| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 |
221. LR stats - in General Discussions [original thread]
Vell0cet wrote: Looking at the SDE the mFireMode0.effectiveRange = 11,000.0 and the mFireMode0.absoluteRange = 25,000.0 for the wpn_laserrifle_am_std. Does anyone know what units they're in? Edit: Ranges are the same for all variants. cent...
- by Alpha 443-6732 - at 2014.03.20 20:31:00
|
222. Get rid off 3rd person view on tanks. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Takahiro Kashuken wrote: 3. If camera drones are real i should be able to shoot at them - They are cloaked and you cant see them 4. If camera drones are real i should be able to use EWAR to blind you/force you into FPV - They are immune to E...
- by Alpha 443-6732 - at 2014.03.20 20:23:00
|
223. I think we can all agree 1.6 AV vs vehicles was way better - in General Discussions [original thread]
**** thread full of ****** people. move along anyone who says 1.6 had great balance is either looking through the nostalgia goggles or just plain ********. Uprising tanks were a big stepdown from the previous (much more balanced) versions of tank...
- by Alpha 443-6732 - at 2014.03.20 20:16:00
|
224. Get rid off 3rd person view on tanks. - in General Discussions [original thread]
bamboo x wrote: Better yet, require that there be 2 people inside the tank as well. Even better, too bad the whiny babes wouldn't have that The only reason I started tanking was for the thrills (from late chrome to now), because there was a...
- by Alpha 443-6732 - at 2014.03.19 21:01:00
|
225. Get rid off 3rd person view on tanks. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Skihids wrote: Go ahead and keep your camera drone, but make it visable and let me blow it up! If it's real I can destroy it. This guy gets it
- by Alpha 443-6732 - at 2014.03.19 20:52:00
|
226. Get rid off 3rd person view on tanks. - in General Discussions [original thread]
and if you want to use camera drones as an excuse, would rather have Ewar as a balancing point in this aspect? Would you rather see Ewar that can disable your drones (completely blinding you) or 1st person viewports?
- by Alpha 443-6732 - at 2014.03.19 20:50:00
|
227. Get rid off 3rd person view on tanks. - in General Discussions [original thread]
The dark cloud wrote: There is no reason for tanks to have a 3rd person view. That camera makes it near impossible to sneak up on a tank cause he can see you clearly from the side and at a certain degree from behind the tank. Gunners on tanks c...
- by Alpha 443-6732 - at 2014.03.19 20:47:00
|
228. Tankers - in General Discussions [original thread]
also as a tanker, I try to use the recall function only as a last resort (if no more depots are available) If the depot's in a safe area Ill spare it and use it myself as it's a lot more easy + secure to do than recalling (which can potentially t...
- by Alpha 443-6732 - at 2014.03.14 01:34:00
|
229. Tankers - in General Discussions [original thread]
HappyAsshole1 wrote: Why do you have to destroy every single supply depot for few wp? As a hmg user who try to defend something and teammates wont give ammo it's a must have. when you see teammates hacking supply depot just don't destroy it pls...
- by Alpha 443-6732 - at 2014.03.14 01:31:00
|
230. AV Buff: Make vehicle profile increase SL lock range. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Godin Thekiller wrote: Beren Hurin wrote: Hagintora wrote: There should be a way for vehicle users to counter this effect as well, either through the Skill Tree, or with Mods. First, not stacking hardeners would be the main way to 'cou...
- by Alpha 443-6732 - at 2014.03.14 01:26:00
|
231. AV Buff: Make vehicle profile increase SL lock range. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Hagintora wrote: I'm going to have to side with the vehicle users on this one. While the idea does have merit, other changes would have to be implented first for it to be balanced properly. Vehicles vs AV would have to be balanced, Vehiculer E-...
- by Alpha 443-6732 - at 2014.03.13 19:32:00
|
232. AV Buff: Make vehicle profile increase SL lock range. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Takahiro Kashuken wrote: Change does **** all becauses do not have them mods yet and that idea with passive resistance mods they are also removed and have been taken from us ;^)
- by Alpha 443-6732 - at 2014.03.12 18:35:00
|
233. AV Buff: Make vehicle profile increase SL lock range. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Im saying in addition to your suggestion of a passive +10% dB increase, make them have half their active resistance as an increase in profile (only when active). Also I was suggesting a way to implement a balanced passive hardener.
- by Alpha 443-6732 - at 2014.03.12 18:33:00
|
234. AV Buff: Make vehicle profile increase SL lock range. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Takahiro Kashuken wrote: Atiim wrote: Takahiro Kashuken wrote: Beren Hurin wrote: I WANT TO FIRE MY SL FROM THE TOP OF A TOWER WITH NO RISK. Fixed *Sigh* There would also be no reward, as you could prevent locking from that ra...
- by Alpha 443-6732 - at 2014.03.12 18:30:00
|
235. AV Buff: Make vehicle profile increase SL lock range. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Takahiro Kashuken wrote: Beren Hurin wrote: I WANT TO FIRE MY SL FROM THE TOP OF A TOWER WITH NO RISK. Fixed But this time you have the opportunity to render them useless while up there. You can decide whether or not they fire at yo...
- by Alpha 443-6732 - at 2014.03.12 18:27:00
|
236. AV Buff: Make vehicle profile increase SL lock range. - in General Discussions [original thread]
pegasis prime wrote: I like some of your ideas but I loved when you request swarms getting back the ability to lock at 4th lol that's half the map if it's a large map and most of the map I if it's a smaller map. Also tieing swarms lock on to th...
- by Alpha 443-6732 - at 2014.03.12 18:18:00
|
237. AV Buff: Make vehicle profile increase SL lock range. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Id much rather see this happen than a default to the easiest option (more base damage and range). Seriously, this is a gem of an idea that opens up a huge amount of possibilities in the infantry AV vs Tank field.
- by Alpha 443-6732 - at 2014.03.12 18:17:00
|
238. AV Buff: Make vehicle profile increase SL lock range. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Beren Hurin wrote: Alright, I've wondered why vehicles have an insanely large profile. And I think this could be used as a way to balance swarm launchers as infantry AV vs. vehicles. Step 1) Make Swarm Launcher lock range a function of vehicle...
- by Alpha 443-6732 - at 2014.03.12 18:09:00
|
239. AV Buff: Make vehicle profile increase SL lock range. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Beren Hurin wrote: Alright, I've wondered why vehicles have an insanely large profile. And I think this could be used as a way to balance swarm launchers as infantry AV vs. vehicles. Step 1) Make Swarm Launcher lock range a function of vehicle...
- by Alpha 443-6732 - at 2014.03.12 18:08:00
|
240. Judge VS Bamm - in General Discussions [original thread]
Harpyja wrote: Solution to rails: revert stats to 1.6 of the compressed variants. Rails needed only one buff going into 1.7, and that was the render fix. Also, make it so that railguns behave like the breach forge gun, where you become immob...
- by Alpha 443-6732 - at 2014.03.09 17:47:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |