| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
1941. The scrambler rifle is perfect, please don't even consider touching it CCP. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Harkon Vysarii wrote: up and hit the head it can one shot some suits. the scrambler pistol can do this without charging My point is range coupled with scope coupled with badassery makes this a good gun, though depends on your playstyle. Al...
- by Jack McReady - at 2013.05.15 08:38:00
|
1942. No Love for Snipers - in General Discussions [original thread]
BRAIN-MATTER-SPLATTERER NEURALGIA wrote: Every time your clone dies you're supposed to be enlightened with new ideas on how not to die the same way again, So maybe your guy's clones are straight mentally disabled or something. you havent r...
- by Jack McReady - at 2013.05.15 08:34:00
|
1943. The scrambler rifle is perfect, please don't even consider touching it CCP. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Llan Heindell wrote: Jack McReady wrote: Llan Heindell wrote: Better aim scope. Btw, the advantages you said in your post makes it pretty good already. The charge shot can 1hitKO people. Llan Heindell. yeah when you charge it up and ...
- by Jack McReady - at 2013.05.15 08:25:00
|
1944. The scrambler rifle is perfect, please don't even consider touching it CCP. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Harkon Vysarii wrote: Jack McReady wrote: Skyhound Solbrave wrote: I'm really glad to know that CCP tried to do everything they could to make the new weapons as good as they could. It's even better to know they succeeded. The Scrambler Ri...
- by Jack McReady - at 2013.05.15 08:13:00
|
1945. The scrambler rifle is perfect, please don't even consider touching it CCP. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Skyhound Solbrave wrote: I'm really glad to know that CCP tried to do everything they could to make the new weapons as good as they could. It's even better to know they succeeded. The Scrambler Rifle is a true marksman's weapon, despite not hav...
- by Jack McReady - at 2013.05.15 08:05:00
|
1946. My take on the Imperial Scrambler Rifle vs. Duvolle Tactical Assault Rifle - in General Discussions [original thread]
there is no need of deep analysis to see that the AR is over the top and scrambler cannot compete. all you need to kwow is: -ARs have more range. it is pretty obvious that something is wrong when the LR (which is supposed to be best at long range...
- by Jack McReady - at 2013.05.15 07:58:00
|
1947. [Logi Gate] You know what? I give up. - in General Discussions [original thread]
NeoWraith Acedia wrote: Jack McReady wrote: OP noobsuit Quote: standard amarr logi suit with scrambler pistol I've lost all faith in humanity have you actually read what I wrote?
- by Jack McReady - at 2013.05.15 07:48:00
|
1948. Flaylock - I Luv U <3 <3 <3 - in General Discussions [original thread]
Orin the Freak wrote: Martin0 Brancaleone wrote: XXfootnoteXX wrote: Far Fall wrote: Does the blast from the flaylock form a bubble. I guess i'm asking, if someone jumps and you shoot straight under their feet will the splash damage hi...
- by Jack McReady - at 2013.05.15 07:44:00
|
1949. The Amarr Medium suits. - in General Discussions [original thread]
the amarr logi just needs more PG/CPU and the sidearm slot from the beginning to allow it to run laser + sidearm combo. it pays high price to get the sidearm, namely slots, but the sidearm is not available till proto.
- by Jack McReady - at 2013.05.14 21:57:00
|
1950. lets "discuss" the Flaylock - in General Discussions [original thread]
Sontie wrote: tricky to hit and small splash radius means it's almost worthless against good opponents. But the std lvl takes 0 PG... and as a scout I have plenty cpu, not enough pg... It's not equiped to my nova knifer. The true problem is t...
- by Jack McReady - at 2013.05.14 21:55:00
|
1951. Tanks: feeling good today - in General Discussions [original thread]
Tanks got overbuffed, who would guess that a tank driver claims they are "OK"
- by Jack McReady - at 2013.05.14 18:28:00
|
1952. Ticketed for respec this is the response - in General Discussions [original thread]
Icy Xenosmilus wrote: It is available. Guys, used your skill points, level up to reading proficiency v if you need it. This offer will be available once changes to the Skill Tree progression system is deployed to the Tranquility server and...
- by Jack McReady - at 2013.05.14 18:26:00
|
1953. No Trophies CCP? What gives? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Bling Blaine wrote: I thought Sony required all fully released games to include trophies. Now is this not a commercial release? Or is it because it is F2P. Microtransactions don't count? CCP please answer this for us trophy hunters. here we...
- by Jack McReady - at 2013.05.14 18:25:00
|
1954. Ticketed for respec this is the response - in General Discussions [original thread]
GM Hercules wrote: Anyway, the process have been explained in this thread and I need to quote this: Quote: Please bear in mind that it may take a few days to process your request and enable respecs/reset on your accounts, So many thank...
- by Jack McReady - at 2013.05.14 18:23:00
|
1955. Scrambler Rifle: What's your impression? - in General Discussions [original thread]
TAR is still king without competition. why does the SR has 20m less range? I dont get it.
- by Jack McReady - at 2013.05.14 18:19:00
|
1956. Uhh....more dropship nerfs?? - in General Discussions [original thread]
skill bonuses are not stacking penalized, it is a buff.
- by Jack McReady - at 2013.05.14 15:49:00
|
1957. How was yesturdays game running more smoother then today?! - in General Discussions [original thread]
anti scrub feature. can I have your stuff? PS: all working fine for me.
- by Jack McReady - at 2013.05.14 15:47:00
|
1958. Soooo, bout that Scrambler. - in General Discussions [original thread]
RECON BY FIRE wrote: Only a bit less? Do you even see the differences in optimal!? well he obviously uses the TAR and is in denial :)
- by Jack McReady - at 2013.05.14 15:43:00
|
1959. Scrambler Rifle... - in General Discussions [original thread]
Bones McGavins wrote: Optimal Range:44M Basically I want to know if the TAR outranges it. if the SR has 44m only then TAR outranges it by alot, no need for further testing.
- by Jack McReady - at 2013.05.14 15:38:00
|
1960. lets "discuss" the Flaylock - in General Discussions [original thread]
Jin Robot wrote: Problem is those people who call OP probably are shield tanking, and thats what flaylock destroys. I believe CCP is smart enough to distinguish tears from real issues. your are mixxing it up, flaylock does less damage to shie...
- by Jack McReady - at 2013.05.14 15:22:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |