| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 |
1101. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Hull Progression - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Pokey Dravon wrote: Godin Thekiller wrote: No, I mean if smalls didn't effect the amount of fitting possibilities that a HAV could have (seeing as without them you can make the same fits), then why have a different hull just to do that? Seem...
- by Godin Thekiller - at 2015.01.31 23:14:00
|
1102. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Hull Progression - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Pokey Dravon wrote: Godin Thekiller wrote: Pokey Dravon wrote: WeapondigitX V7 wrote: Is the MBT supposed to be a jack of all trades tank which has small turrents? Master of None, yes. The SHAV is superior to the DHAV when fightin...
- by Godin Thekiller - at 2015.01.31 18:09:00
|
1103. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Hull Progression - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Pokey Dravon wrote: WeapondigitX V7 wrote: Is the MBT supposed to be a jack of all trades tank which has small turrents? Master of None, yes. The SHAV is superior to the DHAV when fighting infantry in that it has better defenses, but is...
- by Godin Thekiller - at 2015.01.31 16:36:00
|
1104. LAV Handling Reform - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
TooMany Names AlreadyTaken wrote: They need bigger wheels, that's all. The current ones are so tiny... the smallest pothole sends you flying for the moon. Bigger wheels don't solve the fact that the mass and suspension is akin to that of a s...
- by Godin Thekiller - at 2015.01.31 16:08:00
|
1105. LAV Handling Reform - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
killian178 wrote: I believe that when they nerfed the LLAV, they did something with how vehicles react to the terrain, making them only drivable on roads. I could be wrong, might of been my imagination, but if Im right I believe that this chang...
- by Godin Thekiller - at 2015.01.31 16:06:00
|
1106. LAV Handling Reform - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Thaddeus Reynolds wrote: So...what you're saying is the LAV needs Mass and Torque enough to climb hills? (Oh, and not to blow up when dropping over a 2 ft drop) No, I'm saying that 1: They need to not lose control over small bumps in the ro...
- by Godin Thekiller - at 2015.01.31 16:05:00
|
1107. T II LAV's - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Vulpes Dolosus wrote: Honestly, I'd rather ditch the EWAR LAVs and have an actual "assault" focused light ASSAULT vehicle. The reason why I didn't put a Assault based LAV is because of the SLAV. It simply didn't work. Why? Well, moving and s...
- by Godin Thekiller - at 2015.01.31 16:03:00
|
1108. LAV Handling Reform - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
So we all know that LAV's LAV's are trying to be off road vehicles when in reality they handle like sports cars. This imo should be changed. But how should they be changed? This question bothered me since I wondered this question a solid 3 years a...
- by Godin Thekiller - at 2015.01.31 06:16:00
|
1109. T II LAV's - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
This is the same basis as the T II DS thread, but with LAV's: SUMMARY -Based around being more versatile supporting tools, but still having still a focused role, kind of like a "Vehicle Logi" (if the vehicle equipment thing becomes more than ...
- by Godin Thekiller - at 2015.01.31 05:22:00
|
1110. [WARNING] Radical ideas about vehicles inbound - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
caps and the crew thing is silly Caps- It doesn't create balance on its own (in fact, that's more balance work), and it makes it to where Pilots has to put much more focus on module usage, which we just don't have. Making them more cloak like whe...
- by Godin Thekiller - at 2015.01.31 04:16:00
|
1111. T II DS's - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
While brainstroming, I came up with this: SUMMARY : Each DS would get a ship bonus and a passenger bonus
FRDS (Force Recon DS), made to do discreet dropoffs; it's the Black Ops Heli of New Eden.
Ship Styling - High Speed and moderate...
- by Godin Thekiller - at 2015.01.31 03:42:00
|
1112. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Hull Progression - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Pokey Dravon wrote: WeapondigitX V7 wrote: Is the MBT supposed to be a jack of all trades tank which has small turrents? Master of None, yes. The SHAV is superior to the DHAV when fighting infantry in that it has better defenses, but is...
- by Godin Thekiller - at 2015.01.31 02:03:00
|
1113. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Hull Progression - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
No disrespect to Master Splinter, but your spreadsheets hurt my eyes. Can someone make a better looking one, with like the same stats?
- by Godin Thekiller - at 2015.01.31 01:49:00
|
1114. Sticky:[Feedback] Full Balance of Large Turrets - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Breakin Stuff wrote: Godin Thekiller wrote: Breakin Stuff wrote: The-Errorist wrote: Breakin Stuff wrote: none of the heavy turrets should be higher than 1000 DPS before skills and mods. Not even a large missile turret? the lar...
- by Godin Thekiller - at 2015.01.30 23:30:00
|
1115. Sticky:[Feedback] Full Balance of Large Turrets - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Breakin Stuff wrote: The-Errorist wrote: Breakin Stuff wrote: none of the heavy turrets should be higher than 1000 DPS before skills and mods. Not even a large missile turret? the large missile turret burst DPS is BEYOND excessive. ...
- by Godin Thekiller - at 2015.01.30 22:18:00
|
1116. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Hull Progression - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Breakin Stuff wrote: Avallo Kantor wrote: Breakin Stuff wrote: I'm going to be VERY honest with you, that's going to be impossible to predict until we start shooting at each other. Fair enough, let me reword the question then: What, in...
- by Godin Thekiller - at 2015.01.30 22:06:00
|
1117. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Hull Progression - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Spkr4theDead wrote: Breakin Stuff wrote: Tesfa Alem wrote: I am Looking forward for future DHAV tankers thinking its going to be them running the battlefield. Anyone who actually believes DHAVs are going to rule the battlefield have b...
- by Godin Thekiller - at 2015.01.30 21:59:00
|
1118. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Hull Progression - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Pokey Dravon wrote: The-Errorist wrote: Pokey Dravon wrote: ... From an EVE perspective, sure, but in Dust its the armor that reps constantly and the shields with a delay. I guess my point is that why do we need to make dropsuits and vehi...
- by Godin Thekiller - at 2015.01.30 21:55:00
|
1119. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Hull Progression - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Spkr4theDead wrote: Pokey Dravon wrote: I don't see why people feel the need to depart from the existing shield/armor mechanics we have in Dust. They're so set on making shields recharge constantly, yet armor already works that way. If peopl...
- by Godin Thekiller - at 2015.01.30 21:53:00
|
1120. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Hull Progression - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Pokey Dravon wrote: From an EVE perspective, sure, but in Dust its the armor that reps constantly and the shields with a delay. I guess my point is that why do we need to make dropsuits and vehicles different? As far as concepts of modules...
- by Godin Thekiller - at 2015.01.30 21:52:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |