Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Tech De Ra
Electronic Sports League
988
|
Posted - 2014.10.29 16:13:00 -
[61] - Quote
Michael Arck wrote:Dust 514 stalled in growth because of many reasons, one being the hunt for "true balance".
I dont think you understand how balancing or development works mate, the quest for balance will always be ongoing and stopping is a ******** idea
development of a game does not stop because a small team that isnt in charge of development ends up working on balancing
(P.S. Balancing takes into account the skill difference of players via the use of razors, it doesnt give them a handicap because "they are too good")
Prime League champion
SGL Sidearm champion
Fanfest '14 All star champion
|
Ripley Riley
Incorruptibles
4281
|
Posted - 2014.10.29 16:15:00 -
[62] - Quote
Michael Arck wrote:I honestly cannot answer that because I havent played for a long time except for yesterday. Let me reword it. Heres an example. Players respec. 75 percent skills into RRs. We all know (or should know) RRs are weak, just effective in mainly pubs. Yet the increase of usage causes GD to react. Because of Rattati's direction of pursuing FOTM discouraging by way of nerfing, RR is nerfed again. Mainstay users render it useless. Respec buyers just buy another respec and the process begins again. If that was the way CCP balanced things, then you would be right. But that is not, at all, how it is done now. Player usage is just one of many numbers they consider in balancing.
Here is an example of how CCP balances things: [Data Insights] Rifles and Balancing Methodology
My advice to you, playa...
|
Michael Arck
5902
|
Posted - 2014.10.29 16:15:00 -
[63] - Quote
Soraya Xel wrote:Michael, Rattati's primary statistic for balance is not forum whining. You may wish to check the post he made today, it has pretty graphs and charts and explains a lot about the balance process. :)
I didnt say anything about forum whining though when discussing Rattati. I read his post before, that he wishes to discourage FOTM by way of nerfing. In fact he has nerfed items before based on a high usage percentage. Paid respecs give way to tipping the balance even further.
Archistrategos / The 7th Prime / Selah
*Where the fear has gone there will be nothing....only I will remain
|
Tech De Ra
Electronic Sports League
988
|
Posted - 2014.10.29 16:17:00 -
[64] - Quote
Michael Arck wrote:Soraya Xel wrote:Michael, Rattati's primary statistic for balance is not forum whining. You may wish to check the post he made today, it has pretty graphs and charts and explains a lot about the balance process. :) I didnt say anything about forum whining though when discussing Rattati. I read his post before, that he wishes to discourage FOTM by way of nerfing. In fact he has nerfed items before based on a high usage percentage. Paid respecs give way to tipping the balance even further.
There is a difference between "high usage %" and "high usage % coupled with high performance on average"
Prime League champion
SGL Sidearm champion
Fanfest '14 All star champion
|
Michael Arck
5902
|
Posted - 2014.10.29 16:18:00 -
[65] - Quote
Tech De Ra wrote:Michael Arck wrote:Dust 514 stalled in growth because of many reasons, one being the hunt for "true balance". I dont think you understand how balancing or development works mate, the quest for balance will always be ongoing and stopping is a ******** idea development of a game does not stop because a small team that isnt in charge of development ends up working on balancing (P.S. Balancing takes into account the skill difference of players via the use of razors, it doesnt give them a handicap because "they are too good")
I think most of you dont understand what Im expressing and have rose tinted glasses on, mate.
Oh well, I will return later...got breakfast cooking.
Archistrategos / The 7th Prime / Selah
*Where the fear has gone there will be nothing....only I will remain
|
Ripley Riley
Incorruptibles
4282
|
Posted - 2014.10.29 16:24:00 -
[66] - Quote
Michael Arck wrote:I think most of you dont understand what Im expressing and have rose tinted glasses on, mate.
Oh well, I will return later...got breakfast cooking. We're trying to explain that CCP doesn't nerf to discourage usage of a fitting. They nerf when a fitting is overperforming in areas it should not be overperforming in.
Tomorrow, every player begins using the shotgun. As expected, data indicates shotguns are destroying people that are 4m away. That is good, that is what the shotgun should do. No changes needed.
The day after that, data indicates the shotgun is insta-gibbing people at 20m away. WHOA. That's not right. The range on the shotgun is way too high. CCP then nerfs the range of the shotgun so it performs well within its intended role: high-alpha damage CQC.
THAT is how balancing works. Not, "LOTS OF PEOPLE USING THINGS MAKE THAT THING BAD NOA!!!"
My advice to you, playa...
|
Tech De Ra
Electronic Sports League
989
|
Posted - 2014.10.29 16:24:00 -
[67] - Quote
Michael Arck wrote:Tech De Ra wrote:Michael Arck wrote:Dust 514 stalled in growth because of many reasons, one being the hunt for "true balance". I dont think you understand how balancing or development works mate, the quest for balance will always be ongoing and stopping is a ******** idea development of a game does not stop because a small team that isnt in charge of development ends up working on balancing (P.S. Balancing takes into account the skill difference of players via the use of razors, it doesnt give them a handicap because "they are too good") I think most of you dont understand what Im expressing and have rose tinted glasses on, mate. Oh well, I will return later...got breakfast cooking.
Ah, my time spent helping multiple games with balancing and then winning thier tournaments must mean i'm wrong then
It couldn't possibly be that a scrub like you is wrong, we wouldn't ever think about that :P
(i do like forums that allow me to say scrub, did you know the RSI forums instantly ban you if you say scrub or carebear?)
Prime League champion
SGL Sidearm champion
Fanfest '14 All star champion
|
Apothecary Za'ki
Biomass Positive
1436
|
Posted - 2014.10.29 17:19:00 -
[68] - Quote
DUST Fiend wrote:Mobius Wyvern wrote:DUST Fiend wrote:We win
GG no RE You left this game for Destiny. How did you win anything? *tries to pretend he doesn't fervently hope this is a sign his old ADS buddy will be back for more awesome adventures* To be fair, I didn't leave "for" Destiny, I left because this game is a nightmare, Destiny just released around the same time. I have no ps3 or desire to use neutered ADS lol. I just saw the respec thing and laughed my ass off. it wasnt neutered it had its Godmode ultimate-slayer-killer of anything moveing.. Title revoked.
[[LogiBro ADV/PRO]]
[[Level 1 Forum Warrior]]
[[Level 2 Forum Pariah]]
|
DUST Fiend
Onslaught Inc RISE of LEGION
14765
|
Posted - 2014.10.29 18:01:00 -
[69] - Quote
Apothecary Za'ki wrote:DUST Fiend wrote:Mobius Wyvern wrote:DUST Fiend wrote:We win
GG no RE You left this game for Destiny. How did you win anything? *tries to pretend he doesn't fervently hope this is a sign his old ADS buddy will be back for more awesome adventures* To be fair, I didn't leave "for" Destiny, I left because this game is a nightmare, Destiny just released around the same time. I have no ps3 or desire to use neutered ADS lol. I just saw the respec thing and laughed my ass off. it wasnt neutered it had its Godmode ultimate-slayer-killer of anything moveing.. Title revoked. Only scrubs couldn't down an Incubus before. Now its virtually impossible to fail at killing one, and it lost the one thing that made it worth a damn in the first place: its AV potential.
If theres one thing Ratatti clearly still struggles to understand, its AV vs Vehicle balance.
(pâÄa¦át¢èa¦á)pâÄs+íGö+GöüGö+
|
Soraya Xel
Abandoned Privilege Top Men.
4466
|
Posted - 2014.10.29 18:08:00 -
[70] - Quote
DUST Fiend wrote:If theres one thing Ratatti clearly still struggles to understand, its AV vs Vehicle balance.
This is the first time in the game's history we've legitimately had any attempt at AV vs. Vehicle balance.
CPM1 Elect. Thanks for all your support. [email protected] for ideas, thoughts, and feedback.
|
|
DUST Fiend
Onslaught Inc RISE of LEGION
14766
|
Posted - 2014.10.29 18:11:00 -
[71] - Quote
Soraya Xel wrote:DUST Fiend wrote:If theres one thing Ratatti clearly still struggles to understand, its AV vs Vehicle balance. This is the first time in the game's history we've legitimately had any attempt at AV vs. Vehicle balance. ...........
(pâÄa¦át¢èa¦á)pâÄs+íGö+GöüGö+
|
Vesta Opalus
Bloodline Rebellion Capital Punishment.
120
|
Posted - 2014.10.29 18:42:00 -
[72] - Quote
Michael Arck wrote:Soraya Xel wrote:Michael, Rattati's primary statistic for balance is not forum whining. You may wish to check the post he made today, it has pretty graphs and charts and explains a lot about the balance process. :) I didnt say anything about forum whining though when discussing Rattati. I read his post before, that he wishes to discourage FOTM by way of nerfing. In fact he has nerfed items before based on a high usage percentage. Paid respecs give way to tipping the balance even further.
But thats not true. He has used high usage percentage as a starting point for investigating possible overpoweredness, but I'd like you to prove that hes using people using **** alot and just saying WELP LETS NERF IT.
Saying "Oh thats funny, the rail rifle is being used like 30% of the time which is way more than any other rifle, lets look at the kill rate of the weapon compared to other rifles and other data and see if its outperforming everything else" is way different to just saying "Oh thats funny, the rail rifle is being used like 30% of the time, lets nerf it now without even investigating". |
DUST Fiend
Onslaught Inc RISE of LEGION
14766
|
Posted - 2014.10.29 18:52:00 -
[73] - Quote
Vesta Opalus wrote:Michael Arck wrote:Soraya Xel wrote:Michael, Rattati's primary statistic for balance is not forum whining. You may wish to check the post he made today, it has pretty graphs and charts and explains a lot about the balance process. :) I didnt say anything about forum whining though when discussing Rattati. I read his post before, that he wishes to discourage FOTM by way of nerfing. In fact he has nerfed items before based on a high usage percentage. Paid respecs give way to tipping the balance even further. But thats not true. He has used high usage percentage as a starting point for investigating possible overpoweredness, but I'd like you to prove that hes using people using **** alot and just saying WELP LETS NERF IT. Saying "Oh thats funny, the rail rifle is being used like 30% of the time which is way more than any other rifle, lets look at the kill rate of the weapon compared to other rifles and other data and see if its outperforming everything else" is way different to just saying "Oh thats funny, the rail rifle is being used like 30% of the time, lets nerf it now without even investigating". I tend to hate on Ratatti and crew a lot, but this man speaks truth
(pâÄa¦át¢èa¦á)pâÄs+íGö+GöüGö+
|
DeadlyAztec11
Ostrakon Agency
5646
|
Posted - 2014.10.29 19:21:00 -
[74] - Quote
Soraya Xel wrote:Bright Cloud, I've heard this argument, but there is no logic to it. Just saying it repetitively does not make it true.
Every respec will cost money. (Exact cost not announced at current.) Players are not going to pay to switch fits every time the balance is changed when the difference in power is only a few percentage points, since the game is so much more balanced than it used to be, and SP gain will be so much higher. There's just no logic or sense in your statement. I think Bright Cloud is exaggerating at the scale at which people will get respec's but Cloud is still correct in that a substantial amount of people are likely to switch their skill points into the best rated gear for the moment.
Put your flags up in the sky.
And wave them side to side.
Show the world where you're from.
Show the world we are one.
|
Toby Flenderson
research lab
596
|
Posted - 2014.10.29 19:37:00 -
[75] - Quote
Mobius Kaethis wrote:Soraya Xel wrote:Mobius Kaethis wrote:KEROSIINI-TERO wrote:No, this mean everybody loses.
Well, every dust player at least. I can't help but agree. All that is happening is the switch from dust as a free to play game to a pay to win game. Allowing players to redefine the skill points they have is hardly different than allowing players to earn additional skill points (via boosters) for AUR. And unlike the latter, this has a cost penalty to use it: You lose ISK every time you do it, since you don't get a full refund on skill books. I am generally against respecs (particularly free ones with no penalty), but this isn't pay to win. CCP has done a good job avoiding that, and the CPM will help ensure they stay on point with that. I disagree. Now I can pay AUR to move into the FOTM. That is the very essence of pay to win. I pay money, I win. Loosing ISK is of absolutely no concern. It doesn't matter what you use at this point, people do well with PLCs and flaylocks. The FOTM is nice but it's not like everything else is unusable. This isn't pay to win, it's pay to change. |
DUST Fiend
Onslaught Inc RISE of LEGION
14768
|
Posted - 2014.10.29 19:38:00 -
[76] - Quote
DeadlyAztec11 wrote:Soraya Xel wrote:Bright Cloud, I've heard this argument, but there is no logic to it. Just saying it repetitively does not make it true.
Every respec will cost money. (Exact cost not announced at current.) Players are not going to pay to switch fits every time the balance is changed when the difference in power is only a few percentage points, since the game is so much more balanced than it used to be, and SP gain will be so much higher. There's just no logic or sense in your statement. I think Bright Cloud is exaggerating at the scale at which people will get respec's but Cloud is still correct in that a substantial amount of people are likely to switch their skill points into the best rated gear for the moment. I still say it makes for a healthier environment in terms of game balancing. If a fit is actually OP and a player is a FoTM player, they are likely putting sp into that anyways. Respecs simply highlight these over performing options, and also provide an avenue of escape should the nerf hammer hit unreasonably hard.
I know people want this to be real life, but at the end of the day, games should be fun. If you arent having fun, then theres no reason to play.
I dont even play this game anymore but ill probably buy a respec just to get rid of all my infantry sp and save it
(pâÄa¦át¢èa¦á)pâÄs+íGö+GöüGö+
|
Alena Ventrallis
Vengeance Unbound RISE of LEGION
2071
|
Posted - 2014.10.29 19:43:00 -
[77] - Quote
Mobius Kaethis wrote:Soraya Xel wrote:Mobius Kaethis wrote:KEROSIINI-TERO wrote:No, this mean everybody loses.
Well, every dust player at least. I can't help but agree. All that is happening is the switch from dust as a free to play game to a pay to win game. Allowing players to redefine the skill points they have is hardly different than allowing players to earn additional skill points (via boosters) for AUR. And unlike the latter, this has a cost penalty to use it: You lose ISK every time you do it, since you don't get a full refund on skill books. I am generally against respecs (particularly free ones with no penalty), but this isn't pay to win. CCP has done a good job avoiding that, and the CPM will help ensure they stay on point with that. I disagree. Now I can pay AUR to move into the FOTM. That is the very essence of pay to win. I pay money, I win. Loosing ISK is of absolutely no concern. No, no, NO.
Pay to win is: the best weapons/gear are only available for real money.
The only difference between respecs and getting more SP is time. That's it. Pay to win would be: the only way to gain more SP at all is with AUR. Or the only way to get officer weapons is to buy them for AUR. Or the only way to get proto weapons and gear is AUR.
Proof that Rattati/CCP do listen to the playerbase.
|
Michael Arck
5902
|
Posted - 2014.10.29 19:43:00 -
[78] - Quote
So the AR was nerfed due to balance, even when it was pretty much the standard go to rifle? This when we didnt even have a various auto rifle selection. The RR was nerfed for balance, even though in its original form it couldnt compete in a highly competitive setting of PC? I think if the rose tinted glasses are taken off, my point would be understood.
Archistrategos / The 7th Prime / Selah
*Where the fear has gone there will be nothing....only I will remain
|
Omega Nox
Consolidated Dust
6
|
Posted - 2014.10.29 19:52:00 -
[79] - Quote
X7 lion wrote:DUST Fiend wrote:We win
GG no RE yea kool, thanks for funding ccp so dust can turn a profit off you guys specing into fotm so that they can afford to put more development resources into dust. really thanks. more money for them means they can afford to keep people working on the game. On a personal note it also adds to a human element in which the developers can actually pay their rent and feed their kids. Money = more game = everyone's happy except the malcontented free riders. |
Iron Wolf Saber
Den of Swords
17549
|
Posted - 2014.10.29 19:54:00 -
[80] - Quote
Mobius Kaethis wrote:Iron Wolf Saber wrote:Really?
I thought a faction of the anti speccers won because there won't be any more free ones on the grounds of 'just because' and that the effort being put into these items would pay for the efforts. How does that reduce the pay to win aspect or the homogenizing effect this will have on the battlefield? Did no one on the CPM mention either of these outcomes? I am all for CCP making money. The more they make the longer I get to shoot face. This will have too many negatives to be worth the trade off though.
The item has a certain nature to it that will be explained in a blog.
CPM 1
Omni-Soldier, Forum Warrior
\\= Prototype Forge Gun=// Unlocked
|
|
CELESTA AUNGM
Kang Lo Directorate Gallente Federation
306
|
Posted - 2014.10.29 21:11:00 -
[81] - Quote
The players among us who think RESPEC is a cause for celebration and is going to solve GÇ£the point in the skill-path where I think I took the wrong turn and thatGÇÖs why I keep losing these fights---NOW IGÇÖm going to WIN these fightsGÇöjust watch me---GÇ£...
...are sort of like the compulsive gambler who swears sheGÇÖs got the right card-counting system to beat the casino at blackjack, and that last week she lost ONLY because she started playing after the third deck instead of the fourth deck. The casino has nothing to lose and everything to win by letting that gambler come back to try again. SheGÇÖs still going to lose, because sheGÇÖs believing thereGÇÖs a SYSTEM in here somewhere that will give her straight wins.
CCP has nothing to lose and everything to win by letting you do-over (heck, they even know they can CHARGE you for a do-over, and youGÇÖll buy it) to try your luck at re-skilling. Most, (not all, but most) of us are still going to lose our new SP to the same poor judgement as before, because weGÇÖre believing thereGÇÖs a GÇ£pay-to-winGÇ¥ SYSTEM in here somewhere that will give us stomper-wins.
But Dust Fiend and Alena make great points: WeGÇÖve played this game for so long, yet we STILL ignore AlenaGÇÖs true definition of GÇ£pay-to-winGÇ¥(your money or SP wonGÇÖt win you a Dust fightGÇöonly the unpreparedness of the red players). There IS something being lost by respec-allowance. TIME is lost (that means the game has sacrificed some longevity with developing your merc). And some RESPECT is lost for those players who stuck through the game the way EVE players stuck through---absorb your mistakes, eat your losses, grind the extra time as penance, and STILL prevail. I wonGÇÖt be respect-ing. DonGÇÖt need to, ... and I donGÇÖt have any resentments against those who DO buy a respec (respec-ers most likely wonGÇÖt acknowledge my point of view about GÇ£respectingGÇ¥ the player who GÇÿsucks-it-up-n-takes-the grindGÇÖ, so... hey, why argue, Celesta.)
I WILL be curious about the reasons WHY Uprising 1.9 has such GÇ£giftsGÇ¥ for us players. Bakery going out of business, so give the muffins away at -+ price to keep them from spoiling without a profit? Throw all BPOs and leftover goods into a revolving-Aurum scheme that lines up players to have more addictive reasons to buy more Aurum from Sony between now and 2015 than weGÇÖve seen since Jan 2014? I donGÇÖt know.
Remember that funny scene in Peter JacksonGÇÖs movie where Golum bites the ring off FrodoGÇÖs finger and finally wins the ring,... heGÇÖs won, heGÇÖs won.... But, umm, waitGÇöwhat?
Universe of good wishes for the 49, especially CCP Eterne...
No story can have life without writers and publishers.
|
jenza aranda
BetaMax.
3566
|
Posted - 2014.10.29 21:36:00 -
[82] - Quote
Yes, you won. But they went with my idea :)
Dust 514 101 // Dust 514 Wiki
|
Mobius Wyvern
Onslaught Inc RISE of LEGION
5365
|
Posted - 2014.10.29 21:45:00 -
[83] - Quote
DUST Fiend wrote:Mobius Wyvern wrote:DUST Fiend wrote:We win
GG no RE You left this game for Destiny. How did you win anything? *tries to pretend he doesn't fervently hope this is a sign his old ADS buddy will be back for more awesome adventures* To be fair, I didn't leave "for" Destiny, I left because this game is a nightmare, Destiny just released around the same time. I have no ps3 or desire to use neutered ADS lol. I just saw the respec thing and laughed my ass off. *trying to look nonchalant while sniffing quietly and blinking back tears*
Amidst the blue skies
A link from past to future
The sheltering wings of the protector
|
TechMechMeds
KILL-EM-QUICK RISE of LEGION
6184
|
Posted - 2014.10.29 21:52:00 -
[84] - Quote
CELESTA AUNGM wrote:The players among us who think RESPEC is a cause for celebration and is going to solve GÇ£the point in the skill-path where I think I took the wrong turn and thatGÇÖs why I keep losing these fights---NOW IGÇÖm going to WIN these fightsGÇöjust watch me---GÇ£... ...are sort of like the compulsive gambler who swears sheGÇÖs got the right card-counting system to beat the casino at blackjack, and that last week she lost ONLY because she started playing after the third deck instead of the fourth deck. The casino has nothing to lose and everything to win by letting that gambler come back to try again. SheGÇÖs still going to lose, because sheGÇÖs believing thereGÇÖs a SYSTEM in here somewhere that will give her straight wins. CCP has nothing to lose and everything to win by letting you do-over (heck, they even know they can CHARGE you for a do-over, and youGÇÖll buy it) to try your luck at re-skilling. Most, (not all, but most) of us are still going to lose our new SP to the same poor judgement as before, because weGÇÖre believing thereGÇÖs a GÇ£pay-to-winGÇ¥ SYSTEM in here somewhere that will give us stomper-wins. But Dust Fiend and Alena make great points: WeGÇÖve played this game for so long, yet we STILL ignore AlenaGÇÖs true definition of GÇ£pay-to-winGÇ¥(your money or SP wonGÇÖt win you a Dust fightGÇöonly the unpreparedness of the red players). There IS something being lost by respec-allowance. TIME is lost (that means the game has sacrificed some longevity with developing your merc). And some RESPECT is lost for those players who stuck through the game the way EVE players stuck through---absorb your mistakes, eat your losses, grind the extra time as penance, and STILL prevail. I wonGÇÖt be respect-ing. DonGÇÖt need to, ... and I donGÇÖt have any resentments against those who DO buy a respec (respec-ers most likely wonGÇÖt acknowledge my point of view about GÇ£respectingGÇ¥ the player who GÇÿsucks-it-up-n-takes-the grindGÇÖ, so... hey, why argue, Celesta. ) I WILL be curious about the reasons WHY Uprising 1.9 has such GÇ£giftsGÇ¥ for us players. Bakery going out of business, so give the muffins away at -+ price to keep them from spoiling without a profit? Throw all BPOs and leftover goods into a revolving-Aurum scheme that lines up players to have more addictive reasons to buy more Aurum from Sony between now and 2015 than weGÇÖve seen since Jan 2014? I donGÇÖt know. Remember that funny scene in Peter JacksonGÇÖs movie where Golum bites the ring off FrodoGÇÖs finger and finally wins the ring,... heGÇÖs won, heGÇÖs won.... But, umm, waitGÇöwhat?
Generalised doom and gloom, well put.
I am GJR's Renfield lol
My favourite BAND '14 days till Maine'
Their album - 28 days till maine.
|
DUST Fiend
Onslaught Inc RISE of LEGION
14770
|
Posted - 2014.10.29 21:57:00 -
[85] - Quote
jenza aranda wrote:Yes, you won. But they went with my idea :) To be fair, im fairly certain it was a lot of peoples idea.
(pâÄa¦át¢èa¦á)pâÄs+íGö+GöüGö+
|
Mobius Kaethis
Molon Labe. General Tso's Alliance
1992
|
Posted - 2014.10.29 22:12:00 -
[86] - Quote
Soraya Xel wrote:True enough.
Okay, good game balance... combined with the cost of the respec which will likely make it not worth it for very small gains in benefit.
That is probably a fair assessment. I will concede but I am, as previously stated, displeased about this turn.
Now with more evil.
|
Soraya Xel
Abandoned Privilege Top Men.
4481
|
Posted - 2014.10.29 22:24:00 -
[87] - Quote
Man, if everyone could be happy at the same time........
CPM1 Elect. Thanks for all your support. [email protected] for ideas, thoughts, and feedback.
|
Ripley Riley
Incorruptibles
4301
|
Posted - 2014.10.30 00:40:00 -
[88] - Quote
Michael Arck wrote:That is a side opinion and it doesn't address what I'm saying. If the balance was true now even after all his work (no offense Rattati), Judge wouldn't be pissed about the ADS and nerf talks wouldn't still be happening on GD. You cannot obtain true balance. Its either players are going to suck it up or others are going to complain. That is always the case and for that reason alone, true balance will never be achieved.
True balance is able to be achieved through constant monitoring of data and tweaking the game as needed. It's going to upset players who get comfortable with certain play styles (ADS, RR) then have that play style changed. If they are adults they will accept it as a necessary part of keeping the game healthy; they will either adapt to the balance or switch to a different fitting.
Judge makes posts about the ADS because he got all warm and cozy in his 50 K/D genocide chariot, CCP discovered the overperformance of the ADS, and nerfed it accordingly. His play style has been disrupted. People don't like change. That has nothing to do with balance. It's just human nature.
Important note: no, Dust being healthy isn't an opinion. CCP Rouge, "WeGÇÿre very happy to see that our player base remains both stable and active. In fact, we are currently seeing the highest engagement numbers in over a year, averaging around 300.000 Monthly Active (unique) Users over the last few months" Quoted from this devblog. Anecdotally, I squad with new mercs more often now and members of my own corporation are returning to Dust after all of the hotfixes. Someone I thought would NEVER return to Dust, if coming back after hearing about 1.9.
Hell, even the forum feels a bit more active since the hotfixes.
My advice to you, playa...
|
Ripley Riley
Incorruptibles
4301
|
Posted - 2014.10.30 00:41:00 -
[89] - Quote
jenza aranda wrote:Yes, you won. But they went with my idea :) Now if they just would have ignored your friendly-fire in FW idea...
My advice to you, playa...
|
DUST Fiend
Onslaught Inc RISE of LEGION
14773
|
Posted - 2014.10.30 00:48:00 -
[90] - Quote
Ripley Riley wrote:Michael Arck wrote:That is a side opinion and it doesn't address what I'm saying. If the balance was true now even after all his work (no offense Rattati), Judge wouldn't be pissed about the ADS and nerf talks wouldn't still be happening on GD. You cannot obtain true balance. Its either players are going to suck it up or others are going to complain. That is always the case and for that reason alone, true balance will never be achieved. True balance is able to be achieved through constant monitoring of data and tweaking the game as needed. It's going to upset players who get comfortable with certain play styles (ADS, RR) then have that play style changed. If they are adults they will accept it as a necessary part of keeping the game healthy; they will either adapt to the balance or switch to a different fitting. Judge makes posts about the ADS because he got all warm and cozy in his 50 K/D genocide chariot, CCP discovered the overperformance of the ADS, and nerfed it accordingly. His play style has been disrupted. People don't like change. That has nothing to do with balance. It's just human nature. Important note: no, Dust being healthy isn't an opinion. CCP Rouge, "WeGÇÿre very happy to see that our player base remains both stable and active. In fact, we are currently seeing the highest engagement numbers in over a year, averaging around 300.000 Monthly Active (unique) Users over the last few months" Quoted from this devblog. Anecdotally, I squad with new mercs more often now and members of my own corporation are returning to Dust after all of the hotfixes. Someone I thought would NEVER return to Dust, if coming back after hearing about 1.9. Hell, even the forum feels a bit more active since the hotfixes. Turning ADS into warpoint piniatas for skill less swarms is just a tad more than disrupting a play style lol. Never mind removing any AV potential from the Incubus. Rapid transport is rarely needed and almost always done better by an LAV befause easu to use AV with massive knock back makes extractions less than appealing. The problem is CCP has no idea what they want from ADS, and it shows.
(pâÄa¦át¢èa¦á)pâÄs+íGö+GöüGö+
|
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |