| Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 :: one page |
|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Spkr4theDead
Red Star.
EoN.
1833
   |
Posted - 2014.02.16 02:29:00 -
[91] - Quote
Darken-Soul wrote:ADAM-OF-EVE wrote:what gets me is there are awesome tankers in dust from pre1.7 who prevailed who don't speak up and this leaves us with the rubbish tankers (yes Spkr4theDead thats you) dictating their poor views on changes. these good tankers need to step forward and take the mantle and shut these scrub tankers up so we can all get some sort of balance that works for everyone last time I saw Pearson he was at the flight ceiling in a drop ship avoiding nyan spam tanks.
That's called smart thinking.
I may be missing something, but I'm pretty sure that I didn't call for a tank nerf before Uprising 1.7. - Atiim
|
KING CHECKMATE
Tal-Romon Legion
Amarr Empire
4644
|
Posted - 2014.02.16 02:29:00 -
[92] - Quote
Spkr4theDead wrote:Henchmen21 wrote:Makes up a bunch of rubbish.
Can anyone guess who I am? KING CHECKMATE? ADAM-AND-STEVE? Atiim? Like infantry that said during the period before 1.7, that a Soma could survive an alpha strike of 16,000 damage? You mean those people?
The thing is,before, Armor reppers were very Powerful and FAst.
Sure Shield tanks sucked but armor tanks could take a LOT of damage with Reppers alone.Like 4 Proto Swarms and Proxy mines?
The only way was to connect ALL that damage in 1 blow, which is up to date,still pretty difficult.
Then we got reppers replaced with Passive reppers which at first sounded balanced,but combines with the NEW HARDENER modules and the ability to stack them, its not.,
Now, somewhere in this page you said: '' I one-shot a Madrugar with a Wiyrkomi breach at the weak spot in a test. Of course, nobody believed me. It can still be done with a Wiyrkomi. Not my fault infantry can't wait for the best position. ''
Not my fault infantry can't wait for the best position.
Its not your fault. Neither is ours.
Staying in the OPEN for more than 5 seconds in this game filled with Thales and Rail Tanks is SUICIDE.
There is no , ''TIME'' to waste while playing vs competent players.
OF COURSE, you know this, but same as many other points, you choose to ignore.
2nd , the Breach Forgegun can be powerful, damage wise.But in the middle of a battlefield a weapon that does not let you move is stupid, like this thread....
Support Amarr scout bonus change! : https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=1813029#post1813029
|
Lightning Bolt2
Binary Mercs
383
|
Posted - 2014.02.16 02:29:00 -
[93] - Quote
Spkr4theDead wrote:This is why vehicles and AV are always in such a state of flux, CCP. You listen to mainline infantry, without talking to the pilots. And by that, I mean a lot of us. Get dedicated dropship and tank pilots, not just one dropship pilot who happens to hate railguns.
Stop listening to infantry 99% of the time, with that 1% being one person. One person does make a consensus. That one person cannot speak for all pilots.
Infantry, what gives you the right to decide our fate? We don't care what you do, we don't tell you how to fit your suits, or when you can use certain suits. We tell you how to destroy us in an easy way, yet you all completely ignore it, and continue to bash your heads against a brick wall, then get on here and complain when you can't destroy us.
The time I've seen people launching MLT swarms at my Gunnlogi is staggering. It's the same with people firing their ARs and throwing locus grenades at my tanks. My Madrugar gets fluxed, and all I can do is laugh because a Madrugar is an armor tank.
Stop throwing insane ideas at us. We'll stop throwing insane ideas back.
I truly feel ONLY the hardeners need nerfed in 1.8 then CCP will have to work from there.
[EDIT] and speed
Favorite gear: Duct-tape and Butter knives
squad play!
|
ADAM-OF-EVE
Dead Man's Game
1020
|
Posted - 2014.02.16 02:30:00 -
[94] - Quote
Darken-Soul wrote:ADAM-OF-EVE wrote:what gets me is there are awesome tankers in dust from pre1.7 who prevailed who don't speak up and this leaves us with the rubbish tankers (yes Spkr4theDead thats you) dictating their poor views on changes. these good tankers need to step forward and take the mantle and shut these scrub tankers up so we can all get some sort of balance that works for everyone last time I saw Pearson he was at the flight ceiling in a drop ship avoiding nyan spam tanks.
im talking more of the unseen tanking hero's such as APgrasshopper etc (not seen him in a while actually). i remember a time i used to rent a spot in his invincible pre 1.7 tank. gone are those days of working in a tank squad all thanks to ideas from the likes of the OP
I will logi the s* out of you
https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=99075&find
|
Spkr4theDead
Red Star.
EoN.
1833
|
Posted - 2014.02.16 02:31:00 -
[95] - Quote
Darken-Soul wrote:Spkr4theDead wrote:Bojo The Mighty wrote:You don't speak for the dead
You speak for the spammers Spammers? Last I remember, there was a problem with MLT spam. I don't use MLT. Don't group me with those people. I've been tanking since Chromosome. you are the only one saying its militia. Everyone else realizes its all tanks now.
..... it's not all tanks. I see 90% MLT, 10% STD.
Are you in Ambush 99% of the time?
I may be missing something, but I'm pretty sure that I didn't call for a tank nerf before Uprising 1.7. - Atiim
|
Spkr4theDead
Red Star.
EoN.
1833
|
Posted - 2014.02.16 02:32:00 -
[96] - Quote
ADAM-OF-EVE wrote:Darken-Soul wrote:ADAM-OF-EVE wrote:what gets me is there are awesome tankers in dust from pre1.7 who prevailed who don't speak up and this leaves us with the rubbish tankers (yes Spkr4theDead thats you) dictating their poor views on changes. these good tankers need to step forward and take the mantle and shut these scrub tankers up so we can all get some sort of balance that works for everyone last time I saw Pearson he was at the flight ceiling in a drop ship avoiding nyan spam tanks. im talking more of the unseen tanking hero's such as APgrasshopper etc (not seen him in a while actually). i remember a time i used to rent a spot in his invincible pre 1.7 tank. gone are those days of working in a tank squad all thanks to ideas from the likes of the OP
What, you mean the guy that can't fight other tanks worth a damn?
I may be missing something, but I'm pretty sure that I didn't call for a tank nerf before Uprising 1.7. - Atiim
|
Canari Elphus
Ancient Exiles.
Renegade Alliance
1179
|
Posted - 2014.02.16 02:33:00 -
[97] - Quote
Spkr4theDead wrote:Canari Elphus wrote:Michael Arck wrote:Okay playing along with this class separation thing to make a point.
Tankers are the ones to blame for getting tanks to the current state that they are in, not infantry.
That doesn't even make sense. So infantry wanted more powerful, speedy tanks? LOL yea ok. Tankers are the ones who got it to this point. Tankers were behind the AV nerf as well-lets just lay it on the table here and be honest.
Some folks just like to omit key points from their memories around here. TBH, most tankers proposed one solution or the other. It was CCP that said ok....... TO ALL OF THEM. - We want tanks to be cheaper... sure - We want tanks to have more survivability.... sure - We want AV nerfed..... sure CCP said that they were going to make tanks very efficient for short periods of time but their QC team spent about 30 seconds testing out different scenarios. The fact that they didnt see rotating hardners or double reps as a possibility is staggering. So we should fit our tanks according to you?
When did I tell you how to fit your tank? I was simply stating that CCP didnt deliver a product that they said they would. How that translates to me telling you what to do, I have no clue.
Canari Elphus for CPM1
|
Spkr4theDead
Red Star.
EoN.
1833
|
Posted - 2014.02.16 02:34:00 -
[98] - Quote
Lightning Bolt2 wrote:Spkr4theDead wrote:This is why vehicles and AV are always in such a state of flux, CCP. You listen to mainline infantry, without talking to the pilots. And by that, I mean a lot of us. Get dedicated dropship and tank pilots, not just one dropship pilot who happens to hate railguns.
Stop listening to infantry 99% of the time, with that 1% being one person. One person does make a consensus. That one person cannot speak for all pilots.
Infantry, what gives you the right to decide our fate? We don't care what you do, we don't tell you how to fit your suits, or when you can use certain suits. We tell you how to destroy us in an easy way, yet you all completely ignore it, and continue to bash your heads against a brick wall, then get on here and complain when you can't destroy us.
The time I've seen people launching MLT swarms at my Gunnlogi is staggering. It's the same with people firing their ARs and throwing locus grenades at my tanks. My Madrugar gets fluxed, and all I can do is laugh because a Madrugar is an armor tank.
Stop throwing insane ideas at us. We'll stop throwing insane ideas back.
I truly feel ONLY the hardeners need nerfed in 1.8 then CCP will have to work from there.
Why? Why should I have to fit my tanks the way someone else wants me to?
I may be missing something, but I'm pretty sure that I didn't call for a tank nerf before Uprising 1.7. - Atiim
|
Darken-Soul
BIG BAD W0LVES
713
|
Posted - 2014.02.16 02:35:00 -
[99] - Quote
Spkr4theDead wrote:Darken-Soul wrote:Spkr4theDead wrote:Bojo The Mighty wrote:You don't speak for the dead
You speak for the spammers Spammers? Last I remember, there was a problem with MLT spam. I don't use MLT. Don't group me with those people. I've been tanking since Chromosome. you are the only one saying its militia. Everyone else realizes its all tanks now. ..... it's not all tanks. I see 90% MLT, 10% STD. Are you in Ambush 99% of the time?
lets pretend your thick skull is a tank. And all these arguments are AV. Do you see how nothing gets thru? Do you see how overwhelming numbers do nothing? You are a triple hardened dumblogi.
Who wants some?
|
Spkr4theDead
Red Star.
EoN.
1833
|
Posted - 2014.02.16 02:35:00 -
[100] - Quote
Canari Elphus wrote:Spkr4theDead wrote:Canari Elphus wrote:Michael Arck wrote:Okay playing along with this class separation thing to make a point.
Tankers are the ones to blame for getting tanks to the current state that they are in, not infantry.
That doesn't even make sense. So infantry wanted more powerful, speedy tanks? LOL yea ok. Tankers are the ones who got it to this point. Tankers were behind the AV nerf as well-lets just lay it on the table here and be honest.
Some folks just like to omit key points from their memories around here. TBH, most tankers proposed one solution or the other. It was CCP that said ok....... TO ALL OF THEM. - We want tanks to be cheaper... sure - We want tanks to have more survivability.... sure - We want AV nerfed..... sure CCP said that they were going to make tanks very efficient for short periods of time but their QC team spent about 30 seconds testing out different scenarios. The fact that they didnt see rotating hardners or double reps as a possibility is staggering. So we should fit our tanks according to you? When did I tell you how to fit your tank? I was simply stating that CCP didnt deliver a product that they said they would. How that translates to me telling you what to do, I have no clue.
If you don't like the product, then stop using it. It's simple
I may be missing something, but I'm pretty sure that I didn't call for a tank nerf before Uprising 1.7. - Atiim
|
|
|
Gavr1lo Pr1nc1p
TRA1LBLAZERS
623
|
Posted - 2014.02.16 02:35:00 -
[101] - Quote
Spkr4theDead wrote:
Why? Why should I have to fit my tanks the way someone else wants me to?
ARRGGGHHH!!!!!!!!!!!
the irony is killing me!!!!!!
Kills- Archduke Ferdinand
Balance!
|
Spkr4theDead
Red Star.
EoN.
1833
|
Posted - 2014.02.16 02:35:00 -
[102] - Quote
Darken-Soul wrote:Spkr4theDead wrote:Darken-Soul wrote:Spkr4theDead wrote:Bojo The Mighty wrote:You don't speak for the dead
You speak for the spammers Spammers? Last I remember, there was a problem with MLT spam. I don't use MLT. Don't group me with those people. I've been tanking since Chromosome. you are the only one saying its militia. Everyone else realizes its all tanks now. ..... it's not all tanks. I see 90% MLT, 10% STD. Are you in Ambush 99% of the time? lets pretend your thick skull is a tank. And all these arguments are AV. Do you see how nothing gets thru? Do you see how overwhelming numbers do nothing? You are a triple hardened dumblogi.
... there's a problem with how I fit my tank?
I may be missing something, but I'm pretty sure that I didn't call for a tank nerf before Uprising 1.7. - Atiim
|
Spkr4theDead
Red Star.
EoN.
1833
|
Posted - 2014.02.16 02:36:00 -
[103] - Quote
Gavr1lo Pr1nc1p wrote:Spkr4theDead wrote:
Why? Why should I have to fit my tanks the way someone else wants me to?
ARRGGGHHH!!!!!!!!!!! the irony is killing me!!!!!!
What irony?
I may be missing something, but I'm pretty sure that I didn't call for a tank nerf before Uprising 1.7. - Atiim
|
Gavr1lo Pr1nc1p
TRA1LBLAZERS
623
|
Posted - 2014.02.16 02:38:00 -
[104] - Quote
Spkr4theDead wrote:Gavr1lo Pr1nc1p wrote:Spkr4theDead wrote:
Why? Why should I have to fit my tanks the way someone else wants me to?
ARRGGGHHH!!!!!!!!!!! the irony is killing me!!!!!! What irony?
NOOOOOO!!!!!
STOOOOPP!!!!
IT HURTS!!!!!!!!
Kills- Archduke Ferdinand
Balance!
|
Awry Barux
New Eden Blades Of The Azure
Zero-Day
649
|
Posted - 2014.02.16 02:39:00 -
[105] - Quote
Spkr4theDead wrote:Awry Barux wrote:Spkr4theDead wrote:Michael Arck wrote:Okay playing along with this class separation thing to make a point.
Tankers are the ones to blame for getting tanks to the current state that they are in, not infantry.
That doesn't even make sense. So infantry wanted more powerful, speedy tanks? LOL yea ok. Tankers are the ones who got it to this point. Tankers were behind the AV nerf as well-lets just lay it on the table here and be honest.
Some folks just like to omit key points from their memories around here. The AV nerf was commensurate with the tank nerf. Can't keep AV at pre-1.7 levels with such lowered max HP. Packed Lai Dai were doing about 2000 damage to armor tanks with no shield. Swarms were pushing 3000 a shot. I one-shot a Madrugar with a Wiyrkomi breach at the weak spot in a test. Of course, nobody believed me. It can still be done with a Wiyrkomi. Not my fault infantry can't wait for the best position. Then there's the swarmers with ADD, that can't stay locked onto the same target, but fire at everything. Why would we want to deal with ammo, less slots, fewer module choices, and fewer turret choices? We lost the bonuses to max shield, armor, PG and CPU. What more does infantry want? Oh wait, I already know the answer to that. Tanks removed. Barring that, they want ARs to be legitimate AV weapons. Are you really trying to say that 1.7 was a nerf to tanks? I just... I... I... *dies of a brain aneurysm and falls twitching to the floor* What do you consider fewer slots, fewer turret choices, fewer turret choices, and having to deal with ammo supplies? A buff? You'd probably consider contracting HIV to be a good thing.
Fewer slots with more powerful modules = better than more slots with worse modules.
Fewer turrets? The new rails are better than any of the old variants, the missile revamp was a huge improvement to them, and blasters are plenty effective without you having the scattered variant. You have nothing to complain about in the turret department.
Ammo supplies? That's not a thing you have to deal with, don't even pretend it's any sort of real handicap. You have plenty of ammo, and if you run out, you can just retreat to the redline and call in a new one.
Oh, and they slashed the price of tanks hugely, so even if they were half as good as they were before 1.7, you're still getting more power for your ISK.
In any case, what constitutes a nerf is not the reduction of particular aspects, it's about how it performs in the field against its opposition, and there's no conceivable way you can argue that you are worse off now than you were in 1.6.
tl;dr think before you open your incredibly vast, incredibly loud mouth.
|
Darken-Soul
BIG BAD W0LVES
716
|
Posted - 2014.02.16 02:39:00 -
[106] - Quote
ADAM-OF-EVE wrote:Darken-Soul wrote:ADAM-OF-EVE wrote:what gets me is there are awesome tankers in dust from pre1.7 who prevailed who don't speak up and this leaves us with the rubbish tankers (yes Spkr4theDead thats you) dictating their poor views on changes. these good tankers need to step forward and take the mantle and shut these scrub tankers up so we can all get some sort of balance that works for everyone last time I saw Pearson he was at the flight ceiling in a drop ship avoiding nyan spam tanks. im talking more of the unseen tanking hero's such as APgrasshopper etc (not seen him in a while actually). i remember a time i used to rent a spot in his invincible pre 1.7 tank. gone are those days of working in a tank squad all thanks to ideas from the likes of the OP
grasshopper was good. Him and Kenkaniff were worthy adversaries.
Who wants some?
|
ADAM-OF-EVE
Dead Man's Game
1021
|
Posted - 2014.02.16 02:39:00 -
[107] - Quote
Spkr4theDead wrote:ADAM-OF-EVE wrote:Darken-Soul wrote:ADAM-OF-EVE wrote:what gets me is there are awesome tankers in dust from pre1.7 who prevailed who don't speak up and this leaves us with the rubbish tankers (yes Spkr4theDead thats you) dictating their poor views on changes. these good tankers need to step forward and take the mantle and shut these scrub tankers up so we can all get some sort of balance that works for everyone last time I saw Pearson he was at the flight ceiling in a drop ship avoiding nyan spam tanks. im talking more of the unseen tanking hero's such as APgrasshopper etc (not seen him in a while actually). i remember a time i used to rent a spot in his invincible pre 1.7 tank. gone are those days of working in a tank squad all thanks to ideas from the likes of the OP What, you mean the guy that can't fight other tanks worth a damn?
no im talking about a guy who was awesome pre 1.7 who persevered and thrived while you went on the forums and moaned your ass off at everything.
you talk about av and infantry adapting yet you have never been able to adapt to anything
I will logi the s* out of you
https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=99075&find
|
Darken-Soul
BIG BAD W0LVES
716
|
Posted - 2014.02.16 02:41:00 -
[108] - Quote
Darken-Soul wrote:Spkr4theDead wrote:Darken-Soul wrote:Spkr4theDead wrote:Bojo The Mighty wrote:You don't speak for the dead
You speak for the spammers Spammers? Last I remember, there was a problem with MLT spam. I don't use MLT. Don't group me with those people. I've been tanking since Chromosome. you are the only one saying its militia. Everyone else realizes its all tanks now. ..... it's not all tanks. I see 90% MLT, 10% STD. Are you in Ambush 99% of the time? lets pretend your thick skull is a tank. And all these arguments are AV. Do you see how nothing gets thru? Do you see how overwhelming numbers do nothing? You are a triple hardened dumblogi.
relevancy bump.
Who wants some?
|
Spkr4theDead
Red Star.
EoN.
1833
|
Posted - 2014.02.16 02:42:00 -
[109] - Quote
Darken-Soul wrote:ADAM-OF-EVE wrote:Darken-Soul wrote:ADAM-OF-EVE wrote:what gets me is there are awesome tankers in dust from pre1.7 who prevailed who don't speak up and this leaves us with the rubbish tankers (yes Spkr4theDead thats you) dictating their poor views on changes. these good tankers need to step forward and take the mantle and shut these scrub tankers up so we can all get some sort of balance that works for everyone last time I saw Pearson he was at the flight ceiling in a drop ship avoiding nyan spam tanks. im talking more of the unseen tanking hero's such as APgrasshopper etc (not seen him in a while actually). i remember a time i used to rent a spot in his invincible pre 1.7 tank. gone are those days of working in a tank squad all thanks to ideas from the likes of the OP grasshopper was good. Him and Kenkaniff were worthy adversaries.
lolwut
I may be missing something, but I'm pretty sure that I didn't call for a tank nerf before Uprising 1.7. - Atiim
|
Gavr1lo Pr1nc1p
TRA1LBLAZERS
627
|
Posted - 2014.02.16 02:42:00 -
[110] - Quote
A compilation of things that Spkr4theDead wrote:
Infantry should only be able to kill tanks if they equip a proto assault forge gun, 2x complex damage mods, and have at least 3 of them being together. In the low slots, they need kin cats and cardio regulators so that they can run away in case a tank notices them tickling it, and shouldn't equip a sidearm because it requires too much cpu/pg. Equipment should, of course, be nano hives
This should be the only way to kill tanks. Infantry, if you don't do exactly as i say, you are a n00b and need to HTFU, and its players that you that got tanks to be as UP as they are in 1.7
Just found this somewhere
Kills- Archduke Ferdinand
Balance!
|
|
|
Spkr4theDead
Red Star.
EoN.
1833
|
Posted - 2014.02.16 02:42:00 -
[111] - Quote
Gavr1lo Pr1nc1p wrote:Spkr4theDead wrote:Gavr1lo Pr1nc1p wrote:Spkr4theDead wrote:
Why? Why should I have to fit my tanks the way someone else wants me to?
ARRGGGHHH!!!!!!!!!!! the irony is killing me!!!!!! What irony? NOOOOOO!!!!! STOOOOPP!!!! IT HURTS!!!!!!!!
Might want to go to the emergency room.
I may be missing something, but I'm pretty sure that I didn't call for a tank nerf before Uprising 1.7. - Atiim
|
Spkr4theDead
Red Star.
EoN.
1833
|
Posted - 2014.02.16 02:43:00 -
[112] - Quote
Gavr1lo Pr1nc1p wrote:A compilation of quotes that Spkr4theDead wrote:
Infantry should only be able to kill tanks if they equip a proto assault forge gun, 2x complex damage mods, and have at least 3 of them being together. In the low slots, they need kin cats and cardio regulators so that they can run away in case a tank notices them tickling it, and shouldn't equip a sidearm because it requires too much cpu/pg. Equipment should, of course, be nano hives
This should be the only way to kill tanks. Infantry, if you don't do exactly as i say, you are a n00b and need to HTFU, and its players that you that got tanks to be as UP as they are in 1.7
Just found this somewhere
LOL okay
Keep talking out your rear end. I've never said that biotics modules on a heavy is a good idea.
I may be missing something, but I'm pretty sure that I didn't call for a tank nerf before Uprising 1.7. - Atiim
|
Gavr1lo Pr1nc1p
TRA1LBLAZERS
627
|
Posted - 2014.02.16 02:44:00 -
[113] - Quote
Spkr4theDead wrote:Gavr1lo Pr1nc1p wrote:Spkr4theDead wrote:Gavr1lo Pr1nc1p wrote:Spkr4theDead wrote:
Why? Why should I have to fit my tanks the way someone else wants me to?
ARRGGGHHH!!!!!!!!!!! the irony is killing me!!!!!! What irony? NOOOOOO!!!!! STOOOOPP!!!! IT HURTS!!!!!!!! Might want to go to the emergency room.
I don't know if they treat for extreme irony and forum trolling exposure. Tell my mother i loved h
Kills- Archduke Ferdinand
Balance!
|
Spkr4theDead
Red Star.
EoN.
1833
|
Posted - 2014.02.16 02:44:00 -
[114] - Quote
ADAM-OF-EVE wrote:Spkr4theDead wrote:ADAM-OF-EVE wrote:Darken-Soul wrote:ADAM-OF-EVE wrote:what gets me is there are awesome tankers in dust from pre1.7 who prevailed who don't speak up and this leaves us with the rubbish tankers (yes Spkr4theDead thats you) dictating their poor views on changes. these good tankers need to step forward and take the mantle and shut these scrub tankers up so we can all get some sort of balance that works for everyone last time I saw Pearson he was at the flight ceiling in a drop ship avoiding nyan spam tanks. im talking more of the unseen tanking hero's such as APgrasshopper etc (not seen him in a while actually). i remember a time i used to rent a spot in his invincible pre 1.7 tank. gone are those days of working in a tank squad all thanks to ideas from the likes of the OP What, you mean the guy that can't fight other tanks worth a damn? no im talking about a guy who was awesome pre 1.7 who persevered and thrived while you went on the forums and moaned your ass off at everything. you talk about av and infantry adapting yet you have never been able to adapt to anything
Never able to adapt to anything? lol okay
Clearly, it's infantry that hasn't been able to adapt.
I may be missing something, but I'm pretty sure that I didn't call for a tank nerf before Uprising 1.7. - Atiim
|
Awry Barux
New Eden Blades Of The Azure
Zero-Day
649
|
Posted - 2014.02.16 02:45:00 -
[115] - Quote
Darken-Soul wrote:Spkr4theDead wrote:Darken-Soul wrote:Spkr4theDead wrote:Bojo The Mighty wrote:You don't speak for the dead
You speak for the spammers Spammers? Last I remember, there was a problem with MLT spam. I don't use MLT. Don't group me with those people. I've been tanking since Chromosome. you are the only one saying its militia. Everyone else realizes its all tanks now. ..... it's not all tanks. I see 90% MLT, 10% STD. Are you in Ambush 99% of the time? lets pretend your thick skull is a tank. And all these arguments are AV. Do you see how nothing gets thru? Do you see how overwhelming numbers do nothing? You are a triple hardened dumblogi.
That's a nice turn of phrase. |
BAD FURRY
SVER True Blood
General Tso's Alliance
507
|
Posted - 2014.02.16 02:46:00 -
[116] - Quote
scrub players crying over tanks
Yes i am a Undead Hell Wolf ... nice to meat you!
|
ADAM-OF-EVE
Dead Man's Game
1021
|
Posted - 2014.02.16 02:47:00 -
[117] - Quote
Darken-Soul wrote:lets pretend your thick skull is a tank. And all these arguments are AV. Do you see how nothing gets thru? Do you see how overwhelming numbers do nothing? You are a triple hardened dumblogi.
maybe if we all repost this we might do enough damage to break through
I will logi the s* out of you
https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=99075&find
|
Michael Arck
Onuoto Uakan Huogaatsu
3219
|
Posted - 2014.02.16 02:48:00 -
[118] - Quote
Canari Elphus wrote:Michael Arck wrote:Okay playing along with this class separation thing to make a point.
Tankers are the ones to blame for getting tanks to the current state that they are in, not infantry.
That doesn't even make sense. So infantry wanted more powerful, speedy tanks? LOL yea ok. Tankers are the ones who got it to this point. Tankers were behind the AV nerf as well-lets just lay it on the table here and be honest.
Some folks just like to omit key points from their memories around here. TBH, most tankers proposed one solution or the other. It was CCP that said ok....... TO ALL OF THEM. - We want tanks to be cheaper... sure - We want tanks to have more survivability.... sure - We want AV nerfed..... sure CCP said that they were going to make tanks very efficient for short periods of time but their QC team spent about 30 seconds testing out different scenarios. The fact that they didnt see rotating hardners or double reps as a possibility is staggering.
Ok, so the problem is that CCP said yes to all what the community wanted?
Hnolai ki tuul, ti sei oni a tiu.
For the State!!
[email protected]
|
Gavr1lo Pr1nc1p
TRA1LBLAZERS
627
|
Posted - 2014.02.16 02:49:00 -
[119] - Quote
Spkr4theDead wrote:Gavr1lo Pr1nc1p wrote:A compilation of quotes that Spkr4theDead wrote:
Infantry should only be able to kill tanks if they equip a proto assault forge gun, 2x complex damage mods, and have at least 3 of them being together. In the low slots, they need kin cats and cardio regulators so that they can run away in case a tank notices them tickling it, and shouldn't equip a sidearm because it requires too much cpu/pg. Equipment should, of course, be nano hives
This should be the only way to kill tanks. Infantry, if you don't do exactly as i say, you are a n00b and need to HTFU, and its players that you that got tanks to be as UP as they are in 1.7
Just found this somewhere LOL okay Keep talking out your rear end. I've never said that biotics modules on a heavy is a good idea.
Man, THIS is hilarious
Kills- Archduke Ferdinand
Balance!
|
KING CHECKMATE
Tal-Romon Legion
Amarr Empire
4648
|
Posted - 2014.02.16 02:49:00 -
[120] - Quote
Spkr4theDead wrote:
Never able to adapt to anything? lol okay
Clearly, it's infantry that hasn't been able to adapt.
Tankers NEVER adapted.
They cried until CCP broke AV-Tank Balance their way.
And now think they've adapted and they are skilled.
Tanks are such a Crutch now that TRUE , GOOD tankers are not tanking anymore.
SPKR4DEAD is a biased tanker and his posts should be ignored
Thats all.
/thread
Support Amarr scout bonus change! : https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=1813029#post1813029
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |