Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Aeon Amadi
Ahrendee Inc. Negative-Feedback
9686
|
Posted - 2015.04.26 17:42:00 -
[61] - Quote
Dreis ShadowWeaver wrote:Aeon Amadi wrote:Not even about that, just tired of prissy bitches acting like I'm on some pedestal. Dude does what he does, I do what I do - I'm not talking **** first opportunity he gives me, I'd at least like that same respect. Actually, you did start talking ****, where you essentially said 'Your opinion is worthless' to One Eyed King. Forget the CPM nonsense, which was just a jibe, and for that, I apologise.
Yeah, and that's between me and One Eyed King because he's a superficial troll who makes an effort to contradict every post I make - I accepted that a long time ago and quit trying to reason with the dude and as such, I don't really care to read long posts that basically just sums up to "you're wrong" with perfect consistency. Has absolutely nothing to do with you so don't go off making it your problem. Peachy keen? Peachy keen.
You guys are like a broken record with this "CPM material" business xD Let it go
|
Knightshade Belladonna
Mannar Focused Warfare Gallente Federation
1210
|
Posted - 2015.04.26 17:42:00 -
[62] - Quote
Varoth Drac wrote:The other day, a corp mate in my squad was laughing at me, due to how much my blue cloak shimmer stuck out as I tried to sneak around.
From the perspective of using cloaks, I do seem to be spotted whilst cloaked frustratingly quickly. Obviously I expect to be seen If I run in front of someone, but getting spotted often when at a distance and in peripheral vision is pretty annoying.
I fully agree that cloaks should act like camo rather than full invisibility. Despite what some people claim, using a cloak successfully takes skill. Full invisibility would destroy that element of stealth gameplay.
I do feel though, that a reduction, or darkening, of the shimmer is needed.
Cloaks, in their old form were op. This is because they could be used very effectively for ganking people. This involved mainly operating in built up areas where you could track enemies with passive scans whilst cloaked, and pounce on people with a shotgun. The cloak increases the time it takes for people to react to you as it takes time to be spotted. The scans and instant decloak allowed you to make sure there was rarely enough time for enemies to react before it was too late. You could then quickly dive back into cover and repeat.
The introduction of cloak blind and delay has made this technique pretty much impossible. With this use of cloaks removed it highlights the other, more beneficial to the game, use for cloaks. This being infiltration and movement without being spotted / killed. It now appears that the level of camouflage provided by a cloak is sufficient to perform this role, but perhaps not sufficient to perform the role well. As a result many scouts don't bother with cloaks at all and the capabilities of a scout beyond direct combat are diminished.
Following the long awaited, major buffs to assaults, cloaks are one of the few things that distinguishes scouts and gives them a purpose.
TLDR: Seems to me the shimmer should be darkened a bit.
You bring up a good argument. After all the nerfs it hit, it should get a buff ( if you want to even call it that) by decreasing the visibility some.
Some say that standard settings won't show them easily, and you only see if you upped the settings. I have never touched mine, at all, and I still see them. I don't know if that's because i'm actually using a monitor for gaming though..and not a t.v.
|
7th Son 7
Escrow Removal and Acquisition
796
|
Posted - 2015.04.26 17:54:00 -
[63] - Quote
You can still lose track of a cloaked scout even when you know exactly where he went, from time to time. Seems like they're working fine to me.
Always mystify, mislead and surprise the enemy if possible........--- Stonewall Jackson
|
Varoth Drac
Dead Man's Game RUST415
741
|
Posted - 2015.04.26 17:57:00 -
[64] - Quote
Knightshade Belladonna wrote:You bring up a good argument. After all the nerfs it hit, it should get a buff ( if you want to even call it that) by decreasing the visibility some.
Some say that standard settings won't show them easily, and you only see if you upped the settings. I have never touched mine, at all, and I still see them. I don't know if that's because i'm actually using a monitor for gaming though..and not a t.v.
I seem to see cloaks pretty easily with a TV, without changing any settings. Though obviously it's difficult to guess exactly how often I spot cloaked scouts as if I didn't see them, I didn't see them. |
P14GU3
UNIVERSAL C.A.R.N.A.G.E
1485
|
Posted - 2015.04.26 17:59:00 -
[65] - Quote
One Eyed King wrote:P14GU3 wrote:Lightning35 Delta514 wrote:Aeon Amadi wrote:Can you recall the times you didn't see the cloak? When they weren't in front of me obviously. If they are behind me, I won't see them. I can see like 90% of cloaks in front of me at a decent distance. It could be the TV as well. Or I am just a REALLY GOOD CLOAK SPOTTER. LIKE SERIOUSLY. I WILL SPOT YOU REAL QUICK. it isn't that hard tbh. If you are aware. You will always just be aware and ready to spot a cloak in the blink of an eye. Just look for that blue shimmer or that still blur. It's easy trust me. Toupee fallacy.. Toupee fallacy ONLY works when someone says they ALWAYS see the cloak.If you don't understand a fallacy, don't quote it... If you don't have empirical evidence to demonstrate his subjective opinion of seeing 90% of cloaked mercs number is inaccurate, then your subjective opinion of how often people cloaked go unseen is no more or less relevant. You can disagree with someone's observations, and state your own, but without hard evidence, you can't pretend it is fact. 90% of butthurt scouts claim that cloakers are seen 90% of the time.
Have empirical evidence to prove me wrong?
'Sault AK.0 - Logi AK.0 - Logi GK.0 - Scout GK.0 - 'Mando MK.0 - Masshole in every sense of the word.
|
Flaylock Steve
Nos Nothi
760
|
Posted - 2015.04.26 18:14:00 -
[66] - Quote
Aeon Amadi wrote:One Eyed King wrote:Aeon Amadi wrote: I really could care less what anyone thinks, it's fine the way it is right now. Noted. I'm a bit jaded from having to argue every little opinion I have, sorry mate. Only people I gotta convince are the Blue Tags. You shouldn't even run, what help can you provide if you tell us you don't even care about our opinion? Even the blue tags listen to us, they ask for our feedback. You just stomp on anyones feedback that differs from yours...... |
Dreis ShadowWeaver
0uter.Heaven Back and Forth
3191
|
Posted - 2015.04.26 18:23:00 -
[67] - Quote
Flaylock Steve wrote:Aeon Amadi wrote:One Eyed King wrote:Aeon Amadi wrote: I really could care less what anyone thinks, it's fine the way it is right now. Noted. I'm a bit jaded from having to argue every little opinion I have, sorry mate. Only people I gotta convince are the Blue Tags. You shouldn't even run, what help can you provide if you tell us you don't even care about our opinion? Even the blue tags listen to us, they ask for our feedback. You just stomp on anyones feedback that differs from yours...... \o/
Creator of the 'Nova Knifers United' channel
Caldari blood, Minmatar heart <3
Day 10/30 exclusively Minja
|
Aeon Amadi
Ahrendee Inc. Negative-Feedback
9720
|
Posted - 2015.04.26 18:26:00 -
[68] - Quote
Flaylock Steve wrote:Aeon Amadi wrote:One Eyed King wrote:Aeon Amadi wrote: I really could care less what anyone thinks, it's fine the way it is right now. Noted. I'm a bit jaded from having to argue every little opinion I have, sorry mate. Only people I gotta convince are the Blue Tags. You shouldn't even run, what help can you provide if you tell us you don't even care about our opinion? Even the blue tags listen to us, they ask for our feedback. You just stomp on anyones feedback that differs from yours......
Are you high?
No seriously, like - are you high? Do you just parrot stuff because you see "Aeon Amadi" in the thread and instantly thought, "BOY THIS IS A PERFECT OPPORTUNITY TO SHOW MUCH OF A JACKASS I CAN BE!"
That's all I can think bro. Because if you payed even -the slightest bit of attention- you'd know that I had absolutely no intentions of running for CPM 2 and hate the very notion fo it. You'd know that I don't need some stupid white tag to feel good about myself and be the drive to go and do those community-driven things that -I still occasionally do- despite posts like this constantly trying to drive me down because some ignorant nobody came along and figured they'd try to sound important.
And no, I stomp on anyone's feedback that differs from mine whenever they contradict me at every single turn. One Eyed King and I have -never- gotten along and I'm fairly sure we're all aware of that by now. Just because we don't agree, and likely never will, doesn't mean I'm not going to include him in on any of the community driven stuff that I actually do like the PSD if I ever get around to actually shouldering that weight again - what with the fact that it was basically just me doing it anyway.
But yanno, feel free to step up any time and shoulder some weight yourself and do something. Hell, I challenge you, personally, to go off and do something community driven. That doesn't mean go and argue with a bunch of people on the forums, that doesn't mean go and start liking a bunch of posts you agree with, I mean actually sit down and work some magic that betters the community as a whole - even the people you don't agree with.
Go do that, then you can come over here and start telling people who should or shouldn't run for the CPM. Even though those people aren't running anyway because they recognize you don't have to have the CPM moniker to do stuff around here.
EDIT: And yes, to educate you a bit on how things are run around here, a CPM member can and probably will disagree - sometimes quite verbally - with what someone else says. You're no good to anyone if you just go around agreeing with everything. CPM member that 'represents everyone' is a liar.
You guys are like a broken record with this "CPM material" business xD Let it go
|
Adipem Nothi
Nos Nothi
9228
|
Posted - 2015.04.26 18:29:00 -
[69] - Quote
Dreis ShadowWeaver wrote:Lightning35 Delta514 wrote:Dreis ShadowWeaver wrote:The cloak seems fine IMO. I'm strongly opposed to any buff, lest we go back to Scout 514.
It is difficult to spot a cloaked Scout from a distance, which is good because it's meant to be a tool to get from cover to cover. It's not a combat cloak. Last time I used it, it was used in combat and fighting. So YES, IT IS A COMBAT CLOAK That's not what it's purpose is. Look at the 1.8 period, where you could instantly decloak, gank someone, and cloak right back up again. It didn't matter if you ran into any reds because you could instantly decloak and gank them. This was whilst we still had functional scans whilst we were cloaked too. At this time, it was performing as a combat cloak. That's why it was nerfed though. It was performing as a combat cloak when that wasn't it's intended purpose. It was meant to be used as a tool to move across open ground with no cover, nothing more. To achieve this purpose, the cloak delay was added, as well as True: Not meant to be a combat tool. False: Difficult to spot cloak at a distance.
While sniping, I routinely spot cloaked units crossing open terrain at long range. Try it.
Shoot scout with yes.
- Ripley Riley
|
Clone D
Solo Zen
1698
|
Posted - 2015.04.26 18:29:00 -
[70] - Quote
Sir Dukey wrote:Dreis ShadowWeaver wrote:The cloak seems fine IMO. I'm strongly opposed to any buff, lest we go back to Scout 514.
It is difficult to spot a cloaked Scout from a distance, which is good because it's meant to be a tool to get from cover to cover. It's not a combat cloak. You know something is wrong when I can head shot cloak users with a sniper rifle from a mile away.
That doesn't necessarily imply that you were aiming at their head. |
|
Knightshade Belladonna
Mannar Focused Warfare Gallente Federation
1216
|
Posted - 2015.04.26 18:29:00 -
[71] - Quote
I wanna be high :(
what's the PSD you mentioned Aeon? Curious what it is, have not heard of it..or atleast by that title. I had a long vactaion, I missed a lot of stuff. |
One Eyed King
Nos Nothi
9769
|
Posted - 2015.04.26 18:29:00 -
[72] - Quote
Aeon Amadi wrote:One Eyed King wrote:Aeon Amadi wrote: I really could care less what anyone thinks, it's fine the way it is right now. Noted. I'm a bit jaded from having to argue every little opinion I have, sorry mate. Only people I gotta convince are the Blue Tags. Everyone has to argue every little opinion they have.
Including the OP to which you rightly challenged.
Let me know when you are ready to have discussions again, til then I will let you be.
Former CEO of the Land of the BIind.
Any double entendre is unintended I assure you.
|
One Eyed King
Nos Nothi
9769
|
Posted - 2015.04.26 18:31:00 -
[73] - Quote
Aeon Amadi wrote:Knightshade Belladonna wrote:Dreis ShadowWeaver wrote:Aeon Amadi wrote:I kinda stopped reading because I don't care, lol. Just being brutally honest. It's 11:30 AM and I haven't gone to lunch yet. Aeon Amadi wrote:I really could care less what anyone thinks. ^ CPM material. damn!!!! that's a burn worse than grabbin the tray out oven at 2 a.m drunk and forgettin the mit! Worse than Judge Rhadamanthus? Doubtful. While true, you aren't really using a high, or even medium standard.
Former CEO of the Land of the BIind.
Any double entendre is unintended I assure you.
|
Keeriam Miray
Nos Nothi
488
|
Posted - 2015.04.26 18:35:00 -
[74] - Quote
Current cloaks good for two things: standing still while cloaked & avoid view scan while standing still cloaked.
I was sniping them 550m away before SR range nerf, still sniping at max distance, it's even more easy (after myofibs change) with speedy-jump paper fits. They are killed with railgun tanks 200-250m away while cloaked.
Combat or not, it's almost useless, if you can spot & kill running cloaked scout (with all disadvantage it has) more than 50m away with SR or railgun tank. I say it's not working as intended even being non-combat cloak.
-í-ç-¦-ü-é-+-+-¦-ï-+ -+-+-¦-¦-é -¦-ï-é-î -é-+-+-î-¦-+ -+-+-¦-+-¦-+-+-¦. -í-ç-¦-ü-é-+-+-¦, -ü-ç-¦-ü-é-+-+-¦, -ü-ç-¦-ü-é-+-+-¦, -ü-ç-¦-ü-é-+-+-¦...
|
Aeon Amadi
Ahrendee Inc. Negative-Feedback
9721
|
Posted - 2015.04.26 18:37:00 -
[75] - Quote
Knightshade Belladonna wrote:I wanna be high :(
what's the PSD you mentioned Aeon? Curious what it is, have not heard of it..or atleast by that title. I had a long vactaion, I missed a lot of stuff.
Stickied in General Discussions
One Eyed King wrote:Aeon Amadi wrote:One Eyed King wrote:Aeon Amadi wrote: I really could care less what anyone thinks, it's fine the way it is right now. Noted. I'm a bit jaded from having to argue every little opinion I have, sorry mate. Only people I gotta convince are the Blue Tags. Everyone has to argue every little opinion they have. Including the OP to which you rightly challenged. Let me know when you are ready to have discussions again, til then I will let you be.
And this is why I don't argue with you - because not everyone's opinion has to be openly challenged and the sooner you realize that the better. I asked a question, I didn't "challenge" the OP I just wanted to see if he had considered the plausibility that if he hadn't seen a cloaked user then it was working correctly.
Like, for real, I'm -really- not in the mood to argue with you about every little thing, dude, and going into this conversation with that mentality isn't doing you kudos either. You wanna play the square and think I'm like some dude on a pedestal that needs to be brought down a few notches, you go right ahead. More power to you, buddy, you show the man who's boss. But today? Just not in the mood to get into a multi-page long debate over something I really don't care about (cloaking) with someone who I really don't want to argue with (you) yet again because I know it's not going to go anywhere (ever).
Don't mistake me, I'm totally down for discussions - just not with someone that isn't ready or willing to listen or compromise.
You guys are like a broken record with this "CPM material" business xD Let it go
|
Knightshade Belladonna
Mannar Focused Warfare Gallente Federation
1217
|
Posted - 2015.04.26 18:48:00 -
[76] - Quote
ohhhh, the Planetary Services Department , lol , I wasn't thinking. Thanks |
Flaylock Steve
Nos Nothi
762
|
Posted - 2015.04.26 19:24:00 -
[77] - Quote
Aeon Amadi wrote:Flaylock Steve wrote:Aeon Amadi wrote:One Eyed King wrote:Aeon Amadi wrote: I really could care less what anyone thinks, it's fine the way it is right now. Noted. I'm a bit jaded from having to argue every little opinion I have, sorry mate. Only people I gotta convince are the Blue Tags. You shouldn't even run, what help can you provide if you tell us you don't even care about our opinion? Even the blue tags listen to us, they ask for our feedback. You just stomp on anyones feedback that differs from yours...... Are you high? No seriously, like - are you high? Do you just parrot stuff because you see "Aeon Amadi" in the thread and instantly thought, "BOY THIS IS A PERFECT OPPORTUNITY TO SHOW MUCH OF A JACKASS I CAN BE!" That's all I can think bro. Because if you payed even -the slightest bit of attention- you'd know that I had absolutely no intentions of running for CPM 2 and hate the very notion fo it. You'd know that I don't need some stupid white tag to feel good about myself and be the drive to go and do those community-driven things that -I still occasionally do- despite posts like this constantly trying to drive me down because some ignorant nobody came along and figured they'd try to sound important. And no, I stomp on anyone's feedback that differs from mine whenever they contradict me at every single turn. One Eyed King and I have -never- gotten along and I'm fairly sure we're all aware of that by now. Just because we don't agree, and likely never will, doesn't mean I'm not going to include him in on any of the community driven stuff that I actually do like the PSD if I ever get around to actually shouldering that weight again - what with the fact that it was basically just me doing it anyway. But yanno, feel free to step up any time and shoulder some weight yourself and do something. Hell, I challenge you, personally, to go off and do something community driven. That doesn't mean go and argue with a bunch of people on the forums, that doesn't mean go and start liking a bunch of posts you agree with, I mean actually sit down and work some magic that betters the community as a whole - even the people you don't agree with. Go do that, then you can come over here and start telling people who should or shouldn't run for the CPM. Even though those people aren't running anyway because they recognize you don't have to have the CPM moniker to do stuff around here. EDIT: And yes, to educate you a bit on how things are run around here, a CPM member can and probably will disagree - sometimes quite verbally - with what someone else says. You're no good to anyone if you just go around agreeing with everything. CPM member that 'represents everyone' is a liar. Then I withhold my statement, but no. I wasn't trying to be a "JACKASS", just from what I read here I don't agree without that statement I quoted and many others. And yes I know how things work around here. But even if a CMP/DEV team member disagrees with feedback they don't come out and say they don't care about such and such opinion. |
Aeon Amadi
Ahrendee Inc. Negative-Feedback
9725
|
Posted - 2015.04.26 19:38:00 -
[78] - Quote
Flaylock Steve wrote:Aeon Amadi wrote:Flaylock Steve wrote:Aeon Amadi wrote:One Eyed King wrote: Noted.
I'm a bit jaded from having to argue every little opinion I have, sorry mate. Only people I gotta convince are the Blue Tags. You shouldn't even run, what help can you provide if you tell us you don't even care about our opinion? Even the blue tags listen to us, they ask for our feedback. You just stomp on anyones feedback that differs from yours...... Are you high? No seriously, like - are you high? Do you just parrot stuff because you see "Aeon Amadi" in the thread and instantly thought, "BOY THIS IS A PERFECT OPPORTUNITY TO SHOW MUCH OF A JACKASS I CAN BE!" That's all I can think bro. Because if you payed even -the slightest bit of attention- you'd know that I had absolutely no intentions of running for CPM 2 and hate the very notion fo it. You'd know that I don't need some stupid white tag to feel good about myself and be the drive to go and do those community-driven things that -I still occasionally do- despite posts like this constantly trying to drive me down because some ignorant nobody came along and figured they'd try to sound important. And no, I stomp on anyone's feedback that differs from mine whenever they contradict me at every single turn. One Eyed King and I have -never- gotten along and I'm fairly sure we're all aware of that by now. Just because we don't agree, and likely never will, doesn't mean I'm not going to include him in on any of the community driven stuff that I actually do like the PSD if I ever get around to actually shouldering that weight again - what with the fact that it was basically just me doing it anyway. But yanno, feel free to step up any time and shoulder some weight yourself and do something. Hell, I challenge you, personally, to go off and do something community driven. That doesn't mean go and argue with a bunch of people on the forums, that doesn't mean go and start liking a bunch of posts you agree with, I mean actually sit down and work some magic that betters the community as a whole - even the people you don't agree with. Go do that, then you can come over here and start telling people who should or shouldn't run for the CPM. Even though those people aren't running anyway because they recognize you don't have to have the CPM moniker to do stuff around here. EDIT: And yes, to educate you a bit on how things are run around here, a CPM member can and probably will disagree - sometimes quite verbally - with what someone else says. You're no good to anyone if you just go around agreeing with everything. CPM member that 'represents everyone' is a liar. Then I withhold my statement, but no. I wasn't trying to be a "JACKASS", just from what I read here I don't agree with that statement I quoted and many others. And yes I know how things work around here. But even if a CMP/DEV team member disagrees with feedback they don't come out and say they don't care about such and such opinion.
Kay, well, I'm not a CPM and I'm not a Dev. So. Dunno what to tell you.
You guys are like a broken record with this "CPM material" business xD Let it go
|
Flaylock Steve
Nos Nothi
763
|
Posted - 2015.04.26 19:52:00 -
[79] - Quote
Aeon Amadi wrote:
Kay, well, I'm not a CPM and I'm not a Dev. So. Dunno what to tell you.
Well you claim that you try to do things that are community driven. Honestly technically everyone is, how do the devs know which items in the game are OP? from the data, who's responsible for the data? the community. Even those who don't even post once are still part of the data the team is gathering. Yet, from what I see if it doesn't suit you, you A: go against it, B:Ignore it. C: State theres no issue here. Do you use scouts regularly? Run cloak regularly? If not, then why bother posting in this thread? yes you probably think cloaks are fine or w.e but yet most of us scouts and I mean dedicated scouts agree that cloaks are in a bad spot. |
Aeon Amadi
Ahrendee Inc. Negative-Feedback
9730
|
Posted - 2015.04.26 20:19:00 -
[80] - Quote
Flaylock Steve wrote:Aeon Amadi wrote:
Kay, well, I'm not a CPM and I'm not a Dev. So. Dunno what to tell you.
Well you claim that you try to do things that are community driven. Honestly technically everyone is, how do the devs know which items in the game are OP? from the data, who's responsible for the data? the community. Even those who don't even post once are still part of the data the team is gathering. Yet, from what I see if it doesn't suit you, you A: go against it, B:Ignore it. C: State theres no issue here. Do you use scouts regularly? Run cloak regularly? If not, then why bother posting in this thread? yes you probably think cloaks are fine or w.e but yet most of us scouts and I mean dedicated scouts agree that cloaks are in a bad spot.
Well your first mistake is thinking that only the user can weigh in on the topic.
I'll tell you the same thing they told me whenever I started saying that the Gallente Assault was in a bad spot - they're bias. Of course they want the cloaking to be better, because then they can reap the benefits of it. Sure, other roles "can" use cloaking devices but you change anything about them and the only ones who are going to see the effects are Scouts. So, if you nyx the feedback of anyone who is not a Scout (something the Barbershop looooovessss to do) then what's left?
You guys are like a broken record with this "CPM material" business xD Let it go
|
|
Squagga
Fatal Absolution Negative-Feedback
553
|
Posted - 2015.04.26 20:35:00 -
[81] - Quote
It's already 'get shot in the back514' we really don't need more invisi-hunting. Look at musturd. He wrecks without a cloak
Reloading, the silent killer.
|
jonny battles
Random Gunz Rise Of Legion.
27
|
Posted - 2015.04.26 20:37:00 -
[82] - Quote
Thus is a good point it's east them there was four scouts and they was after a blue dot pulled out a breach scrambler pistol and killed 3/4 the other one ran bcuz I had to reload and then found him hiding behind some crates
It was just that easy
|
Adipem Nothi
Nos Nothi
9230
|
Posted - 2015.04.26 22:33:00 -
[83] - Quote
Aeon Amadi wrote:So, if you nyx the feedback of anyone who is not a Scout (something the Barbershop looooovessss to do) then what's left? Oh noes! My feedback on a subject has been challenged by subject matter experts! What to do!?
A) Hear their counterpoints; reevaluate my position. B) Hear their counterpoints; defend my position. C) Throw a tantrum D) Play the victim E) Attack the subject matter experts!
Shoot scout with yes.
- Ripley Riley
|
Operative 1174 Uuali
Y.A.M.A.H
622
|
Posted - 2015.04.27 00:25:00 -
[84] - Quote
Aeon Amadi wrote:Can you recall the times you didn't see the cloak?
Many times lag. You see the shimmer and the scout uncloak as you are going to death screen.
Death is a serious businessGǪ So is running a shoddy, half-baked game company.
|
Aeon Amadi
Ahrendee Inc. Negative-Feedback
9752
|
Posted - 2015.04.27 00:43:00 -
[85] - Quote
Adipem Nothi wrote:Aeon Amadi wrote:So, if you nyx the feedback of anyone who is not a Scout (something the Barbershop looooovessss to do) then what's left? Oh noes! My feedback on a subject has been challenged by subject matter experts! What to do!?A) Hear their counterpoints; reevaluate my position. B) Hear their counterpoints; defend my position. C) Throw a tantrum D) Play the victim E) Attack the subject matter experts!
Mhmm. Gone down this route before, if you'd remember. Actually tried A and B and got flame warred out of the place for trying. But I suppose that bringing this up automatically puts me in category D and that's never good because for some reason we don't acknowledge victims around here (be rather ironic if someone in this community worked at a crisis center).
Soooo that leaves C... and E....
C is my likely MO but given since that's not a practical response since it doesn't really do much for me and the community is just going to use that as more ammo to further prevent A and B from being warranted, that only leaves E...
So, yeah! Looks like I did the right thing! Think I deserve to give myself a pat on the back
EDIT: Btw, if you didn't get the message - yeah, I'm attacking the subject matter experts in the previous post entirely out of facetiousness, but feel free to think that I was totes being serious and follow up in your next post with "HURRR CPM MATERIAL DURR DE-DURR". I won't mind. Really.
You guys are like a broken record with this "CPM material" business xD Let it go
|
jane stalin
Ametat Security Amarr Empire
284
|
Posted - 2015.04.27 00:55:00 -
[86] - Quote
sometimes blue scouts are totally invisible, I only know they are there because of the blue arrow above their heads so I think lag causes weird visibility issues.
|
LUGMOS
Corrosive Synergy Rise Of Legion.
3778
|
Posted - 2015.04.27 01:06:00 -
[87] - Quote
it's all in the lighting.
All there is to it really :/
Sniper Rifles are for Nitrogenous Dioxide Borons
First to PM me with common name wins
(no Hyansaru, u win too much ;P)
|
Flaylock Steve
Nos Nothi
765
|
Posted - 2015.04.27 03:05:00 -
[88] - Quote
Aeon Amadi wrote:Flaylock Steve wrote:Aeon Amadi wrote:
Kay, well, I'm not a CPM and I'm not a Dev. So. Dunno what to tell you.
Well you claim that you try to do things that are community driven. Honestly technically everyone is, how do the devs know which items in the game are OP? from the data, who's responsible for the data? the community. Even those who don't even post once are still part of the data the team is gathering. Yet, from what I see if it doesn't suit you, you A: go against it, B:Ignore it. C: State theres no issue here. Do you use scouts regularly? Run cloak regularly? If not, then why bother posting in this thread? yes you probably think cloaks are fine or w.e but yet most of us scouts and I mean dedicated scouts agree that cloaks are in a bad spot. Well your first mistake is thinking that only the user can weigh in on the topic. I'll tell you the same thing they told me whenever I started saying that the Gallente Assault was in a bad spot - they're bias. Of course they want the cloaking to be better, because then they can reap the benefits of it. Sure, other roles "can" use cloaking devices but you change anything about them and the only ones who are going to see the effects are Scouts. So, if you nyx the feedback of anyone who is not a Scout (something the Barbershop looooovessss to do) then what's left? And again twisting my words, I never said only the "users" can provide feedback. Was just simply asking why were you posting in this thread. Because frankly for what's it's worth it seems like you have something against us. You're not providing any form of intelligent input whatsoever. Just saying "sometimes it works, sometimes it doesn't" isn't saying anything. Is almost like saying sometimes the AR will register hits and sometimes it won't. That isn't good enough. The cloak was designed to help scouts move throughout the field undetected. If scouts wasn't as broken as they are now then we might just let the cloak be. But since scouts can even be out-scouted by assaults with double the HP something has to give. Either fix the scouts, or fix the cloaks. Cloaks now act more of a double-edge sword. Not only are we cloak-blind, but we also stick out. I've been sniped when I'm the only one in that area while cloaked on a damped gal scout. Explain that, I'm not asking to become completely invisible but come on most of the maps are dark, and the cloak doesn't work in dark areas even if standing still. There been times I just gave up on cloaking because honestly I have a better chance running around uncloaked and surviving an encounter if spotted vs being cloaked and praying that no one sees me. If an equipment designed to keep us hidden isn't working as intended it needs to be fixed |
Kayla Michael
Tactical Logistics and Cargo
111
|
Posted - 2015.04.27 03:44:00 -
[89] - Quote
That's a terrible request, what are you trying to do? Break the game even more? Cloaks are annoying, personally that should be something only left on EVE Online. And not in a FPS, but that is what I think anyway. Cloaking is just a really cowardly way to fight. In my opinion DUST's combat was more satisfying when people weren't tantamount to invisibility.
Not much I can really do about it though. Besides develop counter-strike methods for a feature I greatly despise.
I eat drahp uplink, me thinks this isn't a cookie. ~
|
Oswald Rehnquist
1507
|
Posted - 2015.04.27 05:11:00 -
[90] - Quote
I'm not sure if the thread is still a debating / conversing thread or not, this isn't to attack anyone, just trying to explain something. Also this isn't a critique against CCP, they have done an amazing job with such a complex game. Truly its mind blowing.
The point of cloaks is to be useful, currently cloaks are not, or the gains are not worth the the time/space to field them.
That being said, cloaks don't have to be useful or even in the game. Arguable the most enjoyable scout times were when we lacked a cloak. The problem is with scouts being tied to something that isn't useful which is then used to justify subpar stats/mechanics.
Between early beta's open field neo dodging scouts (that had a short lifespan) and uprising 1.8, people had zero problem with scouts and laughed at the suit for the most part. Yet during this period their stealth abilities were a lot stronger than they are now. In fact scout stealthiness was highest right when they removed auto detection perfect precision from points of interest. Scouts could effectively stay electronically invisible pre cloaks. Obviously this was not overpowered, no one flocked to scouts but they had the freedom to do what they needed with their fittings while having a niche power.
Cloaks were implemented in 1.8, and boy not since the logisaults did we see so much domination, but this time from a non medium frame. Since then, scouts have been severely nerfed to justify the existence of the cloak. Core mechanics were changed to nerf scouts, and scouts are now chained to the cloak limiting imaginative builds.
The cloaks does not project you with open terrain movement, the cloak does a poor job of protecting you if you are standing still in normally unsafe areas (at least against good players). So scouts need to go back to pre cloak habits as the cloak doesn't really expand any opportunities. I'm cool with that, not needing to depend on expensive equipment is nice, I honestly did prefer pre 1.8 scouts, and it was the opness of 1.8 that made me leave dust for a bit as traditional stalking is much more intense.
The obvious answer now is to simply not run cloaks. The thing is that those old opportunities are also limited due to all the other changes that they have been implemented to balance around cloaks. The suit role is directly tied to it, its like running a sentinel without ehp buffers, and new scanning system makes old method of pre cloak stalking obsolete. So what we are left with is a suit without a niche with subpar stats.
Essentially, scouts are in a werid position now than ever only because the scout debate has been "settled", which is a lot worse than the initial excitement pre 1.8 that an actual niche would have been given to us.
These are early uprising clips, so what makes them so special especially when we consider that this time we still had auto detect installations and no cloaks? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8hYp9WYkmhg https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i8X7qUXaqS8#t=4m09s
They are special because none of this isn't really feasible under the current mechanics (as it pertains to the new scan system), and this is probably the "most scoutly" image one can conjure up when thinking about general scout gameplay in fps games. This is a 11k fitting, if that matters at all, its just for kicks and giggles but the point still stands.
As a result, I use ScR/BP combo to accommodate the new middle range which scouts have been delineated to, but the concept of the cloak really isn't useful at this distance, in fact more often than not gives you away, its best to use basic cover than a cloak with this spacing as well. The scanning stats not exactly in favor with scouts which more or less makes it a big deal to ditch the cloak considering how much has been sacrificed for its existence.
This will probably PO many scouts off, I'm stating it because I'm selfish/dumb/evil/ignorant/etc, but if it fixes the role bleed, I personally wouldn't mind a more utility based passive aggressive role such as debuffing, kind of like an anti logi (drains ammo, reveals position, slows movement, cancels healing, etc). Though since this is more of a pipe dream, then that means with the exception for pilots and logis who can earn WPs without traditional rifle front line combat. Scouts are also rifle slayers until given tools to function as something else.
Assault stats get really close to the scouts traditional niche stats while fielding better ones themselves (this was reversed in 1.8, where people were wondering why they should even field assaults), their roles and functioning too similar to where one will clearly absorb the others role. Scouts were initially nerfed into oblivion due to offending assault suits and left untouched for a long time, they got touched in 1.8, offending assaults and got the relative nerf bat again (scouts aren't existing in oblivion now though). I'm of the opinion that they cannot be balanced, hence I think the aggressive speedster role should be absorbed by the assault permanently creating a light vs heavy assault sub class while providing something unique for the scout (currently, its the cloak, which has been made easier to be field by other suits).
My suggestion here should rightfully offend every slayer scout here because its directly threatening their role, and any criticism against me based on this suggestion is entirely justified, but the interesting part is more of them are now fielding non scouts to accommodate the current situation.
Didn't cost me much so there is my $.02 at any rate. I'm completely willing to be informed/corrected of my ignorance as I'm not immune to being off base. Theorycrafting is fun for me, so I'm all ears to better thoughts and opinions. Mine are simply influenced based on my observations on Dust's buffing and nerfing history of the scout.
Below 28 dB
|
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |