| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
1661. Small Blaster Dispersion - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Evolution-7 wrote: KAGEHOSHI Horned Wolf wrote: Needs more dispersion! 1.4 messed up blasters and they suck even now. Before 1.4 they was splash damage, 0.5 meter about. And there was the scattered version till 1.7 which had more dispersi...
- by Godin Thekiller - at 2014.02.20 03:54:00
|
1662. Small Blaster Dispersion - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Awry Barux wrote: More to the point, why don't we have a HMG turret? It doesn't even need fancy graphics assets, just the HMG + duct tape. more like explosive Combat rifle turret. The AC is burst fire, and like I said, explosive.
- by Godin Thekiller - at 2014.02.20 03:53:00
|
1663. How to fix tanks - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Let me explain what you just said into words you can probably better understand, as I don't think you even got what you're asking for: once you start firing your rifle, any plate or extender you have equipped will be void. Let that sink in for a ...
- by Godin Thekiller - at 2014.02.20 03:52:00
|
1664. [Idea] RDV should appear to carry recalled vehicles away - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
I'd wait until bob stops being drunk 24/7
- by Godin Thekiller - at 2014.02.20 03:35:00
|
1665. MAV suggestion: light tanks - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
True Adamance wrote: Toobar Zoobar wrote: True Adamance wrote: Toobar Zoobar wrote: As the current selection of vehicles is getting quit old now and more and more players are starting to get bored with what the game has to offer, this ...
- by Godin Thekiller - at 2014.02.20 03:34:00
|
1666. MAV suggestion: light tanks - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Toobar Zoobar wrote: idk. But I have seen it work in battlefield which is a good analog to this game. Will CCP Shanghai ever introduce MAVs or even medium turrets? in the foreseeable future, highly doubtful. The game as it is still has dozens o...
- by Godin Thekiller - at 2014.02.20 03:29:00
|
1667. MAV suggestion: light tanks - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Toobar Zoobar wrote: I would like to see an MAV that is specifically intended to take down HAVs. It could out maneuver them. if it was weak enough than anyone driving it would think twice about engaging inconspicuous infantry. might work might ...
- by Godin Thekiller - at 2014.02.20 03:27:00
|
1668. Going back to old vehicle stats - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Darken-Soul wrote: Nope. You say no, but you just want to disagree with me. Bet you didn't even read it.
- by Godin Thekiller - at 2014.02.14 10:50:00
|
1669. Going back to old vehicle stats - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Let me say which ones needs changing first before I explain so you might understand better. Look here to see what the stats I'm talking about: Hardeners would go back to old stats, other than the down and up times, which would stay damage mods...
- by Godin Thekiller - at 2014.02.14 02:14:00
|
1670. why prototype gear should be better - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
killertojo42 wrote: That's not really making a stand on the topic being discussed Assuming you were talking to me, ye it does. I don't think should be stronger becase I don't think they should exist.
- by Godin Thekiller - at 2014.02.13 07:25:00
|
1671. why prototype gear should be better - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
**** tiers.
- by Godin Thekiller - at 2014.02.13 06:51:00
|
1672. P.L.E.X for Dust - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
CCP already said no. I don't see why you idiots keep on asking.........
- by Godin Thekiller - at 2014.02.12 21:17:00
|
1673. Neutral installations should not give WP - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Hoover Damn wrote: Tankers are going to destroy neutral installations anyway so that they have fewer 80 GJ weapons to worry about. If you want to discourage them from doing that, you're going to need to find a way to make it not worth their whi...
- by Godin Thekiller - at 2014.02.12 21:06:00
|
1674. [Request] Replace LAVS with Buggies!! - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Evolution-7 wrote: Godin Thekiller wrote: So a roll cage and higher suspension? Agreed. Essentially, thats what I mean. But this is the future dammit, why the f''' do we use 'cars' on bumpy unexplored terrain, its a really bad fault th...
- by Godin Thekiller - at 2013.11.12 22:41:00
|
1675. [Request] Replace LAVS with Buggies!! - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
So a roll cage and higher suspension? Agreed.
- by Godin Thekiller - at 2013.11.12 21:31:00
|
1676. Only receive salvage in like 1 out of every 20 matches? - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
I liked the old method of salvage, where you could get low tier things as well. Yea, you stacked up on it, but it would make you want to skill into the stuff.
- by Godin Thekiller - at 2013.11.12 03:39:00
|
1677. Mobile Indirect Fire Platform (Field Artillery) - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
General Erick wrote: Hopefully someday we will have artillery cannons for our vehicles. They would be like a grenade launcher (parabolic flight path). This could also bring in a new HAV type that is like the Dreadnought class in EvE that can be...
- by Godin Thekiller - at 2013.11.12 03:36:00
|
1678. [Request] One man Orbitals - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
1: It's 2500 WP's. 2: OB's are a squad only thing. Make a solo squad.
- by Godin Thekiller - at 2013.11.12 03:36:00
|
1679. Request RESPEC 1.7 means lasers become OBSOLETE Amarr asault lasers bonus OBSOLETE - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Well, apparently it has serious recoil, so that might make it good. You know, since the Laser has no recoil?
- by Godin Thekiller - at 2013.11.10 22:22:00
|
1680. [Suggestion] Vehicles on fire - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
If you lose control, that means that the DS hit 0 HP.
- by Godin Thekiller - at 2013.11.10 20:37:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |