Pages: 1 2 3 :: [one page] |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
pagl1u M
Maphia Clan Unit Unicorn
550
|
Posted - 2014.04.11 14:35:00 -
[1] - Quote
Armor plates.
But first let me explain why the cloak isn't OP. First of all: it doesn't make you invisible. If You pay attention you can See cloaked scouts when they are moving (you can See them while they stand still but it is harder).
If a cloaked scout wants to kill you he has to come near to you, he can do that in front of you or from behind. If he runs in front of you And You can't see him... Well... You have to be blind! If he approaches you from behind he is doing something he could do without a cloak, the cloak just helps him a bit. You couldnt have seen him anyway even if he was uncloaked.
Second: when I scout 9/10 of my Kills come from players that play all alone on the battlefield. If You are playing all alone in a medium or heavy suits you are doing it wrong. Scouts are supposed to play alone, other suits aren't. You should stick with your team and watch the back of your mates. This Way you can destroy a cloaked scout if he is stupid enough to engage.
3 the cloak isn't given for free. It is heavy. The Basic one occupies 40 cpu and 9 pg, the adv 58 cpu and 12 pg, the cmplx 82 cpu and 17 pg (on a scout suit with 5 in the skill) If you want to Fit a cloak you have to give up on something else. In a caldari or a Min scout if you want an adv cloak you better use low pg modules, no nades maybe and a low pg Secondary equipment.
What about Gallente and amarr? Using Basic armor plate to tank they are able to Fit Whatever they want because of the OPNESS of armor plates, they give you a lot of hp and they only uses 10 cpu and 1 pg.
I have fitted a gal scout with: 2 cmplx shield ext 2 Basic armor plates, a cmplx kincat, a cmplx cardiac regulator, boundless combat rifle, ishukone smg, m1 locus nades, adv cloak, allotek nanohives (proto). It has an Incredible fire power (2 proto weapons and adv nades) a lot of hp (580), tons of stamina and stamina recharge, a good passive scanner and invisibility, it is fast 8.66 speed, an innate armor repair rate of 3 helped by PROTO nanohives!!
The point of the thread is: cloak isn't OP, scouts aren't OP, armor plates are OP!
What do you think?
|
Soraya Xel
Abandoned Privilege Top Men.
1909
|
Posted - 2014.04.11 14:40:00 -
[2] - Quote
I think encouraging players to be more observant, and watch their backs is a good thing. This is a tactical game.
I'd like to be your CPM1 candidate
|
Racro 01 Arifistan
501st Knights of Leanbox INTERGALACTIC WARPIGS
286
|
Posted - 2014.04.11 14:45:00 -
[3] - Quote
i dont even bother tanking my scout gk.o i mianly use dual enhanced profile damps and 2 enhanced kincats with creodron shotgun/ionpistol. with complex light/sidearm mods. lots of firepower and basically inviasble with 9.55m/s sprint. this is a far better fit in my opinon than putting on plates as i cant clsoe the gap quick enough with the shotgun while useing plates.
Elite Gallenten Soldier
|
Adell Shinzumakami
Paladin Survey Force Amarr Empire
227
|
Posted - 2014.04.11 14:50:00 -
[4] - Quote
Cloak is not OP: From a guy who uses cloaking
I GÖÑ RoadKill
Closed BETA vet - CLOAKING
|
Jade Dragonis
GRIM MARCH D.E.F.I.A.N.C.E
359
|
Posted - 2014.04.11 14:50:00 -
[5] - Quote
I am fond of cloaks. Except for those glitching it and thinking its fun.
As for tanked scouts its a little silly that they can tank more than some assault.
But hey ho. CCP made it this way so it must be a New Eden thing.
Follow me on Youtube
|
pagl1u M
Maphia Clan Unit Unicorn
550
|
Posted - 2014.04.11 14:50:00 -
[6] - Quote
Racro 01 Arifistan wrote:i dont even bother tanking my scout gk.o i mianly use dual enhanced profile damps and 2 enhanced kincats with creodron shotgun/ionpistol. with complex light/sidearm mods. lots of firepower and basically inviasble with 9.55m/s sprint. this is a far better fit in my opinon than putting on plates as i cant clsoe the gap quick enough with the shotgun while useing plates. You can Fit it how you Fit it.. And I dont think it is OP, but you could Fit it how I did on protofits and it looks really OP. That is why I m not saying that the gal scout is OP, I m saying that armor plates are OP, or better, they are way stronger than shield extenders because of their weight in cpu/pg |
pagl1u M
Maphia Clan Unit Unicorn
550
|
Posted - 2014.04.11 14:52:00 -
[7] - Quote
Adell Shinzumakami wrote:Cloak is not OP: From a guy who uses cloaking Can you please say something intelligent to prove that I m wrong instead of trying to troll? Thank you. |
al nize mk2
DUST University Ivy League
68
|
Posted - 2014.04.11 14:53:00 -
[8] - Quote
I agree with you all the way - I hated Cloaks for a bit but now I rate them and think they were a decent addition. I don't play scout I'm Assault - and you're 100% on the lone player vs squad player. I play alone - I get scout f***** I play in a squad - Scouts get scared.
When a Scout screws up his close up attack - that's when things go wobbly. He/She has an adavantage even after the mistake because the Scout has big armour which means the fight is suddenly about even. When really the fight should be weighted in the your favour once the Scout has screwed up and missed or alerted you to his presence..
I've come to terms with most of the things that were bugging me since 1.8 but this is one that still upsets me and makes me cry like a baby. I hope ccp does a fix of some kind and makes armour tanking work for Assaults and fail for Scouts.
Other than that I agree completely there is nothing OP about the cloak.
GÇ£All that I know most surely about morality and obligations I owe to football.GÇ¥
|
Kristoff Atruin
Subdreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
2048
|
Posted - 2014.04.11 14:54:00 -
[9] - Quote
It isn't quite accurate to say it is the plates that are OP. Medium frames use armor plates heavily too, and nobody is calling them OP right now. The problem is the ability for a scout to have more tank than some medium frames and commandos. Nerfing plates would just nerf mediums at the same time, leaving us with the same problem.
Maybe scouts should just receive a flat fitting penalty to plates of 20% (or some other number). ie: not affected by skill level. Then they have a choice: max tank, or cloak. The idea that is that you could do a heavily tanked passive scan squad support scout, or be a paper tiger. |
Adell Shinzumakami
Paladin Survey Force Amarr Empire
227
|
Posted - 2014.04.11 14:57:00 -
[10] - Quote
pagl1u M wrote:Adell Shinzumakami wrote:Cloak is not OP: From a guy who uses cloaking Can you please say something intelligent to prove that I m wrong instead of trying to troll?. I've made valid arguments about cloaking being OP in the past. I would hate to repeat myself, but from a cloaking point-of-view you will defend it because of the astronomical advantages you people have.
I'm not "trolling" just pointing out that we can't believe a guy who says something isn't op if he uses it himself.
I GÖÑ RoadKill
Closed BETA vet - CLOAKING
|
|
pagl1u M
Maphia Clan Unit Unicorn
550
|
Posted - 2014.04.11 14:57:00 -
[11] - Quote
Kristoff Atruin wrote:It isn't quite accurate to say it is the plates that are OP. Medium frames use armor plates heavily too, and nobody is calling them OP right now. The problem is the ability for a scout to have more tank than some medium frames and commandos. Nerfing plates would just nerf mediums at the same time, leaving us with the same problem.
Maybe scouts should just receive a flat fitting penalty to plates of 20% (or some other number). ie: not affected by skill level. Then they have a choice: max tank, or cloak. The idea that is that you could do a heavily tanked passive scan squad support scout, or be a paper tiger. While I don't really think that a scout can tank more than an assault or a commando, I know that assault are a bit UP atm. But it has nothing to do with scouts or cloaks, it is just that they need something unique to them |
Piercing Serenity
PFB Pink Fluffy Bunnies
606
|
Posted - 2014.04.11 14:59:00 -
[12] - Quote
Kristoff Atruin wrote:It isn't quite accurate to say it is the plates that are OP. Medium frames use armor plates heavily too, and nobody is calling them OP right now. The problem is the ability for a scout to have more tank than some medium frames and commandos. Nerfing plates would just nerf mediums at the same time, leaving us with the same problem.
Maybe scouts should just receive a flat fitting penalty to plates of 20% (or some other number). ie: not affected by skill level. Then they have a choice: max tank, or cloak. The idea that is that you could do a heavily tanked passive scan squad support scout, or be a paper tiger.
People have been saying that plates are out of whack (OP) for ages now...
DUST 514 BETA VET
16.2M Lifetime SP
SH4T --> PFBHz --> PFB --> SH4T --> Fatal
|
pagl1u M
Maphia Clan Unit Unicorn
551
|
Posted - 2014.04.11 15:02:00 -
[13] - Quote
Adell Shinzumakami wrote:pagl1u M wrote:Adell Shinzumakami wrote:Cloak is not OP: From a guy who uses cloaking Can you please say something intelligent to prove that I m wrong instead of trying to troll?. I've made valid arguments about cloaking being OP in the past. I would hate to repeat myself, but from a cloaking point-of-view you will defend it because of the astronomical advantages you people have. I'm not "trolling" just pointing out that we can't believe a guy who says something isn't op if he uses it himself. I m not just saying "I got killed while cloaked, clearly not OP!!! 11one!!" I m trying to explain why it isnt OP, why people think it is OP and what is really OP instead. |
Racro 01 Arifistan
501st Knights of Leanbox INTERGALACTIC WARPIGS
287
|
Posted - 2014.04.11 15:02:00 -
[14] - Quote
pagl1u M wrote:Racro 01 Arifistan wrote:i dont even bother tanking my scout gk.o i mianly use dual enhanced profile damps and 2 enhanced kincats with creodron shotgun/ionpistol. with complex light/sidearm mods. lots of firepower and basically inviasble with 9.55m/s sprint. this is a far better fit in my opinon than putting on plates as i cant clsoe the gap quick enough with the shotgun while useing plates. You can Fit it how you Fit it.. And I dont think it is OP, but you could Fit it how I did on protofits and it looks really OP. That is why I m not saying that the gal scout is OP, I m saying that armor plates are OP, or better, they are way stronger than shield extenders because of their weight in cpu/pg
i dont like fitting plates mainly ue to the speed reduction si very noticble. sure i have less hp but my speed makes it hard to keep track of me and allows me to disaper very quickly after killing the target. i do have a assault scout with 80 shield/404 armour with a duvolle and cloak with k-2 hives but its nto as effective as the untanked shotgun since the duvolle takes longer to kill. and if i come across equipment spammers i just drop my voth my c-7's and anhilate it all. so i think untanked scouts are better as they really hurt the enemy much more thana tanked scout can.
Elite Gallenten Soldier
|
NAV HIV
The Generals General Tso's Alliance
1423
|
Posted - 2014.04.11 15:03:00 -
[15] - Quote
Players mostly writing Cloak is OP is Crying because they only want 1 Go to suit for all problems. . . They wanna Use a heavy suit for all purposes, or an Assault/Logi suits for all things... Rather than being aware of the situation or being good at actually playing the game, they want the kills, SP and WP to be handed to them in a platter...
IF CCP gave WP for shooting at a wall, they'd gladly accept it... Involves so much skills in a safe shell... there should be a separate game mode for all these cry babies.
"Spend you SP wisely, specially upgrade the core skills first before you grab that shiny suit which you lose so often!" |
The dark cloud
The Rainbow Effect
2740
|
Posted - 2014.04.11 15:06:00 -
[16] - Quote
A smart scout never engages from upfront, he cloaks up, waits till people walk past them and then shots them in the back. Moving with a cloak sure makes you visible to a point but at medium-long range it makes you much harder to spot as if you where not cloaked. I cant tell how many times i was just standing still while like 10 people walk past me. Then i grab my gun and shot them in the back.
Another thing is when some 1 comes trough a door you better wait a few secs if another guy is behid him and then engage. You should aswell avoid gunshots that could hit multiple people by accident. Cause if you just drop cloak and spray at 5 people at once chances are they all turn around and kill you. Precision is key and you should focus only at 1 person at a time and not hope that you get a quad spray like on COD.
Head of public relations from The Rainbow Effect.
|
Adell Shinzumakami
Paladin Survey Force Amarr Empire
227
|
Posted - 2014.04.11 15:08:00 -
[17] - Quote
pagl1u M wrote:Adell Shinzumakami wrote:pagl1u M wrote:Adell Shinzumakami wrote:Cloak is not OP: From a guy who uses cloaking Can you please say something intelligent to prove that I m wrong instead of trying to troll?. I've made valid arguments about cloaking being OP in the past. I would hate to repeat myself, but from a cloaking point-of-view you will defend it because of the astronomical advantages you people have. I'm not "trolling" just pointing out that we can't believe a guy who says something isn't op if he uses it himself. I m not just saying "I got killed while cloaked, clearly not OP!!! 11one!!" I m trying to explain why it isnt OP, why people think it is OP and what is really OP instead. So putting the blame on something never even considered OP and placing unlikely scenarios as a way to defend cloaking is a way to make people instantly think cloaking is not OP
I GÖÑ RoadKill
Closed BETA vet - CLOAKING
|
pagl1u M
Maphia Clan Unit Unicorn
552
|
Posted - 2014.04.11 15:11:00 -
[18] - Quote
Adell Shinzumakami wrote:pagl1u M wrote:Adell Shinzumakami wrote:pagl1u M wrote:Adell Shinzumakami wrote:Cloak is not OP: From a guy who uses cloaking Can you please say something intelligent to prove that I m wrong instead of trying to troll?. I've made valid arguments about cloaking being OP in the past. I would hate to repeat myself, but from a cloaking point-of-view you will defend it because of the astronomical advantages you people have. I'm not "trolling" just pointing out that we can't believe a guy who says something isn't op if he uses it himself. I m not just saying "I got killed while cloaked, clearly not OP!!! 11one!!" I m trying to explain why it isnt OP, why people think it is OP and what is really OP instead. So putting the blame on something never even considered OP and placing unlikely scenarios as a way to defend cloaking is a way to make people instantly think cloaking is not OP Unlikely scenarios? Do you Consider team work an Unlikely scenario??? I suddenly know why you Consider cloak so OP
Edit: never even considered OP... Are you talking about armor plates??? |
emtbraincase
The Phoenix Federation
117
|
Posted - 2014.04.11 15:12:00 -
[19] - Quote
Most mercs use the minimap to find enemies, instead of actually looking where they are facing. If you are using the minimap for ANYTHING other than finding equipment to destroy, you are going to die to Scouts ALOT. I am a logi, having put all but a proto Gal scout's worth of SP into Logi, and I only use Dren fittings with my scout. While only anecdotal, I have played with, and without, the cloak and see very little difference in performance when I don't use it. I am damn near a ghost if I use a proto galscout with 2 damps even without a cloak....why? It is simply because people stopped using their eyes to scan the screen and instead relied on the crutch of a high profile suit, the (at-one-time) overly useful and all-seeing minimap. It isn't as good/useful as it used to be, and until people figure that out, there will ALWAYS be a few QQ threads about clacks.
TL;DR If you think clacks are OP, learn to situational awareness. |
darkiller240
K-A-O-S theory
716
|
Posted - 2014.04.11 15:19:00 -
[20] - Quote
+1 That is all
"Insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results." - Albert Einstein
|
|
NAV HIV
The Generals General Tso's Alliance
1424
|
Posted - 2014.04.11 15:20:00 -
[21] - Quote
Apparently Teamwork is OP and so is squad work...
Adell wants to Solo Smash the Entire Red team... LOL I can smell the butthurt in him. Use your High and low slots for other items such as Precision enhancer and Range amplifiers, then come back and QQ |
Adell Shinzumakami
Paladin Survey Force Amarr Empire
227
|
Posted - 2014.04.11 15:35:00 -
[22] - Quote
pagl1u M wrote:Unlikely scenarios? Do you Consider team work an Unlikely scenario??? I suddenly know why you Consider cloak so OP Yes teamwork. You honestly can't expect cloaking can be easy to predict with or without teamwork. Why? Because most players will be too focused on defending or ACTUAL strategy that a cloaked scout are unpredictable that it's difficult to have just one or a few guys stand around looking for scouts. Even with detector mods you will still have difficulties actually finding the guy. Cloaking from my point-of-view is used as a "Troll" rather than an actual tactic; but most cloaked users are too self centered thinking it's a weak equipment and there are different ways to counter it. For example. This thread.
I GÖÑ RoadKill
Closed BETA vet - CLOAKING
|
The Terminator T-1000
Skynet Incorporated
389
|
Posted - 2014.04.11 15:37:00 -
[23] - Quote
It sounds like you are afraid to get hit by the nerf bat |
MINA Longstrike
2Shitz 1Giggle United Brotherhood Alliance
470
|
Posted - 2014.04.11 15:40:00 -
[24] - Quote
pagl1u M wrote:Armor plates.
But first let me explain why the cloak isn't OP. First of all: it doesn't make you invisible. If You pay attention you can See cloaked scouts when they are moving (you can See them while they stand still but it is harder).
If a cloaked scout wants to kill you he has to come near to you, he can do that in front of you or from behind. If he runs in front of you And You can't see him... Well... You have to be blind! If he approaches you from behind he is doing something he could do without a cloak, the cloak just helps him a bit. You couldnt have seen him anyway even if he was uncloaked.
Second: when I scout 9/10 of my Kills come from players that play all alone on the battlefield. If You are playing all alone in a medium or heavy suits you are doing it wrong. Scouts are supposed to play alone, other suits aren't. You should stick with your team and watch the back of your mates. This Way you can destroy a cloaked scout if he is stupid enough to engage.
3 the cloak isn't given for free. It is heavy. The Basic one occupies 40 cpu and 9 pg, the adv 58 cpu and 12 pg, the cmplx 82 cpu and 17 pg (on a scout suit with 5 in the skill) If you want to Fit a cloak you have to give up on something else. In a caldari or a Min scout if you want an adv cloak you better use low pg modules, no nades maybe and a low pg Secondary equipment.
What about Gallente and amarr? Using Basic armor plate to tank they are able to Fit Whatever they want because of the OPNESS of armor plates, they give you a lot of hp and they only uses 10 cpu and 1 pg.
I have fitted a gal scout with: 2 cmplx shield ext 2 Basic armor plates, a cmplx kincat, a cmplx cardiac regulator, boundless combat rifle, ishukone smg, m1 locus nades, adv cloak, allotek nanohives (proto). It has an Incredible fire power (2 proto weapons and adv nades) a lot of hp (580), tons of stamina and stamina recharge, a good passive scanner and invisibility, it is fast 8.66 speed, an innate armor repair rate of 3 helped by PROTO nanohives!!
The point of the thread is: cloak isn't OP, scouts aren't OP, armor plates are OP!
What do you think?
No, the problem with scouts isn't armor plates. It's the fact that we went from 45 profile down to 35 - that's right a scout with *NO* skills invested in profile dampening inherently dodges advanced scanners from anyone but gal-logi's... and on top of that the scouts 5% profile dampening per level was switched over to the cloaking device (on all scouts except the gallente who still have the inherent dampening), making most scouts even harder to scan. If you have 1 complex profile dampener on your scout and a cloaking device you cant be scanned by anything except for a gallogi with a proto scanner, if you have 2 complex damps he needs a focused proto scanner.
On top of that scouts got some pretty insane stamina buffs across the board, and the cloaking device has no transitory period from 'cloaked' to 'shooting', in fact you can often 'decloak' and get a shot or two off before you're even through the animation.
Now I'm fine with the buffs to powergrid, cpu and slots because honestly scouts *needed* those buffs, but the massive buffs to profile weren't needed and are causing the problems.
The overall *massive* buffs to the scouts base stats in terms of profile and stamina are what are making scouts so problematic - if 'bad' scouts could be more easily countered with advanced scanners, you'd see more people using advanced scanners.
I was playing with a proto minmatar scout beforehand on my alt, and I'm playing with a proto caldari scout now on my main, and I frequently run with 2 proto gallente scout friends (one of whom switched over to cal scout with the patch). Cloaks do need some balancing, but hitting scouts for 5 profile would fix some of the problems. |
pagl1u M
Maphia Clan Unit Unicorn
556
|
Posted - 2014.04.11 15:42:00 -
[25] - Quote
I m not afraid of the nerf Bat it is just that I m Tired of receiving hatemails because I use a scout with cloak (I run a minscout!! How can you Consider it op???).
@Adell I dont know how you play but I dont have to stand around to see things on the battlefield, if the scout approaches you from the back in the Middle of a gun fight what helped him doing so? His cloak or his play Style? Would you be able to see him when he comes from your back, cloaked or not? |
NAV HIV
The Generals General Tso's Alliance
1425
|
Posted - 2014.04.11 15:43:00 -
[26] - Quote
Adell Shinzumakami wrote:pagl1u M wrote:Unlikely scenarios? Do you Consider team work an Unlikely scenario??? I suddenly know why you Consider cloak so OP Yes teamwork. You honestly can't expect cloaking can be easy to predict with or without teamwork. Why? Because most players will be too focused on defending or ACTUAL strategy that a cloaked scout are unpredictable that it's difficult to have just one or a few guys stand around looking for scouts. Even with detector mods you will still have difficulties actually finding the guy. Cloaking from my point-of-view is used as a "Troll" rather than an actual tactic; but most cloaked users are too self centered thinking it's a weak equipment and there are different ways to counter it. For example. This thread.
Have a scout, Logi with proper tools or fittings and then problem solved. It's not cloak's fault that players don't know how to play, defend or approach an objective...
You start a thread for that : Dust Blueberries are UP |
NAV HIV
The Generals General Tso's Alliance
1425
|
Posted - 2014.04.11 15:46:00 -
[27] - Quote
The Terminator T-1000 wrote:It sounds like you are afraid to get hit by the nerf bat
Well it is going to get nerfed from all the QQ.... From all the butthurt people who think fitting a Cloak in Commando is the answer (They get smashed in that suit, they realize how much they such and they come here and say "Cloak is OP")
Give a Scope to the AR now and see how quickly AR is OP threads return. Same people who are saying AR needs a buff are going to write/revive threads about AR and it's OPness |
NAV HIV
The Generals General Tso's Alliance
1425
|
Posted - 2014.04.11 15:47:00 -
[28] - Quote
pagl1u M wrote:I m not afraid of the nerf Bat it is just that I m Tired of receiving hatemails because I use a scout with cloak (I run a minscout!! How can you Consider it op???).
@Adell I dont know how you play but I dont have to stand around to see things on the battlefield, if the scout approaches you from the back in the Middle of a gun fight what helped him doing so? His cloak or his play Style? Would you be able to see him when he comes from your back, cloaked or not?
Shhh... Brick tanked Logi suits wont see it coming... Someone loaded with PE and RA would notice a thing or two... |
Isa Lucifer
Praetoriani Classiarii Templares Praetoria Imperialis Excubitoris
31
|
Posted - 2014.04.11 15:49:00 -
[29] - Quote
I agree that this situation where scouts hp and profile are over the top is problematic. In my opinion making the scout suffer les agility and less speed and more noticeble to scanners while using armor plates would disencourage brick tanking scouts.
Amarr Victor
|
NAV HIV
The Generals General Tso's Alliance
1431
|
Posted - 2014.04.11 15:50:00 -
[30] - Quote
Isa Lucifer wrote:I agree that this situation where scouts hp and profile are over the top is problematic. In my opinion making the scout suffer les agility and less speed and more noticeble to scanners while using armor plates would disencourage brick tanking scouts.
Exactly, Brick tanked scouts are for the Stupid... |
|
Shadowswipe
Molon Labe. General Tso's Alliance
219
|
Posted - 2014.04.11 15:51:00 -
[31] - Quote
Quote:I m Tired of all these "cloak is OP", the real problem with scout is..
I was hoping to open the thread and see.. "the negative community."
or... "people that think they know it all."
This game is like real life. If you don't like the environment you are in, leave. Example: Hostile job environment, just leave.
And then secondly, if you are so great at designing a balanced game, please list your references of triple A games that you were the lead designer on. Otherwise, don't sound so matter of fact in your statements. |
pagl1u M
Maphia Clan Unit Unicorn
557
|
Posted - 2014.04.11 15:51:00 -
[32] - Quote
Isa Lucifer wrote:I agree that this situation where scouts hp and profile are over the top is problematic. In my opinion making the scout suffer les agility and less speed and more noticeble to scanners while using armor plates would disencourage brick tanking scouts. Exactly, the problem is not that they are fast and invisible to scanner the problem is that they are fats, invisible to scanner and have tons of hp. The thing that make this possible is that armor plates are OP |
Adell Shinzumakami
Paladin Survey Force Amarr Empire
229
|
Posted - 2014.04.11 15:51:00 -
[33] - Quote
NAV HIV wrote:Have a scout, Logi with proper tools or fittings and then problem solved. It's not cloak's fault that players don't know how to play, defend or approach an objective... "How to play" I guess there is suppose to be an exact way to play with everyone being open to their own tactics, while cloaking scouts can run freely in close-range space with shotguns near objective? I guess if we spend time forgetting about objective and killing cloaking scouts, they will probably say to themselves "Hey, I think we should stop cloaking"
I GÖÑ RoadKill
Closed BETA vet - CLOAKING
|
Revelations 514
Red Star. EoN.
164
|
Posted - 2014.04.11 15:51:00 -
[34] - Quote
Adell Shinzumakami wrote:pagl1u M wrote:Unlikely scenarios? Do you Consider team work an Unlikely scenario??? I suddenly know why you Consider cloak so OP Yes teamwork. You honestly can't expect cloaking can be easy to predict with or without teamwork. Why? Because most players will be too focused on defending or ACTUAL strategy that a cloaked scout are unpredictable that it's difficult to have just one or a few guys stand around looking for scouts. Even with detector mods you will still have difficulties actually finding the guy. Cloaking from my point-of-view is used as a "Troll" rather than an actual tactic; but most cloaked users are too self centered thinking it's a weak equipment and there are different ways to counter it. For example. This thread.
Who are you calling self-centered? Seeing soo much QQ from you about cloaks in every post actually motivated me to view all of your posts. I challenge anyone to do the same. You repeatedly stroke your own ego, talk down to others, make ridiculous claims like how your LAV is always getting hit by 3 heavies at once whenever you call it in, or how your so godlike in your LAV driving lol. Dude go on somewhere! Your obvious exaggerations and narcissistic attitude betray the real issue, your mad your crutch got taken away. Your elevated opinion of your own "godlike skills", (your words not mine), means you simply cannot comprehend that anyone could beat you in a fair fight.
Go ahead and call me a liar, the proof is in your posts. All one must do to verify it is to click on your name and check it out themselves. The pattern practically leaps off the screen.
Go play the game, or better yet don't. Your constant vitriol towards anyone that has a differing opinion is tiring. Taken from your own words, "90% of the time I am killed while hacking by someone cloaked", I cleaned it up a bit but that's the statement. Basically this shows everything I said to be true: 1) lack of facts, what does a cloak have to do with getting shot in the back while hacking? 2) Others find you equally annoying, hence why you have no team members to watch your back while you hack.
Why is a "godlike LAV driver", trying to hack objectives? Do you even check the objective first? <-Rhetorical Questions btw |
xxwhitedevilxx M
Maphia Clan Unit Unicorn
2214
|
Posted - 2014.04.11 15:53:00 -
[35] - Quote
The Terminator T-1000 wrote:It sounds like you are afraid to get hit by the nerf bat
I'm pretty sure Pagliu does not need any crutch to win any 1 vs 1 or 1 vs 2.
-#Firmocosìperchènonhopersonalità
|
pagl1u M
Maphia Clan Unit Unicorn
557
|
Posted - 2014.04.11 15:58:00 -
[36] - Quote
Shadowswipe wrote:Quote:I m Tired of all these "cloak is OP", the real problem with scout is.. I was hoping to open the thread and see.. "the negative community." or... "people that think they know it all." This game is like real life. If you don't like the environment you are in, leave. Example: Hostile job environment, just leave. And then secondly, if you are so great at designing a balanced game, please list your references of triple A games that you were the lead designer on. Otherwise, don't sound so matter of fact in your statements. Can you plz quote the part where I said that I m" so great at designing a balanced game"? It make it look like I dont Like the Job that ccp is doing but the problem is.... I actually love what they are doing!
It is not that I dont Like the environment it is just that I dont Like QQs.
Can you plz stay on Topic instead of just try to insult me? Thank you very much
|
NAV HIV
The Generals General Tso's Alliance
1432
|
Posted - 2014.04.11 15:59:00 -
[37] - Quote
Adell Shinzumakami wrote:NAV HIV wrote:Have a scout, Logi with proper tools or fittings and then problem solved. It's not cloak's fault that players don't know how to play, defend or approach an objective... "How to play" I guess there is suppose to be an exact way to play with everyone being open to their own tactics, while cloaking scouts can run freely in close-range space with shotguns near objective? I guess if we spend time forgetting about objective and killing cloaking scouts, they will probably say to themselves "Hey, I think we should stop cloaking"
Well focus on killing them then... Dont come here and try to show how concerned you are about that null canon... If you could kill a scout or had the skills to, you wouldn't be here crying...
Let me make is easy for you:
- If you think there are scouts hiding in the Null Cannon
a. Throw a nade b. Throw some MD rounds (Now i'll see you in MD is OP threads) c. Be patient cause They can't stay cloaked forever... and every cloaked scout itches for a kill....
- Use proper teamwork. We have Gal/cal/Min logis with proper Drop suit setup to pick up 85% of the Scouts...
- Use a counter Scout (Cal Scout and Min for the High Slots)
- Use something Other than Shield extenders and Armor plates
- Teamwork overall
"How to kill a Scout For Dummies" Now at the Marketplace.... |
Vespasian Andendare
Subsonic Synthesis RISE of LEGION
840
|
Posted - 2014.04.11 15:59:00 -
[38] - Quote
Actually, just perusing the forums, much of the cloak qq has died down simply because now they're not "new" anymore and people know what to look for/how to play against them. People grew so used to having everything permascanned that it really was a change to have to, you know, use your eyeballs to find targets.
>> Play Dust 514 FREE! Sign up for exclusive gear today! <<
|
pagl1u M
Maphia Clan Unit Unicorn
558
|
Posted - 2014.04.11 16:02:00 -
[39] - Quote
Vespasian Andendare wrote:Actually, just perusing the forums, much of the cloak qq has died down simply because now they're not "new" anymore and people know what to look for/how to play against them. People grew so used to having everything permascanned that it really was a change to have to, you know, use your eyeballs to find targets. Are you mad?? This is an fps you can't think people will use their eyes!!! |
NAV HIV
The Generals General Tso's Alliance
1432
|
Posted - 2014.04.11 16:02:00 -
[40] - Quote
pagl1u M wrote:Shadowswipe wrote:Quote:I m Tired of all these "cloak is OP", the real problem with scout is.. I was hoping to open the thread and see.. "the negative community." or... "people that think they know it all." This game is like real life. If you don't like the environment you are in, leave. Example: Hostile job environment, just leave. And then secondly, if you are so great at designing a balanced game, please list your references of triple A games that you were the lead designer on. Otherwise, don't sound so matter of fact in your statements. Can you plz quote the part where I said that I m" so great at designing a balanced game"? It make it look like I dont Like the Job that ccp is doing but the problem is.... I actually love what they are doing! It is not that I dont Like the environment it is just that I dont Like QQs. Can you plz stay on Topic instead of just try to insult me? Thank you very much
Like i said before... Now that you need to set your squad up properly to be effective... People are crying cause Teamwork is OP and no more SOLO BS.... Soloist get stomped and should get stomped... |
|
NAV HIV
The Generals General Tso's Alliance
1432
|
Posted - 2014.04.11 16:17:00 -
[41] - Quote
Revelations 514 wrote:Adell Shinzumakami wrote:pagl1u M wrote:Unlikely scenarios? Do you Consider team work an Unlikely scenario??? I suddenly know why you Consider cloak so OP Yes teamwork. You honestly can't expect cloaking can be easy to predict with or without teamwork. Why? Because most players will be too focused on defending or ACTUAL strategy that a cloaked scout are unpredictable that it's difficult to have just one or a few guys stand around looking for scouts. Even with detector mods you will still have difficulties actually finding the guy. Cloaking from my point-of-view is used as a "Troll" rather than an actual tactic; but most cloaked users are too self centered thinking it's a weak equipment and there are different ways to counter it. For example. This thread. Who are you calling self-centered? Seeing soo much QQ from you about cloaks in every post actually motivated me to view all of your posts. I challenge anyone to do the same. You repeatedly stroke your own ego, talk down to others, make ridiculous claims like how your LAV is always getting hit by 3 heavies at once whenever you call it in, or how your so godlike in your LAV driving lol. Dude go on somewhere! Your obvious exaggerations and narcissistic attitude betray the real issue, your mad your crutch got taken away. Your elevated opinion of your own "godlike skills", (your words not mine), means you simply cannot comprehend that anyone could beat you in a fair fight. Go ahead and call me a liar, the proof is in your posts. All one must do to verify it is to click on your name and check it out themselves. The pattern practically leaps off the screen. Go play the game, or better yet don't. Your constant vitriol towards anyone that has a differing opinion is tiring. Taken from your own words, "90% of the time I am killed while hacking by someone cloaked", I cleaned it up a bit but that's the statement. Basically this shows everything I said to be true: 1) lack of facts, what does a cloak have to do with getting shot in the back while hacking? 2) Others find you equally annoying, hence why you have no team members to watch your back while you hack. Why is a "godlike LAV driver", trying to hack objectives? Do you even check the objective first? <-Rhetorical Questions btw
Good time to say "Buurrnn" |
xxwhitedevilxx M
Maphia Clan Unit Unicorn
2217
|
Posted - 2014.04.11 16:20:00 -
[42] - Quote
Just pointing out an important thing: AA still detects you even if you're cloaked, just saying...
-#Firmocosìperchènonhopersonalità
|
pagl1u M
Maphia Clan Unit Unicorn
559
|
Posted - 2014.04.11 16:22:00 -
[43] - Quote
xxwhitedevilxx M wrote:Just pointing out an important thing: AA still detects you even if you're cloaked, just saying... +1, also when you are cloaked you are almost deafened, it is an important thing that people seem to forgot while speaking about cloak. It makes you really unaware of what happens near you |
Adell Shinzumakami
Paladin Survey Force Amarr Empire
230
|
Posted - 2014.04.11 16:30:00 -
[44] - Quote
Revelations 514 wrote:-Long Quote past Ps3 text limit- Not "QQ" about anything. I point out different counters about the Op's "strategy" to counter cloaking, but most people automatically think I'm getting killed by cloakers everyday. Most of my post get taken the wrong way by people who I am arguing with (Even posts where I'm making a joke.) Most of my time playing is either driving an LAV or snipping. I rarely have any actual encounters with cloaking scouts. The whole "90% I die" was when I jump in to assist hack or hacking something to give my team an advantage while driving.
I would also like to add I use cloaking in few occasions as a tactical way to get closer to objective rather than use it for kills....
I GÖÑ RoadKill
Closed BETA vet - CLOAKING
|
al nize mk2
DUST University Ivy League
72
|
Posted - 2014.04.11 16:30:00 -
[45] - Quote
Vespasian Andendare wrote:Actually, just perusing the forums, much of the cloak qq has died down simply because now they're not "new" anymore and people know what to look for/how to play against them. People grew so used to having everything permascanned that it really was a change to have to, you know, use your eyeballs to find targets.
Totally agree with that - I was raging for the first couple of weeks after scout mayhem. But once I started looking around and spotting the little buggers I found it fun hunting them down or taking them on in a stand up fight when they close up shotty w*nked all over me.
The only issue for me is that they can carry so much armour and make themselves invisi-assaults. otherwise the cloak is not OP it's just a great bit of kit for scouts!
GÇ£All that I know most surely about morality and obligations I owe to football.GÇ¥
|
al nize mk2
DUST University Ivy League
72
|
Posted - 2014.04.11 16:34:00 -
[46] - Quote
NAV HIV wrote: Like i said before... Now that you need to set your squad up properly to be effective... People are crying cause Teamwork is OP and no more SOLO BS.... Soloist get stomped and should get stomped...
Here I disagree with you. Teamwork is king - there's no doubt. But there has to be a place for the solo player and that ties in with the NPE issue and keeping hold of casual players. In fairness - scouts are the solo player experience.
GÇ£All that I know most surely about morality and obligations I owe to football.GÇ¥
|
pagl1u M
Maphia Clan Unit Unicorn
566
|
Posted - 2014.04.11 16:38:00 -
[47] - Quote
Adell Shinzumakami wrote:Most of my time playing is either driving an LAV or snipping. Only people that play in the Middle of the battlefield can know if cloak is OP... Just saying. |
xxwhitedevilxx M
Maphia Clan Unit Unicorn
2218
|
Posted - 2014.04.11 16:40:00 -
[48] - Quote
pagl1u M wrote:Adell Shinzumakami wrote:Most of my time playing is either driving an LAV or snipping. Only people that play in the Middle of the battlefield can know if cloak is OP... Just saying.
Oh! That's why!!!
-#Firmocosìperchènonhopersonalità
|
Leadfoot10
Molon Labe. General Tso's Alliance
1049
|
Posted - 2014.04.11 16:40:00 -
[49] - Quote
pagl1u M wrote:
What do you think?
I think cloaks are OP, and armor plates have little to nothing do with it.
Signed, An invisible Cal Scout who can see everything to 70m |
Adell Shinzumakami
Paladin Survey Force Amarr Empire
232
|
Posted - 2014.04.11 16:42:00 -
[50] - Quote
pagl1u M wrote:Adell Shinzumakami wrote:Most of my time playing is either driving an LAV or snipping. Only people that play in the Middle of the battlefield can know if cloak is OP... Just saying. I go by examples and experience. If I was actually in the battlefield you would just be using the "QQ" as an excuse to make yourself seem like you're right.
I GÖÑ RoadKill
Closed BETA vet - CLOAKING
|
|
pagl1u M
Maphia Clan Unit Unicorn
568
|
Posted - 2014.04.11 16:45:00 -
[51] - Quote
Adell Shinzumakami wrote:pagl1u M wrote:Adell Shinzumakami wrote:Most of my time playing is either driving an LAV or snipping. Only people that play in the Middle of the battlefield can know if cloak is OP... Just saying. I go by examples and experience. If I was actually in the battlefield you would just be using the "QQ" as an excuse to make yourself seem like you're right. I still have to see a single argument from you. Where do you experience comes from? Cant you see scouts while you are on your taxi? |
pagl1u M
Maphia Clan Unit Unicorn
568
|
Posted - 2014.04.11 16:48:00 -
[52] - Quote
Leadfoot10 wrote:pagl1u M wrote:
What do you think?
I think cloaks are OP, and armor plates have little to nothing do with it. Signed, An invisible Cal Scout who can see everything to 70m Why do you Consider cloak OP? What makes it OP? (I m not trolling I really want some arguments from the other side)
A cal scout with such a good radar has obviously low ehp, isnt fast... Yes he has a good scanner but he will die in a second. Also... What has the radar of a cal scout has to do with cloaks? |
Adell Shinzumakami
Paladin Survey Force Amarr Empire
232
|
Posted - 2014.04.11 16:48:00 -
[53] - Quote
pagl1u M wrote:Adell Shinzumakami wrote:pagl1u M wrote:Adell Shinzumakami wrote:Most of my time playing is either driving an LAV or snipping. Only people that play in the Middle of the battlefield can know if cloak is OP... Just saying. I go by examples and experience. If I was actually in the battlefield you would just be using the "QQ" as an excuse to make yourself seem like you're right. I still have to see a single argument from you. Where do you experience comes from? Cant you see scouts while you are on your taxi? Sniping. I see cloaked scouts easily rushing towards people and killing a group by themselves while team is distracted. I can vaguely see the blue spots but have difficulties shooting them with a 12" television
I GÖÑ RoadKill
Closed BETA vet - CLOAKING
|
xxwhitedevilxx M
Maphia Clan Unit Unicorn
2219
|
Posted - 2014.04.11 16:53:00 -
[54] - Quote
Adell Shinzumakami wrote:pagl1u M wrote:Adell Shinzumakami wrote:pagl1u M wrote:Adell Shinzumakami wrote:Most of my time playing is either driving an LAV or snipping. Only people that play in the Middle of the battlefield can know if cloak is OP... Just saying. I go by examples and experience. If I was actually in the battlefield you would just be using the "QQ" as an excuse to make yourself seem like you're right. I still have to see a single argument from you. Where do you experience comes from? Cant you see scouts while you are on your taxi? Sniping. I see cloaked scouts easily rushing towards people and killing a group by themselves while team is distracted. I can vaguely see the blue spots but have difficulties shooting them with a 12" television
This is an argument, but it's hardware related. It's like complaining about your 1999 computer unable to run Eve at all.
-#Firmocosìperchènonhopersonalità
|
xxwhitedevilxx M
Maphia Clan Unit Unicorn
2219
|
Posted - 2014.04.11 16:57:00 -
[55] - Quote
Leadfoot10 wrote:pagl1u M wrote:
What do you think?
I think cloaks are OP, and armor plates have little to nothing do with it. Signed, An invisible Cal Scout who can see everything to 70m
That's interesting: cloak is OP because you can easily see a cloaked scout? You're the perfect counter-scout, a living glass-scanner; I'm not going to give you some tips, but it's actually your scan radius/precision that would make your entire squad OP, in this case cloak is just a waste of PG/CPU.
-#Firmocosìperchènonhopersonalità
|
Adell Shinzumakami
Paladin Survey Force Amarr Empire
233
|
Posted - 2014.04.11 16:58:00 -
[56] - Quote
xxwhitedevilxx M wrote:This is an argument, but it's hardware related. It's like complaining about your 1999 computer unable to run Eve at all. I only mentioned my television so they won't question why I don't shoot cloaks if I see them
I GÖÑ RoadKill
Closed BETA vet - CLOAKING
|
pagl1u M
Maphia Clan Unit Unicorn
572
|
Posted - 2014.04.11 17:02:00 -
[57] - Quote
Adell Shinzumakami wrote:pagl1u M wrote:Adell Shinzumakami wrote:pagl1u M wrote:Adell Shinzumakami wrote:Most of my time playing is either driving an LAV or snipping. Only people that play in the Middle of the battlefield can know if cloak is OP... Just saying. I go by examples and experience. If I was actually in the battlefield you would just be using the "QQ" as an excuse to make yourself seem like you're right. I still have to see a single argument from you. Where do you experience comes from? Cant you see scouts while you are on your taxi? Sniping. I see cloaked scouts easily rushing towards people and killing a group by themselves while team is distracted. I can vaguely see the blue spots but have difficulties shooting them with a 12" television While I dont Consider it an argument (I ve seen players destroy with plasma cannons... IT doesn't make it OP)... That scout is doing exactly is Job, that is why it works well... You usally play from Miles away so I dont know if you are aware of this but... And heavy doing is Job (defending an objective in cqc even better with a logi repping him) can destroy an entire Squad... Working as intended. |
Shadowswipe
Molon Labe. General Tso's Alliance
220
|
Posted - 2014.04.11 17:03:00 -
[58] - Quote
pagl1u M wrote:Shadowswipe wrote:Quote:I m Tired of all these "cloak is OP", the real problem with scout is.. I was hoping to open the thread and see.. "the negative community." or... "people that think they know it all." This game is like real life. If you don't like the environment you are in, leave. Example: Hostile job environment, just leave. And then secondly, if you are so great at designing a balanced game, please list your references of triple A games that you were the lead designer on. Otherwise, don't sound so matter of fact in your statements. Can you plz quote the part where I said that I m" so great at designing a balanced game"? It make it look like I dont Like the Job that ccp is doing but the problem is.... I actually love what they are doing! It is not that I dont Like the environment it is just that I dont Like QQs. Can you plz stay on Topic instead of just try to insult me? Thank you very much I wasn't quoting you. It was more of an interjection of thought cause I didn't read it past the title and the first couple words. I was already disappointed by word two cause the post wan't something that I hoped it was going to be. That is all. |
pagl1u M
Maphia Clan Unit Unicorn
572
|
Posted - 2014.04.11 17:04:00 -
[59] - Quote
Shadowswipe wrote:pagl1u M wrote:Shadowswipe wrote:Quote:I m Tired of all these "cloak is OP", the real problem with scout is.. I was hoping to open the thread and see.. "the negative community." or... "people that think they know it all." This game is like real life. If you don't like the environment you are in, leave. Example: Hostile job environment, just leave. And then secondly, if you are so great at designing a balanced game, please list your references of triple A games that you were the lead designer on. Otherwise, don't sound so matter of fact in your statements. Can you plz quote the part where I said that I m" so great at designing a balanced game"? It make it look like I dont Like the Job that ccp is doing but the problem is.... I actually love what they are doing! It is not that I dont Like the environment it is just that I dont Like QQs. Can you plz stay on Topic instead of just try to insult me? Thank you very much I wasn't quoting you. It was more of an interjection of thought cause I didn't read it past the title and the first couple words. I was already disappointed by word two cause the post wan't something that I hoped it was going to be. That is all. So basically you "insult" me and make joke of me after only reading the title of my post... That s really mature. |
Shadowswipe
Molon Labe. General Tso's Alliance
220
|
Posted - 2014.04.11 17:07:00 -
[60] - Quote
pagl1u M wrote:So basically you "insult" me and make joke of me after only reading the title of my post... That s really mature. Basically I am sorry you are hurt by my post. It wasn't directed to you, it was a general statement of sentiment of these forums. Sorry if you took it the wrong way. |
|
Yan Darn
Science For Death
578
|
Posted - 2014.04.11 17:15:00 -
[61] - Quote
MINA Longstrike wrote:
No, the problem with scouts isn't armor plates. It's the fact that we went from 45 profile down to 35 - that's right a scout with *NO* skills invested in profile dampening inherently dodges advanced scanners from anyone but gal-logi's... and on top of that the scouts 5% profile dampening per level was switched over to the cloaking device (on all scouts except the gallente who still have the inherent dampening), making most scouts even harder to scan. If you have 1 complex profile dampener on your scout and a cloaking device you cant be scanned by anything except for a gallogi with a proto scanner, if you have 2 complex damps he needs a focused proto scanner.
surely your problem is with the current state of scanners - scouts could always evade ADV scanners passively, all this does is make it so new guys getting into scouting (or wanting to try it out) don't have to wait an extra couple of weeks to actually be able to avoid the most widely used scanner - it's not really OP just easier to obtain. If anything, older scouts like me should be bitter about that.
It's actually kinda harder for non-gals to avoid proto scanners now, before you only needed max skills and a basic damp. The only scout that could possibly evade a focused scan before was a protofit gal scout using all low slots, which was kinda ridiculous against even level opponents. Also, cloaking has to be active to provide that bonus (which you still have to spend significant SP to use)
On top of that scouts got some pretty insane stamina buffs across the board, and the cloaking device has no transitory period from 'cloaked' to 'shooting', in fact you can often 'decloak' and get a shot or two off before you're even through the animation.
first - stamina bonuses being insane? Does that make Amarr the most OP scout? I don't think people reckon the stamina bonus is OP, it was always a basic change scouts always cried for, because we knew it would help us without anyone getting all QQey about...As for the cloak switch shoot - everybody knows its an unintentional feature that needs fixing - like 360 scans did. In fact it's the first thing CCP should change before considering anything else in IMHO).
Now I'm fine with the buffs to powergrid, cpu and slots because honestly scouts *needed* those buffs, but the massive buffs to profile weren't needed and are causing the problems.
The overall *massive* buffs to the scouts base stats in terms of profile and stamina are what are making scouts so problematic - if 'bad' scouts could be more easily countered with advanced scanners, you'd see more people using advanced scanners.
seriously - the potential HP advantage on top of the stealth is what the reasonable QQ is about - and that is all down to armour plates
I was playing with a proto minmatar scout beforehand on my alt, and I'm playing with a proto caldari scout now on my main, and I frequently run with 2 proto gallente scout friends (one of whom switched over to cal scout with the patch). Cloaks do need some balancing, but hitting scouts for 5 profile would fix some of the problems.
MINA...it's like you came from a parallel dimension where people have vastly different reasons to QQ about scouts...
I do agree that the ewar mechanics in general need some serious attention however.
The Ghost of Bravo
|
NAV HIV
The Generals General Tso's Alliance
1435
|
Posted - 2014.04.11 17:25:00 -
[62] - Quote
al nize mk2 wrote:NAV HIV wrote: Like i said before... Now that you need to set your squad up properly to be effective... People are crying cause Teamwork is OP and no more SOLO BS.... Soloist get stomped and should get stomped...
Here I disagree with you. Teamwork is king - there's no doubt. But there has to be a place for the solo player and that ties in with the NPE issue and keeping hold of casual players. In fairness - scouts are the solo player experience.
LOL Very true... I want to fight Drones... |
NAV HIV
The Generals General Tso's Alliance
1435
|
Posted - 2014.04.11 17:29:00 -
[63] - Quote
Adell Shinzumakami wrote:Revelations 514 wrote:-Long Quote past Ps3 text limit- Not "QQ" about anything. I point out different counters about the Op's "strategy" to counter cloaking, but most people automatically think I'm getting killed by cloakers everyday. Most of my post get taken the wrong way by people who I am arguing with (Even posts where I'm making a joke.) Most of my time playing is either driving an LAV or snipping. I rarely have any actual encounters with cloaking scouts. The whole "90% I die" was when I jump in to assist hack or hacking something to give my team an advantage while driving. I would also like to add I use cloaking in few occasions as a tactical way to get closer to objective rather than use it for kills....
I thought i saw everything... But i was wrong... Murder Taxi Heavy Sniper Calling other things OP and all .... |
Medical Crash
CLONES AGAINST HUMANITY
257
|
Posted - 2014.04.11 17:54:00 -
[64] - Quote
pagl1u M wrote:Armor plates.
But first let me explain why the cloak isn't OP. First of all: it doesn't make you invisible. If You pay attention you can See cloaked scouts when they are moving (you can See them while they stand still but it is harder).
If a cloaked scout wants to kill you he has to come near to you, he can do that in front of you or from behind. If he runs in front of you And You can't see him... Well... You have to be blind! If he approaches you from behind he is doing something he could do without a cloak, the cloak just helps him a bit. You couldnt have seen him anyway even if he was uncloaked.
Second: when I scout 9/10 of my Kills come from players that play all alone on the battlefield. If You are playing all alone in a medium or heavy suits you are doing it wrong. Scouts are supposed to play alone, other suits aren't. You should stick with your team and watch the back of your mates. This Way you can destroy a cloaked scout if he is stupid enough to engage.
3 the cloak isn't given for free. It is heavy. The Basic one occupies 40 cpu and 9 pg, the adv 58 cpu and 12 pg, the cmplx 82 cpu and 17 pg (on a scout suit with 5 in the skill) If you want to Fit a cloak you have to give up on something else. In a caldari or a Min scout if you want an adv cloak you better use low pg modules, no nades maybe and a low pg Secondary equipment.
What about Gallente and amarr? Using Basic armor plate to tank they are able to Fit Whatever they want because of the OPNESS of armor plates, they give you a lot of hp and they only uses 10 cpu and 1 pg.
I have fitted a gal scout with: 2 cmplx shield ext 2 Basic armor plates, a cmplx kincat, a cmplx cardiac regulator, boundless combat rifle, ishukone smg, m1 locus nades, adv cloak, allotek nanohives (proto). It has an Incredible fire power (2 proto weapons and adv nades) a lot of hp (580), tons of stamina and stamina recharge, a good passive scanner and invisibility, it is fast 8.66 speed, an innate armor repair rate of 3 helped by PROTO nanohives!!
The point of the thread is: cloak isn't OP, scouts aren't OP, armor plates are OP!
What do you think?
Defend the Scout crutch, do go on! Cloaks are not the problem, the weak scanners are. Buff Scanners -SLIGHTLY- and this all goes a way. So a Scout can see 24/7 on their radar, and this is not OP, but Active Scanners highlighting small areas is? Lol, no, apparently we can go kick rocks.
Either all Scouts Dampning gets nerfed a bit, or Scanners get a small boost (+5 for the Duvolle Focused, that would be enough I think, haven't done the math).
Also, reduce the effectiveness of Scouts Precision when their cloak is activated, as well as getting rid of that Dampning bonus with the Cloak. Scouts have too much Stealth as it is. |
MINA Longstrike
2Shitz 1Giggle United Brotherhood Alliance
470
|
Posted - 2014.04.11 17:56:00 -
[65] - Quote
Yan Darn wrote:MINA...it's like you came from a parallel dimension where people have vastly different reasons to QQ about scouts...
I do agree that the ewar mechanics in general need some serious attention however.
The Amarr scout is the most screwed in terms of its stamina - a minmatar scout is the the fastest thing on foot now, and it completely smashes any other suit in a footrace.
Scouts went from like ~10s stamina recharges that meant they actually had to stop for things down to 2-4 second stamina recharges, which completely screws the amarr scouts bonus entirely.
Cloaking is a fairly simple fix, but scout profile & stamina is really where they broke things. I'm fine with scouts having HP and the ability to sprint, I'm fine with scouts being able to use shotguns, I'm fine with them being able to cloak, I'm fine with scouts being able to dodge scanners. I'm not fine with them being able to get the best of all of these things without actually having to invest any real sp into it and cloaking in its current form is (as I have seen quite frequently) used by scouts to charge straight at you and whip out a shotgun and blast it before they finish decloaking because there is no delay between 'decloaking' and firing.
Add 4-5 points to scout profile so they're picked up by adv scanners unless they're cloaked, or they have a damp fitted, or they have profile dampening 5. Add a .5-2.5s delay to decloaking before you can fire (as a point of balance it should start at .5s and then be adjusted upwards if it needs to). Adjust the minmatar, gallente and caldari scout stamina amounts and recharges, the minmatar should win the 100-150m run, the amarr should win the 250m. |
Pisidon Gmen
Ivory Vanguard
39
|
Posted - 2014.04.11 18:29:00 -
[66] - Quote
cloaks are op 4 these reasons esp on scouts
1 able to shoot from cloak
2 able to recloak if is was not exhausted before uncloaking have seen it meany times where scout keeps disappearing and then shooting some 1 only to recloak in under 30 sec ( cool down before able to recloak not working)
both of these seem to be a glich( unintended effect) and are the biggest problem there should be a short delay of a sec or 2 before a player can shoot from being cloaked
3 combined near invisibility with added profile damping scouts all ready were near invisible on scans and with passive suit scans
4 the cpu is very high to use on any thing but a skilled scout over 100 cpu at lowest level try fitting it on any suit at a base or adv level with out having max skills that add cpu and pg then what can u put on the suit with it ? all most nothing
5 yes u can see a cloaked guy moving ( sprinting) but if he is walking or just standing in 1 spot they are close to invisible or a shadow or the sun is low in the sky it gives too much to 1 guy
combine all these things with a shot gun that at the lowest level will kill a proto heavy in 3 to 4 shots yes it makes a scout shot gun cloak very op
what a lot of players seem to forget is that not every one in the game has 20 mill sp invested in there guy or has 2 to 3 mill (extra) sp to just skill in to the next new thing with out new players in the game that stay with the game how long will dust last? unless ccp is relining on eve to support dust ?
|
GLOBAL RAGE
Consolidated Dust
39
|
Posted - 2014.04.11 18:37:00 -
[67] - Quote
post 1.8 this game is Charlie Foxtrot. |
Onesimus Tarsus
703rd Ishuk-Raata Enforcement Directive
1885
|
Posted - 2014.04.11 18:47:00 -
[68] - Quote
pagl1u M wrote:Adell Shinzumakami wrote:Cloak is not OP: From a guy who uses cloaking Can you please say something intelligent to prove that I m wrong instead of trying to troll? Thank you. Post something other than apologist whinges for cleaning, and I'm sure he'll try.
1.8 (!) forum warrior. SMG wielder. Mama's boy.
703rd for life! (or at least, for now).
|
pagl1u M
Maphia Clan Unit Unicorn
584
|
Posted - 2014.04.11 19:18:00 -
[69] - Quote
Pisidon Gmen wrote:cloaks are op 4 these reasons esp on scouts
1 able to shoot from cloak
2 able to recloak if is was not exhausted before uncloaking have seen it meany times where scout keeps disappearing and then shooting some 1 only to recloak in under 30 sec ( cool down before able to recloak not working)
both of these seem to be a glich( unintended effect) and are the biggest problem there should be a short delay of a sec or 2 before a player can shoot from being cloaked
3 combined near invisibility with added profile damping scouts all ready were near invisible on scans and with passive suit scans
4 the cpu is very high to use on any thing but a skilled scout over 100 cpu at lowest level try fitting it on any suit at a base or adv level with out having max skills that add cpu and pg then what can u put on the suit with it ? all most nothing
5 yes u can see a cloaked guy moving ( sprinting) but if he is walking or just standing in 1 spot they are close to invisible or a shadow or the sun is low in the sky it gives too much to 1 guy
combine all these things with a shot gun that at the lowest level will kill a proto heavy in 3 to 4 shots yes it makes a scout shot gun cloak very op
what a lot of players seem to forget is that not every one in the game has 20 mill sp invested in there guy or has 2 to 3 mill (extra) sp to just skill in to the next new thing with out new players in the game that stay with the game how long will dust last? unless ccp is relining on eve to support dust ?
1 You cant shoot while invisible, when you switch to a weapon it starts going down so even if you cant perfectly see the player you will see the animation of the cloak.
2 I dont understand this.
3 a cloaked scout without radar invisibility would be as visibile as everyone else, it d be a bad idea.
4this doesn't make it OP.
5 it makes you almost invisible while standing still, it requires an equipment slot and a lot of pg cpu. It seems balanced to me. None ever remember that you actually have to Fit it |
Isa Lucifer
Praetoriani Classiarii Templares Praetoria Imperialis Excubitoris
34
|
Posted - 2014.04.11 19:30:00 -
[70] - Quote
Guy above me (Quote **** wont work)
5. Bro, you have tons of low slots and high slots to remedy that. Scouts have too much of everything.
Amarr Victor
|
|
Jastad
D.A.R.K L.E.G.I.O.N D.E.F.I.A.N.C.E
697
|
Posted - 2014.04.11 19:34:00 -
[71] - Quote
There are multiple problems.
Cloak is op because you can shot 1/2 hit before actually decloacking (Glitch)
People can ISTANT recloack, and the cloak don't turn off when you get hit.
Another source of the problem are the CAL/GAL scout and the fact that they seem balanced on 1,7 stat.
The Caldari can passive scan( 360-24/24) at 27DB in 37M with skill only. They don't need to sacrifice nothing for this result. This with the lowest shield regen except for the Cal.sent ( in one case is the best), with a 50HP per sec recharge (no need for charger o energ.)
Cal.Heavy-Min.Heavy-Amarr.Heavy
Believe in the FORGE, young padawans
SoloDoloreSuCharlie
|
pagl1u M
Maphia Clan Unit Unicorn
587
|
Posted - 2014.04.11 20:23:00 -
[72] - Quote
Jastad wrote:There are multiple problems.
Cloak is op because you can shot 1/2 hit before actually decloacking (Glitch)
People can ISTANT recloack, and the cloak don't turn off when you get hit.
Another source of the problem are the CAL/GAL scout and the fact that they seem balanced on 1,7 stat.
The Caldari can passive scan( 360-24/24) at 27DB in 37M with skill only. They don't need to sacrifice nothing for this result. This with the lowest shield regen except for the Cal.sent ( in one case is the best), with a 50HP per sec recharge (no need for charger o energ.)
Your first point can be easily Fixed by forcing players to press R1 and decloak before they can change weapon.
You cant instantly decloak you have to change equipment and wait Till it put the cloak on. I also think that it is not wrong that you can stay cloaked while being hitted. We have to remember that a scout have to give up to better weapons and modules to have this cloak, it have to give us some bonuses
|
Mobius Kaethis
Molon Labe. General Tso's Alliance
1396
|
Posted - 2014.04.11 20:43:00 -
[73] - Quote
pagl1u M wrote: We have to remember that a scout have to give up to better weapons and modules to have this cloak, it have to give us some bonuses
Ummm, no you don't. Hop onto protofits turn on max skills, and you can completely proto out a gal scout gk.0. I already posted on this in another thread but I'll restate it here. A fully skilled gal gk.0 wearer can fit: 989 ehp, a proto RR (specialist), a proto Magsec SMG, a cloak, and flux nades.
The problem here isn't necessarily the tanking but the fact that the scout does not really need to make any sacrifices here. With the fit that I described the scout can cloak, out DPS almost any suit at pretty long ranges (though they could easily fit a proto-SG and NK as well), have an extremely damaging mid-short range side arm, run faster than any med frame, be invisble to almost all scans (passive cal scouts would need to fit complex precision enhancers to see it and gal logis would need a proto scanner), its flux lets it easily take out eq and do serious damage to infantry. Heck, the flux even makes it a worry for shield tanks as 1500 damage is enough to scare most shield tankers. I can find absolutely no sacrifices of a meaningful sort in this fit.
Fun > Realism
|
pagl1u M
Maphia Clan Unit Unicorn
588
|
Posted - 2014.04.11 20:49:00 -
[74] - Quote
Mobius Kaethis wrote:pagl1u M wrote: We have to remember that a scout have to give up to better weapons and modules to have this cloak, it have to give us some bonuses
Ummm, no you don't. Hop onto protofits turn on max skills, and you can completely proto out a gal scout gk.0. I already posted on this in another thread but I'll restate it here. A fully skilled gal gk.0 wearer can fit: 989 ehp, a proto RR (specialist), a proto Magsec SMG, a cloak, and flux nades. The problem here isn't necessarily the tanking but the fact that the scout does not really need to make any sacrifices here. With the fit that I described the scout can cloak, out DPS almost any suit at pretty long ranges (though they could easily fit a proto-SG and NK as well), have an extremely damaging mid-short range side arm, run faster than any med frame, be invisble to almost all scans (passive cal scouts would need to fit complex precision enhancers to see it and gal logis would need a proto scanner), its flux lets it easily take out eq and do serious damage to infantry. Heck, the flux even makes it a worry for shield tanks as 1500 damage is enough to scare most shield tankers. I can find absolutely no sacrifices of a meaningful sort in this fit. Try to Fit a Min scout and you ll see that you have to give up to something, the same for the cal scout. I already said that the problem is that armor plates require no cpu and pg(almost) |
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 :: [one page] |