Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 [19] 20 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 2 post(s) |
Vespasian Andendare
Subsonic Synthesis Alpha Wolf Pack
220
|
Posted - 2013.09.02 17:56:00 -
[541] - Quote
It's a good thing CCP doesn't do game design by petition. |
Soldiersaint
Deepspace Digital
415
|
Posted - 2013.09.02 18:34:00 -
[542] - Quote
Vespasian Andendare wrote:It's a good thing CCP doesn't do game design by petition. but they do listen from time to time. your trolling is not welcome. |
Django Quik
Dust2Dust. Top Men.
1375
|
Posted - 2013.09.02 18:52:00 -
[543] - Quote
Soldiersaint wrote:Listen respecs will keep more people on the game. only a handful of people will leave if they add respecs. why don't all you haters go cry on a nerf thread or something. You have no idea how many people will leave this game if respecs are introduced. It's not going to happen - I wish you people would just realise that and give this nonsense up. CCP has had this rubbish from Eve players too for years and years - you think you're going to change their minds with this largely falsified and invalid petition? You're wasting your breathe. |
Garrett Blacknova
Codex Troopers
3473
|
Posted - 2013.09.02 18:53:00 -
[544] - Quote
Tek Hound wrote:Garrett Blacknova wrote:Soldiersaint wrote:Remember keep signing but it will take some time to get your names on the list. And even longer to clean up the double-signs and the significant collection of people who have spoken AGAINST the petition and still had their names added. No real reason not to have a respec option. There's plenty of reason why there shouldn't be a respec option.
That's why there are people against having it.
And that's why the people who are against having it are also against the fact that some of those people's names are on this petition as if they signed it. |
Tek Hound
Death In Xcess Corporation
48
|
Posted - 2013.09.02 21:12:00 -
[545] - Quote
Garrett Blacknova wrote:Tek Hound wrote:Garrett Blacknova wrote:Soldiersaint wrote:Remember keep signing but it will take some time to get your names on the list. And even longer to clean up the double-signs and the significant collection of people who have spoken AGAINST the petition and still had their names added. No real reason not to have a respec option. There's plenty of reason why there shouldn't be a respec option. That's why there are people against having it. And that's why the people who are against having it are also against the fact that some of those people's names are on this petition as if they signed it.
Their names on the petition I can understand.Those reason for no respec that players mention are dumb.There really is no good reason why not.Sp doesn't equal skill just time played.No one is asking for free sp just the freedom to use it how they want.They put the time in for that sp why do anyone of you(so called) elite players care if they respec.You say people who want respec suck if they do they will after. |
Glitch116
T.R.I.A.D
4
|
Posted - 2013.09.02 21:19:00 -
[546] - Quote
signed 'h |
Garrett Blacknova
Codex Troopers
3486
|
Posted - 2013.09.02 21:26:00 -
[547] - Quote
New Eden is a good reason why not.
Choices having consequences for once in a console game is a good reason why not.
There was plenty of prior warning that things would change and you aren't getting a respec is a good reason why not.
And while SP doesn't mean you're more (or less) skilled than someone else, intelligent use of SP is a skill in and of itself. Just because you suck at skiling your character, doesn't mean you deserve a free do-over every time you realise you screwed up.
There are times where a PARTIAL respec makes sense - when CCP introduce new racial variants of certain equipment, I hope the let us re-allocate the relevant SP into the new variant. I don't really want to be stuck with Gallente AR Operation when I'm using a Rail Rifle. I don't particularly mind, but it would be nice to swap those points over if I can. If there's a Caldari Shotgun equivalent at some point, I'll want to transfer my Gallente Shotgun SP into that as well. You say you want the freedom to use your SP how you want. You already have that. You can choose not to spend it. You can choose to spend it sensibly. You can choose to spend it poorly. But once you've spent your SP, it's spent and you have the skills you chose. You're not just asking for the freedom to use your SP how you want. You're asking for the ability to undo things you chose to do because you no longer like your decision.
But a full respec is something that we have been assured time and again WILL NOT BE HAPPENING, and that we have plenty of GOOD reasons not to want.
No matter how many times you say that's "dumb", the reasons are still there, sitll valid, and even if they weren't, people have a right to their own opinions, and refusing to admit that is inarguably pig-headed and deliberately offensive. |
Django Quik
Dust2Dust. Top Men.
1376
|
Posted - 2013.09.02 21:49:00 -
[548] - Quote
Further to the very good and valid points that Garrett makes above, respecs go against one of the very few things that make this game unique. By allowing your decisions to be reset at will, this game becomes just another lobby shooter, not much different to COD or BF or one of the other dozens of FPS games already well established in the market. Lose the persistence of your choices and that's a key unique selling point gone and everyone might as well be playing another game that's already doing everything else a lot better.
Whatever shortsighted players this game might lose because they don't like being unable to change their choices at the drop of a hat (these people will probably not last long anyway), it will lose a lot more and gain a lot less if it loses one of its few unique selling points.
edit - also note that I am not against some limited form of reallocation for new racial variants. |
KING CHECKMATE
TEAM SATISFACTION
792
|
Posted - 2013.09.02 22:07:00 -
[549] - Quote
Garrett Blacknova wrote:New Eden is a good reason why not.
Choices having consequences for once in a console game is a good reason why not.
There was plenty of prior warning that things would change and you aren't getting a respec is a good reason why not.
And while SP doesn't mean you're more (or less) skilled than someone else, intelligent use of SP is a skill in and of itself. Just because you suck at skiling your character, doesn't mean you deserve a free do-over every time you realise you screwed up.
There are times where a PARTIAL respec makes sense - when CCP introduce new racial variants of certain equipment, I hope the let us re-allocate the relevant SP into the new variant. I don't really want to be stuck with Gallente AR Operation when I'm using a Rail Rifle. I don't particularly mind, but it would be nice to swap those points over if I can. If there's a Caldari Shotgun equivalent at some point, I'll want to transfer my Gallente Shotgun SP into that as well.
You say you want the freedom to use your SP how you want. You already have that. You can choose not to spend it. You can choose to spend it sensibly. You can choose to spend it poorly. But once you've spent your SP, it's spent and you have the skills you chose. You're not just asking for the freedom to use your SP how you want. You're asking for the ability to undo things you chose to do because you no longer like your decision.
But a full respec is something that we have been assured time and again WILL NOT BE HAPPENING, and that we have plenty of GOOD reasons not to want.
No matter how many times you say that's "dumb", the reasons are still there, sitll valid, and even if they weren't, people have a right to their own opinions, and refusing to admit that is inarguably pig-headed and deliberately offensive.
EDIT: Fixed formatting.
''. You're asking for the ability to undo things you chose to do because you no longer like your decision.''
THIS is why a respec petition is actually a sensible idea. At least one FULL respec once every dropsuit variant and weapon has been released. WHY? well, its not that i NO LONGER LIKE MY DECISION, more like:
-CCP does not give you ANY help at all to make a solid decision; in game descriptions are OFF , promising things that they arent.(like BREACH FORGE GUN: ''cannot move while charging''.WELL NOBODY told me i couldnt move AFTER the shot was charged.) Militia weapons are the ones that should help you do this decision,but there are a lot of weapons that dont have a MLT version so you can try it out, making the only effective way of testing a weapon is SPENDING SP. So the other viable option is to spend a good 2-3 hours to create a new character and buy and ''try out'' a specific item, in a not to optimal enviroment nor setting. So HOW EXACTLY im going to do my ''important and permanent'' decision based on what I IMAGINE they are based on the description? My time is more important than a game. And same is for a lot of other people.
-CCP rebalance issues: I DO NOT abuse Cal LOGI, i never used a Flaylock pistol, not a TAC AR not even LLAV, just for the record. BUT CCP DOES change stuff ridiculously often making your ''highly important and Permanent decisions'' pointless. I might spend a month thinking, and decide: Ok i want to use Minmatar Logi.Spend 5+ mill in doing a loadout just for it, and next month CCP might nerf it to the ground. Sorry , but my time is a LOT more important than EVE fanboys: ''no respecs on eve, no respecs on dust'' stupid a** motto....
-'' You can choose not to spend it''.This is , by far the stupidest thing you've said in that post. With all due respect, why would someone play a game with RPG elements if you are not going to PROGRESS?
-''But a full respec is something that we have been assured time and again WILL NOT BE HAPPENING, and that we have plenty of GOOD reasons not to want.'' Actually the reasons given are nothing but bulltalk. They are abstract excuses inspired by a decade old game that did good because the lack of competition at the time. BUT DUST514 is NOT without competition. Dust514 MUST give their players a hand and besides PARTIAL RESPECS , CCP should offer a optional FULL respec when everything is out and balanced better. IF NOT, something that did not happen with EVE will happen to DUST. Same goes with me. If everything is out and i dont get a respec, no way into having better equipment, NEWER equipment despite the months and money spent on the game? I'll simply pack my things and leave. And so will many more. And you can say: Well bye F*gg*t, we dont need you, whatever. But you are ALREADY complaining about the low player count , running in the 3000-4000. DUST cannot afford to loose another 1-2k players and at this rate, you will be saying: Good luck, HTFU LOL,etcetc... Alone in your tranquility server.....
|
Michael Arck
Anubis Prime Syndicate
763
|
Posted - 2013.09.02 22:08:00 -
[550] - Quote
This is still going? The majority of respec requests comes from the fact the player doesn't want to lose or afraid to. Especially the murder taxi bunch who had much joy running people over for the ease, points and fun. Now changes are coming and you want to keep the edge. It's unfair to those of us who at least didn't resort to cheap tactics as a crutch. I see so many folks who never fire a weapon. They murder taxi all game. No, you shouldn't get respecs. That's your fault that you went for easy kill skill progression instead of building a character that you know the ins and outs of. It's called karma and due justice |
|
Garrett Blacknova
Codex Troopers
3491
|
Posted - 2013.09.02 22:36:00 -
[551] - Quote
KING CHECKMATE wrote:''. You're asking for the ability to undo things you chose to do because you no longer like your decision.''
THIS is why a respec petition is actually a sensible idea. At least one FULL respec once every dropsuit variant and weapon has been released. WHY? well, its not that i NO LONGER LIKE MY DECISION, more like:
-CCP does not give you ANY help at all to make a solid decision; in game descriptions are OFF , promising things that they arent.(like BREACH FORGE GUN: ''cannot move while charging''.WELL NOBODY told me i couldnt move AFTER the shot was charged.) Militia weapons are the ones that should help you do this decision,but there are a lot of weapons that dont have a MLT version so you can try it out, making the only effective way of testing a weapon is SPENDING SP. So the other viable option is to spend a good 2-3 hours to create a new character and buy and ''try out'' a specific item, in a not to optimal enviroment nor setting. So HOW EXACTLY im going to do my ''important and permanent'' decision based on what I IMAGINE they are based on the description? My time is more important than a game. And same is for a lot of other people. Assuming you could charge the Breach Forge Gun then walk around holding the charge is actually pretty ridiculous. If you skill into something based on the description, and it doesn't work as described, then petition CCP for a refund of the SP in question. There's precedent for cases like that, for example, the SP I poured into Vehicle Engineering when the skill description said it gave a PG increase while it gave a CPU reduction on PG modules (which didn't apply to Militia modules at the time). That was a broken description, and the SP players had spent on the skill was refunded when players requested it to be. But that mistake DOESN'T entitle you to a FULL RESPEC.
Quote:-CCP rebalance issues: I DO NOT abuse Cal LOGI, i never used a Flaylock pistol, not a TAC AR not even LLAV, just for the record. BUT CCP DOES change stuff ridiculously often making your ''highly important and Permanent decisions'' pointless. I might spend a month thinking, and decide: Ok i want to use Minmatar Logi.Spend 5+ mill in doing a loadout just for it, and next month CCP might nerf it to the ground. Sorry , but my time is a LOT more important than EVE fanboys: ''no respecs on eve, no respecs on dust'' stupid a** motto.... Sorry, but I don't actually play EVE. Your time is no more valuable than mine from any perspective but your own. CCP rebalance things when said things are not working as intended. If that means you skilled into something that gets over-nerfed, petition for it to be brought back into line. If you skilled into something that was legitimately OP, and it's been fixed, you have no grounds to complain. And as mentioned above, there ARE situations where it will be expected for CCP to uphold the same approach they've taken in EVE, letting players reassign SP that was "overspent" on a skill that's had its cost reduced, or letting us respec a portion of our skills when something has undergone a major reworking of its core mechanics. With the massive changes being made to vehicles in 1.5, it's likely that vehicle users will be given a respec of all vehicle-related SP. When new racial variants of vehicles and/or new turrets come out, it's plausible that CP might find a way to allow us to shift our specific turret-related SP from the old turret skills into the new ones.
Quote:-'' You can choose not to spend it''.This is , by far the stupidest thing you've said in that post. With all due respect, why would someone play a game with RPG elements if you are not going to PROGRESS? If you know you can progress immediately on something that will kind of work, or wait until there's something that will suit you better, why not wait? On my main, I'm not skilling into Gallente Scouts even though I'm running a Dragonfly Scout fitting as my main, because I want to run Caldari Scouts and I don't want to have to re-earn the relevant SP before I can equip my preferred suit. I'm hoping that there's an optional respec which will allow people who have skilled into Gallente or Minmatar Scouts to shift their SP into Amarr and Caldari Scouts when they become available, but I'm not going to trade on that hope on a long-term project. Just because you, personally, have no impulse control and no sense of the long-term ramifications of your decisions, doesn't mean that your decisions shouldn't have long-term ramifications.
Quote:-''But a full respec is something that we have been assured time and again WILL NOT BE HAPPENING, and that we have plenty of GOOD reasons not to want.'' Actually the reasons given are nothing but bulltalk. They are abstract excuses inspired by a decade old game that did good because the lack of competition at the time. Part of the reason EVE Online is STILL popular is that it offers something that almost no other game in the genre does. That "something" is the same "something" you're asking for CCP to remove from DUST because it doesn't suit your personal preference. That's fine. If you don't like it, play other games and collect your passive SP until you have a nice stockpile to waste. If and when you get bored of your new skills, go back to your latest FOTM game until you have more SP built up, then come back to DUST again.
Your arguments in favour of a respec are as relevant to me as my arguments against it are to you. But guess what? CCP are set on the reasons I like the game, so I'm confident that I'm going to get my way instead of you here. Problem?
And I challenge you to find one post - just one - where I've complained about the lack of players. Me, personally, that is. Obviously. |
xAckie
Ahrendee Mercenaries EoN.
301
|
Posted - 2013.09.02 23:00:00 -
[552] - Quote
Respecs should be allowed cause the grind is sooooo boring due to a skill tree based on massive sp sinks that do absolutely nothing. It would at least alleviate the tedium.
And because the game is so badly broke there should be respecs until 2.0 or at least until the player base can admit the game is 'working as intended'. At the moment CCP is messing around with balance issues that should have been finished by launch. |
KING CHECKMATE
TEAM SATISFACTION
793
|
Posted - 2013.09.02 23:10:00 -
[553] - Quote
@ Garrett Blacknova:
''Assuming you could charge the Breach Forge Gun then walk around holding the charge is actually pretty ridiculous. If you skill into something based on the description, and it doesn't work as described, then petition CCP for a refund of the SP in question. There's precedent for cases like that, for example, the SP I poured into Vehicle Engineering when the skill description said it gave a PG increase while it gave a CPU reduction on PG modules (which didn't apply to Militia modules at the time). That was a broken description, and the SP players had spent on the skill was refunded when players requested it to be. But that mistake DOESN'T entitle you to a FULL RESPEC.''
''''Assuming you could charge the Breach Forge Gun then walk around holding the charge is actually pretty ridiculous.'' -Why is assuming that i can move with a weapon in a FPS ridiculous? -My request for a full respec is when everything is out. So we can play what we want to play. Same as you. You might be saving up for a caldari scout. What if it takes a year and a half in coming out? Or more? it IS stated that DUST is planned to be a long term game so they have NO hurry in making your caldari scout. So you are being denied your right to play the game to your full capacity with SP you have earned with your time,just because you are waiting for something to happen. You might be ok with this. Me and other people arent.
''Sorry, but I don't actually play EVE. Your time is no more valuable than mine from any perspective but your own. CCP rebalance things when said things are not working as intended. If that means you skilled into something that gets over-nerfed, petition for it to be brought back into line. If you skilled into something that was legitimately OP, and it's been fixed, you have no grounds to complain. And as mentioned above, there ARE situations where it will be expected for CCP to uphold the same approach they've taken in EVE, letting players reassign SP that was "overspent" on a skill that's had its cost reduced, or letting us respec a portion of our skills when something has undergone a major reworking of its core mechanics. With the massive changes being made to vehicles in 1.5, it's likely that vehicle users will be given a respec of all vehicle-related SP. When new racial variants of vehicles and/or new turrets come out, it's plausible that CP might find a way to allow us to shift our specific turret-related SP from the old turret skills into the new ones.''
-I have never specced into something OP. In any case , everything i've ever played with gets nerfed like scouts and heavies. So i actually have ground to complain. -It would be easier instead of doing all your twiching and shifting skills, to just give a respec. >..> Plus if vehicle users get a respec, AFTER They have abused the LLAVs so much, then i think everyone else deserves a respec too...
.... but I'm not going to trade on that hope on a long-term project. Just because you, personally, have no impulse control and no sense of the long-term ramifications of your decisions, doesn't mean that your decisions shouldn't have long-term ramifications.
Its not lack of impulse control . Its just me trying to do what i usually do with games. Have fun. And i have fun winning, or at least being useful. You accomplish these by having the best skills/equipment your SP can buy. Say you have 6 mil spent and 2 mil saved SP? Well, you are playing as a 6 mil soldier , and your team would do better with a 8 mil soldier. Think doesnt make a difference? Think taht the ONLY thing you need is skill?please. Proficiency, +% in shield/armor/CPU/PG/Stamina/Stamina Regen/profile dampening etc MAKE a difference.Better weapons make a difference. Core locus grenades Lai Dai nades MAKE a difference.ADV/PROTO Uplinks make a difference. Of course you can DO GREAT even with MLT weapons, but thats just you being better than the enemy. In The case you fight somebody with your exact same skill, hes gonna win, because he is NOT saving SP for something that might come in 3 years....I dont have fun loosing to someone JUST because they have better equipment, there by i spend my SP in order to be stronger.
''Part of the reason EVE Online is STILL popular is that it offers something that almost no other game in the genre does. That "something" is the same "something" you're asking for CCP to remove from DUST because it doesn't suit your personal preference.'' -Yes DUST514 is offering something no other game has. But there is a REASON no other game has it. They went with games that give you the ability to try different loadouts and change gameplay for increased Game time. I understand DUST is unique in this. Unique doesnt mean it will suceed.
'' That's fine. If you don't like it, play other games and collect your passive SP until you have a nice stockpile to waste. If and when you get bored of your new skills, go back to your latest FOTM game until you have more SP built up, then come back to DUST again.
Your arguments in favour of a respec are as relevant to me as my arguments against it are to you. But guess what? CCP are set on the reasons I like the game, so I'm confident that I'm going to get my way instead of you here. Problem? No problem at all. As always, i try to do the best for the game i like at the moment. If the game does not work in my favor.Well to bad, life goes on and other games will like having another player.BUT YOU CANNOT tell me to stop fighting for what i think it is the best for the game i like.Even if by your point of view is wrong....
And I challenge you to find one post - just one - where I've complained about the lack of players. Me, personally, that is. Obviously. I wont take that challenge.I never meant you as an individual compalining about this, more like you anti respec people. |
Soldiersaint
Deepspace Digital
415
|
Posted - 2013.09.05 11:30:00 -
[554] - Quote
Django Quik wrote:Soldiersaint wrote:Listen respecs will keep more people on the game. only a handful of people will leave if they add respecs. why don't all you haters go cry on a nerf thread or something. You have no idea how many people will leave this game if respecs are introduced. It's not going to happen - I wish you people would just realise that and give this nonsense up. CCP has had this rubbish from Eve players too for years and years - you think you're going to change their minds with this largely falsified and invalid petition? You're wasting your breathe. The people who quit are tryhards who like to beat on other people. once they leave this game will be fun again. |
Soldiersaint
Deepspace Digital
415
|
Posted - 2013.09.05 11:32:00 -
[555] - Quote
Django Quik wrote:Further to the very good and valid points that Garrett makes above, respecs go against one of the very few things that make this game unique. By allowing your decisions to be reset at will, this game becomes just another lobby shooter, not much different to COD or BF or one of the other dozens of FPS games already well established in the market. Lose the persistence of your choices and that's a key unique selling point gone and everyone might as well be playing another game that's already doing everything else a lot better.
Whatever shortsighted players this game might lose because they don't like being unable to change their choices at the drop of a hat (these people will probably not last long anyway), it will lose a lot more and gain a lot less if it loses one of its few unique selling points.
edit - also note that I am not against some limited form of reallocation for new racial variants. This game is already a lobby shooter. just with a few boring rpg elements. |
Vethosis
Vherokior Combat Logistics Minmatar Republic
880
|
Posted - 2013.09.05 19:34:00 -
[556] - Quote
Off the ban, all names added. |
Garrett Blacknova
Codex Troopers
3695
|
Posted - 2013.09.05 19:57:00 -
[557] - Quote
Vethosis wrote:Off the ban, all names added. You still didn't address the series of obvious/known alts used to add multiple signatures, and still haven't done anything about multiple signatures from players who have specifically declared their disapproval for the thread. |
Vethosis
Vherokior Combat Logistics Minmatar Republic
882
|
Posted - 2013.09.05 19:58:00 -
[558] - Quote
Garrett Blacknova wrote:Vethosis wrote:Off the ban, all names added. You still didn't address the series of obvious/known alts used to add multiple signatures, and still haven't done anything about multiple signatures from players who have specifically declared their disapproval for the thread.
If you want to you can. |
Garrett Blacknova
Codex Troopers
3697
|
Posted - 2013.09.05 20:19:00 -
[559] - Quote
Vethosis wrote:Garrett Blacknova wrote:Vethosis wrote:Off the ban, all names added. You still didn't address the series of obvious/known alts used to add multiple signatures, and still haven't done anything about multiple signatures from players who have specifically declared their disapproval for the thread. If you want to you can. Feel free to message me in-game with your account details so I can sign in under your name and edit the OP for you. Until then, no I can't. |
TROLL DRIVER
Company of Marcher Lords Amarr Empire
7
|
Posted - 2013.09.05 20:39:00 -
[560] - Quote
SIGNED..........
I've listened to all the BS about no respecs on this thread, mostly from eve neckbeards I might add.
'' you should live with your choices''
''accept the consequences''
'' it's new eden''
etc.etc.
STFU, it's a friggin video game, a boring, tedious, dull grind of a game, but it's still a friggin VIDEO GAME.
I swear you tards think new eden is real. lmfao. |
|
Django Quik
Dust2Dust. Top Men.
1393
|
Posted - 2013.09.05 20:47:00 -
[561] - Quote
TROLL DRIVER wrote:SIGNED..........
I've listened to all the BS about no respecs on this thread, mostly from eve neckbeards I might add.
'' you should live with your choices''
''accept the consequences''
'' it's new eden''
etc.etc.
STFU, it's a friggin video game, a boring, tedious, dull grind of a game, but it's still a friggin VIDEO GAME.
I swear you tards think new eden is real. lmfao. You should realise that neither Garrett nor myself are Eve players.
The only reasons people ever give for wanting respecs are actually nothing to do with respecs and all the problems that people continue to list would all be better served by fixing the issues themselves.
Permanence is a central feature of this game - let's fix the problems with the right fixes and respecs will become entirely unnecessary. |
TROLL DRIVER
Company of Marcher Lords Amarr Empire
9
|
Posted - 2013.09.05 20:59:00 -
[562] - Quote
Django Quik wrote:TROLL DRIVER wrote:SIGNED..........
I've listened to all the BS about no respecs on this thread, mostly from eve neckbeards I might add.
'' you should live with your choices''
''accept the consequences''
'' it's new eden''
etc.etc.
STFU, it's a friggin video game, a boring, tedious, dull grind of a game, but it's still a friggin VIDEO GAME.
I swear you tards think new eden is real. lmfao. You should realise that neither Garrett nor myself are Eve players. The only reasons people ever give for wanting respecs are actually nothing to do with respecs and all the problems that people continue to list would all be better served by fixing the issues themselves. Permanence is a central feature of this game - let's fix the problems with the right fixes and respecs will become entirely unnecessary.
That's the friggin problem pal, until this broke a$$ game is fixed, if ever.......... Respecs are necessary.
Thanks for pointing that out and agreeing. |
Dust Project 514
Pistol King
274
|
Posted - 2013.09.05 21:00:00 -
[563] - Quote
After the abomination that is 1.4. I want a respec. I might as well join the general public and use OP weapons as well. The game is just not enjoyable for me now. |
Django Quik
Dust2Dust. Top Men.
1393
|
Posted - 2013.09.05 21:01:00 -
[564] - Quote
TROLL DRIVER wrote:Django Quik wrote:The only reasons people ever give for wanting respecs are actually nothing to do with respecs and all the problems that people continue to list would all be better served by fixing the issues themselves.
Permanence is a central feature of this game - let's fix the problems with the right fixes and respecs will become entirely unnecessary. That's the friggin problem pal, until this broke a$$ game is fixed, if ever.......... Respecs are necessary. Thanks for pointing that out and agreeing. Yes, the game has many problems - respecs will not fix any of them. |
TROLL DRIVER
Company of Marcher Lords Amarr Empire
9
|
Posted - 2013.09.05 21:09:00 -
[565] - Quote
Django Quik wrote:TROLL DRIVER wrote:Django Quik wrote:The only reasons people ever give for wanting respecs are actually nothing to do with respecs and all the problems that people continue to list would all be better served by fixing the issues themselves.
Permanence is a central feature of this game - let's fix the problems with the right fixes and respecs will become entirely unnecessary. That's the friggin problem pal, until this broke a$$ game is fixed, if ever.......... Respecs are necessary. Thanks for pointing that out and agreeing. Yes, the game has many problems - respecs will not fix any of them.
You really think it's ok to make people wait months to get something in this game. then come along, change the rules of the game, totally change what you've been speccing into for months, and, or ruin it to uselessness, then say '' live with your choices''
Well if you do think this, you sure seem to............... You're a deluded fanboi doofus. |
Django Quik
Dust2Dust. Top Men.
1393
|
Posted - 2013.09.05 21:27:00 -
[566] - Quote
TROLL DRIVER wrote:You really think it's ok to make people wait months to get something in this game. then come along, change the rules of the game, totally change what you've been speccing into for months, and, or ruin it to uselessness, then say '' live with your choices'' That is one of the problems that needs addressing (and is happening) - CCP have committed to making smaller adjustments in terms of balancing, so that people's entire game isn't ruined when they change things. More work needs to be done in a lot of areas, so less changes are needed and then less people will cry for respecs.
Again - respecs will not fix the problems you have with this game; they are only a band-aid so you can forget the problems for a little while. |
Garrett Blacknova
Codex Troopers
3700
|
Posted - 2013.09.05 21:39:00 -
[567] - Quote
Django Quik wrote:edit - also, when was the last time anything was 'nerfed to uselessness'? Shotguns were nerfed when 1.4 went live.
That got fixed today.
48 HOURS LATER.
How many months is that? Oh yea, I remember now... NOT EVEN ONE. |
xAckie
Ahrendee Mercenaries EoN.
327
|
Posted - 2013.09.05 21:41:00 -
[568] - Quote
Garrett Blacknova wrote:Django Quik wrote:edit - also, when was the last time anything was 'nerfed to uselessness'? Shotguns were nerfed when 1.4 went live. That got fixed today. 48 HOURS LATER. How many months is that? Oh yea, I remember now... NOT EVEN ONE.
okay..... if you think so... its 1.4 and they are still having problems with getting the shotgun to register (months, over a year if you include closed beta- should have been fixed by latest 1.0).
I like dust, but i dont have blinkers on |
xAckie
Ahrendee Mercenaries EoN.
327
|
Posted - 2013.09.05 21:47:00 -
[569] - Quote
Django Quik wrote:TROLL DRIVER wrote:You really think it's ok to make people wait months to get something in this game. then come along, change the rules of the game, totally change what you've been speccing into for months, and, or ruin it to uselessness, then say '' live with your choices'' That is one of the problems that needs addressing (and is happening) - CCP have committed to making smaller adjustments in terms of balancing, so that people's entire game isn't ruined when they change things. More work needs to be done in a lot of areas, so less changes are needed and then less people will cry for respecs. Again - respecs will not fix the problems you have with this game; they are only a band-aid so you can forget the problems for a little while. edit - also, when was the last time anything was 'nerfed to uselessness'?
respecs do fix the problem. This patch has helped Dust go in the right direction (even if we take the argument of aim assist out)
But lets be real CCP admitted they had to throw out their roadmap and start a to do list
respecs should be available until the basic mechanics and balance have got to a point where we cn all admit its ok |
Garrett Blacknova
Codex Troopers
3702
|
Posted - 2013.09.05 22:06:00 -
[570] - Quote
xAckie wrote:Garrett Blacknova wrote:Django Quik wrote:edit - also, when was the last time anything was 'nerfed to uselessness'? Shotguns were nerfed when 1.4 went live. That got fixed today. 48 HOURS LATER. How many months is that? Oh yea, I remember now... NOT EVEN ONE. okay..... if you think so... its 1.4 and they are still having problems with getting the shotgun to register (months, over a year if you include closed beta- should have been fixed by latest 1.0). I like dust, but i dont have blinkers on He was asking when they last nerfed something into uselessness. While not working properly (due to the shoddy hit detection), Shotguns were still viable in 1.3 but the release of 1.4 broke them completely. They've since had those problems resolved, and with the improved hit detection now helping them, Shotguns have been great for me so far today.
You're welcome to have your own experiences telling you different, but my experience shows that Shotguns are amazing right now. |
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 [19] 20 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |