| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
3001. A question on suit bonuses - in General Discussions [original thread]
Is there a reason that we can't tie a particular bonus to an individual skill? For instance, why can't we tie the assaults 2%ROF bonus to be dependent on the basic suit skill level and the second bonus to be based on the assault suit skill level.
- by Alena Ventrallis - at 2014.01.08 00:34:00
|
3002. repping shields - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
So now we have all racial heavies announced, so I think its time shields got a rep tool so I can have a caldari heavy on a leash.
- by Alena Ventrallis - at 2014.01.07 22:51:00
|
3003. The assault is all messed up... - in General Discussions [original thread]
Sir Dukey wrote: Alena Ventrallis wrote: Caldari assault should reduce rail rifle kick. Other than that I agree with your ideas. you must be awful at fps games if you cannot manage the kick of the rail rifle... If the bonuses are meant ...
- by Alena Ventrallis - at 2014.01.07 21:38:00
|
3004. So if MLT tanks get nerfed, doesn't that just mean we will see STD tank spam? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Give all hardeners the militia active and cool down timers. Have the amount resisted increase from standard to proto. The resistance we have now should be the advanced module, meaning standard is 10% less resistance and proto is 10% more.
- by Alena Ventrallis - at 2014.01.07 21:04:00
|
3005. The assault is all messed up... - in General Discussions [original thread]
Caldari assault should reduce rail rifle kick. Other than that I agree with your ideas.
- by Alena Ventrallis - at 2014.01.07 21:00:00
|
3006. What little things do you want in Dust? Like, super duper little things. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Weapon ranges added to list of stats. Have fitted gear on dropsuit fittings show relevant skill bonuses applied.
- by Alena Ventrallis - at 2014.01.07 17:32:00
|
3007. New Equipment: Remote Nanite Injector - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
More like a nanite launcher of some kind. Less healing because some of the nanites don't survive the flight to the target.
- by Alena Ventrallis - at 2014.01.07 17:22:00
|
3008. New Equipment: Remote Nanite Injector - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Just brainstorming for fun. Can revive from out to 15m Heals 10%/20%/30% at std/adv/proto Charge up time of 3 sec, cool down of 10 sec to stop spamming it from cover. Just throwing out ideas. Thoughts?
- by Alena Ventrallis - at 2014.01.07 17:12:00
|
3009. [Request] 20gj Blaster and 80gj Blaster overhaul - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
A good idea that needs some tweaking. Enact Large Blaster changes as stated. Give small blasters some dispersion. My issue is you have to keep a pin size dot on a moving target, while you yourself are moving. Makes things really annoying to hit...
- by Alena Ventrallis - at 2014.01.07 17:01:00
|
3010. my own tryout of logi and assault suits - in General Discussions [original thread]
The passive scanning is negligible, since we don't share passive data on tacnet anymore, but the values should be switched on assault and logi. Logis are slower, and have less shield recharge. Of course, this is not useful for armor tankers. Lo...
- by Alena Ventrallis - at 2014.01.03 21:34:00
|
3011. Breach Remote Explosives - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
A normal RE pops a heavy anyway, and with a larger blast radius to boot. 3500 damage or 1500 damage, Thats a dead heavy. How about 2500 damage? The point is that a proto fitted tank can be killed by no more than 3 of these, or one full standard ...
- by Alena Ventrallis - at 2013.12.31 06:23:00
|
3012. Spec Ops: The Line - in The Locker Room [original thread]
Suddenly all my shooter games seem awful and horrid.
- by Alena Ventrallis - at 2013.12.31 06:19:00
|
3013. cash for respes tokens - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Xeger's Hammer wrote: How about this: sell respec tokens for 49.99 USD via PSN. I myself would by one in a heartbeat, and so will half a dozen other players. everyone wants to respec so let us pay for it. You get a **** ton of sales revenue, a...
- by Alena Ventrallis - at 2013.12.30 19:33:00
|
3014. Breach Remote Explosives - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Not "stolen" but "tactically acquired" Honestly it just made sense to me with how maning conventions in the game go. breach means less range, higher damage. Numbers can fluctuate, but the goal is 3 of them can pop a tank with no hardeners up. ma...
- by Alena Ventrallis - at 2013.12.30 09:49:00
|
3015. Breach Remote Explosives - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
3 should pop your tank, unless hardeners are up.
- by Alena Ventrallis - at 2013.12.30 09:22:00
|
3016. why are militia nanite injectors in the game? - in General Discussions [original thread]
A better idea would be to make total wp gain be the same for armor repair regardless of how that armor was repaired. So using a militia needle and repping ith a tool should award the same amount of wp as using a proto needle and repping with a too...
- by Alena Ventrallis - at 2013.12.30 00:15:00
|
3017. AV needs to have a lasting effect for it to matter - in General Discussions [original thread]
My idea is that a tank needs to be able to stand and deliver, but it should take awhile for it to get where it needs to stand. IMO, a scout with kincats and sprinting should outrun any tank, save for if it fits speed modules. Limiting hardeners ...
- by Alena Ventrallis - at 2013.12.30 00:06:00
|
3018. AV needs to have a lasting effect for it to matter - in General Discussions [original thread]
Surt gods end wrote: Alena Ventrallis wrote: Remember back when one person with proto swarms could chase off a tank in one magazine? That was OP. It should taek 2-3 people to down a tank in one mag. However, the pendulum has swung too far b...
- by Alena Ventrallis - at 2013.12.29 23:54:00
|
3019. AV needs to have a lasting effect for it to matter - in General Discussions [original thread]
Remember back when one person with proto swarms could chase off a tank in one magazine? That was OP. It should taek 2-3 people to down a tank in one mag. However, the pendulum has swung too far back in the other direction, mainly because tanks ar...
- by Alena Ventrallis - at 2013.12.29 23:47:00
|
3020. AV had changed - in General Discussions [original thread]
As someone who runs tanks part time, I think proxies need a big buff, along with RE, to deal with tanks. A single swarm shouldn't solo a tank in one magazine, but a tank shrugging off anti-vehicle mines? Thats not fair. Make breach RE, 3500 dama...
- by Alena Ventrallis - at 2013.12.29 23:30:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |