF tank has cover like a building then yes it is very likely that you can't kill tank as you are fighting it on it's own terms. Exposing hims...
- by KEROSIINI-TERO - at 2014.12.16 19:20:00
|
1479. HELP - in General Discussions [original thread]
D4GG3R wrote: I get a fatal error every time I try to log into dust, why? Same, internal error. Sux. Had some 8 hours time to play with expiring boosters.
- by KEROSIINI-TERO - at 2014.12.16 01:48:00
|
1480. Still lagging... Bandwidth sucks. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Equipment spam has never had anything to do with latency or server lag. Try client lag or low framerate.
- by KEROSIINI-TERO - at 2014.12.16 01:44:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |