| Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 9 10 20 |
81. Un-nerf the TAR's hipfire - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Mobius Kaethis wrote: Clearly the OP was one of those people who exploited the TAR when it was 'the" weapon. I'm voting for no as well. I didn't even start playing this game until after the TAR nerf.
- by Awry Barux - at 2014.02.24 03:24:00
|
82. Un-nerf the TAR's hipfire - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Gavr1lo Pr1nc1p wrote: the TARGǪhmmmmmGǪ..i don't recall ever seeing those in existenceGǪ..Oh wait! they used to be OP because of hip fire! No, they used to be OP with a 30-round clip, SCR-level ROF, and tight hip-fire. It lost all of tho...
- by Awry Barux - at 2014.02.24 03:19:00
|
83. Un-nerf the TAR's hipfire - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Seriously. There's no balance justification for leaving it like this.
- by Awry Barux - at 2014.02.24 02:35:00
|
84. [Module Idea] Code Encryptor - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
I like it, but why low slot? Lows are crowded as it is. I say high slot, we need something other than damage mods and shields there. I guess precision enhancers will count in 1.8, but still.
- by Awry Barux - at 2014.02.24 02:14:00
|
85. Remove invincibility after switching suits at supply depots - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Derpty Derp wrote: Don't let them take the supply depo then... I've been on both ends of this and well, it take a second or two to actually select the suit you want, which if you were actually about to kill the guy, would give you the time need...
- by Awry Barux - at 2014.02.23 23:51:00
|
86. Game, Vehicle and Infantry Balance. A stand for a solution to end al... - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
On one hand: I 100% agree with your points. On the other hand: A full set of map redesigns and a variety of new equipment is going to take CCP years- literally. For now, a numerical nerfbat is needed, because we shouldn't have to live (or, usually...
- by Awry Barux - at 2014.02.23 21:49:00
|
87. Remove invincibility after switching suits at supply depots - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
I'm sick of scrubs swapping between heavy suits and abusing 3-5 seconds of invincibility when defending supply depots. There should be some danger to changing dropsuits in the field, as opposed to it being a win button.
- by Awry Barux - at 2014.02.23 21:07:00
|
88. Sticky:The Respec Discussion Thread - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Brian LaFleur wrote: Ghost Steps wrote: i think we whould get 1 last respec (being warned that is the last). Also the respec option with aur is a good idea 4 days to come as it is a name change (is not like u cant get an identity change in t...
- by Awry Barux - at 2014.02.23 19:05:00
|
89. New weapon idea for the brave - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Hoover Damn wrote: thor michaelson wrote: Would love to see a weapon tag system for the swarm missiles in Dust. A pack of tag's that if a player so equipped was to run and tag a lav or a hav that all swarm shots in a increased weapon range ...
- by Awry Barux - at 2014.02.23 17:41:00
|
90. [Suggestion] Add wallet balance to Matchmaking - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Regis Blackbird wrote: I mentioned this in another thread, but I thought I would post it here as well. Dust 514 is all about the ISKies, right? You can pad your K/D ratio all you want, but in the end if you can't play ISK positive you have di...
- by Awry Barux - at 2014.02.23 07:44:00
|
91. [Request] Show me how much I lost - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
The EVE-side killmails demonstrate that CCP obviously has a record of every fitting lost complete with ISK value. This shouldn't be very hard.
- by Awry Barux - at 2014.02.23 07:09:00
|
92. [REQUEST] Blue/red colored text for hacking info - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
I agree, this would be a tiny change that would actually be really nice.
- by Awry Barux - at 2014.02.23 06:38:00
|
93. Request: Enable swarms to lock on through objects - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
What if it only worked on scanned vehicles?
- by Awry Barux - at 2014.02.23 02:22:00
|
94. Sticky:The Respec Discussion Thread - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Rinzler XVIII wrote: The Robot Devil wrote: Spectral Clone wrote: The Robot Devil wrote: snip I completely agree with you Robot, but the game was released too early and has too little content for this to be true IMO. If you didnt ha...
- by Awry Barux - at 2014.02.22 20:11:00
|
95. Sticky:The Respec Discussion Thread - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
The Robot Devil wrote: Awry Barux wrote: Aikuchi Tomaru wrote: Ryme Intrinseca wrote: Just confirm the respec CCP. You know there is an overwhelming case in favour, given that you are changing how pretty much every combination of sui...
- by Awry Barux - at 2014.02.22 19:33:00
|
96. Sticky:The Respec Discussion Thread - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Aikuchi Tomaru wrote: Ryme Intrinseca wrote: Just confirm the respec CCP. You know there is an overwhelming case in favour, given that you are changing how pretty much every combination of suit, weapons, and upgrades works. Sometimes even ...
- by Awry Barux - at 2014.02.22 18:49:00
|
97. Request:Role based weapons - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Ehh, seems kind of gimmicky to me. I'd like to have cool colors, but if we're doing class-based bonuses like this, why not just build them into the suit class instead?
- by Awry Barux - at 2014.02.22 06:51:00
|
98. Sticky:The Respec Discussion Thread - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Sgt Buttscratch wrote: I disagree with the idea of a respec/refund totally rude to those who have played a scout or commando for the last x amount of bullshit months. And the logis.....looool, their tears are epic, Keep em!!! You changed the s...
- by Awry Barux - at 2014.02.22 06:43:00
|
99. Sticky:The Respec Discussion Thread - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Scout Registry wrote: Chase FoTM. Keep FoTM. Not in favor of respec. - 32 million SP (some in bad places, but I own my decisions) Time to address the FoTM argument for the millionth time. *yawn* Vets are sitting on millions of unallocat...
- by Awry Barux - at 2014.02.22 04:36:00
|
100. Sticky:The Respec Discussion Thread - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Vordred Knight wrote: N1ck Comeau wrote: Basically confirmed. ^ This Not confirmed enough.
- by Awry Barux - at 2014.02.22 03:06:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 9 10 20 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |