| Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 |
41. Heavy Type-3 - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Perhaps not, but it seemed to have the most obvious and easy trade off, compared to the other suits.
- by Encharrion - at 2012.12.30 11:30:00
|
42. Heavy Type-3 - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
I thought of laser rifle/assault rifle. The LR would cover long to medium range while the AR would cover short to medium range. There are a ton of different combinations, and I think something able to use them would be fun.
- by Encharrion - at 2012.12.30 10:42:00
|
43. Request Making Weaponry - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Bojo The Mighty wrote: That's all everyone asks for. Every one knows this is coming in the future, also use forum search. I'm Hijackig this because there are too many here. I want futuristic Weapon add-ons, not all this modern day stuff. ...
- by Encharrion - at 2012.12.30 06:56:00
|
44. Heavy Type-3 - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
I like the idea of greater versatility with a tradeoff. I felt that it would be too powerful on any other suit, and the heavy suit has an obvious tradeoff. If it is too weak, speed and health could be tweaked anyways.
- by Encharrion - at 2012.12.30 06:49:00
|
45. Heavy Type-3 - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
What about a heavy suit that trades its sidearm and heavy weapon slots for two light weapon slots? Increased versatility, at the cost of the ability to carry heavy weapons.
- by Encharrion - at 2012.12.30 06:38:00
|
46. [Request] Dynamic match start times for Skirmish - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
I like this, we need a longer amount of time in the war barge.
- by Encharrion - at 2012.12.30 06:31:00
|
47. (Request For Full Game )Merc/Corp Rooms - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Kaathe wrote: Psychotic Shooter wrote: But when we take over a planet we should have the war barge in orbit and have the planet as a asset we can build on by paying people in eve to bring resources so we can build that way isk will go in a c...
- by Encharrion - at 2012.12.30 06:24:00
|
48. Request - before next/final character reset - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
This would be extremely fun.
- by Encharrion - at 2012.12.30 06:21:00
|
49. Identify what kind of suits team-mates are using... - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
I like this idea, reminds me of TF2 where all your teammates classes are shown, very useful.
- by Encharrion - at 2012.12.30 06:10:00
|
50. Make Inertia Dampeners Tactical - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Unfortunately, F=ma where F is the force, m is the inertial mass, and a is the acceleration. For some kind of inertial dampener to work it would have to reduce the inertial mass, which would reduce the force exerted on and by the falling object. ...
- by Encharrion - at 2012.12.30 06:07:00
|
51. Request Making Weaponry - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
I like the idea but with whats already in the game I think that leaves you with simply too many options and too much complexity. I would rather see a rigging system like in EVE, but instead of being suit rigs they would be weapon rigs, providing o...
- by Encharrion - at 2012.12.30 05:29:00
|
52. Request Stances - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
As long as the timing is handled correctly and going prone can't be used for dropshotting (but dropping behind cover would be fine, maybe a delay before you can fire after going prone?), it makes no sense that prone should not be allowed. Also the...
- by Encharrion - at 2012.12.30 05:24:00
|
53. SP cap for long-term consideration - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
I personally think they should remove SP from match rewards entirely, and focus on passive SP, because when everyone advances at the same rate regardless of play time it solves all the problems we are having right now, and people won't try and gri...
- by Encharrion - at 2012.12.30 05:18:00
|
54. CCP: Laser Rifles need a buff - here is why - in General Discussions [original thread]
Actually the whole overheating mechanic on the laser rifles needs a change, I find it rarely comes into play, perhaps the laser rifle simply cools too quickly. How about a laser rifle without clips that cools very slowly. Think it would work?
- by Encharrion - at 2012.12.30 04:57:00
|
55. [PETITION] Give us back voice in corp without use of UVT! - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
RAFER G wrote: now if they were still making the game for ps3 and xbox 360 they would have had free corporation chat because xbox 360 users has in game vioce chat. ccp is taking advantage of the ps3 RAM problem. just because the xbox 360 is out...
- by Encharrion - at 2012.12.30 04:48:00
|
56. [feedback] Cover for objectives from sniping - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Crm234 wrote: the fact that skirmish can be won without taking one objective shows bad implantation for snipers. Also your not spotting anything stop over hyping the class. Most of the snipers are just going out of the hard ranges of Dust guns ...
- by Encharrion - at 2012.12.29 16:13:00
|
57. [Request] Splash radius buff for missiles - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
I had forgotten I had already read this thread, so when I opened it and took a look, I went to like the post, and found I had already done so previously. I then proceeded to the bottom of the page to write a comment... which I had also already don...
- by Encharrion - at 2012.12.29 16:00:00
|
58. [Feedback/Request] Equipment Inconsistencies - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
+1
- by Encharrion - at 2012.12.29 15:55:00
|
59. What's up with all the vehicle hate? - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
While the OP is clearly exaggerating, I do believe there is a problem here. This problem is that the vehicles in DUST 514 are too fragile to invest in. I would trade any other stat on my vehicles for more defense, I would trade damage, or speed, o...
- by Encharrion - at 2012.12.29 15:34:00
|
60. [PETITION] Give us back voice in corp without use of UVT! - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
I originally thought UVT was terrible, but I have begun to change my mind. The voice service isn't free for CCP, and they need to fund it somehow. It isn't as if communication doesn't happen if you don't have UVT, I actually don't use it a large ...
- by Encharrion - at 2012.12.29 14:40:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |