Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Iron Wolf Saber
BetaMax.
2962
|
Posted - 2013.03.03 22:34:00 -
[31] - Quote
Cerebral Wolf Jr wrote:Who the hell is Cpt Awesome anyway and why have i never heard of him?...
The guy who corralled me and others into the channel, I don't think he plays much though due to his job, however so far hes building a website and is doing a decent job of it and you can basically call him the founder and one of the more reserved voices of the group.
Captain Awesome is probably going to skin me for this since its a work in progress and not done.
http://cpm.neweden.co/ |
Iron Wolf Saber
BetaMax.
2962
|
Posted - 2013.03.03 22:35:00 -
[32] - Quote
Beld Errmon wrote:Heh the self appointed leaders of dust requirement to rule: know how to use IRC and slap people with trout. It all resembles a pack of old church hags getting together and electing a president of the decoration committee, oh I do hope Martha's roses are ready for Berthas funeral this saturday.... oh I know. Oh I know
Wait where having an election? since when? |
Iron Wolf Saber
BetaMax.
2962
|
Posted - 2013.03.03 22:37:00 -
[33] - Quote
Nova Knife wrote:I'm in this channel, but I don't consider myself a part of this. I'm just keeping an eye on things.
(Because I'm a total information monger)
Honestly? I think that the gun has been jumped on this thing time and again.
When you ask them why they are there and what they are doing, the 3-4 people directly involved will all give you completely different answers. As admirable as Ironwolf's efforts are to keep the forums up to speed.. There's really nothing to bring people up to speed with until you even know what your group is even about.
There's been a half dozen posts and threads mentioning the CPM before now, and pretty much all of them painted it in a completely different picture than the last.
I originally joined the channel because I was told the goal was to allow people who wanted to establish themselves in the community, to help them get known if they were to ever run for CSM or whatever and I was curious who'd show up even if I had my doubts about its success. (Also to log everything they say, because I'm an infomonger)
Later, it was being spread that the purpose was to actually eventually become the official CSM.
Also being said, was that is was just a place for serious talks without the usual banter/trolling of the standard IRC channel to give higher quality feedback.
I'm still not entirely convinced the people involved in this have agreed on what they're even doing, so IMO it's far too early to be making a post like this.
Probably because there is no leadership is the reason why its going 80 different directions. |
Mithridates VI
The Southern Legion
224
|
Posted - 2013.03.03 22:41:00 -
[34] - Quote
I find that naming yourselves after the CSM gives me an impression of feigned legitimacy which is hard to look past.
Your raison d'+Žtre appears to be "helping to establish an actual council in the future"; a goal which could be satisfied just as well without wearing the council costume or declaring yourselves pre-council.
Starting a thread to say "we've established a group but we can't agree on what our purpose is" suggests that you're doing things backwards. The correct order of activities is to find like-minded fellows who share your aims and THEN start a group...
Sustaining an organisation at the cost of that organisation's cause is already a trap which a group can fall into. This seems even more of a danger when that organisation exists for its own sake before it even has a cause. |
Iron Wolf Saber
BetaMax.
2962
|
Posted - 2013.03.03 22:45:00 -
[35] - Quote
Mithridates VI wrote:I find that naming yourselves after the CSM gives me an impression of feigned legitimacy which is hard to look past.
Your raison d'+Žtre appears to be "helping to establish an actual council in the future"; a goal which could be satisfied just as well without wearing the council costume or declaring yourselves pre-council.
Starting a thread to say "we've established a group but we can't agree on what our purpose is" suggests that you're doing things backwards. The correct order of activities is to find like-minded fellows who share your aims and THEN start a group...
Sustaining an organisation at the cost of that organisation's cause is already a trap which a group can fall into. This seems even more of a danger when that organisation exists for its own sake before it even has a cause.
Your right which is why the group is at a cross roads on trying to figure out what the hard set goals are and that was the big argument on Friday before end of session. |
Cerebral Wolf Jr
Immobile Infantry
764
|
Posted - 2013.03.03 22:51:00 -
[36] - Quote
Iron Wolf Saber wrote:Cerebral Wolf Jr wrote:Who the hell is Cpt Awesome anyway and why have i never heard of him?... The guy who corralled me and others into the channel, I don't think he plays much though due to his job, however so far hes building a website and is doing a decent job of it and you can basically call him the founder and one of the more reserved voices of the group. Captain Awesome is probably going to skin me for this since its a work in progress and not done. http://cpm.neweden.co/ I was already aware of the site but thanks for posting.
So you're saying that a nobody that never plays the game or posts on the forum and isn't known by anyone at all the in community outside of IRC is the person doing this? That's pretty :laffo: |
Kain Spero
Imperfects Negative-Feedback
1014
|
Posted - 2013.03.03 22:57:00 -
[37] - Quote
I don't think this can be made clear enough.
There is NO CPM until it has the support of CCP and then is elected by the players. Until then we just have people with their ideas that want to help the community. |
Dexter Peabody
Immobile Infantry
0
|
Posted - 2013.03.03 23:02:00 -
[38] - Quote
Best case scenario, this was an ill-thought out plan with the best intentions.
Worst case scenario, it's a blatant power-grab by a handful of anonymous players.
Here's a wonderful idea -- let CCP develop their game in their vision without interference. If CCP decides there is a time and a place for a group similar to the CSM, that's their call to make. Coming up with guidelines, rules, and suggestions for a group that, quite frankly, is irrelevant. I'll give the group the benefit of the doubt and say they do have the best intentions, but the idea is foolhardy and arrogant. |
Samahiel
Immobile Infantry
1
|
Posted - 2013.03.03 23:13:00 -
[39] - Quote
This idea is so premature that it didn't even make it past small talk over coffee.
Dust hasn't even finished the early stages of development as a game yet. We need massive improvements in corp management, and the state of the community before we're ready to start discussing sending a unified voice to CCP; And they would be foolish to listen to us.
Keep your trousers on and let the game get out of Beta first. |
Kain Spero
Imperfects Negative-Feedback
1015
|
Posted - 2013.03.03 23:18:00 -
[40] - Quote
Samahiel wrote:This idea is so premature that it didn't even make it past small talk over coffee.
Dust hasn't even finished the early stages of development as a game yet. We need massive improvements in corp management, and the state of the community before we're ready to start discussing sending a unified voice to CCP; And they would be foolish to listen to us.
Keep your trousers on and let the game get out of Beta first.
I understand where you are coming from, but Beta may end this summer.
I would rather be proactive then have a t20 incident occur to force the issue. The FPS community moves far to fast to survive something like that. |
|
Samahiel
Immobile Infantry
1
|
Posted - 2013.03.03 23:32:00 -
[41] - Quote
Kain Spero wrote: I understand where you are coming from, but Beta may end this summer.
I would rather be proactive then have a t20 incident occur to force the issue. The FPS community moves far to fast to survive something like that.
The biggest impediment to a new T20 was CCP's changes to the Internal Affairs division, not the introduction of the CSM. A better example would be the Jump Bridge nerf since that was the kind of sweeping game design mistakes we're worried about. And I'll remind you that happened at the instigation of an immature, unrepresentative, and unprepared CSM. |
Iron Wolf Saber
BetaMax.
2962
|
Posted - 2013.03.03 23:35:00 -
[42] - Quote
Samahiel wrote:Kain Spero wrote: I understand where you are coming from, but Beta may end this summer.
I would rather be proactive then have a t20 incident occur to force the issue. The FPS community moves far to fast to survive something like that.
The biggest impediment to a new T20 was CCP's changes to the Internal Affairs division, not the introduction of the CSM. A better example would be the Jump Bridge nerf since that was the kind of sweeping game design mistakes we're worried about. And I'll remind you that happened at the instigation of an immature, unrepresentative, and unprepared CSM.
Proof that a bad council can be just as bad as bad developer decisions. |
Dexter Peabody
Immobile Infantry
3
|
Posted - 2013.03.03 23:38:00 -
[43] - Quote
Kain Spero wrote:Samahiel wrote:This idea is so premature that it didn't even make it past small talk over coffee.
Dust hasn't even finished the early stages of development as a game yet. We need massive improvements in corp management, and the state of the community before we're ready to start discussing sending a unified voice to CCP; And they would be foolish to listen to us.
Keep your trousers on and let the game get out of Beta first. I understand where you are coming from, but Beta may end this summer. I would rather be proactive then have a t20 incident occur to force the issue. The FPS community moves far to fast to survive something like that. It's also not your call to make. While the original concept of the CSM was just a publicity stunt after a wave of bad press, the current version serves as a sounding board to give CCP feedback because they are limited to how far up they can go in the game. It's also why the guys who get heard the most are CEOs, FCs, and other specialized players. CCP doesn't need an advisory group to tell them how to frag nerds. What they need is time to develop the game within their vision; players yacking at them from the sideline just delays that.
|
Samahiel
Immobile Infantry
1
|
Posted - 2013.03.03 23:39:00 -
[44] - Quote
Iron Wolf Saber wrote:Samahiel wrote:Kain Spero wrote: I understand where you are coming from, but Beta may end this summer.
I would rather be proactive then have a t20 incident occur to force the issue. The FPS community moves far to fast to survive something like that.
The biggest impediment to a new T20 was CCP's changes to the Internal Affairs division, not the introduction of the CSM. A better example would be the Jump Bridge nerf since that was the kind of sweeping game design mistakes we're worried about. And I'll remind you that happened at the instigation of an immature, unrepresentative, and unprepared CSM. Proof that a bad council can be just as bad as bad developer decisions.
And this movement is laying the foundation for a bad council. Though I'm not terribly worried because CCP will ignore it for all the reasons my corpmate so eloquently stated above. |
Nova Knife
Seituoda Taskforce Command Caldari State
790
|
Posted - 2013.03.03 23:39:00 -
[45] - Quote
Kain Spero wrote:
I would rather be proactive then have a t20 incident occur to force the issue. The FPS community moves far to fast to survive something like that.
TBH, Another t20 issue wouldn't force anything. Contrary to what some people say... The Eve CSM isn't a watchdog organization. They're a crowdsourcing feedback method. The implication of the CSM as a watchdog agency is a token PR gesture at best in response to a situation they were not really prepared to deal with. The real watchdog is CCP Interal Affairs, who now perform audits on a regular basis of all employee's activity on their dev and personal characters.. Last I heard, they full on delete any personal characters of a CCP employee if it becomes known to players that they work for CCP. (Though I'm not certain of that)
Something like t20 simply could not happen, and even if it did, CCP has systems in place to make it a relative nonissue aside from the relatively brief forum drama during which CCP says "Yeah some stuff happened, and we took action and removed all assets/gains related to whatever it was that happened, and are looking into further actions if necessary"
A stakeholder isn't meant to be a watchdog, it's meant to be a party with a direct interest in the success of a product. Implying the need for a watchdog essentially implies that CCP needs to be (or is vulnerable to being) bullied into action. |
Iron Wolf Saber
BetaMax.
2963
|
Posted - 2013.03.04 00:01:00 -
[46] - Quote
Nova Knife wrote:Kain Spero wrote:
I would rather be proactive then have a t20 incident occur to force the issue. The FPS community moves far to fast to survive something like that.
TBH, Another t20 issue wouldn't force anything. Contrary to what some people say... The Eve CSM isn't a watchdog organization. They're a crowdsourcing feedback method. The implication of the CSM as a watchdog agency is a token PR gesture at best in response to a situation they were not really prepared to deal with. The real watchdog is CCP Interal Affairs, who now perform audits on a regular basis of all employee's activity on their dev and personal characters.. Last I heard, they full on delete any personal characters of a CCP employee if it becomes known to players that they work for CCP. (Though I'm not certain of that) Something like t20 simply could not happen, and even if it did, CCP has systems in place to make it a relative nonissue aside from the relatively brief forum drama during which CCP says "Yeah some stuff happened, and we took action and removed all assets/gains related to whatever it was that happened, and are looking into further actions if necessary" A stakeholder isn't meant to be a watchdog, it's meant to be a party with a direct interest in the success of a product. Implying the need for a watchdog essentially implies that CCP needs to be (or is vulnerable to being) bullied into action.
Hence the IA laser sniper kill team jokes ccp makes in irc. |
Cerebral Wolf Jr
Immobile Infantry
770
|
Posted - 2013.03.04 12:54:00 -
[47] - Quote
Cpt awesome needs to come to this thread and explain his actions to the community if he's the instigator behind all this.
Where are you cpt awesome? Why the silence? Come and answer my questions. |
Iron Wolf Saber
BetaMax.
2966
|
Posted - 2013.03.04 13:31:00 -
[48] - Quote
Cerebral Wolf Jr wrote:Cpt awesome needs to come to this thread and explain his actions to the community if he's the instigator behind all this.
Where are you cpt awesome? Why the silence? Come and answer my questions.
Ill drag him in here, hes not on during the weekends. |
Laurent Cazaderon
Villore Sec Ops Gallente Federation
1169
|
Posted - 2013.03.04 15:01:00 -
[49] - Quote
CPM is both from IRC and an ego fest and i wasnt invited in ?
Jerks ! |
trollface dot jpg
Destined 4 Biomass
41
|
Posted - 2013.03.04 20:18:00 -
[50] - Quote
Iron Wolf Saber wrote:Cerebral Wolf Jr wrote:That's just utter bollocks. Even if there's more of us than EVE players if there's only a single seat or even 3 for Dust players we won't out number them or whatever, there won't ever be a situation where there's more Dust voices on the CSM than EVE, that's just silly and the actual chances of that are tiny.
Especially with the new STV system!
Not to mention what i posted in Hunter Blakes thread about their only being a very small percentage of the community that will be able to vote Dust side assuming you have to pay for the privilege let along an even smaller percentage of the community that gives a **** about the politics and what goes on forumside/metagaming. Yeah the previous voter turnouts for the CSM say anything only 10% seem to care about it at all. Most feel that its a useless organization. There is of course the large number of alts that could suck with the population amount though however if one votes usually all the alts vote. Simply elect our own council, give them equal status with the Eve council, and make the two councils work together on issues that concern both games. Then we'll have ourselves a REAL $#!^storm to deal with. |
|
Iron Wolf Saber
BetaMax.
2966
|
Posted - 2013.03.04 21:38:00 -
[51] - Quote
Samahiel wrote:Iron Wolf Saber wrote:Samahiel wrote:Kain Spero wrote: I understand where you are coming from, but Beta may end this summer.
I would rather be proactive then have a t20 incident occur to force the issue. The FPS community moves far to fast to survive something like that.
The biggest impediment to a new T20 was CCP's changes to the Internal Affairs division, not the introduction of the CSM. A better example would be the Jump Bridge nerf since that was the kind of sweeping game design mistakes we're worried about. And I'll remind you that happened at the instigation of an immature, unrepresentative, and unprepared CSM. Proof that a bad council can be just as bad as bad developer decisions. And this movement is laying the foundation for a bad council. Though I'm not terribly worried because CCP will ignore it for all the reasons my corpmate so eloquently stated above.
Problem is that this is the fifth time a group like this has risen from the ashes of the last one. This is going to be one stubborn phoenix and its light is not going to be stomped out that easily. Ruffling and plucking off the feathers likely but I highly doubt that a total failure of the entire group's agenda is going to be possible. |
Iron Wolf Saber
BetaMax.
2966
|
Posted - 2013.03.04 21:38:00 -
[52] - Quote
Laurent Cazaderon wrote:CPM is both from IRC and an ego fest and i wasnt invited in ? Jerks !
you're invited :D Everyone's officially invited! |
Mithridates VI
The Southern Legion
234
|
Posted - 2013.03.04 21:44:00 -
[53] - Quote
Iron Wolf Saber wrote:he entire group's agenda
The entire group seems to disagree on whether it even exists and, if it does, what its agenda is. |
Iron Wolf Saber
BetaMax.
2966
|
Posted - 2013.03.04 22:18:00 -
[54] - Quote
Mithridates VI wrote:Iron Wolf Saber wrote:he entire group's agenda The entire group seems to disagree on whether it even exists and, if it does, what its agenda is.
That's true too. |
Free Beers
Internal Error. Negative-Feedback
1142
|
Posted - 2013.03.04 22:44:00 -
[55] - Quote
agenda is to make rules so they can get elected.
/thread |
Mithridates VI
The Southern Legion
237
|
Posted - 2013.03.04 22:59:00 -
[56] - Quote
Iron Wolf Saber wrote:Mithridates VI wrote:Iron Wolf Saber wrote:he entire group's agenda The entire group seems to disagree on whether it even exists and, if it does, what its agenda is. That's true too.
That's bordering on Kafkaesque.
ETA SUGGESTION! We'll establish a committee to determine the legitimacy of all committees heretofore and henceforth. |
Captain-Awesome
Internal Error. Negative-Feedback
351
|
Posted - 2013.03.05 17:47:00 -
[57] - Quote
Cerebral Wolf Jr wrote:Cpt awesome needs to come to this thread and explain his actions to the community if he's the instigator behind all this.
Where are you cpt awesome? Why the silence? Come and answer my questions.
hi cerebral, I'll post in about 15 mins (working at the moment :) but I'll be as helpful as I can.
but er - you guys I do play quite a bit.... I mean, 2am is pretty late to play dust when you have work at 9:30 the following day - come on now. |
Captain-Awesome
Internal Error. Negative-Feedback
351
|
Posted - 2013.03.05 18:04:00 -
[58] - Quote
ok I'm here, I'm also on IRC if you would rather talk there, but I assume here so everyone sees?
what would you like to know? |
Free Beers
Internal Error. Negative-Feedback
1147
|
Posted - 2013.03.05 18:38:00 -
[59] - Quote
Captain-Awesome wrote:ok I'm here, I'm also on IRC if you would rather talk there, but I assume here so everyone sees?
what would you like to know?
edit - still here (and on irc)
Post on the forums what you have to say. Stop being an irc elitest.
Though I think this thread is over because the who cpm0/1 it bullshit and a waste of time.
/thread |
Captain-Awesome
Internal Error. Negative-Feedback
351
|
Posted - 2013.03.05 19:49:00 -
[60] - Quote
note: if too long, just read the bold lines :)
thought you'd say that so here I go :)
this is going to be a tldr post so, sorry people well much like the cpm, I don't have anything to say (contrary to the reems of text below ;) )... I agree with what the majority here have said:
1. a cpm is far too soon It most certainly is! I created the channel back when zionshad and a couple others wanted to run for csm... I figured they would use the channel for some sort of Q&A thing :) ... after seeing a couple of people show their enthusiasm for the game, show a willingness to help (in their own eyes) only to get shot down by the forum in a way it would scare anyone from trying... I decided that I would offer my services to anyone who wanted to do anything. in this forum post.
I completely agree, finding, electing and putting someone in post is by far much too soon. Nobody in this game is ready to run, nobody in this game is ready to accept, and nobody on both sides knows what they would even do!
but this doesn't mean I can't help those who want to help have a platform to stand up and show their support. Beers wants to complain about something, Kain wants to do something Ironwolf wants to pass on community ideas
but all we have are forums, irc and in game chat. the forums you get flamed, irc is unconstructive and forgotten, and in game chat is just inappropriate. but I digress and will come to this later.
2. the community doesn't trust itself to elect a panel it would be happy with (not a community issue) It definitely doesn't and why should it!? EVE has the mindset: "trust no-one" and as a lot of eve players have come across, so has the mindset. But nobody is there hoping a cpm is built by the next weekend. We know it's going to take months to years before the community can believe in the idea let alone an actual panel, then there's the evolution of the cpm and the community to boot.
This strengthens point 1, but with time, planning, structure, the community can believe in a solid idea that it created for itself. It'll take a long, long time, but it's possible and that's what's important - whether it's official, unofficial, tied to ccp or not, the fact that it is there to give the community a better meta game, is more than enough for it's existence to start being built now. (I'll speak about why I mentioned meta game later.)
3. nobody can decide on what the cpm is for That is how early into the process it really is, and more reason for us to call out to the forum to talk about it - nobody is saying you MUST be on IRC, heck the forums are linked on the site for a reason! :) IRC is good for instant discussions only - if you have a sudden idea and need instant answers, we still need to post those IRC logs at the end of every week to the website, to the forums so people can read and talk about them, but we haven't even started doing that (until today) because we are still in that stage of setting up shop.
At the moment we are making a brief, to explain to the community everything about this idea, so when people ask "what's the cpm?" people don't say "a bunch of selfish kids who want to be something" they say "a bunch of players we elected from the community to help improve the game, here's some more info", this alone will take months as we gather everybodies opinions
4. the cpm seems like a rushed idea I'm trying to make this go as slow as possible. Building the website takes some time for me and this is just the filler site until the real one is ready, the chat room is mainly where the problem lies as people get ahead of themselves, decide to change something not easily changeable (change the name is a common one).
But I think the most damage is coming from people with different ideas on what the CPM should actually do... not only does it create confusion for the community, it also makes us have to reiterate what the community are there to do ontop of making more work for us to convince the rest of the community to help, I'm hoping that as we build this brief, it will help clear a lot of confusion and for those for and against it - but I wouldn't be surprised if it takes more than a google doc to change the minds of many!
5. public opinion of it is that it's a bunch of people that want a cool kids club I think if that ever happens to be true, it will fail. I never want(ed) this to be for a minority, it would never work, serve no purpose and be general fail. I suppose you could say it's one of the reasons I'm glad the IRC channel is there because those who oppose the idea are there to keep those who are for the idea on the ground. Everyone there agrees, another form of communication with ccp would be nice, but that's not what I want the cpm to be for.
My idea of a council of representatives is meta game. This community, the website, the irc chats - all meta game. I enjoy seeing the discussions unfold, ideas being generated, when I first heard of the eve csm I was told "it's a council of elected players who represent the community" - I love that idea and think it adds a whole new dimension to the meta game. What does meta game have to do with CCP? absolutely nothing. So I don't see why people both for and against it make a fuss about something that isn't even the primary goal
,more to come >.<
also caz, I said in the channel we need a french man! ^_^ |
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |