| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 [8] 9 10 20 30 |
141. DUST 514 : Tanks Are Not OP, Take 2... You Have Been Judged ! - in General Discussions [original thread]
Harpyja wrote: Leonid Tybalt wrote: Harpyja wrote: Dauth Jenkins wrote: I don't believe tanks are op anymore, now, it's just the blaster turrets efficiency against infantry. I'd argue that it's the blaster turret's AV efficiency that...
- by Alpha 443-6732 - at 2014.04.06 17:37:00
|
142. Vehicles vs AV is almost balanced - in General Discussions [original thread]
Samahiel wrote: I want to put this bugbear to rest, because it's one of the stupidest fallacies that continues to rear it's ugly head in these discussions. CCP has stated multiple times that they do not balance around isk. At most potentia...
- by Alpha 443-6732 - at 2014.04.06 17:32:00
|
143. Vehicles vs AV is almost balanced - in General Discussions [original thread]
TERMINALANCE wrote: Its not anyway balanced. dedicated AV should always have the advantage over tanks in a 1v1 context, its what the role does. Pro AV forgegun fit is expensive. over 250k isk each, its super weak vs all other infantry and it i...
- by Alpha 443-6732 - at 2014.04.06 17:30:00
|
144. The Cost Of AV - in General Discussions [original thread]
I say again, if you want to be great with cheap AV, go commando. You don't make compromises, and that reload speed and extra damage helps a lot.
- by Alpha 443-6732 - at 2014.04.06 17:25:00
|
145. The Cost Of AV - in General Discussions [original thread]
I can suppress and sometimes take out (if they hang around like morons) proto fit tanks with my dren swarms. In fact, I find it is the most effective counter to the armour tanked sica/gunnloggi BS, as infantry AV can be concealed easier than a mas...
- by Alpha 443-6732 - at 2014.04.06 17:22:00
|
146. Has Ccp even acknowledged the RAIL gun is BROKEN? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Spkr4theDead wrote: Alpha 443-6732 wrote: Harpyja wrote: I hope that by broken, you mean too much damage, too high of a RoF, and too low of a heat cost? Then yes, railguns are broken. I think thats what he means. Why are large railgun...
- by Alpha 443-6732 - at 2014.04.04 20:14:00
|
147. DUST 514 : Tanks Are Not OP, Take 2... You Have Been Judged ! - in General Discussions [original thread]
Harpyja wrote: It's absolutely rewarding when I'm able to score direct hits on infantry. I've had a fair amount of instances where I'd just shoot one missile at a moving target and score a direct hit on them, killing them instantly. It's SOO r...
- by Alpha 443-6732 - at 2014.04.04 19:55:00
|
148. Vehicles vs AV is almost balanced - in General Discussions [original thread]
KAGEHOSHI Horned Wolf wrote: Since the hardener nerf, fighting tanks no longer feel like an overwhelming challenge. I can personally damage a tank enough with advanced swarms to make it retreat in fear, and with one or 2 more other AV players o...
- by Alpha 443-6732 - at 2014.04.04 19:46:00
|
149. DUST 514 : Tanks Are Not OP, Take 2... You Have Been Judged ! - in General Discussions [original thread]
Godin Thekiller wrote: Alpha 443-6732 wrote: Godin Thekiller wrote: 1: missiles and rails are OP Those are some hot opinions there. Get this, a rail sica with a single hardener will defeat even the most upgraded missile turret, a ...
- by Alpha 443-6732 - at 2014.04.04 19:39:00
|
150. I'm comming BACK - in General Discussions [original thread]
Zymonx wrote: Beware im comming back into DUST Who the **** wouldve guessed?
- by Alpha 443-6732 - at 2014.04.03 23:55:00
|
151. Has Ccp even acknowledged the RAIL gun is BROKEN? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Harpyja wrote: I hope that by broken, you mean too much damage, too high of a RoF, and too low of a heat cost? Then yes, railguns are broken. I think thats what he means. Why are large railguns automatic again?
- by Alpha 443-6732 - at 2014.04.03 23:54:00
|
152. DUST 514 : Tanks Are Not OP, Take 2... You Have Been Judged ! - in General Discussions [original thread]
Godin Thekiller wrote: 1: missiles and rails are OP Those are some hot opinions there. Get this, a rail sica with a single hardener will defeat even the most upgraded missile turret, a blaster sica with two hardeners will do the same I...
- by Alpha 443-6732 - at 2014.04.03 23:52:00
|
153. You know the AR is **** - in General Discussions [original thread]
iirc, new rail rifle has lower dps (~350) than AR with a spool up time of .30 scrambler rifle has overheat and is semi auto AR is **** easy to use, high magazine, ZERO recoil for the first few seconds of firing down sight and good damage to back...
- by Alpha 443-6732 - at 2014.04.02 11:11:00
|
154. Bad tankers buy aurum - in General Discussions [original thread]
with the hardener nerf, militia tanks are where it's at. Aurum or not, they all die in 3-4 shots from my militia rail anyway Militia tanks really need to cost more if they are almost as effective as proto, god damn
- by Alpha 443-6732 - at 2014.03.30 16:32:00
|
155. What do you run on ambushes? - in General Discussions [original thread]
SUNNY THE NINJA wrote: My ambush suit is a duplicate of the medic starter fit with a combat rifle, total cost : 1,500 isk. What do you run on ambushes? Triple hardened blaster Gunnlogis.
- by Alpha 443-6732 - at 2014.03.30 16:23:00
|
156. Whats left to add to the game. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Joseph Ridgeson wrote: Everything is left to add. I am not being cute, at least not on purpose. Get on the EVE forums and ask "what is left to be added?" and you will just see a wave of suggestions on what to add. It is in the nature of the MMO...
- by Alpha 443-6732 - at 2014.03.30 16:20:00
|
157. swarms are killing dropships again - in General Discussions [original thread]
Joseph Ridgeson wrote: "Im a little annoyed that people keep viewing Assault Rifles as a primary weapon for Anti-Infantry . Its a light weapon ... you can fit it to a cloaked scout. sure, they shouldnt be worthless and do no damage, but i th...
- by Alpha 443-6732 - at 2014.03.30 16:16:00
|
158. swarms are killing dropships again - in General Discussions [original thread]
Cat Merc wrote: Light AV is not supposed to be inferior to Heavy AV. Light AV - Hunting down vehicles Heavy AV - Defending locations from vehicles You are a genius! Did you make that up right on the spot?
- by Alpha 443-6732 - at 2014.03.30 16:10:00
|
159. Slowdown effect is bullshitt!! - in General Discussions [original thread]
noob cavman wrote: Alpha 443-6732 wrote: Im sorry but if you're going to complain that speed tanking is dead because you can't phase through bullets, you are just bad why don't you try checking the area first before making any of your moves...
- by Alpha 443-6732 - at 2014.03.29 23:41:00
|
160. Slowdown effect is bullshitt!! - in General Discussions [original thread]
Im sorry but if you're going to complain that speed tanking is dead because you can't phase through bullets, you are just bad why don't you try checking the area first before making any of your moves next time, pretty basic concept and stop exag...
- by Alpha 443-6732 - at 2014.03.29 19:08:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 [8] 9 10 20 30 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |