|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Dexter Peabody
Immobile Infantry
0
   |
Posted - 2013.03.03 20:18:00 -
[1] - Quote
Regardless of the intentions, anything resembling an advisory board should only be created by CCP when they feel the time is appropriate, if at all. If CCP felt that such an organization was necessary at this time, there already be one.
edit: whoops, put in an extra word |
Dexter Peabody
Immobile Infantry
0
|
Posted - 2013.03.03 23:02:00 -
[2] - Quote
Best case scenario, this was an ill-thought out plan with the best intentions.
Worst case scenario, it's a blatant power-grab by a handful of anonymous players.
Here's a wonderful idea -- let CCP develop their game in their vision without interference. If CCP decides there is a time and a place for a group similar to the CSM, that's their call to make. Coming up with guidelines, rules, and suggestions for a group that, quite frankly, is irrelevant. I'll give the group the benefit of the doubt and say they do have the best intentions, but the idea is foolhardy and arrogant. |
Dexter Peabody
Immobile Infantry
3
|
Posted - 2013.03.03 23:38:00 -
[3] - Quote
Kain Spero wrote:Samahiel wrote:This idea is so premature that it didn't even make it past small talk over coffee.
Dust hasn't even finished the early stages of development as a game yet. We need massive improvements in corp management, and the state of the community before we're ready to start discussing sending a unified voice to CCP; And they would be foolish to listen to us.
Keep your trousers on and let the game get out of Beta first. I understand where you are coming from, but Beta may end this summer. I would rather be proactive then have a t20 incident occur to force the issue. The FPS community moves far to fast to survive something like that. It's also not your call to make. While the original concept of the CSM was just a publicity stunt after a wave of bad press, the current version serves as a sounding board to give CCP feedback because they are limited to how far up they can go in the game. It's also why the guys who get heard the most are CEOs, FCs, and other specialized players. CCP doesn't need an advisory group to tell them how to frag nerds. What they need is time to develop the game within their vision; players yacking at them from the sideline just delays that.
|
|
|
| |
|