| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 [60] 70 80 90 100 |
1181. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Bring Back Initiative - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Breakin Stuff wrote: Wasn't the ttk problem for tanks in chrome related to damage mods? Use the 1.0 damage profiles or close to it with chrome hulls. I would go with that, hell yes. Although, I still want a shotty blaster. Hell, looking at...
- by Godin Thekiller - at 2015.01.10 07:57:00
|
1182. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Bring Back Initiative - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Spkr4theDead wrote: Breakin Stuff wrote: Wasn't the ttk problem for tanks in chrome related to damage mods? Use the 1.0 damage profiles or close to it with chrome hulls. Insane railgun damage as well as damage mods. Uprising 1.0 TTK was m...
- by Godin Thekiller - at 2015.01.10 07:56:00
|
1183. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Bring Back Initiative - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Spkr4theDead wrote: Godin Thekiller wrote: I doubt that, he'll probably take our advice about the chromo AV/V balance however It really does sound like he wants tanks to beat the hell out of each other. And as far as Chrome V/AV balanc...
- by Godin Thekiller - at 2015.01.10 06:41:00
|
1184. Amarr should have slightly better sheild delays than gallente - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
I don't remember Amarr ever told to me as being better shield tankers than Gallente. Like ever. I don't think I've ever seen a shield fit Amarr ship in EVE either. Well, until now, anyways
- by Godin Thekiller - at 2015.01.10 06:22:00
|
1185. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Bring Back Initiative - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Spkr4theDead wrote: Godin Thekiller wrote: Golden Day wrote: Quote: Neither my mental state nor vacations are affecting this. After the first 20 pages were dragged down into the useless drivel I have come to expect between vehicle and ...
- by Godin Thekiller - at 2015.01.10 06:19:00
|
1186. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Bring Back Initiative - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Golden Day wrote: Quote: Neither my mental state nor vacations are affecting this. After the first 20 pages were dragged down into the useless drivel I have come to expect between vehicle and infantry discussions, I decided to let it simmer ...
- by Godin Thekiller - at 2015.01.10 04:59:00
|
1187. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Bring Back Initiative - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Thaddeus Reynolds wrote: Pokey, do you have a skype? I'd very much like some help hammering down my numbers (and ask you a bit about yours) It would be a good idea to make a channel discussing this, live talking is better than this imo.
- by Godin Thekiller - at 2015.01.10 04:11:00
|
1188. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Bring Back Initiative - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Pokey Dravon wrote: Godin Thekiller wrote: Pokey Dravon wrote: Breakin Stuff wrote: Doing things for no purpose other than "this might be cool. Let's surprise everyone" makes no sense in the context of a game who's features are near-ri...
- by Godin Thekiller - at 2015.01.09 22:08:00
|
1189. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Bring Back Initiative - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Pokey Dravon wrote: Breakin Stuff wrote: Doing things for no purpose other than "this might be cool. Let's surprise everyone" makes no sense in the context of a game who's features are near-riot inducing from the word go whenever someone pok...
- by Godin Thekiller - at 2015.01.09 21:36:00
|
1190. Small Blasters still suck CCP - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Sgt Kirk wrote: Godin Thekiller wrote: It used to be basically preference, which is best kind of balance in a game. 100% Correct. Although I do remember people gravitating towards the Small Scattered Blaster the most because it did m...
- by Godin Thekiller - at 2015.01.09 21:35:00
|
1191. Small Blasters still suck CCP - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Sgt Kirk wrote: Godin Thekiller wrote: Chromo blasters were the ****. They were the bomb-diggity. Then CCP ****** it up and are apparently afraid to make them useful again. Missiles completely wrecking Infantry, Installations and Veh...
- by Godin Thekiller - at 2015.01.09 20:03:00
|
1192. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Bring Back Initiative - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Breakin Stuff wrote: Godin Thekiller wrote: Breakin Stuff wrote: Thaddeus Reynolds wrote: So...we're in agreement that we need a less hull-centric model for vehicles, with more of a focus on what modules are fitted, and with skills eff...
- by Godin Thekiller - at 2015.01.09 19:54:00
|
1193. Small Blasters still suck CCP - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Chromo blasters were the ****.
- by Godin Thekiller - at 2015.01.09 19:25:00
|
1194. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Bring Back Initiative - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Breakin Stuff wrote: Thaddeus Reynolds wrote: So...we're in agreement that we need a less hull-centric model for vehicles, with more of a focus on what modules are fitted, and with skills effecting final stats? Yes. I'm still baffled WHY...
- by Godin Thekiller - at 2015.01.09 19:22:00
|
1195. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Bring Back Initiative - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Breakin Stuff wrote: Thaddeus Reynolds wrote: So instead of increasing the base stats on the hulls, why not increase the HP given by armor plates themselves? (or re-examine the damage bonus from the tailpipe weakspot) Chromosome the base...
- by Godin Thekiller - at 2015.01.09 19:19:00
|
1196. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Bring Back Initiative - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
To the people who thinks that making blasters into a giant PLC is a good idea: How in the hell does a precision weapon such as a PLC makes sense? Also, would you ever use a PLC over a FG? Shotty blaster makes more sense.
- by Godin Thekiller - at 2015.01.09 19:11:00
|
1197. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Bring Back Initiative - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
True Adamance wrote: Godin Thekiller wrote: Spkr4theDead wrote: Godin Thekiller wrote: Spkr4theDead wrote: I don't play it, so how would I know? So you're judging something you haven't even tried? lol What am I judging again?...
- by Godin Thekiller - at 2015.01.07 11:00:00
|
1198. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Bring Back Initiative - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Spkr4theDead wrote: Godin Thekiller wrote: Spkr4theDead wrote: I don't play it, so how would I know? So you're judging something you haven't even tried? lol What am I judging again? You said that Ground forces style mechanics ad...
- by Godin Thekiller - at 2015.01.07 03:33:00
|
1199. Sticky:[Feedback] HAV Bring Back Initiative - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Mobius Wyvern wrote: CCP Rattati wrote: Dear Players, We have wanted to bring back variety for the Vehicle Users of DUST 514 for some time now. I will be honest and admit that I thought it would be easier. After considerable groundwork, I s...
- by Godin Thekiller - at 2015.01.07 03:30:00
|
1200. Vehicle Specialists!? - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Hynox Xitio wrote: Remove all vehicles. I will end you. You have been warned.
- by Godin Thekiller - at 2015.01.06 05:43:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 [60] 70 80 90 100 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |