Pages: 1 2 3 [4] :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |
Maken Tosch
Planetary Response Organization
2174
|
Posted - 2013.05.03 02:04:00 -
[91] - Quote
Again, it's all up to CCP to decide on that. |
NeoWraith Acedia
Fraternity of St. Venefice Amarr Empire
24
|
Posted - 2013.05.03 02:05:00 -
[92] - Quote
Parson Atreides wrote:Just as a matter of curiosity, I looked up the EULA for EVE, which cites the adherence to the Rules of Conduct. Number 23 is of particular interest, since, if Dust EULA is anything like EVE's, it means they are justifiably punishable. Quote:23. You may not exploit any bug in EVE Online to gain an unfair advantage over other players. You may not communicate the existence of any exploitable bug to others directly or through a public forum. Bugs should be reported through the bug reporting tool on our website. Except this isn't a bug, it's bad design choice |
Veiny Throbbing Joystick
Intara Direct Action Caldari State
33
|
Posted - 2013.05.03 02:07:00 -
[93] - Quote
Parson Atreides wrote:Maken Tosch wrote:Parson Atreides wrote:Maken Tosch wrote:Overall, what I'm trying to say here is that it's one thing to remove the AFK SP farming but it's another to try to retroactively remove the SP earned when none of the players who were farming were breaking any rules. Yes, I defend their actions by virtue of the fact that they can do whatever they want with the tools given to them. Yes, their actions cheapen our efforts for those of us who actually put forth effort and therefore this mechanic in which SP is earned for time played must be removed. But I will not stand silent to the fact that some people here want to remove the SP earned this way.
Since no rules were broken, there should be no punishment (in this case removing SP earned). Just simply take away the AFK-promoting mechanic and be done with it. I'm almost positive there was something we agreed to at some point (EULA maybe) that states we will not knowingly and willingly use exploits in the game. So rules were broken. Tears were shed. Now SP should be lost (and hopefully more tears will be shed). Fully endorse removing SP from AFK farmers. We'll just end this debate here right now and wait for CCP to make an official announcement on the matter. Just as a matter of curiosity, I looked up the EULA for EVE, which cites the adherence to the Rules of Conduct. Number 23 is of particular interest, since, if Dust EULA is anything like EVE's, it means they are justifiably punishable. 23. You may not exploit any bug in EVE Online to gain an unfair advantage over other players. You may not communicate the existence of any exploitable bug to others directly or through a public forum. Bugs should be reported through the bug reporting tool on our website. Was gonna post the same thing. Unfortunately in Dust's EULA there is no written rule specific to exploits. It looks like they are actually still writing it and it has very little things on the list.
But if the EVE code applies, afk farming should be an offence. |
Maken Tosch
Planetary Response Organization
2174
|
Posted - 2013.05.03 02:09:00 -
[94] - Quote
Veiny Throbbing Joystick wrote:But if the EVE code applies, afk farming should be an offence.
Key word. |
Veiny Throbbing Joystick
Intara Direct Action Caldari State
33
|
Posted - 2013.05.03 02:12:00 -
[95] - Quote
Actually, EVE codes DO NOT apply because this is a different game/product.
So it is really up to CCP to decide what to do.
I don't think the currently AFKing people are gonna be punished. |
Parson Atreides
Ahrendee Mercenaries
253
|
Posted - 2013.05.03 02:13:00 -
[96] - Quote
Maken Tosch wrote:Veiny Throbbing Joystick wrote:But if the EVE code applies, afk farming should be an offence. Key word.
It's already been proven it's an exploit. Whether we explicitly agreed not to advocate the use or use the exploits themselves is pointless right now.
You're so far beyond trying to defend this rationally it's insane. People were willfully and knowingly abusing an exploit and if any punishment is possible, it's clearly justified. |
|
CCP Frame
C C P C C P Alliance
765
|
Posted - 2013.05.03 02:21:00 -
[97] - Quote
We already have multiple threads on this issue, there is no need to create another one. |
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |