|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Canari Elphus
Ancient Exiles.
Renegade Alliance
1179
   |
Posted - 2014.02.16 02:14:00 -
[1] - Quote
Michael Arck wrote:Okay playing along with this class separation thing to make a point.
Tankers are the ones to blame for getting tanks to the current state that they are in, not infantry.
That doesn't even make sense. So infantry wanted more powerful, speedy tanks? LOL yea ok. Tankers are the ones who got it to this point. Tankers were behind the AV nerf as well-lets just lay it on the table here and be honest.
Some folks just like to omit key points from their memories around here.
TBH, most tankers proposed one solution or the other. It was CCP that said ok....... TO ALL OF THEM.
- We want tanks to be cheaper... sure
- We want tanks to have more survivability.... sure
- We want AV nerfed..... sure
CCP said that they were going to make tanks very efficient for short periods of time but their QC team spent about 30 seconds testing out different scenarios. The fact that they didnt see rotating hardners or double reps as a possibility is staggering.
Canari Elphus for CPM1
|
Canari Elphus
Ancient Exiles.
Renegade Alliance
1179
|
Posted - 2014.02.16 02:33:00 -
[2] - Quote
Spkr4theDead wrote:Canari Elphus wrote:Michael Arck wrote:Okay playing along with this class separation thing to make a point.
Tankers are the ones to blame for getting tanks to the current state that they are in, not infantry.
That doesn't even make sense. So infantry wanted more powerful, speedy tanks? LOL yea ok. Tankers are the ones who got it to this point. Tankers were behind the AV nerf as well-lets just lay it on the table here and be honest.
Some folks just like to omit key points from their memories around here. TBH, most tankers proposed one solution or the other. It was CCP that said ok....... TO ALL OF THEM. - We want tanks to be cheaper... sure - We want tanks to have more survivability.... sure - We want AV nerfed..... sure CCP said that they were going to make tanks very efficient for short periods of time but their QC team spent about 30 seconds testing out different scenarios. The fact that they didnt see rotating hardners or double reps as a possibility is staggering. So we should fit our tanks according to you?
When did I tell you how to fit your tank? I was simply stating that CCP didnt deliver a product that they said they would. How that translates to me telling you what to do, I have no clue.
Canari Elphus for CPM1
|
Canari Elphus
Ancient Exiles.
Renegade Alliance
1180
|
Posted - 2014.02.16 02:57:00 -
[3] - Quote
Spkr4theDead wrote:Canari Elphus wrote:Spkr4theDead wrote:Canari Elphus wrote:Michael Arck wrote:Okay playing along with this class separation thing to make a point.
Tankers are the ones to blame for getting tanks to the current state that they are in, not infantry.
That doesn't even make sense. So infantry wanted more powerful, speedy tanks? LOL yea ok. Tankers are the ones who got it to this point. Tankers were behind the AV nerf as well-lets just lay it on the table here and be honest.
Some folks just like to omit key points from their memories around here. TBH, most tankers proposed one solution or the other. It was CCP that said ok....... TO ALL OF THEM. - We want tanks to be cheaper... sure - We want tanks to have more survivability.... sure - We want AV nerfed..... sure CCP said that they were going to make tanks very efficient for short periods of time but their QC team spent about 30 seconds testing out different scenarios. The fact that they didnt see rotating hardners or double reps as a possibility is staggering. So we should fit our tanks according to you? When did I tell you how to fit your tank? I was simply stating that CCP didnt deliver a product that they said they would. How that translates to me telling you what to do, I have no clue. If you don't like the product, then stop using it. It's simple
So thats why you stopped playing before 1.7 hit?
Canari Elphus for CPM1
|
Canari Elphus
Ancient Exiles.
Renegade Alliance
1181
|
Posted - 2014.02.16 03:03:00 -
[4] - Quote
Spkr4theDead wrote:Canari Elphus wrote:
So thats why you stopped playing before 1.7 hit?
Lol Since CCP started the daily SP bonus for signing on, I haven't missed a single day. When did I ever stop playing?
Well, considering you said that if I have a problem with the current system I should stop playing, I assumed that you followed your own advice when tanks were UP and you were complaining. So, did you? Or are you trying to impose a double standard?
Canari Elphus for CPM1
|
Canari Elphus
Ancient Exiles.
Renegade Alliance
1182
|
Posted - 2014.02.16 03:38:00 -
[5] - Quote
Gavr1lo Pr1nc1p wrote:Spkr4theDead wrote:Gavr1lo Pr1nc1p wrote:Man, Spkr's threads are so fun to troll on. And by troll i mean providing factual information. On a more serious note... That's dropsuits. I'm trolling this community about tanks. Yes you areGǪ.but its far more important than any of these senseless and illiterate rants on this thread which are constantly devolving into personal attacks and idiotic statements
Thats what happens when people cannot debate you using logic.
Canari Elphus for CPM1
|
|
|
| |
|