Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 [8] 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 2 post(s) |
Malkai Inos
Opus Arcana Covert Intervention
794
|
Posted - 2013.07.23 18:05:00 -
[211] - Quote
ISuperstar wrote:After thinking it over and my Ill feelings towards all of you flavor the players has been subdued somewhat. I've come to look at this situation a little more logically.
I now retract my statement about No further respecs. While I still would love to see all those Cal logi's and FoTM players suffer to the highest degree. I believe that changing the attributes and aspects of certain items or suits that quite possible played a huge role in someone's decision to invest SP into it deserves nothing less that a refund of all invested SP into that suit or item.
+1 For Respec
StillHateYouAll While it's actually a good thing that you don't reduce yay sayers on this issue to FOTM chasers anymore, if the only argument against respecs you can think of is an Ad hominem than you must not have thought about it very deeply to begin with.
There have been countless threads on this explaining in detail why respecs are very very bad for this game. None of which have been acknowledged, let alone adressed anywhere in this thread although they are just one search away.
This whole thread is heavily one sided because it is very easy to just demand something without any consideration of the possible downsides. I quite hard and tiring to explain the other position when no one is really interested in hearing any of this. More so when we have to repeat ourselves on a daily basis because there's always a new thread on this somewhere with the same people claiming that there are no arguments against it.
I've seen this happening so often that i will just trust on CCPs integrity on the matter and stop writing 5k character essays on this subject every time someone has the great idea to make yet another "respec" thread. |
Soldiersaint
Deepspace Digital
269
|
Posted - 2013.07.23 18:06:00 -
[212] - Quote
Look i know ccp will probably say no....but its still worth a try...if they say no....I WILL HOLD THEM IN THERE OFFICE AT GUN POINT! |
Soldiersaint
Deepspace Digital
271
|
Posted - 2013.07.23 18:09:00 -
[213] - Quote
Malkai Inos wrote:ISuperstar wrote:After thinking it over and my Ill feelings towards all of you flavor the players has been subdued somewhat. I've come to look at this situation a little more logically.
I now retract my statement about No further respecs. While I still would love to see all those Cal logi's and FoTM players suffer to the highest degree. I believe that changing the attributes and aspects of certain items or suits that quite possible played a huge role in someone's decision to invest SP into it deserves nothing less that a refund of all invested SP into that suit or item.
+1 For Respec
StillHateYouAll While it's actually a good thing that you don't reduce yay sayers on this issue to FOTM chasers anymore, if the only argument against respecs you can think of is an Ad hominem than you must not have thought about it very deeply to begin with. There have been countless threads on this explaining in detail why respecs are very very bad for this game. None of which have been acknowledged, let alone adressed anywhere in this thread although they are just one search away. This whole thread is heavily one sided because it is very easy to just demand something without any consideration of the possible downsides. I quite hard and tiring to explain the other position when no one is really interested in hearing any of this. More so when we have to repeat ourselves on a daily basis because there's always a new thread on this somewhere with the same people claiming that there are no arguments against it. a video game that forces you to spend forever to get stuff done just isnt fun....at least for most people...only a hand full of people enjoy that kind off stuff...my friend the masses usually win...this just might be the case with dust 514....i think the ar is op...but the masses use it and say its fine...so nothing happens....the masses always have there way even if they are wrong....now with that said.....RESPEC PLEASE! |
Soldiersaint
Deepspace Digital
271
|
Posted - 2013.07.23 18:13:00 -
[214] - Quote
Man even if another respec sends the game to the seventh hell....i still want it...and i have more than enough people behind me to do it |
Vethosis
Eir Gaming
678
|
Posted - 2013.07.23 18:14:00 -
[215] - Quote
behind me* |
Soldiersaint
Deepspace Digital
271
|
Posted - 2013.07.23 18:17:00 -
[216] - Quote
Vethosis wrote:behind me* aw man......*sigh* yes sir |
Soldiersaint
Deepspace Digital
274
|
Posted - 2013.07.23 18:28:00 -
[217] - Quote
does saying random stuff count as a buff? |
Vethosis
NEW AGE EMPIRE
683
|
Posted - 2013.07.23 18:31:00 -
[218] - Quote
only bump if this thread isn't on the first page, but don't actually say " bump " |
Soldiersaint
Deepspace Digital
274
|
Posted - 2013.07.23 18:32:00 -
[219] - Quote
Vethosis wrote:only bump if this thread isn't on the first page, but don't actually say " bump " oh ok...thanks boss |
Soldiersaint
Deepspace Digital
274
|
Posted - 2013.07.23 18:38:00 -
[220] - Quote
you know i went amarr logi so i could have a decent defense...thats not working out. even with the 25% self repair bonus ..i should have stayed in my minnie logi...it even had more tool slots a lvl 1.....but before any of that. i should have raised my core skills...im so freaking stupid |
|
GTA-V FTW
Mannar Focused Warfare Gallente Federation
119
|
Posted - 2013.07.23 18:55:00 -
[221] - Quote
So if CCP gets a respec on the decisions that they have made like giving us the OP Flaylock then going opps that was wrong, booom nerf respec. Why would it be so bad for all of us to have that same choice.
I mean for real let be honest here, no one would have even spent any SP into the Flaylock if they knew what the intended statistics were going to be.
I am not crying about the nerf because, meh who cares.
But I believe that if CCP gets a respec then we should get the option. |
pierce Hawkeye
BurgezzE.T.F
68
|
Posted - 2013.07.23 19:09:00 -
[222] - Quote
Soldiersaint wrote:hm ill tell you what i wont bump anymore..but im not letting this post die..ccp you may have said no..but your playerbase has spoken.....LET THERE BE RESPECS!
I too want this thread to survive but soldier you have to tone it down a bit I don't want anything happing to this thread ok? Great enthusasim though |
Soldiersaint
Deepspace Digital
283
|
Posted - 2013.07.23 19:09:00 -
[223] - Quote
THE MASSES HAVE SPOKEN....GIVE US OUR REPEC CCP OR DIE!!!! |
Soldiersaint
Deepspace Digital
283
|
Posted - 2013.07.23 19:10:00 -
[224] - Quote
pierce Hawkeye wrote:Soldiersaint wrote:hm ill tell you what i wont bump anymore..but im not letting this post die..ccp you may have said no..but your playerbase has spoken.....LET THERE BE RESPECS! I too want this thread to survive but soldier you have to tone it down a bit I don't want anything happing to this thread ok? Great enthusasim though aw man....alright....maybe a little |
Pje251296
KILL ORDERS
85
|
Posted - 2013.07.23 19:12:00 -
[225] - Quote
Soldiersaint wrote:THE MASSES HAVE SPOKEN....GIVE US OUR REPEC CCP OR DIE!!!!
No |
RKKR
The Southern Legion
271
|
Posted - 2013.07.23 19:12:00 -
[226] - Quote
Malkai Inos wrote:Soldiersaint wrote:hm ill tell you what i wont bump anymore..but im not letting this post die..ccp you may have said no..but your playerbase has spoken.....LET THERE BE RESPECS! I can just hope CCP knows that the Argumentum ad Populum is a classic fallacy.
It will depend if CCP thinks that the majority are more profitable than the smaller group of people for DUST514.
PS: It's cool that you're aware of your fallacies, but pointing out fallacies is not really helpful to get a point across. |
pierce Hawkeye
BurgezzE.T.F
68
|
Posted - 2013.07.23 19:14:00 -
[227] - Quote
Soldiersaint wrote:THE MASSES HAVE SPOKEN....GIVE US OUR REPEC CCP OR DIE!!!!
that escalated quickly again we all want respecs but lets be polite about it so what you really ment was THE MASSES HAVE SPOKEN....GIVE US OUR REPEC CCP OR DIE!!!!OF FRIENDSHIP. bro you don't want to threaten the guys possibly giving the respec no matter how silly or outrageous |
Malkai Inos
Opus Arcana Covert Intervention
804
|
Posted - 2013.07.23 19:30:00 -
[228] - Quote
RKKR wrote:Malkai Inos wrote:Soldiersaint wrote:hm ill tell you what i wont bump anymore..but im not letting this post die..ccp you may have said no..but your playerbase has spoken.....LET THERE BE RESPECS! I can just hope CCP knows that the Argumentum ad Populum is a classic fallacy. It will depend if CCP thinks that the majority are more profitable than the smaller group of people for DUST514. PS: It's cool that you're aware of your fallacies, but pointing out fallacies is not really helpful to get a point across.
It also depents on wether this "majority" is real, merely perceived or even contrived. As i've said in an earlier post i've stopped engaging in every single respec thread because arguing against it seems to be much more work arguing in favour of it. Especially since the half life of your everage respec thread is about 6hours if not forcefully kept alive like this one. Those against respecs have to repeat themselves constantly. It starts to feel like a waste of time really when i see people i have debated with jump on every respec thread they can find repeating arguments i have challenged and sometimes refuted on more than one occasion.
I imagine quite a few people to feel the same and others not to raise contra on the forums because they have no issue and thus don't visit the forums to begin with. That is incidentily one of the reasons why the argumentum ad populum is deemed a fallacy. You can make any position seem like the majority, sound or not.
The PS. is actually correct. Argumentum ad logicam can be fallacious in itself (fallception ). |
Soldiersaint
Deepspace Digital
283
|
Posted - 2013.07.23 19:35:00 -
[229] - Quote
Malkai Inos wrote:RKKR wrote:Malkai Inos wrote:Soldiersaint wrote:hm ill tell you what i wont bump anymore..but im not letting this post die..ccp you may have said no..but your playerbase has spoken.....LET THERE BE RESPECS! I can just hope CCP knows that the Argumentum ad Populum is a classic fallacy. It will depend if CCP thinks that the majority are more profitable than the smaller group of people for DUST514. PS: It's cool that you're aware of your fallacies, but pointing out fallacies is not really helpful to get a point across. It also depents on wether this "majority" is real, merely perceived or even contrived. As i've said in an earlier post i've stopped engaging in every single respec thread because arguing against it seems to be much more work arguing in favour of it. Especially since the half life of your everage respec thread is about 6hours if not forcefully kept alive like this one. Those against respecs have to repeat themselves constantly. It starts to feel like a waste of time really when i see people i have debated with jump on every respec thread they can find repeating arguments i have challenged and sometimes refuted on more than one occasion. I imagine quite a few people to feel the same and others not to raise contra on the forums because they have no issue and thus don't visit the forums to begin with. That is incidentily one of the reasons why the argumentum ad populum is deemed a fallacy. You can make any position seem like the majority, sound or not. The PS. is actually correct. Argumentum ad logicam can be fallacious in itself (fallception ). we are not going to spend a year and a half to spec into other classes..we dont have time for that...dust 514 should not become a second life...a respec every once in a while will solve that....i know it will |
Soldiersaint
Deepspace Digital
285
|
Posted - 2013.07.23 19:41:00 -
[230] - Quote
pierce Hawkeye wrote:Soldiersaint wrote:THE MASSES HAVE SPOKEN....GIVE US OUR REPEC CCP OR DIE!!!! that escalated quickly again we all want respecs but lets be polite about it so what you really ment was THE MASSES HAVE SPOKEN....GIVE US OUR REPEC CCP OR DIE!!!!OF FRIENDSHIP. bro you don't want to threaten the guys possibly giving the respec no matter how silly or outrageous woah now im not being serious when i say this...im *cough* roleplaying a very evil merc that want his training redone *cough*...that requires hunting down each individual ccp member a torturing them accordingly..... The op is helping me accomplish this devious task |
|
Tectonic Fusion
The Unholy Legion Of DarkStar DARKSTAR ARMY
60
|
Posted - 2013.07.23 19:46:00 -
[231] - Quote
Why the heck do players think you want to spec out of the Caldari Logi? I got it because it had more slots so I can fit and experiment with other builds for a SUPPORT LOGISTICS. I only want a respec because I've leveled up parts of my core skills that are useless and cost me like 4mil SP. |
Soldiersaint
Deepspace Digital
285
|
Posted - 2013.07.23 19:47:00 -
[232] - Quote
Tectonic Fusion wrote:Why the heck do players think you want to spec out of the Caldari Logi? I got it because it had more slots so I can fit and experiment with other builds for a SUPPORT LOGISTICS. I only want a respec because I've leveled up parts of my core skills that are useless and cost me like 4mil SP. then sign my friend..sign |
Soldiersaint
Deepspace Digital
285
|
Posted - 2013.07.23 19:56:00 -
[233] - Quote
this respec thread demands an audience with ccp....or at least a cookie ...... |
CommanderBolt
A.N.O.N.Y.M.O.U.S. League of Infamy
104
|
Posted - 2013.07.23 20:03:00 -
[234] - Quote
Haha the list is growing. Maybe one way CCP could solve this all is have say one or two optional respecs a year or something. Similar to how it is in eve. Then (Give us notice as to when) drop the first one of these yearly respecs in the coming weeks after 1.3? How about that? |
Soldiersaint
Deepspace Digital
293
|
Posted - 2013.07.23 20:04:00 -
[235] - Quote
Pje251296 wrote:Soldiersaint wrote:THE MASSES HAVE SPOKEN....GIVE US OUR REPEC CCP OR DIE!!!! No BURN THE INFIDEL BURN HIM NOW |
Soldiersaint
Deepspace Digital
293
|
Posted - 2013.07.23 20:05:00 -
[236] - Quote
CommanderBolt wrote:Haha the list is growing. Maybe one way CCP could solve this all is have say one or two optional respecs a year or something. Similar to how it is in eve. Then (Give us notice as to when) drop the first one of these yearly respecs in the coming weeks after 1.3? How about that? it makes sense....but i am not a man to negotiate with |
Malkai Inos
Opus Arcana Covert Intervention
810
|
Posted - 2013.07.23 20:10:00 -
[237] - Quote
CommanderBolt wrote:Haha the list is growing. Maybe one way CCP could solve this all is have say one or two optional respecs a year or something. Similar to how it is in eve. Then (Give us notice as to when) drop the first one of these yearly respecs in the coming weeks after 1.3? How about that? Neural remaps are not respecs!
Neural remaps are given out once a year but only allow to change your attributes. Those have a (limited) impact on how fast certain types of skills can be trained. It has no effect on your current SP and provides no instantaneous change whatsoever.
Misleading comparison is misleading.
|
Soldiersaint
Deepspace Digital
295
|
Posted - 2013.07.23 20:12:00 -
[238] - Quote
Malkai Inos wrote:CommanderBolt wrote:Haha the list is growing. Maybe one way CCP could solve this all is have say one or two optional respecs a year or something. Similar to how it is in eve. Then (Give us notice as to when) drop the first one of these yearly respecs in the coming weeks after 1.3? How about that? Neural remaps are not respecs! Neural remaps are given out once a year but only allow to change your attributes. Those have a (limited) impact on how fast certain types of skills can be trained. It has no effect on your current SP and provides no instantaneous change whatsoever. Misleading comparison is misleading. Those who mislead us will be purged.... |
Pje251296
KILL ORDERS
87
|
Posted - 2013.07.23 20:14:00 -
[239] - Quote
I love the crying for respecs. Adapt to your situations and make do with what you have. |
Malkai Inos
Opus Arcana Covert Intervention
810
|
Posted - 2013.07.23 20:16:00 -
[240] - Quote
Soldiersaint wrote:Malkai Inos wrote:CommanderBolt wrote:Haha the list is growing. Maybe one way CCP could solve this all is have say one or two optional respecs a year or something. Similar to how it is in eve. Then (Give us notice as to when) drop the first one of these yearly respecs in the coming weeks after 1.3? How about that? Neural remaps are not respecs! Neural remaps are given out once a year but only allow to change your attributes. Those have a (limited) impact on how fast certain types of skills can be trained. It has no effect on your current SP and provides no instantaneous change whatsoever. Misleading comparison is misleading. Those who mislead us will be purged.... Then banish him from the list. You don't want to be associated with deceiving individuals. Have some integrity.
|
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 [8] 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |