| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 400 |
361. Infantry battles are fun, tank make it not fun. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Gunner sclor wrote: Cosgar wrote: Tank battles are so fun now, I hope infantry battles get that intense instead of this unintended twitch COD crap we've been getting lately. Halo is that way.... What? You don't want the game to be fun? ...
- by Cosgar - at 2013.12.16 03:39:00
|
362. Infantry battles are fun, tank make it not fun. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Tank battles are so fun now, I hope infantry battles get that intense instead of this unintended twitch COD crap we've been getting lately.
- by Cosgar - at 2013.12.16 03:33:00
|
363. The Solution To The Tank Problem. - in General Discussions [original thread]
And this is why you never let inmates run the asylum.
- by Cosgar - at 2013.12.16 03:32:00
|
364. lost 15 Corp mates due to AV nerf - in General Discussions [original thread]
Lorhak Gannarsein wrote: Cosgar wrote: Lorhak Gannarsein wrote: Cosgar wrote: Can I have their ISK? Fifteen guys? C'mon man, don't be greedy. Give me some! I'm a logi that uses proto equipment. My loadout alone costs more than tha...
- by Cosgar - at 2013.12.16 03:10:00
|
365. Just get rid of Tanks - in General Discussions [original thread]
CoD is that way
- by Cosgar - at 2013.12.16 03:05:00
|
366. lost 15 Corp mates due to AV nerf - in General Discussions [original thread]
Lorhak Gannarsein wrote: Cosgar wrote: Can I have their ISK? Fifteen guys? C'mon man, don't be greedy. Give me some! I'm a logi that uses proto equipment. My loadout alone costs more than than a proto assault.
- by Cosgar - at 2013.12.16 03:03:00
|
367. lost 15 Corp mates due to AV nerf - in General Discussions [original thread]
Can I have their ISK?
- by Cosgar - at 2013.12.16 02:45:00
|
368. Just Remove AV's entirely and i bet the Tankers will say its balanced. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Anyone stop to think that maybe the new balancing is for AV is supposed to have a more area denial role? Bring back WP for damaging vehicles, EWAR to mess with the more specialized pilots and fix rendering so swarms can have a slightly better rang...
- by Cosgar - at 2013.12.16 02:43:00
|
369. CCP - CHANGE VEHICLE RESTRICTIONS - in General Discussions [original thread]
KING CHECKMATE wrote: Cosgar wrote: Sounds like it's working as intended. Tanks are force multipliers and the go-to for escalating situations. Been tired of seeing CoD 514 where everyone ran around with nothing but rifles and wondering why ...
- by Cosgar - at 2013.12.16 02:40:00
|
370. [Feedback/Request] Fixing The TTK Issue - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Ulysses Knapse wrote: Cosgar wrote: Ulysses Knapse wrote: To be honest, I think TTK is at a good place for the most part. The main exceptions are: -Assault Rifles -Cooked Grenades -Vehicles -Shotguns and Nova Knives (arguably) Other tha...
- by Cosgar - at 2013.12.16 02:36:00
|
371. CCP - CHANGE VEHICLE RESTRICTIONS - in General Discussions [original thread]
KING CHECKMATE wrote: Cosgar wrote: Pvt Numnutz wrote: KING CHECKMATE wrote: Pvt Numnutz wrote: Setting limits to what mercs can field is a bad idea. It takes away the freedom to use what ever the hell you want. CCP please don't do ...
- by Cosgar - at 2013.12.16 02:33:00
|
372. points for active scans from vehicle? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Patrick57 wrote: Are you in a squad when you're trying to get the points? ^This
- by Cosgar - at 2013.12.16 02:26:00
|
373. im ashamed ccp - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
If the Caldari MD doesn't emulate an XM-25, I might cry.
- by Cosgar - at 2013.12.16 02:25:00
|
374. Dev Invasions are coming! - in General Discussions [original thread]
Until we realize they're all using Jovian gear.
- by Cosgar - at 2013.12.16 02:22:00
|
375. Assault rail rifle is a beast in cqc. - in General Discussions [original thread]
You should see how bad they ramped the HMG muzzle flash up.
- by Cosgar - at 2013.12.16 02:19:00
|
376. CCP - CHANGE VEHICLE RESTRICTIONS - in General Discussions [original thread]
Pvt Numnutz wrote: KING CHECKMATE wrote: Pvt Numnutz wrote: Setting limits to what mercs can field is a bad idea. It takes away the freedom to use what ever the hell you want. CCP please don't do this, next thing you know they will be ask...
- by Cosgar - at 2013.12.16 02:18:00
|
377. Webifiers - in General Discussions [original thread]
Roger Cordill wrote: message from Godin: Give it a 30 meter range, make it a equipment. Lock on similar to a swarm, and fire at said vehicle. vehicle is now slowed for X amount of time. After period is over, the equipment has to cooldown. Make ...
- by Cosgar - at 2013.12.16 02:12:00
|
378. CCP - CHANGE VEHICLE RESTRICTIONS - in General Discussions [original thread]
KING CHECKMATE wrote: Pvt Numnutz wrote: Setting limits to what mercs can field is a bad idea. It takes away the freedom to use what ever the hell you want. CCP please don't do this, next thing you know they will be asking to limit the amoun...
- by Cosgar - at 2013.12.16 02:08:00
|
379. Webifiers - in General Discussions [original thread]
Been thinking about EWAR for a while. I'd like to see it available for vehicle combat, infantry combat, and anti-vehicle combat: -Passive high slot modules for infantry v infantry. Has a chance to generate an effect when you damage someone. -Equip...
- by Cosgar - at 2013.12.16 02:05:00
|
380. Notice how - in General Discussions [original thread]
That's why it's better to be non-partial.
- by Cosgar - at 2013.12.16 01:59:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 400 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |