Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 6 post(s) |
CoochMaster Flex
Contract Hunters
2
|
Posted - 2014.10.14 13:38:00 -
[121] - Quote
GM Archduke wrote:I'll check in with my managers tomorrow if I can explain the 'customer support view' about this topic in detail. I would love to :) Even though I know I won't convince anyone. And I don't want to. We know you guys want respecs, and we handle respec requests according to our policies. Every ticket reply with a denied respec request also includes the line "Please keep an eye on the DUST 514 Forum and DEV Blog, to be up-to-date with any DUST 514 related news, and to see if such an option will ever be available again." How about you add the respec feature in the game. Everyone ask for it so bad constantly. Just add it to the game already, BUT it has to cost a butt load of ISK OR Aurum. I'd be happy with that.
It's not about how much sheild and armor you stack to win. It's how you use the suit to win.
|
Mobius Kaethis
Molon Labe. General Tso's Alliance
1953
|
Posted - 2014.10.14 14:20:00 -
[122] - Quote
CoochMaster Flex wrote:GM Archduke wrote:I'll check in with my managers tomorrow if I can explain the 'customer support view' about this topic in detail. I would love to :) Even though I know I won't convince anyone. And I don't want to. We know you guys want respecs, and we handle respec requests according to our policies. Every ticket reply with a denied respec request also includes the line "Please keep an eye on the DUST 514 Forum and DEV Blog, to be up-to-date with any DUST 514 related news, and to see if such an option will ever be available again." How about you add the respec feature in the game. Everyone ask for it so bad constantly. Just add it to the game already, BUT it has to cost a butt load of ISK OR Aurum. I'd be happy with that.
I'm game for that but only if the price is 1 mil aur. No more no less.
Now with more evil.
|
Alldin Kan
Imperfects Negative-Feedback
1218
|
Posted - 2014.10.14 14:54:00 -
[123] - Quote
Just quit the game if you can't handle the changes.
Alldin Kan has joined the battle!
|
Leadfoot10
Molon Labe. General Tso's Alliance
1686
|
Posted - 2014.10.14 15:00:00 -
[124] - Quote
Apothecary Za'ki wrote:Zindorak wrote:So everyone can be a scumbag cal scout? lolno naw smart people will save their sp as i feel a nerfageddon on the horizon for scouts.. especially the cal scout.
The smart people figured that out long ago and have been storing SP well ahead of every hotfix since then.
|
RayRay James
Vengeance Unbound Dark Taboo
499
|
Posted - 2014.10.14 15:15:00 -
[125] - Quote
maluble wrote:Leadfoot10 wrote:No.
I've spent my SP wisely. Why should someone gain an advantage over me from spending it unwisely? So what your saying is you dont have 10 mil worth of skills that were drastically changed making them invalid to your playstyle?
I do, He does, we all do if we've been playing for any sort of long time.
They aren't invalid. You can't use all your skills all the time. If you use a logi suit, your points in commango, sentinel or scout aren't invalid, they just aren't being used at the time. Do you want a respec every time you switch a suit? Before every match? How many respecs do you want, because there's more changes coming down the pipe. |
Leadfoot10
Molon Labe. General Tso's Alliance
1686
|
Posted - 2014.10.14 15:36:00 -
[126] - Quote
maluble wrote:Leadfoot10 wrote:No.
I've spent my SP wisely. Why should someone gain an advantage over me from spending it unwisely? So what your saying is you dont have 10 mil worth of skills that were drastically changed making them invalid to your playstyle?
Yes, I'm saying I have very little wasted SP.
I've got all core skills maxed, 4 proto suits, 2 proto weapons, and 2 proto sidarms. A few of those suits have changed significantly (cal scout and gal logi), which required a change to MY playstyle. One of the weapons was useless for months (AR). Two more had their roles change significantly (Gal Logi and Cal Scout). The AR and RR have been nerfed, buffed, and nerfed again. Never did I complain. Never asked for a respec. Just quietly went about adapting to the changes....
And perhaps if your playstyle was a little more flexible and your foresight was a little better, you, too, wouldn't be crying over something that isn't going to happen.
Do you do anything other than scout? That's the only suit I ever recall you seeing. Perhaps the issue isn't CCP, but rather you....as putting all your eggs into one basket makes you even more at risk when the balance bat is swung. |
RayRay James
Vengeance Unbound Dark Taboo
499
|
Posted - 2014.10.14 15:42:00 -
[127] - Quote
Bradric Banewolf wrote:RayRay James wrote:Dreis Shadowweaver wrote:Leadfoot10 wrote:No.
I've spent my SP wisely. Why should someone gain an advantage over me from spending it unwisely? It's not spending SP unwisely if what you spent it on gets changed. How are choices supposed to matter if CCP takes our choices and ***** all over them? Which is why I support respecs just on things that get changed, not full-blown respecs. That way, our choices REALLY WILL MATTER. You're crying over spilled milk The only skill point refund I remember in EVE in 8 years when was they removed learning skills. It wasn't a respec, it was a return. THAT IS WHY IT WILL NEVER HAPPEN If CCP won't refund SP in EVE, their bread and butter, even when they make such sweeping changes to ship design, they WILL NOT do it in Dust. You know what happens in EVE when something get's put on it's a$s? People adapt, they skill into new ships, they pull out old ships they haven't used in 3 years, a very tiny amount rage on the forums. Those that rage get told the same thing you see on these forums. It's exponentially easier to skill into new suits and weapons in this game that it is in EVE. Suck it up and quit whining. So I spec into assault full proto. Assault is rendered useless currently do to the fact that scouts are better at being assault. I can do ten times more with my gal scout than I can with my gal assault. Both are proto, but the assault is a waste of isk?! If I were to get just my suit and weapon points back I could choose to run two types of scout instead. I don't even run the assault at this point?! Almost got the gal commando proto too because it's also more versatile than my assault. It can use light weapons and tank armor. It can be slow or fast ( as you can get a heavy). It serves double as AV and fire support. With assault you have to choose one or the other. All my points in the AR and gal assault were pretty much a waste as I watched both the weapon and the class get nerfed and outclassed into oblivion?! Any points into the ScR was a waste as it has been killed?! These changes were after the fact that I spent the points. I spec into it for one reason only to have that reason removed. To be completely honest with you I can care less about eve outside of OB support. The two games simply aren't integrated enough to matter. What you don't get in eve shouldn't be denied to me in dust simply because you get on the forums and say "htfu"?! Eve is an entirely different game. When they change a ship it's still a ship. You change guns or whatever and keep mining?! In dust when they nerf something it gets obliterated!!! They completely change the way the suit or weapon operates. The gal heavy slot were 4 low 1 high. They switch them with the Amarr 3 low 2 high for the game "lore". That's a complete suit change! Well now gal heavy players want to spec into Amarr heavies to get their performance back, and rightfully so! I understand tweaks, but you must also understand how steep some of these changes have been. Once rattati finds a balance a respec is in order. The race you picked might be useless to your playstyle altogether by the time he's through. If you play well with Amarr weapons, and they get nerfed? Maybe your new weapon is minmatar weapons. By the time they're done I will have points all over the skill tree at this rate?! Remember! If I ran proto assault first that means I ran assault style mods. Armor, damage mods, shields, etc. Now due to the fact that assault is useless I run proto scout, but I must also spec into scout weapons and mods?! Your talking about saving millions of sp just to be effective?! We're not whining. We're asking for some consideration.
You really think swapping out t2 blasters for t2 lasers is a simple as swapping an AR for a CR?
CCP has done slot layout changes every 6 months I can remember playing. The ships are no different than the suits in that sense.
You may not care about EVE, and that's fine, but you should understand that the same developer is making the game. Set in the same universe, set by (essentially) same rules for both. Yes, I in fact have had ships destroyed by changes to the game. I used to fly a Myrmadon that was armor tanked and had 5 heavy drones. Now the right way to fit that is shield tanked with medium drones. Same hull, completely different ship. The hurricane is another ship they keep changing. Don't even LOOK at the EVE forums regarding the Jump Distance changes coming in. Every null-sec block $hit themselves.
YES! You will have skill points spread across everything in game, get over it. My main has MILLIONS of SP in industry that haven't been used in half a decade. I used them at one point, I don't anymore. Mostly because changes to industry made me not want to play that style anymore.
YES! CCP wan'ts you to retrain into weapons, your "millions of SP to save", when they make changes. Conversely, if you know changes are coming, save your SP. Wait to see how things play out, then apply them.
Asking for consideration while sounding like a petulant, spoiled child (not you specifically) is going to come across as whining. There are plenty of people here, who have gotten an answer from a GM, and have said "Waah, but that's not fair, that's not what I want". The people with concise arguments for getting a respec keep getting drowned out by the whiners and when a GM all but says 'Ain't happening, here's why', people keep going on.
|
Leadfoot10
Molon Labe. General Tso's Alliance
1686
|
Posted - 2014.10.14 15:51:00 -
[128] - Quote
maluble wrote:Leadfoot10 wrote:Ripley Riley wrote:Leadfoot10 wrote:No.
I've spent my SP wisely. Why should someone gain an advantage over me from spending it unwisely? They will have an advantage over you, how? They have access to the same skills you do, at the same SP prices you do? Are you concerned some new player might start being competitive against you because of an SP respec? They will have an advantage because they will not have to "pay for their mistakes". I'm not concerned with any new players becoming competitive -- that already happens with great frequency -- but I am concerned with being given a respec as it is not fair to those of us who used their SP wisely. To flip this around a bit and using your logic, why not give an unlimited number of SP refunds? They will have access to the same skills as everyone at the same SP prices, right? Wrong. Because our choices should matter, and SP refunds mean they don't matter. Which is, essentially, what I'm saying. How does it not matter when one skills into something and a month later it gets changed? How is that not spending sp wisely when the function of the skill is changed? I think you should actually put some thought into your logic. Your rederic suggests that we should all be physic and predict when something will be changed. Not only that but they release half the weapons, equipment and suits a year later making my previous choices invalid, I dont need ar and cr I dont need sg after the min scout got a good bonus change and kn got a much needed buff. I could go on with more valid reason as to why we should get respec's when **** is always being changed. Why should we suffer because they can't make a semi balanced game to begin with let alone release all the content right away. This is not a model that will succeed even on PC.
It does matter that thing get changed. However, if you're stupid enough not to realize that this game (and, frankly, every FPS) struggles with balance and haven't realized over the 20 or so iterations of this game that it's a continual process, is it CCP's fault or is it your fault?
There is no truly balanced FPS. They all have series of nerfs and buffs to try to achieve balance. The wise player realizes that and chooses their skills wisely against this backdrop.
And so you know, the "model that will [not] succeed even on a PC" has been surviving for more than a decade with Eve, not to mention countless other FPS and MMOs that use a similar model, and respecs after every change water down a fundamental tenet of the genre -- your choices matter.
So I guess I just need to put some thought into my logic....or you need to realize that all games with skill trees suffer this same challenge. |
Leadfoot10
Molon Labe. General Tso's Alliance
1686
|
Posted - 2014.10.14 15:57:00 -
[129] - Quote
Ripley Riley wrote:Leadfoot10 wrote:If I'm wrong about that, kindly post a specific example of what you're talking about. All racial starter fittings had the Assault Rifle fitted to them making new players believe that was their racial go-to weapon... which is 100% wrong and led to many players (who were not Gallente) dumping SP into a weapon that was not inline with their racial rifles.
That's hardly an example of useless.
At best it's an example of "less useful". |
Leadfoot10
Molon Labe. General Tso's Alliance
1686
|
Posted - 2014.10.14 16:01:00 -
[130] - Quote
maluble wrote:Leadfoot10 wrote:maluble wrote: I agree we shouldnt be able to respec every time we make a choice and end up regretting it, but when i skill into something and the way it works is changed, my choice means nothing. I don't mind tweaks to things but when it becomes useless I don't want it anymore because I never skilled into what it became.
Nothing has become "useless", but many things have changed (positively and negatively, with the intent of balance). Moving past that, if you end up regretting your choices then perhaps you should be more measured rather than skill into FoTM or OP things before they get changed. If I'm wrong about that, kindly post a specific example of what you're talking about. Essentially what your saying leadfoot is it doesnt affect you so **** anyo e it does, do you live your life based on such selfish ideals?
That's not what I'm saying at all.... What I'm saying is I saw it coming and planned accordingly....and when things don't go as planned, I don't complain, I don't QQ, I adapt.
So I guess you don't have a specific example then...and would rather infer that I'm selfish for wanting everyone to be held to the same standard where your decisions matter rather than refund SP because some players specced into FoTM and now it's not as dominant as it was??? |
|
RayRay James
Vengeance Unbound Dark Taboo
499
|
Posted - 2014.10.14 16:04:00 -
[131] - Quote
Leadfoot10, I like you.
I wish I had more votes to give. |
Spkr4theDead
Red Star. EoN.
2175
|
Posted - 2014.10.14 16:06:00 -
[132] - Quote
Leadfoot10 wrote:
And so you know, the "model that will [not] succeed even on a PC" has been surviving for more than a decade with Eve, not to mention countless other FPS and MMOs that use a similar model, and respecs after every change water down a fundamental tenet of the genre -- your choices matter.
The choices you make don't matter when CCP changes things on a whim.
I may be missing something, but I'm pretty sure that I didn't call for a tank nerf before Uprising 1.7. - Atiim
|
Leadfoot10
Molon Labe. General Tso's Alliance
1686
|
Posted - 2014.10.14 16:08:00 -
[133] - Quote
Spkr4theDead wrote:Leadfoot10 wrote:
And so you know, the "model that will [not] succeed even on a PC" has been surviving for more than a decade with Eve, not to mention countless other FPS and MMOs that use a similar model, and respecs after every change water down a fundamental tenet of the genre -- your choices matter.
The choices you make don't matter when CCP changes things on a whim.
But they're not "changing things on a whim".
They are changing things to improve balance....
...just like every FPS I've ever played in the past two decades....
...and just like Dust has been since closed beta. |
Lonewolf Heavy
Chaotic Company
136
|
Posted - 2014.10.14 16:18:00 -
[134] - Quote
I've been playing since before closed beta, and honestly i can care less about respecs, I've made and deleted 4 other characters because I made mistakes. This character Ive had for almost 2 years now and just like with EVE, i've spec'ed into so many things i regret (e.g. assaults, logi's, and scouts) but honestly I do use them from time to time based on events that come up. so yea you might spec into something that gets changed, but its still helpful to have in case of events or if they get buffed
Everyone used to make fun of me for going proto in commandos when they were first released but then I stuck with them and after they released all of them I went straight into Minimitar Sentinel and Commando proto even though they had the lowest EHP. Again I got mocked and then look at them now. everyone hates me because i can tear apart any vehicle I want with my winmando .
Blueberries are delicious and an essential part of my diet ;)
Commando/Heavy
Willing to PC for anyone for a low price
|
deezy dabest
IMPERIAL SPECIAL FORCES GROUP
1009
|
Posted - 2014.10.14 16:25:00 -
[135] - Quote
The ONLY time we should get a respec is when all racial variants of vehicles, suits, and weapons are in the game. The only reason we should get that is because there have been a lot of people forced into things they did not want but that was their only choice.
For those that are going to say oh well this, this, and this have been added since last respec its still a NO in my book because if they were to give out a respec every time something was added then people would just count on that and wildly blow their SP on the FOTM and then whine that respecs are not happening fast enough.
WHEN THINKING ABOUT MAKING A RESPEC THREAD THINK NEVER MIND. |
Spkr4theDead
Red Star. EoN.
2175
|
Posted - 2014.10.14 17:03:00 -
[136] - Quote
Leadfoot10 wrote:Spkr4theDead wrote:Leadfoot10 wrote:
And so you know, the "model that will [not] succeed even on a PC" has been surviving for more than a decade with Eve, not to mention countless other FPS and MMOs that use a similar model, and respecs after every change water down a fundamental tenet of the genre -- your choices matter.
The choices you make don't matter when CCP changes things on a whim. But they're not "changing things on a whim". They are changing things to introduce new content and improve balance.... ...just like every FPS I've ever played in the past two decades.... ...and just like Dust has been since closed beta. So, either you can recognize that and plan accordingly or you can continue to cry for respecs and argue that those who disagree make no sense. The choice is yours. I guess you forgot we only had a dropsuit SP refund for 1.8, when everybody on here wanted a full infantry respec. I had a full vehicle SP refund for 1.7, there wasn't any reason not to get a full dropsuit SP refund.
You have no logical argument against one. You think people will get an unfair advantage over you, even though everybody would get one. Or do you enjoy stomping on noobs so much that you won't allow one for that reason alone?
I may be missing something, but I'm pretty sure that I didn't call for a tank nerf before Uprising 1.7. - Atiim
|
CUSE TOWN333
KILL-EM-QUICK RISE of LEGION
1758
|
Posted - 2014.10.14 17:11:00 -
[137] - Quote
Leadfoot10 wrote:Spkr4theDead wrote:Leadfoot10 wrote:
And so you know, the "model that will [not] succeed even on a PC" has been surviving for more than a decade with Eve, not to mention countless other FPS and MMOs that use a similar model, and respecs after every change water down a fundamental tenet of the genre -- your choices matter.
The choices you make don't matter when CCP changes things on a whim. But they're not "changing things on a whim". They are changing things to introduce new content and improve balance.... ...just like every FPS I've ever played in the past two decades.... ...and just like Dust has been since closed beta. So, either you can recognize that and plan accordingly or you can continue to cry for respecs and argue that those who disagree make no sense. The choice is yours. come on now Lead stop acting like we don't know how to play dust and use SP wisely. i have 4 proto suits heavy,2 assaults, and a scout plus 6 proto weapons no matter what happens every patch i have something i can run thats effective. i never wanted to have to do that as i prefer 1 role and gun but noobs cry to nerf the **** out of something till it completely changes or is useless. this makes me use my SP sideways instead of truely maxing out my prefered role.
KEQ diplomat/ intel /GC officer
|
RayRay James
Vengeance Unbound Dark Taboo
500
|
Posted - 2014.10.14 17:12:00 -
[138] - Quote
Spkr4theDead wrote:Leadfoot10 wrote:Spkr4theDead wrote:Leadfoot10 wrote:
And so you know, the "model that will [not] succeed even on a PC" has been surviving for more than a decade with Eve, not to mention countless other FPS and MMOs that use a similar model, and respecs after every change water down a fundamental tenet of the genre -- your choices matter.
The choices you make don't matter when CCP changes things on a whim. But they're not "changing things on a whim". They are changing things to introduce new content and improve balance.... ...just like every FPS I've ever played in the past two decades.... ...and just like Dust has been since closed beta. So, either you can recognize that and plan accordingly or you can continue to cry for respecs and argue that those who disagree make no sense. The choice is yours. I guess you forgot we only had a dropsuit SP refund for 1.8, when everybody on here wanted a full infantry respec. I had a full vehicle SP refund for 1.7, there wasn't any reason not to get a full dropsuit SP refund. You have no logical argument against one. You think people will get an unfair advantage over you, even though everybody would get one. Or do you enjoy stomping on noobs so much that you won't allow one for that reason alone?
People already have an unfair advantage over me and I have 52 Mil SP
It's called skill. They have it, i don't. (When it comes to guns, I'll Logi the $hit out of someone though)
I still don't think there needs to be a respec.
The reason they did only dropsuits vs full vehicle respecs was because of just how much they removed in 1.7. Trying to unwind the modules, vehicles and core skills for all the vehicles would have taken forever if it could have been done at all. Dropsuits, they refunded the whole tree because the rest of the modules and weapons weren't so intertwined.
I don't think most of the people here against respec's are that way because they want too scream "get gud, noob" on the forums. In my scenario, it's because I have seen that even after the respecs we have gotten, people will never be satisfied. If CCP gives an inch (one time respec) the forums will want a foot (anytime respecs). The only way to prevent that is to just never give in. |
Maken Tosch
DUST University Ivy League
9753
|
Posted - 2014.10.14 17:13:00 -
[139] - Quote
Spkr4theDead wrote:I guess you forgot we only had a dropsuit SP refund for 1.8, when everybody on here wanted a full infantry respec. I had a full vehicle SP refund for 1.7, there wasn't any reason not to get a full dropsuit SP refund.
Dropsuits have absolutely no bearing on the effectiveness of the vehicles which is why you never got a full dropsuit SP refund in 1.7 as pilot suits never even came around. Maybe I can agree that dropsuit SP should have been refunded alongside core skill refund, but that's it.
On Twitter: @HilmarVeigar #greenlightlegion #dust514 players are waiting.
|
RayRay James
Vengeance Unbound Dark Taboo
500
|
Posted - 2014.10.14 17:14:00 -
[140] - Quote
CUSE TOWN333 wrote: come on now Lead stop acting like we don't know how to play dust and use SP wisely. i have 4 proto suits heavy,2 assaults, and a scout plus 6 proto weapons
If you have all those Proto items and haven't maxed out your preferred role, that's your own fault.
|
|
CUSE TOWN333
KILL-EM-QUICK RISE of LEGION
1758
|
Posted - 2014.10.14 17:43:00 -
[141] - Quote
RayRay James wrote:CUSE TOWN333 wrote: come on now Lead stop acting like we don't know how to play dust and use SP wisely. i have 4 proto suits heavy,2 assaults, and a scout plus 6 proto weapons
If you have all those Proto items and haven't maxed out your preferred role, that's your own fault. small things like fitting optimization LvL 5 on a gun.
KEQ diplomat/ intel /GC officer
|
Michael Arck
5885
|
Posted - 2014.10.14 17:50:00 -
[142] - Quote
This again??? Can we start locking these type of threads??
Archistrategos / The 7th Prime / Selah
*Where the fear has gone there will be nothing....only I will remain
|
RayRay James
Vengeance Unbound Dark Taboo
502
|
Posted - 2014.10.14 18:03:00 -
[143] - Quote
CUSE TOWN333 wrote:RayRay James wrote:CUSE TOWN333 wrote: come on now Lead stop acting like we don't know how to play dust and use SP wisely. i have 4 proto suits heavy,2 assaults, and a scout plus 6 proto weapons
If you have all those Proto items and haven't maxed out your preferred role, that's your own fault. small things like fitting optimization LvL 5 on a gun.
Now your just being silly |
Leadfoot10
Molon Labe. General Tso's Alliance
1690
|
Posted - 2014.10.14 18:41:00 -
[144] - Quote
Spkr4theDead wrote:Leadfoot10 wrote:Spkr4theDead wrote:Leadfoot10 wrote:
And so you know, the "model that will [not] succeed even on a PC" has been surviving for more than a decade with Eve, not to mention countless other FPS and MMOs that use a similar model, and respecs after every change water down a fundamental tenet of the genre -- your choices matter.
The choices you make don't matter when CCP changes things on a whim. But they're not "changing things on a whim". They are changing things to introduce new content and improve balance.... ...just like every FPS I've ever played in the past two decades.... ...and just like Dust has been since closed beta. So, either you can recognize that and plan accordingly or you can continue to cry for respecs and argue that those who disagree make no sense. The choice is yours. I guess you forgot we only had a dropsuit SP refund for 1.8, when everybody on here wanted a full infantry respec. I had a full vehicle SP refund for 1.7, there wasn't any reason not to get a full dropsuit SP refund. You have no logical argument against one. You think people will get an unfair advantage over you, even though everybody would get one. Or do you enjoy stomping on noobs so much that you won't allow one for that reason alone?
I have forgotten nothing, and it's worth noting your "everybody" didn't include me.
Moving past that, my argument is perfectly logical: Our choices should matter.
Just because you disagree doesn't mean it's not logical.
And I don't need my proto weapons and guns to stomp noobs. Stop being silly.
I simply think our choices should matter...and I shouldn't be penalized for making sound long-term decisions by giving those with more of a short term focus a "get out of bad choices for free" SP refund. |
DUST Fiend
Onslaught Inc RISE of LEGION
14717
|
Posted - 2014.10.14 18:45:00 -
[145] - Quote
Just quit amd collect your respec if Legion ever happens
Too many try hard role players here, you'll never talk sense into them.
(pâÄa¦át¢èa¦á)pâÄs+íGö+GöüGö+
|
gauntlet44 LbowDeep
Heaven84 Devils General Tso's Alliance
152
|
Posted - 2014.10.14 18:55:00 -
[146] - Quote
no sp reset
asset reset on the other hand
also play as strangeland stranger,
larlac theest,
gauntlett5487,
and balacs sixkin
|
Leadfoot10
Molon Labe. General Tso's Alliance
1690
|
Posted - 2014.10.14 18:58:00 -
[147] - Quote
CUSE TOWN333 wrote: come on now Lead stop acting like we don't know how to play dust and use SP wisely. i have 4 proto suits heavy,2 assaults, and a scout plus 6 proto weapons no matter what happens every patch i have something i can run thats effective. i never wanted to have to do that as i prefer 1 role and gun but noobs cry to nerf the **** out of something till it completely changes or is useless. this makes me use my SP sideways instead of truely maxing out my prefered role.
I certainly wouldn't infer that about you, Cuse....but some of these posters sure have me scratching my head on what's driving their request -- thus the question about specific examples.
And in fairness to Rat, the latest rounds of balance hotfixes has been much better than the OHK nerhammer that was used on the Logis, active scanners, TAR, Flaylock, or other much more impactful nerfs that the vets like you and I can recall like they were yesterday.
Said a bit differently, crying about a respec because the latest nerf to the Assault Scrambler Pistol is far different from crying about a reespec after they nerfed the Flaylock to oblivion a year ago. |
hfderrtgvcd
796
|
Posted - 2014.10.14 19:03:00 -
[148] - Quote
why are players against respecs? At worst it doesn't effect you while it makes the game more enoyable for others and brings people back. Also, its kind of difficult to "adapt" to ccp's changes when you have less that 10 million sp.
You can't fight in here! This is the war room.
|
Thor Odinson42
Molon Labe. General Tso's Alliance
4919
|
Posted - 2014.10.14 19:04:00 -
[149] - Quote
I'd say the number one reason for a respec is that so many people want one.
If they grouped it with an asset refund as well I think it would bring a lot of people back. I've mentioned that before and the anti-respec dudes say they don't believe it would. But that's utterly insane.
Anything to bring people back to Dust is a good thing.
Level 4 Forum Warrior
Help Me Reach Level 5
|
Leadfoot10
Molon Labe. General Tso's Alliance
1690
|
Posted - 2014.10.14 19:10:00 -
[150] - Quote
Just so you guys don't think I'm being ridiculous here...
Bringing people back to the game would be something that may change my view on this topic.
But what I read in this thread are a bunch of people who already play who want a respec so they can erase the effects of balance on their character.
In the end, I suppose it doesn't really affect me outside of this action reinforcing FoTM chasing in the playerbase or any advantage my more measured approach to SP investment has given me.
But if the end result is more players playing this game, then I could get on board. |
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |