Pages: 1 [2] 3 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
fenrir storm
Tronhadar Free Guard Minmatar Republic
314
|
Posted - 2012.12.31 00:49:00 -
[31] - Quote
Iron Wolf Saber wrote:fenrir storm wrote:Shiro Mokuzan wrote:Does anyone else out there not want DUST to be a "competitive shooter"?
I don't mean I don't want competition; I mean I don't want this to forego fun gameplay to make it appeal to the "competitive" crowd who wants everything to be perfectly balanced and fair. I've run into these people in other games and they basically seem to want to suck the fun out of everything to make it "competitive".
So if it comes to a choice between RPG elements and consistency with the EVE universe over "competitive" suitability, I'd prefer the former any day.
Also in before "you don't like competition just because you suck so bad at this game". I can already see it coming. Dunno what to say as you have 2 distinct audiences, you have the eve crowd who want every thing as complex and unforgiveing as possible. Then you have the fps crowd who want a fun and fluid balanced shooter and ccp cant decide which camp they are in and niether crowd is willing to give an inch hence the game cant decide what it is I have to agree this is the largest source of problems perceived generating. But when FPS shooters say I want customized guns I want perks and the sorts they stepping towards that level of complexity anyways. Its a bit oxymoronous.
A lack of being able to level adds to the problem for many as in you start at level1 you can skill into such and such, you reach level 4 then that opens a couple more skills what we have is you can do what you want and it dosnt seem as if you are progressing that much even though you are.
Most rpgs you level every so many points and are given a choice in dust you just get the choice and thats a bit alien, in most fps's you level and open new guns your not given the freedom to dump what you earn into one skill and open up all guns as fast as you want at the expense of armour, shields , plus numorous other options.
It's the difference in game style the eve crowd are used to having coplete freedom , most fp's gamers are drip fed there choices |
fenrir storm
Tronhadar Free Guard Minmatar Republic
314
|
Posted - 2012.12.31 00:51:00 -
[32] - Quote
Telcontar Dunedain wrote:fenrir storm wrote:Shiro Mokuzan wrote:Does anyone else out there not want DUST to be a "competitive shooter"?
I don't mean I don't want competition; I mean I don't want this to forego fun gameplay to make it appeal to the "competitive" crowd who wants everything to be perfectly balanced and fair. I've run into these people in other games and they basically seem to want to suck the fun out of everything to make it "competitive".
So if it comes to a choice between RPG elements and consistency with the EVE universe over "competitive" suitability, I'd prefer the former any day.
Also in before "you don't like competition just because you suck so bad at this game". I can already see it coming. Dunno what to say as you have 2 distinct audiences, you have the eve crowd who want every thing as complex and unforgiveing as possible. Then you have the fps crowd who want a fun and fluid balanced shooter and ccp cant decide which camp they are in and niether crowd is willing to give an inch hence the game cant decide what it is You are both wrong. I won't speak for all of the Imperfects but very many of them want MORE rpg not less. Very few of them support the amount of nerfing this game has experienced.
According to you |
Iron Wolf Saber
BetaMax.
2866
|
Posted - 2012.12.31 00:57:00 -
[33] - Quote
well call of duty black ops 2 has it already in the choose your level unlock, which is why is an example close to dust 514s you get skill points nad you spend it on how you decide to gorw your character. |
Telcontar Dunedain
Imperfects Negative-Feedback
328
|
Posted - 2012.12.31 00:58:00 -
[34] - Quote
fenrir storm wrote:Telcontar Dunedain wrote:fenrir storm wrote:Shiro Mokuzan wrote:Does anyone else out there not want DUST to be a "competitive shooter"?
I don't mean I don't want competition; I mean I don't want this to forego fun gameplay to make it appeal to the "competitive" crowd who wants everything to be perfectly balanced and fair. I've run into these people in other games and they basically seem to want to suck the fun out of everything to make it "competitive".
So if it comes to a choice between RPG elements and consistency with the EVE universe over "competitive" suitability, I'd prefer the former any day.
Also in before "you don't like competition just because you suck so bad at this game". I can already see it coming. Dunno what to say as you have 2 distinct audiences, you have the eve crowd who want every thing as complex and unforgiveing as possible. Then you have the fps crowd who want a fun and fluid balanced shooter and ccp cant decide which camp they are in and niether crowd is willing to give an inch hence the game cant decide what it is You are both wrong. I won't speak for all of the Imperfects but very many of them want MORE rpg not less. Very few of them support the amount of nerfing this game has experienced. According to you
yes |
fenrir storm
Tronhadar Free Guard Minmatar Republic
314
|
Posted - 2012.12.31 01:05:00 -
[35] - Quote
Iron Wolf Saber wrote:well call of duty black ops 2 has it already in the choose your level unlock, which is why is an example close to dust 514s you get skill points nad you spend it on how you decide to gorw your character.
Cant say never played the game , but you have to see where I am coming from in that most fps's to date your choice is limited by your level and not left wide open for you.
Not saying either is bad just that it's a bit strange for an fps. |
Iron Wolf Saber
BetaMax.
2866
|
Posted - 2012.12.31 01:06:00 -
[36] - Quote
The critical part about needing the RPG portion is to make it more unique away from the other lobby shooters that do populate many of the console platform.
The faster we get to conquest mode or even faction warfare mode the more we separate ourselves from standard multiplayer shooter to mmo shooter. |
MItt R0mney
Doomheim
58
|
Posted - 2012.12.31 01:06:00 -
[37] - Quote
Iron Wolf Saber wrote:well call of duty black ops 2 has it already in the choose your level unlock, which is why is an example close to dust 514s you get skill points nad you spend it on how you decide to gorw your character.
Are you drunk?
jk. |
HECATONCHIRES GYGES
Villore Sec Ops Gallente Federation
151
|
Posted - 2012.12.31 01:06:00 -
[38] - Quote
Iron Wolf Saber wrote:Dust 514 was this grand idea to marry MMO, FPS, RPG, and RTS elements together.
While MMO department is a road map that will take another two or more years to fully qualify in, nearly the same time as RTS elements are also thrown in as well which leaves us with the RPG and FPS elements to deal with.
Now we are at a strange cross roads where competitive shooter is on one hand and RPG elements are on the other.
Elements from one wouldn't do well in the ensuing child in this marriage. While some games have done a wonderful job of the marriage in a multiplier verses environment it can be sometimes frustration where skill beats exp points or vice versa.
Dust however has special catering to emphasize the bold, the smart, the skillful or deceitful because that is the environment eve online calls for so hand holding is out of the question as well as various other factors from either side of this marriage.
Bad elements to take from an RPG for the Dust 514 environment would be like
FPS players don't want Dice Roll to Hit - would be extremely bad case of hand holding and breaks the realism entire skill of the player aspect entirely.
Where as RPG players don't want Lack of Progression in Gear/Character Power - it sort of kills the entire reason to develop and build the characters up.
However as it stands right now FPS shooters are crying over Proto-gear 'ROFL stomping pubs'. Or how new players 'Don't have a chance.' Or having 'widely varied gear levels =/= competitive shooter.'
Previously many builds ago, I once envied Prototype gear. Not only did I fear it, I wanted one myself. I was invigorated to work my skill sets up to get not only prototype level but making sure I got the best bang for the buck once I got there. I was literally excited over gaining power with every module's access level unlocked to me. I was even more exciting getting better with making cheaper fits with various meta levels to be in budget of the battle. Get better being on the field and earning my keep and not burdening my losses entirely on my limited budget earnings. Even more I was excited for the future of dust 514. Having the entire war play out like a real one would, With logistics (as in making sure I have a body at the front lines to fight with) structure, intel structure, and combined navy/army command structure.
Now a days I see someone in prototype gear and scoff down them as if they were milita scrubs with my milita AR, to be honest I never notice any difference in how fast they die, I haven't been killed by a prototype weapon in weeks, and lately it sees more people are down shifting from the Advanced level gear and back to basic gear. I have no longer the desire to goto prototype level for the simple fact that its no longer a REWARD but inversely its a PUNISHMENT.
While HP suit flattening was a good thing in 'leveling the playing field' as prototype gear from that era could have been made 'invincible' from those not strong enough to break the tank. However weapon flattening (where as weapon curving did not happen) has made this game nearly undesirable progression in gear beyond metalevel 1/0.
We need to put in the fear of high level gear again, maybe not as bad as it was during E3 and Uprising builds,
For those of you arguing against multiple gear levels crimping competition style. You need to look at the Eve Online Open which was a seriously highly unrestricted competition in eve online for 10,000 USD in prizes. Many teams not only signed up but got Eve online Corporate or Allaince SPONSORS to help pay for their ship equipment and despite sponsorship the best gear in the game did not save many of these teams or their ships they've lost during the tournament. I mean how much more competitive can you get when you and your corp becomes an in game franchise or something? Teams in the real world have such sponsors and ownership why cant a virtual one be similar? where wallets are thrown in to help promote and ensure success of a team?
I do not want to see this game resorting to 'Super Master Chief Sargent Chief Master of the Army" ranking system for the only RPG element where achieving max level awarded you the most lamest but most recognized and gold plated gun in the game ever.
I want to choose how I grow, How I develop, how I get better in gear, exp, and skills, that's the RPG elements I need to have in Dust 514 while maintaining player skill over-coming all factors.
While Dust 514 is in its early stages this is one of the things that made dust 514 interesting with what little it did have.
Maybe one day well return back to that point when more gear, such as tech 2 and tech 3 come out. do we get the sense of progression again. but I rather have it sooner than later. Plus 1 Wolf .I agree with you bud but ...dont get amnesia CODEX was .....bad.Retribution or the build before CODEX what ever the hell its name was....I would play 2 matches and it would freeze....it was so bad with bugs I thought it was gonna brick my PS3.Chromosome is way better the game isnt clipping,hardly lagging,it feels more fluid there working on your characters movement let them fix the FPS aspects of the game....I dont want to be losing Proto gear because of rubber banding lag spike when Im running a PVE mission against drones......
|
Elijah Sol' Dzusaki
Onward Defrosted Tuna Team
485
|
Posted - 2012.12.31 01:07:00 -
[39] - Quote
Again do you people realize that you can edit quotes to make them smaller and more specific to what you are replying to?
It would be so much easier to read this forum if people would do this one simple thing. |
HECATONCHIRES GYGES
Villore Sec Ops Gallente Federation
151
|
Posted - 2012.12.31 01:09:00 -
[40] - Quote
Iron Wolf Saber wrote:The critical part about needing the RPG portion is to make it more unique away from the other lobby shooters that do populate many of the console platform.
The faster we get to conquest mode or even faction warfare mode the more we separate ourselves from standard multiplayer shooter to mmo shooter. This plus1 |
|
Iron Wolf Saber
BetaMax.
2866
|
Posted - 2012.12.31 01:09:00 -
[41] - Quote
fenrir storm wrote:Iron Wolf Saber wrote:well call of duty black ops 2 has it already in the choose your level unlock, which is why is an example close to dust 514s you get skill points nad you spend it on how you decide to gorw your character. Cant say never played the game , but you have to see where I am coming from in that most fps's to date your choice is limited by your level and not left wide open for you. Not saying either is bad just that it's a bit strange for an fps.
Well halo 4 has a similar feature but the points awarded are a bit... well at random levels none the less its up to the player to pick or choose how they want to develop 'their spartan' however with halo the game is extremely flat (although fun the game is a well good mix) where as black ops 2 is more closer to dust 514's with extremism (ie designing a suit towards one sole purpose and getting very good at it) and chances are this is going to be very standard FPS feature in the future. Dust 514's skill per unlock progression is no longer a unique concept. What makes ours still unique that our skills will eventually induce or already has induced bonuses for skilling them up. |
Iron Wolf Saber
BetaMax.
2866
|
Posted - 2012.12.31 01:12:00 -
[42] - Quote
HECATONCHIRES GYGES wrote: Plus 1 Wolf .I agree with you bud but ...dont get amnesia CODEX was .....bad.Retribution or the build before CODEX what ever the hell its name was....I would play 2 matches and it would freeze....it was so bad with bugs I thought it was gonna brick my PS3.Chromosome is way better the game isnt clipping,hardly lagging,it feels more fluid there working on your characters movement let them fix the FPS aspects of the game....I dont want to be losing Proto gear because of rubber banding lag spike when Im running a PVE mission against drones......
I whole hear-tingly agree that current build is so much more stable and on no factor am going to disagree. Just item stats are a bit... interesting now verses back when.
I have yet to crash this build. That has been very extremely good news so far.
Now with aim fixed and gunplay improved can you imagine how much higher my kdr has gone up when I am not adjusting or screwing around with testing? <^-^> |
fenrir storm
Tronhadar Free Guard Minmatar Republic
314
|
Posted - 2012.12.31 01:13:00 -
[43] - Quote
Iron Wolf Saber wrote:The critical part about needing the RPG portion is to make it more unique away from the other lobby shooters that do populate many of the console platform.
The faster we get to conquest mode or even faction warfare mode the more we separate ourselves from standard multiplayer shooter to mmo shooter.
And there lies the problem you risk alienating the fps crowd who are used to how things are done mainstream, you end up running the risk that this will turn into a niche game that only a few will want to invest time in.
As i said previously you have 2 different crowds how you pull them together and keep both happy is 1 big head ache.
If this was a pc game I could see it working but on console ccp have there work cut out for them |
Iron Wolf Saber
BetaMax.
2866
|
Posted - 2012.12.31 01:20:00 -
[44] - Quote
fenrir storm wrote:Iron Wolf Saber wrote:The critical part about needing the RPG portion is to make it more unique away from the other lobby shooters that do populate many of the console platform.
The faster we get to conquest mode or even faction warfare mode the more we separate ourselves from standard multiplayer shooter to mmo shooter. And there lies the problem you risk alienating the fps crowd who are used to how things are done mainstream, you end up running the risk that this will turn into a niche game that only a few will want to invest time in. As i said previously you have 2 different crowds how you pull them together and keep both happy is 1 big head ache. If this was a pc game I could see it working but on console ccp have there work cut out for them
Eve Online alienates a lot of mmo players too. to the point we ruin MMO for most people who decide to play it a bit longer.
Dust 514 is going places no shooter wants to go.
We will be having matches in the future that will have impact, and a resounding, resonating, effect that will alter course the history of not just one game but TWO games.
To go back to status quo of play a match and have a match mean nothing is what gets just about every other shooter wanna-be out there killed these days.
FPS genre is getting old with annual releases of games now to the point is becoming the same regurgitated crud from last year no wonder why you guys are so happy to shovel out 60 -120 bucks a year for the newest battlefield and call of duty.
Dust 514 is supposed to be a first person war game. War. Not a battle but an entire sci-fi war simulator.
Dust 514 is not designed to compete against call of duty or battlefield. Its designed to create a new environment where a shooter player can step in, and be something more than a nameless soldier, and when you like it or not, characters are likely going to be forced to join up in these 'epic crusades' just to remain 'competitive' because after all when a faction showers their side with Army Gear instead of civilian try-hard gear we are all currently using players may want a piece of that. and from there you are going to start picking sides.
Imagine playing nuketown in one match, you lose and the nuke goes off. Next time you go there everyone has to be in rad suits because the place is a pile of ashes. |
fenrir storm
Tronhadar Free Guard Minmatar Republic
314
|
Posted - 2012.12.31 01:33:00 -
[45] - Quote
Iron Wolf Saber wrote:fenrir storm wrote:Iron Wolf Saber wrote:The critical part about needing the RPG portion is to make it more unique away from the other lobby shooters that do populate many of the console platform.
The faster we get to conquest mode or even faction warfare mode the more we separate ourselves from standard multiplayer shooter to mmo shooter. And there lies the problem you risk alienating the fps crowd who are used to how things are done mainstream, you end up running the risk that this will turn into a niche game that only a few will want to invest time in. As i said previously you have 2 different crowds how you pull them together and keep both happy is 1 big head ache. If this was a pc game I could see it working but on console ccp have there work cut out for them Eve Online alienates a lot of mmo players too. to the point we ruin MMO for most people who decide to play it a bit longer. Dust 514 is going places no shooter wants to go. We will be having matches in the future that will have impact, and a resounding, resonating, effect that will alter course the history of not just one game but TWO games. To go back to status quo of play a match and have a match mean nothing is what gets just about every other shooter wanna-be out there killed these days. FPS genre is getting old with annual releases of games now to the point is becoming the same regurgitated crud from last year no wonder why you guys are so happy to shovel out 60 -120 bucks a year for the newest battlefield and call of duty. Dust 514 is supposed to be a first person war game. War. Not a battle but an entire sci-fi war simulator. Dust 514 is not designed to compete against call of duty or battlefield. Its designed to create a new environment where a shooter player can step in, and be something more than a nameless soldier, and when you like it or not, characters are likely going to be forced to join up in these 'epic crusades' just to remain 'competitive' because after all when a faction showers their side with Army Gear instead of civilian try-hard gear we are all currently using players may want a piece of that. and from there you are going to start picking sides. Imagine playing nuketown in one match, you lose and the nuke goes off. Next time you go there everyone has to be in rad suits because the place is a pile of ashes.
I aint argueing with you just stating what I know .
But you have to ask yourself is the average console fps player ready for this or are they happy with the staus quo.
And as it's an fps it is going to have to go head to head against Bf , cod and the other fps out there wether it's designed to or not |
Iron Wolf Saber
BetaMax.
2866
|
Posted - 2012.12.31 01:39:00 -
[46] - Quote
I wouldn't want an average FPS player in my battalion, I want people who know how to adapt or die trying. |
Telcontar Dunedain
Imperfects Negative-Feedback
328
|
Posted - 2012.12.31 01:44:00 -
[47] - Quote
Iron Wolf Saber wrote:I wouldn't want an average FPS player in my battalion, I want people who know how to adapt or die trying.
Pretty much this.
Though I extend this to not want average FPS players to even want to play games I play.
To attract those players the game will have to compromise itself so far that it wouldn't be a fun game for me and players like me. |
Iron Wolf Saber
BetaMax.
2866
|
Posted - 2012.12.31 01:45:00 -
[48] - Quote
Essentially I want Dust players in the end. I don't care for their backgrounds as much as where they are heading to. |
fenrir storm
Tronhadar Free Guard Minmatar Republic
314
|
Posted - 2012.12.31 01:47:00 -
[49] - Quote
Iron Wolf Saber wrote:I wouldn't want an average FPS player in my battalion, I want people who know how to adapt or die trying.
And there fore you alienate a large portion of the market you want to capture.
Any way was nice to have a good discussion for a change but I doubt I'll be here for much longer as it just not hitting the spot these last 2 builds. |
Telcontar Dunedain
Imperfects Negative-Feedback
328
|
Posted - 2012.12.31 01:47:00 -
[50] - Quote
fenrir storm wrote: And as it's an fps it is going to have to go head to head against Bf , cod and the other fps out there wether it's designed to or not
This is a very incorrect statement.
If it provides something unique there is no need to compete directly.
It could even have measurable worse graphics (though probably would still need -tight- fps play).
Seeking to compete directly will ruin this game. |
|
fenrir storm
Tronhadar Free Guard Minmatar Republic
314
|
Posted - 2012.12.31 01:56:00 -
[51] - Quote
Telcontar Dunedain wrote:fenrir storm wrote: And as it's an fps it is going to have to go head to head against Bf , cod and the other fps out there wether it's designed to or not
This is a very incorrect statement. If it provides something unique there is no need to compete directly. It could even have measurable worse graphics (though probably would still need -tight- fps play). Seeking to compete directly will ruin this game.
Wether you like it or not these are the games it's up against as it's firstly an fps. |
Telcontar Dunedain
Imperfects Negative-Feedback
328
|
Posted - 2012.12.31 02:01:00 -
[52] - Quote
fenrir storm wrote:Telcontar Dunedain wrote:fenrir storm wrote: And as it's an fps it is going to have to go head to head against Bf , cod and the other fps out there wether it's designed to or not
This is a very incorrect statement. If it provides something unique there is no need to compete directly. It could even have measurable worse graphics (though probably would still need -tight- fps play). Seeking to compete directly will ruin this game. Wether you like it or not these are the games it's up against as it's firstly an fps.
I think you should learn about a few more FPS games if you think Battlefield and COD are the only ones out there.
Lots of different FPS (especially on the PC) that cater to different groups of players.
They don't try to pull the 10m players out of BF or COD by just being another version of BF or COD. |
Iron Wolf Saber
BetaMax.
2866
|
Posted - 2012.12.31 02:27:00 -
[53] - Quote
FPS games I've played.
Metro Arma Ghost Recon 1, 2, FW Rainbow Six America's Army Global Agenda Doom 1 2 and 3 Wolfenstien 3D (not 1 and 2 they where platformers) Spear of Destiny, and the 2002 release of wolfenstien? COD 1, BR1, COD 2, COD 3, COD 4 MW1, COD WAW, MW2, BLOPs, MW3, BLOPs2 Battlefield 1942, 2142, 2, 3 (I have been permanently banned from this game series btw) Painkiller Hexen Decent 1, 2, 3 Halo 1, 2, 3, 4, ODST Team Fortress 2 Portal 1,2 Half Life 2, + ep 1 & 2 Quake II, III Medal of Honor Counter-strike UT 2001, 2002 and UT 2004?(the one with campaign mode and story explaining how they can die and re spawn) Planet Side 1 and 2
List goes on and if you want an extremely long list I can give you a **** list on every game here. Why that game sucked and what that game could have done better.
There has not been any successful FPS has managed to be mainstay by copying another shooter entirely in formula, story or theory of approach to appeal. Dust 514 needs to focus on its goals on being Dust 514, this is not counter strike, not battlefield not halo or call of duty.
It needs to only provide more than enough familiarity that any player from any of the mentioned shooters above can step into this game board and have a good idea how to start running and gunning into a better position. This game could be 'dumbed' much further but I am afraid if that is done then not only gear gets negated but player's own skills get negated entirely. People still complain about the AR despite having Ironsights on them, range reduced, damaged decreased, all because they probably don't know how to shoot the damn things.
Thus the gearing RPG element needs to be in and significant enough to be felt, awed, and inspiring to keep players around in this generation of Effort = Reward and Gratification. It shouldn't be there to the point where best in slot = iwin but it needs to be strong enough to make the wearer say "I am such as a bad ass" and onlookers on both sides would agree, until he accidentally drops a grenade at his foot. |
Tinodi
Doomheim
39
|
Posted - 2012.12.31 10:19:00 -
[54] - Quote
It's really, really silly to argue anything long-term when discussing the balance between reward versus balance. Even as-is, they are going to apply drastically differently just when things like sec space, real corp affects, etc, start taking place. There is no way in hell we can predict what the balance is going to need to be at that point.
At this point, in Dust's current form, I don't think it's that bad, and I think it is a lot better than last build. If they want to step back a bit and lessen the nerf, there's probably room for that too, but I think it definitely took a step in the right direction. Proto gear should be more about a force multiplier than pay2win, and I think even if we stepped too far, we're a lot closer to the sweet spot than we were. $.02. But again, this only really applies to the simple FPS world we're in now... as the game becomes more complex, so will the effects of relationships such as gear discrepancy or SP discrepancy between vets and noobs. It'll be a fun ride. |
Anyanka Shadowmane
Sanmatar Kelkoons Minmatar Republic
80
|
Posted - 2012.12.31 10:48:00 -
[55] - Quote
Iron Wolf Saber wrote:loads of things that, by and large, I agree with. Whilst Dust is an FPS, it can be (and I think the intention is for it to be) more than that.
Just because other FPSs out there do things in a particular way, that doesn't mean Dust has to. As I understand it, Dust isn't 'A FPS First and Foremost', but rather 'An expansion of the EVE online universe'. I thnk that's far cooler and more exciting than yet another FPS game.
I'll be the first to admit that I'm not the best FPS player. As far as killing people goes, I'm a scrub. But that's why games like Dust, team fortress, left 4 dead and even BRINK appeal to me, and quite possibly others like me. It's the team play, the tactics and being rewarded for being useful to you comrades that get's you by more than simply the highest kill streak.
I also agree with Icy Tiger, who said:
Icy Tiger wrote:Yes, the new player experience is important. But the game once you're in the loop doesn't have to be "nerfed" to cater for noobs. Seperated playlist do. From what I've seen, most mmorpgs have areas aimed towards players of a particular level. A player can, if they want, go to a different area and fight people harder than them to try for higher rewards, but it's at their own risk, and they are likely to be squashed mercilessly. Even other FPS games tend to put players with other players of a similar level, or try to spread the players evenly between teams.
With this in mind, I definitely agree that proto gear can afford to be much better than militia gear. It should be. It should be something to be feared, something to aspire to, to save up for and maybe even only break out in situations where you really need to give yourself an edge to 'get things done'. It shouldn't be something to be something to be mocked as for a fraction of the price you can use the militia stuff which can go toe to toe with it anyway. |
xAckie
Ahrendee Mercenaries Legacy Rising
125
|
Posted - 2012.12.31 11:05:00 -
[56] - Quote
Telcontar Dunedain wrote:fenrir storm wrote:Telcontar Dunedain wrote:fenrir storm wrote: And as it's an fps it is going to have to go head to head against Bf , cod and the other fps out there wether it's designed to or not
This is a very incorrect statement. If it provides something unique there is no need to compete directly. It could even have measurable worse graphics (though probably would still need -tight- fps play). Seeking to compete directly will ruin this game. Wether you like it or not these are the games it's up against as it's firstly an fps. I think you should learn about a few more FPS games if you think Battlefield and COD are the only ones out there. Lots of different FPS (especially on the PC) that cater to different groups of players. They don't try to pull the 10m players out of BF or COD by just being another version of BF or COD.
Its competing directly against these and other games from different genres for people's attention. My playstation friends list made up predominantly from people I have met in FPSs are playing COD, battlefield, borederlands, Far Cry, Resident Evil, Fifa, Hitman etc. and many many more.
We dont play in a silo FPS game sector |
Mavado V Noriega
SyNergy Gaming
2282
|
Posted - 2012.12.31 11:26:00 -
[57] - Quote
Anyanka Shadowmane wrote:Iron Wolf Saber wrote:loads of things that, by and large, I agree with. Whilst Dust is an FPS, it can be (and I think the intention is for it to be) more than that. Just because other FPSs out there do things in a particular way, that doesn't mean Dust has to. As I understand it, Dust isn't 'A FPS First and Foremost', but rather 'An expansion of the EVE online universe'. I thnk that's far cooler and more exciting than yet another FPS game. I'll be the first to admit that I'm not the best FPS player. As far as killing people goes, I'm a scrub. But that's why games like Dust, team fortress, left 4 dead and even BRINK appeal to me, and quite possibly others like me. It's the team play, the tactics and being rewarded for being useful to you comrades that get's you by more than simply the highest kill streak. I also agree with Icy Tiger, who said: Icy Tiger wrote:Yes, the new player experience is important. But the game once you're in the loop doesn't have to be "nerfed" to cater for noobs. Seperated playlist do. From what I've seen, most mmorpgs have areas aimed towards players of a particular level. A player can, if they want, go to a different area and fight people harder than them to try for higher rewards, but it's at their own risk, and they are likely to be squashed mercilessly. Even other FPS games tend to put players with other players of a similar level, or try to spread the players evenly between teams. With this in mind, I definitely agree that proto gear can afford to be much better than militia gear. It should be. It should be something to be feared, something to aspire to, to save up for and maybe even only break out in situations where you really need to give yourself an edge to 'get things done'. It shouldn't be something to be something to be mocked as for a fraction of the price you can use the militia stuff which can go toe to toe with it anyway.
If dropsuits are to be buffed so must vehicles and then we go back to square 1 with ppl QQing how OP vehicles are again Tanks are no longer really feared.
and fyi proto suits are def alot better than militia atm
ppl also forget this one little aspect of play as well make proto gear too godlike and then what? when ppl start taking on player contracts and EVE transfers are allowed it wont matter how expensive gear is ppl will be able to run them all day....so guess what? u'll have a bunch of proto gear players running around pubs/hisec where normally u wont be able to fund it but they can because of player contracts and EVE transfers and thus makes it extremely easy to "ruin" that new player experience and ISK wont matter to these players anyway.
balance is important in a FPS i agree ppl should feel the gear is worth it and aspire to get there but at what cost? and it has to be handled carefully or this game wont be retaining new players for long and a game like this NEEDS to constantly keep attracting fresh blood in order to keep it goin.
The most important thing for DUST is making it fun to play, worthwhile/meaningful and competitive for the hardcore in order to keep ppl coming back to the game. |
fenrir storm
Tronhadar Free Guard Minmatar Republic
314
|
Posted - 2012.12.31 11:38:00 -
[58] - Quote
Iron Wolf Saber wrote:FPS games I've played.
Metro Arma Ghost Recon 1, 2, FW Rainbow Six America's Army Global Agenda Doom 1 2 and 3 Wolfenstien 3D (not 1 and 2 they where platformers) Spear of Destiny, and the 2002 release of wolfenstien? COD 1, BR1, COD 2, COD 3, COD 4 MW1, COD WAW, MW2, BLOPs, MW3, BLOPs2 Battlefield 1942, 2142, 2, 3 (I have been permanently banned from this game series btw) Painkiller Hexen Decent 1, 2, 3 Halo 1, 2, 3, 4, ODST Team Fortress 2 Portal 1,2 Half Life 2, + ep 1 & 2 Quake II, III Medal of Honor Counter-strike UT 2001, 2002 and UT 2004?(the one with campaign mode and story explaining how they can die and re spawn) Planet Side 1 and 2
List goes on and if you want an extremely long list I can give you a **** list on every game here. Why that game sucked and what that game could have done better.
There has not been any successful FPS has managed to be mainstay by copying another shooter entirely in formula, story or theory of approach to appeal. Dust 514 needs to focus on its goals on being Dust 514, this is not counter strike, not battlefield not halo or call of duty.
It needs to only provide more than enough familiarity that any player from any of the mentioned shooters above can step into this game board and have a good idea how to start running and gunning into a better position. This game could be 'dumbed' much further but I am afraid if that is done then not only gear gets negated but player's own skills get negated entirely. People still complain about the AR despite having Ironsights on them, range reduced, damaged decreased, all because they probably don't know how to shoot the damn things.
Thus the gearing RPG element needs to be in and significant enough to be felt, awed, and inspiring to keep players around in this generation of Effort = Reward and Gratification. It shouldn't be there to the point where best in slot = iwin but it needs to be strong enough to make the wearer say "I am such as a bad ass" and onlookers on both sides would agree, until he accidentally drops a grenade at his foot.
Can probably mach your list if i sit and think about, been playing games for a hell of a long time (i'm 45 now) sinc the days of the zx sinclair and BBC micro (my god i am old).
As i say i'm not argueing or trying to be a pain, we all want different and developers to push the boundries, trouble is when most get this they can't understand why it's not the same if you see what i'm saying |
Anyanka Shadowmane
Sanmatar Kelkoons Minmatar Republic
80
|
Posted - 2012.12.31 13:02:00 -
[59] - Quote
Mavado V Noriega wrote:If dropsuits are to be buffed so must vehicles and then we go back to square 1 with ppl QQing how OP vehicles are again Tanks are no longer really feared. Why would we need to buff vehicles based on drop suits? I don't see the link.
Mavado V Noriega wrote:and fyi proto suits are def alot better than militia atm That's your opinion, which you are entitled to. I disagree. Yes, the assault vk.0 suit has more than twice the CPU and PG than the militia suit, and it can have 1 more piece of equipment, 1 more high slot and three more low slots and has a slightly higher shield recharge rate. But I wouldn't say that that is a lot better. However, my main concern with the proto gear is with the weapons that were changed to lessen the gap between them all.
Mavado V Noriega wrote:ppl also forget this one little aspect of play as well make proto gear too godlike and then what? when ppl start taking on player contracts and EVE transfers are allowed it wont matter how expensive gear is ppl will be able to run them all day....so guess what? u'll have a bunch of proto gear players running around pubs/hisec where normally u wont be able to fund it but they can because of player contracts and EVE transfers and thus makes it extremely easy to "ruin" that new player experience and ISK wont matter to these players anyway. this is easily solved by having areas/contracts where you can't use proto gear. Having contracts that are set for militia, standard, advanced and proto gear, with different reward possibilities for each. Let people use lower level gear in a higher level contract, but not the other way round. New players will be able to play in the lower contracts without having to worry about being stomped by players in better gear, while players with the ability to use it, can play with their proto gear for bigger bucks, but can 'slum it' with the newbs if they want. The higher ISK payouts, and the ability to use better gear should (in theory) be an incentive for players to aspire to tool up for the more expensive contracts.
Mavado V Noriega wrote:balance is important in a FPS i agree ppl should feel the gear is worth it and aspire to get there but at what cost? and it has to be handled carefully or this game wont be retaining new players for long and a game like this NEEDS to constantly keep attracting fresh blood in order to keep it goin. i agree that balance needs to be handled carefully. CCP certainly needs to be aware of new players and make efforts to keep them playing and becoming old players, but it's just as important to be aware of the older players and to make sure they keep playing. Constantly recruiting new players is pointless if none of them stay around for more than two months, just as keeping old players playing for 15 years doesn't help if there are only three of them with no fresh blood being added to the pool.
Mavado V Noriega wrote:The most important thing for DUST is making it fun to play, worthwhile/meaningful and competitive for the hardcore in order to keep ppl coming back to the game. I agree. Particularly with the highlighted bit. The game is intended to be more than a First-person shooter, and that should be considered when thinking of the 'fun that there is to be had. |
Ydubbs81 RND
Ahrendee Mercenaries Legacy Rising
886
|
Posted - 2012.12.31 13:10:00 -
[60] - Quote
Question is should Dust be more fps or more rpg??
My answer is it can be both equally.....we just need to stop trying to tip the scales. The rpg part is fine except it constantly being tweaked to favor those who wish rpg elements out of the dust.
What dust needs to do is concentrate on the fps part by improving the gameplay and fun factor of Dust....and also to get rid of bugs, framerate drop, lag, etc. If the game is fun, people will play. I have brought guys in who don't even want to look at a skill tree or whatever, they just want to play. If they enjoy the game, then they ask about getting better weapons & gear.
We really don't have to make dust more fps or more rpg than the other. Improve the gameplay by making the action more intense, faster with faster movements. Eliminate bugs and lag, etc. If the gameplay is awesome, then they have done their part in regards to the fps side. Players that enjoy the game will adopt to dust's style of levelling up.
All of this new player getting smash talk should end. There are vets who will get smashed no matter what they put on. But they still play because they enjoy the game and do other things to help. Skilled players will level up and do what they need to do to smash. But they must enjoy the game to want to. |
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 [2] 3 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |