Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |
xSir Campsalotx
G0DS AM0NG MEN
83
|
Posted - 2014.01.25 14:47:00 -
[91] - Quote
What if its designed as a low damage high area of effect weapon intended to kill highly evasive infantry. Low dps easy hits.
Scrambler pistol - high dps, high precision, medium damage per clip (Serious damage fast) like scrambler rifle
Sub machine gun- moderate dps, moderate precision, high damage per clip (Damage over time) like assualt rifle
Flaylock- moderate dps, low precision, low damage per clip (Some damage over large area) like Mass Driver |
Espartoi
Zero-Day Attack Zero-Day
19
|
Posted - 2014.01.25 16:01:00 -
[92] - Quote
ROMULUS H3X wrote: P.S. where is all the dignity in actually using a SKILLED weapon that is harder to land shots.... everyone uses these OVERPOWERED EZ-MODE weapons like the RR or Railgun turrets and think they are "GREAT GAMERS"
There isn't, thats the "PRO" ego stuff that most of the times ruins some matches because there are more worried about their KDR than capture a freaking point.
What if its designed as a low damage high area of effect weapon intended to kill highly evasive infantry. Low dps easy hits.
xSir Campsalotx wrote: Scrambler pistol - high dps, high precision, medium damage per clip (Serious damage fast) like scrambler rifle
Sub machine gun- moderate dps, moderate precision, high damage per clip (Damage over time) like assualt rifle
Flaylock- moderate dps, low precision, low damage per clip (Some damage over large area) like Mass Driver
This could be in another topic discussion like the how most be "change stuff but no one will care about it" am not sseing Devs taking notes. Lets talk about weather or more funny things.
More news at 11.
You think that everything must be like you want and all is unfair? the answer is simple as Deal with it or GTFO.
|
D legendary hero
Ultramarine Corp
1354
|
Posted - 2014.01.25 23:42:00 -
[93] - Quote
ROMULUS H3X wrote:D legendary hero wrote:ROMULUS H3X wrote:I have been using the slaylock consistently on every single fitting I own for the past 3-4 months. This weapon has saved me on thousands of missions. Threads like these make me upset and even more determined to bring the slaylock into a more 'feared' status. IN FACT, there was someone who tried to start the same exact petition you were trying to start right here.... LOW AND BEHOLD the one guy who started this very thread was someone I massacred with my slaylock earlier that day,,,,,,
Forum cry babys....... you deserve nothing, you are owed nothing!! YOU PUT YOUR SKILL POINTS INTO SOMETHING JUST BECAUSE IT WAS OVERPOWERED, THEN IT GETS NERFED AND YOU LET IT SIT AND COLLECT DUST....PLAYERS LIKE YOU ARE THE WORST OF THE WORST, YOUR SENSE OF ENTITLEMENT IS APPALLING! blah.
P.S. where is all the dignity in actually using a SKILLED weapon that is harder to land shots.... everyone uses these OVERPOWERED EZ-MODE weapons like the RR or Railgun turrets and think they are "GREAT GAMERS" im pretty sure your the guy using RR and Scr pistol... if your refering to killing me with the flaylock yesterday or something that is damn near impossible because i haven't been on dust for 3 days now...and TBH i haven't seen anyone killed with a flaylock in the past 3 months i remember perhaps 1 or 2 people. hence this thread I gave the reasons for this SP refund/removal earlier. If you cant comprehend it i dnt know what to say. Its one thing to invest in a failing company its another thing to invest in a good company then have politicians change the laws to break your buisness and investment throwing you into debt, because some stupid people didn't like it... If you read what i wrote, you would understand i was talking about someone who started a thread just like this one, not you. And again, you put your skill points into flaylock JUST BECAUSE IT WAS OVERPOWERED.. I bet you never even tried to use it again after you knew it got nerfed. PATHETIC just like half the community who follow whatever EZMODE flavor of the month is best for their K/D/R..
I used flaylock at 1 month before it became popular among caldari logi scrubs. I had Proficiency 3. I never ran them as my main weapon.
And really that is a lame excuse... saying I specced into a new weapon because it was OP the month it came out when no one knew it would be OP is like saying that people who specced into RR or CR specced into it the first day because it was OP. regardless your argument is invalid.
Once it got nerfed I continued to use it. Until i realized it was so subpar it was worthless. remember I dnt run noob assault like you, I run Heavy with HMG as you can see from my numerous HMG posts. Dont beleive me? Type "D legendary hero" in the search bar on the forums and go back a few months. You will find plenty of posts all about HMGs and Heavy suits. Especially a long one about resistance to small arms fire. So, tell me. How does a heavy with a flaylock every become OP?
In addition I posted several comments and threads after it was nerfed speaking about its usability. It was semi-useful, but guess what a patch came out that increased movement speed, decreased armor speed penalty. Armor values went up and Hit-scan detection (like ARs which you use) went up. while explosive sphere damage and hit-detection decreased.
This killed the flaylock.
And to be honest since UPRISING ARs have always been the best K/D raising weapon in the game. You would be a fool to say otherwise. So if you use an AR, congratulations you are as pathetic as you try to make specialty weapon users look.
Quote:
Truth be told, I dont even have a rifle, NEVER put a point into them and never will. The only weapons I use are the Forge gun, Flaylock, and FIsts. I carry flaylock on everyone of my fits and they get 5-6 kills AT LEAST with it each game.
So you want to RUIN my entire gameplay? Everything I do requires my flaylock to back me up. Don't **** with my fun, bub.
I don't give a **** about your fun. This is about Justice. I know you own an AR, because every other brokelock user here posts something constructive only AR noobs like you post disruptive and offensive comments. Dn't both responding because I'm hidding your comments. Constructive criticisim is one thing, but out right attcks are unacceptable.
Sou o Defendeiro dos derrubadosPronto saberá justiça
I am a Defender of the downtroddenSoon you will discover justice
|
D legendary hero
Ultramarine Corp
1354
|
Posted - 2014.01.25 23:48:00 -
[94] - Quote
xSir Campsalotx wrote:What if its designed as a low damage high area of effect weapon intended to kill highly evasive infantry. Low dps easy hits.
Scrambler pistol - high dps, high precision, medium damage per clip (Serious damage fast) like scrambler rifle
Sub machine gun- moderate dps, moderate precision, high damage per clip (Damage over time) like assualt rifle
Flaylock- moderate dps, low precision, low damage per clip (Some damage over large area) like Mass Driver
That would be cool. The with the flaylock in relation to the MD however is this....
Most side arms do more damage than their primary counter parts at close range but due to their higher fall off and inaccuracy over range they are unsutable for most situations. I guess that could work. But how much damage over how much of a splash area?
Basically what can be done to make it better at CQC than the MD but worse in all othe situations that the MD would excel in?
Sou o Defendeiro dos derrubadosPronto saberá justiça
I am a Defender of the downtroddenSoon you will discover justice
|
Eberk Baldek
Tech Guard RISE of LEGION
13
|
Posted - 2014.01.26 11:44:00 -
[95] - Quote
D legendary hero wrote:Since, it is obvious from the responses of the community that Flaylocks are undesirable it should be removed and SP refunded. Observe:
- Flaylocks are despised by most of the community.
- Flaylocks fail to produce consistant results, and fail at their intendd use.
- their intended use was obscured because of the nerf.
- hitting targets is too hard because of the inconsitancy in splahs damage distribution and small radius
- Even prototype flaylocks cannot compete with a milita scambler pistol
The SP refund is deserved because Flaylocks are an entire field of SP that is useless. When tactical assault rilfes where nerfed, no SP was refunded because it was a field of Assault rifles. Therefore, you could simply switch to using std AR, breach and burst without investing more SP. Since very few if any are using flaylocks on their fits and the FLaylock is getting no kills (CCP has the information and charts and knows these numbers are in the 10s out of the 1,000s of players in DUST) it should just be removed. When the information for flaylocks is reviewed and compared to that of SMGs, nova knives and scramble pistols we can see that it doesn't even make average. According to Lore Minmatar use cheap but RELIABLE weaponry. Anything ineffective and/or unreliable is discarded. The lfaylock is both unreliable and ineffective even when it does connect. This is a petition and discusion. I move for us to remove the flaylock and refund SP. All in favor just confirm it.
er . . . ditto for Swarm Launchers? |
D legendary hero
Ultramarine Corp
1360
|
Posted - 2014.01.26 12:22:00 -
[96] - Quote
Eberk Baldek wrote:D legendary hero wrote:Since, it is obvious from the responses of the community that Flaylocks are undesirable it should be removed and SP refunded. Observe:
- Flaylocks are despised by most of the community.
- Flaylocks fail to produce consistant results, and fail at their intendd use.
- their intended use was obscured because of the nerf.
- hitting targets is too hard because of the inconsitancy in splahs damage distribution and small radius
- Even prototype flaylocks cannot compete with a milita scambler pistol
The SP refund is deserved because Flaylocks are an entire field of SP that is useless. When tactical assault rilfes where nerfed, no SP was refunded because it was a field of Assault rifles. Therefore, you could simply switch to using std AR, breach and burst without investing more SP. Since very few if any are using flaylocks on their fits and the FLaylock is getting no kills (CCP has the information and charts and knows these numbers are in the 10s out of the 1,000s of players in DUST) it should just be removed. When the information for flaylocks is reviewed and compared to that of SMGs, nova knives and scramble pistols we can see that it doesn't even make average. According to Lore Minmatar use cheap but RELIABLE weaponry. Anything ineffective and/or unreliable is discarded. The lfaylock is both unreliable and ineffective even when it does connect. This is a petition and discusion. I move for us to remove the flaylock and refund SP. All in favor just confirm it. er . . . ditto for Swarm Launchers?
Swarms... they actually serve a unique purpose. Swams just need to better all around. Probably with the same range, but definately more ammo.
Even if damage isn't increased, swarms should have more ammunition. When the point system is put in you can earn alot of WP for damaging vehicles with swarms. But the ammunition for swamrs now sucks... you really can't kill any vehcle other than a militia LAV with swarms...
Sou o Defendeiro dos derrubados_Pronto saberá justiça
|
D legendary hero
Ultramarine Corp
1360
|
Posted - 2014.01.26 12:23:00 -
[97] - Quote
el bumpo
Sou o Defendeiro dos derrubados_Pronto saberá justiça
|
ROMULUS H3X
research lab
19
|
Posted - 2014.01.26 14:22:00 -
[98] - Quote
D legendary hero wrote:ROMULUS H3X wrote:D legendary hero wrote:ROMULUS H3X wrote:I have been using the slaylock consistently on every single fitting I own for the past 3-4 months. This weapon has saved me on thousands of missions. Threads like these make me upset and even more determined to bring the slaylock into a more 'feared' status. IN FACT, there was someone who tried to start the same exact petition you were trying to start right here.... LOW AND BEHOLD the one guy who started this very thread was someone I massacred with my slaylock earlier that day,,,,,,
Forum cry babys....... you deserve nothing, you are owed nothing!! YOU PUT YOUR SKILL POINTS INTO SOMETHING JUST BECAUSE IT WAS OVERPOWERED, THEN IT GETS NERFED AND YOU LET IT SIT AND COLLECT DUST....PLAYERS LIKE YOU ARE THE WORST OF THE WORST, YOUR SENSE OF ENTITLEMENT IS APPALLING! blah.
P.S. where is all the dignity in actually using a SKILLED weapon that is harder to land shots.... everyone uses these OVERPOWERED EZ-MODE weapons like the RR or Railgun turrets and think they are "GREAT GAMERS" im pretty sure your the guy using RR and Scr pistol... if your refering to killing me with the flaylock yesterday or something that is damn near impossible because i haven't been on dust for 3 days now...and TBH i haven't seen anyone killed with a flaylock in the past 3 months i remember perhaps 1 or 2 people. hence this thread I gave the reasons for this SP refund/removal earlier. If you cant comprehend it i dnt know what to say. Its one thing to invest in a failing company its another thing to invest in a good company then have politicians change the laws to break your buisness and investment throwing you into debt, because some stupid people didn't like it... If you read what i wrote, you would understand i was talking about someone who started a thread just like this one, not you. And again, you put your skill points into flaylock JUST BECAUSE IT WAS OVERPOWERED.. I bet you never even tried to use it again after you knew it got nerfed. PATHETIC just like half the community who follow whatever EZMODE flavor of the month is best for their K/D/R.. I used flaylock at 1 month before it became popular among caldari logi scrubs. I had Proficiency 3. I never ran them as my main weapon. And really that is a lame excuse... saying I specced into a new weapon because it was OP the month it came out when no one knew it would be OP is like saying that people who specced into RR or CR specced into it the first day because it was OP. regardless your argument is invalid. Once it got nerfed I continued to use it. Until i realized it was so subpar it was worthless. remember I dnt run noob assault like you, I run Heavy with HMG as you can see from my numerous HMG posts. Dont beleive me? Type "D legendary hero" in the search bar on the forums and go back a few months. You will find plenty of posts all about HMGs and Heavy suits. Especially a long one about resistance to small arms fire. So, tell me. How does a heavy with a flaylock every become OP? In addition I posted several comments and threads after it was nerfed speaking about its usability. It was semi-useful, but guess what a patch came out that increased movement speed, decreased armor speed penalty. Armor values went up and Hit-scan detection (like ARs which you use) went up. while explosive sphere damage and hit-detection decreased. This killed the flaylock. And to be honest since UPRISING ARs have always been the best K/D raising weapon in the game. You would be a fool to say otherwise. So if you use an AR, congratulations you are as pathetic as you try to make specialty weapon users look. Quote:
Truth be told, I dont even have a rifle, NEVER put a point into them and never will. The only weapons I use are the Forge gun, Flaylock, and FIsts. I carry flaylock on everyone of my fits and they get 5-6 kills AT LEAST with it each game.
So you want to RUIN my entire gameplay? Everything I do requires my flaylock to back me up. Don't **** with my fun, bub.
I don't give a **** about your fun. This is about Justice. I know you own an AR, because every other brokelock user here posts something constructive only AR noobs like you post disruptive and offensive comments. Dn't both responding because I'm hidding your comments. Constructive criticisim is one thing, but out right attcks are unacceptable.
How thick headed are you, I just told you I don't use a single Rifle... Did i not explain that all I do is Forge? Have you even used the Flaylock since the last update? Ya the introduction of Physical Impulses makes the Flaylock an extremely usefull weapon...1st shot connects and slows them down, allowing the next two shots in your clip (or 3 untill 1.8) to be direct to the enemies face.. You should also try to get the reload speed to 5 that way your flaylock clips look infinite (one of the fastest reload speeds in the game)
Once more thing, I use the Flaylock to finish off Shield tanks after my forge raped their shields.... useless weapon my ass..
|
ROMULUS H3X
research lab
19
|
Posted - 2014.01.26 14:26:00 -
[99] - Quote
Oh my gosh.... hide my comments? Just because someone dissagrees with you you block them? Pathetic.
P.S. Anyone who calls themself a legend is obviously a douche |
The Robot Devil
Molon Labe. Public Disorder.
1569
|
Posted - 2014.01.26 15:44:00 -
[100] - Quote
Needless Sacermendor wrote:Pokey Dravon wrote:And the reason Skirmish 1.0 was removed was because there was a fundamental shift in how they wanted that game mode to operate which required it to be replaced. Skirmish 1.0 was removed because it caused the catastrophic memory leaks that made your console lock up every 2-3 matches if you didn't do a pre-emptive re-log every battle or 2 ... and that was with the 5 minute load times aswell :-(
I think this is the correct answer, we could only play about two games an hour. 1.0 was fun but I would rather be able to play the game when I want. Don't forget that it took about four minutes to load the game, about 7 minutes to load contacts for a squad and about 5 more minutes just to get on the ground. It was rough.
GÇ£No sympathy for the devil; keep that in mind. Buy the ticket, take the ride."
Hunter S. Thompson
|
|
Ludvig Enraga
KILL-EM-QUICK RISE of LEGION
856
|
Posted - 2014.01.26 16:27:00 -
[101] - Quote
Nah, it's cool. It was fine to spend SP in FP back when it was OP it should be fine to keep it now that it's not OP anymore.
Oh, sht! I just learned you can make a signature! Thanks, CCP! Forums are getting better!
|
Sam Tektzby
Better Hide R Die
60
|
Posted - 2014.01.26 16:33:00 -
[102] - Quote
What about make it more usefull, there should be way how to do that. I dont think CCP is shortsighted.
Support - Tactician/Support
|
Sgt Kirk
Fatal Absolution Covert Intervention
4147
|
Posted - 2014.01.26 16:35:00 -
[103] - Quote
D legendary hero wrote:DeadlyAztec11 wrote:Or, buff the Flaylock. that will NEVER happen. too many people hate it, and CCP only listens to those guys... they nerfed the flaylock before they nerfed caldari logi's and caldari logi's had been OP for 4 months at that point. Drama queen |
Ludvig Enraga
KILL-EM-QUICK RISE of LEGION
856
|
Posted - 2014.01.26 16:49:00 -
[104] - Quote
D legendary hero wrote:Chief-Shotty wrote:I got to admit, getting kills with a flaylock pistol is just LOL!
However it really has no role on the field. The MD is a niche weapon but great when red dots crowd an objective/area. Flaylock is a finisher? Anything could be a finisher, try sleek locus grenades.
However as a sidearm, it does not serve its purpose. A sidearm should fulfill 1 of 3 conditions
1) an alternate when primary is unsuited to a situation. CQB Situation: an SMG sidearm to Mass Driver or Sniper fit 2)a fallback when in a last ditch defense or when primary runs dry mid battle. I.E Scrambler pistol 3)a specialty weapon for special engagements i.e nova knives for assassination or behind lines work
Now ask yourself can the flaylock meet any of those conditions and RELIABLY perform that role consistently? i say remove, but a buff to damage OR blast radius would bring it back. Plus a bonus to clip size wouldn't hurt either? ^^This. I couldn't agree more. If they buffed it to have prenerf values and 10-20% more damage, radius, and fire rate (possibly fire rate) and increased the ammo count OR something like that it could be fixed. -OR- It can specialized to have a truely niche role of CQC by increasing Blast radius, damage, clip by 2, and increasing projectile travel speed BUT having its rounds explode after traveling 15m distance, and increasing the projectile arch increasing reload time to a little more than an SMG.Increasing reload time and decreasing range will prevent roof spamming (although TBH spamming from the roof took skill because the flaylocks fire actual projectiles with travel speeds and trajectorys). The increased reload will always prevent spamming because SMGs, and scrambler pistols reload much faster and punish you less for missing. Increasing the arch will make longer shots difficult to pull off and the shorter maximum distance will make mid range combat all but impossible. So, it will effectively be pigeon holed to CQC. That is niche. However, you and I both know everyone will complain and moan about any buffs to it so, forget it, i'd rather have it removed now and get my SP back and spam Scr pistols and SMGs and the new side arms (the caldari SMG will have more range and damage than the current SMG), than fight for months on end to get a possible buff only to have it reversed or worse completely rejected.
So basically you want it to be an MD in the secondary slot?
Oh, sht! I just learned you can make a signature! Thanks, CCP! Forums are getting better!
|
D legendary hero
Ultramarine Corp
1361
|
Posted - 2014.01.27 00:31:00 -
[105] - Quote
Ludvig Enraga wrote:Nah, it's cool. It was fine to spend SP in FP back when it was OP it should be fine to keep it now that it's not OP anymore.
This is horrible logic. People got SP back for much less. On top of that flaylock was never OP. CCP admitted that amor was weak and subsequently buffed armor. CCP admitted that Caldari logi (with 1000+ ehp) were OP and subsequently nerfed them. But people like you who specced into caldari logi which was OP for several months (6) used flaylocks and were practically invincible.
To nail the point on the head the flaylock wasn't realy OP it was caldailofi's and scouts with framerate lagg who used it to great effect against armor tankers etc... Flaylock was only out for 2 months prenerf. I specced into it, people complained about 1 month in, then it got nerfed. I used it for a month after but the AA update killed it.
Think please! Ask yourself: What trend do 90% of the weapons nerfed in this game follow?
Is it not true that with the exception of the TAC AR most of the guns nerfed were all specialty weapons? They were all different from the norm of regular FPS or normally play a less pronounced role in other FPS'... observe, HMG flaylock Lazer Mass driver Flux (if you dnt remember the radius was drastically cut) shotgun forge gun ...
Why is it that the weapons that never get nerfed are ARs and Snipers? So, ask yourself then. Was the flaylock truely flavor of the month? Or were the weapons that never got nerfed the flavor of the year?
Sou o Defendeiro dos derrubados_Pronto saberá justiça
|
D legendary hero
Ultramarine Corp
1361
|
Posted - 2014.01.27 00:32:00 -
[106] - Quote
Sgt Kirk wrote:D legendary hero wrote:DeadlyAztec11 wrote:Or, buff the Flaylock. that will NEVER happen. too many people hate it, and CCP only listens to those guys... they nerfed the flaylock before they nerfed caldari logi's and caldari logi's had been OP for 4 months at that point. You speak the truth I agree
me too
Sou o Defendeiro dos derrubados_Pronto saberá justiça
|
D legendary hero
Ultramarine Corp
1361
|
Posted - 2014.01.27 00:39:00 -
[107] - Quote
Ludvig Enraga wrote:D legendary hero wrote:Chief-Shotty wrote:I got to admit, getting kills with a flaylock pistol is just LOL!
However it really has no role on the field. The MD is a niche weapon but great when red dots crowd an objective/area. Flaylock is a finisher? Anything could be a finisher, try sleek locus grenades.
However as a sidearm, it does not serve its purpose. A sidearm should fulfill 1 of 3 conditions
1) an alternate when primary is unsuited to a situation. CQB Situation: an SMG sidearm to Mass Driver or Sniper fit 2)a fallback when in a last ditch defense or when primary runs dry mid battle. I.E Scrambler pistol 3)a specialty weapon for special engagements i.e nova knives for assassination or behind lines work
Now ask yourself can the flaylock meet any of those conditions and RELIABLY perform that role consistently? i say remove, but a buff to damage OR blast radius would bring it back. Plus a bonus to clip size wouldn't hurt either? ^^This. I couldn't agree more. If they buffed it to have prenerf values and 10-20% more damage, radius, and fire rate (possibly fire rate) and increased the ammo count OR something like that it could be fixed. -OR- It can specialized to have a truely niche role of CQC by increasing Blast radius, damage, clip by 2, and increasing projectile travel speed BUT having its rounds explode after traveling 15m distance, and increasing the projectile arch increasing reload time to a little more than an SMG.Increasing reload time and decreasing range will prevent roof spamming (although TBH spamming from the roof took skill because the flaylocks fire actual projectiles with travel speeds and trajectorys). The increased reload will always prevent spamming because SMGs, and scrambler pistols reload much faster and punish you less for missing. Increasing the arch will make longer shots difficult to pull off and the shorter maximum distance will make mid range combat all but impossible. So, it will effectively be pigeon holed to CQC. That is niche. However, you and I both know everyone will complain and moan about any buffs to it so, forget it, i'd rather have it removed now and get my SP back and spam Scr pistols and SMGs and the new side arms (the caldari SMG will have more range and damage than the current SMG), than fight for months on end to get a possible buff only to have it reversed or worse completely rejected. So basically you want it to be an MD in the secondary slot?
In retrospect I guess so. TBH there is no way to make it good without it just overshadowing the MD, because implementing what i said would balance the flaylock yes... but it would displace the mass driver.
What else can you do to it that will fix it but stop complainers? Not much short of making it a direct fire pistol. Which defeats the point because it has a trajectory and travel time. People say make it direct fire. If they want direct fire then it has to have 0sec travel time to target namely it must be a hit scan weapon because direct fire with travel time and not be a OHK defeats the point.
Think about it. normally in other games weapons that are trick shots are always OHK or massive critical damage shots. IE COD throwing knife/axe and cross bow both are trick shots but OHK. Since no one wants the flaylock to be a OHK it can't be a trick shot direct hit weapon. the risk is simply too high and the reward is simply too low.
this is why I move to remove. Trying to fix it will only create more problems and since CCP doesn't want friction with the AR class of gamers i'd rather just remove it and use the SP to become something else.
Sou o Defendeiro dos derrubados_Pronto saberá justiça
|
D legendary hero
Ultramarine Corp
1364
|
Posted - 2014.01.27 13:59:00 -
[108] - Quote
bump
Sou o Defendeiro dos derrubados_Pronto saberá justiça
|
Sam Tektzby
Better Hide R Die
61
|
Posted - 2014.01.27 21:05:00 -
[109] - Quote
D legendary hero wrote:Ludvig Enraga wrote:Nah, it's cool. It was fine to spend SP in FP back when it was OP it should be fine to keep it now that it's not OP anymore. This is horrible logic. People got SP back for much less. On top of that flaylock was never OP. CCP admitted that amor was weak and subsequently buffed armor. CCP admitted that Caldari logi (with 1000+ ehp) were OP and subsequently nerfed them. But people like you who specced into caldari logi which was OP for several months (6) used flaylocks and were practically invincible. To nail the point on the head the flaylock wasn't realy OP it was caldailofi's and scouts with framerate lagg who used it to great effect against armor tankers etc... Flaylock was only out for 2 months prenerf. I specced into it, people complained about 1 month in, then it got nerfed. I used it for a month after but the AA update killed it. Think please! Ask yourself: What trend do 90% of the weapons nerfed in this game follow? Is it not true that with the exception of the TAC AR most of the guns nerfed were all specialty weapons? They were all different from the norm of regular FPS or normally play a less pronounced role in other FPS'... observe, HMG flaylock Lazer Mass driver Flux (if you dnt remember the radius was drastically cut) shotgun forge gun ... Why is it that the weapons that never get nerfed are ARs and Snipers? So, ask yourself then. Was the flaylock truely flavor of the month? Or were the weapons that never got nerfed the flavor of the year?
Actually ARs were nerfed twice and sniper, theyre basicaly useless withou specs on that, and even with specs theyre somehow overlooked. The problem is CCP, theyre push too much in CoD style and less on strategy and thats reason why pinnacle of dust is now protosomps and HAVs. But i still believe on better "tomorows".
Support - Tactician/Support
|
D legendary hero
Ultramarine Corp
1364
|
Posted - 2014.01.27 21:17:00 -
[110] - Quote
Sam Tektzby wrote:D legendary hero wrote:Ludvig Enraga wrote:Nah, it's cool. It was fine to spend SP in FP back when it was OP it should be fine to keep it now that it's not OP anymore. This is horrible logic. People got SP back for much less. On top of that flaylock was never OP. CCP admitted that amor was weak and subsequently buffed armor. CCP admitted that Caldari logi (with 1000+ ehp) were OP and subsequently nerfed them. But people like you who specced into caldari logi which was OP for several months (6) used flaylocks and were practically invincible. To nail the point on the head the flaylock wasn't realy OP it was caldailofi's and scouts with framerate lagg who used it to great effect against armor tankers etc... Flaylock was only out for 2 months prenerf. I specced into it, people complained about 1 month in, then it got nerfed. I used it for a month after but the AA update killed it. Think please! Ask yourself: What trend do 90% of the weapons nerfed in this game follow? Is it not true that with the exception of the TAC AR most of the guns nerfed were all specialty weapons? They were all different from the norm of regular FPS or normally play a less pronounced role in other FPS'... observe, HMG flaylock Lazer Mass driver Flux (if you dnt remember the radius was drastically cut) shotgun forge gun ... Why is it that the weapons that never get nerfed are ARs and Snipers? So, ask yourself then. Was the flaylock truely flavor of the month? Or were the weapons that never got nerfed the flavor of the year? Actually ARs were nerfed twice and sniper, theyre basicaly useless withou specs on that, and even with specs theyre somehow overlooked. The problem is CCP, theyre push too much in CoD style and less on strategy and thats reason why pinnacle of dust is now protosomps and HAVs. But i still believe on better "tomorows".
to your credit, technically the sniper was never nerfed directly. Indirectly through map design snipers have been nerfed. Still a thale's with 2-3 damage mads is amazing
Sou o Defendeiro dos derrubados_Pronto saberá justiça
|
|
D legendary hero
Ultramarine Corp
1365
|
Posted - 2014.01.27 23:13:00 -
[111] - Quote
bump
Sou o Defendeiro dos derrubados_Pronto saberá justiça
|
D legendary hero
Ultramarine Corp
1403
|
Posted - 2014.01.31 19:03:00 -
[112] - Quote
bump
Sou o Defendeiro dos derrubados_Pronto saberá justiça
|
Egonz4
The Unholy Legion Of DarkStar DARKSTAR ARMY
1
|
Posted - 2014.01.31 19:09:00 -
[113] - Quote
D legendary hero wrote:Since, it is obvious from the responses of the community that Flaylocks are undesirable it should be removed and SP refunded. Observe:
- Flaylocks are despised by most of the community.
- Flaylocks fail to produce consistant results, and fail at their intendd use.
- their intended use was obscured because of the nerf.
- hitting targets is too hard because of the inconsitancy in splahs damage distribution and small radius
- Even prototype flaylocks cannot compete with a milita scambler pistol
The SP refund is deserved because Flaylocks are an entire field of SP that is useless. When tactical assault rilfes where nerfed, no SP was refunded because it was a field of Assault rifles. Therefore, you could simply switch to using std AR, breach and burst without investing more SP. Since very few if any are using flaylocks on their fits and the FLaylock is getting no kills (CCP has the information and charts and knows these numbers are in the 10s out of the 1,000s of players in DUST) it should just be removed. When the information for flaylocks is reviewed and compared to that of SMGs, nova knives and scramble pistols we can see that it doesn't even make average. According to Lore Minmatar use cheap but RELIABLE weaponry. Anything ineffective and/or unreliable is discarded. The lfaylock is both unreliable and ineffective even when it does connect. This is a petition and discusion. I move for us to remove the flaylock and refund SP. All in favor just confirm it.
DONT YOU EVER SAY STUFF ABOUT MY FLAYLOCK AGAIN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Shout out to us Unholy Legion veterans.
|
Skihids
Bullet Cluster Legacy Rising
2794
|
Posted - 2014.01.31 19:24:00 -
[114] - Quote
A weapons respec with 1.8 will solve the issue.
People will dump the Flaylock and not look back. |
D legendary hero
Ultramarine Corp
1405
|
Posted - 2014.02.01 01:22:00 -
[115] - Quote
Egonz4 wrote:D legendary hero wrote:Since, it is obvious from the responses of the community that Flaylocks are undesirable it should be removed and SP refunded. Observe:
- Flaylocks are despised by most of the community.
- Flaylocks fail to produce consistant results, and fail at their intendd use.
- their intended use was obscured because of the nerf.
- hitting targets is too hard because of the inconsitancy in splahs damage distribution and small radius
- Even prototype flaylocks cannot compete with a milita scambler pistol
The SP refund is deserved because Flaylocks are an entire field of SP that is useless. When tactical assault rilfes where nerfed, no SP was refunded because it was a field of Assault rifles. Therefore, you could simply switch to using std AR, breach and burst without investing more SP. Since very few if any are using flaylocks on their fits and the FLaylock is getting no kills (CCP has the information and charts and knows these numbers are in the 10s out of the 1,000s of players in DUST) it should just be removed. When the information for flaylocks is reviewed and compared to that of SMGs, nova knives and scramble pistols we can see that it doesn't even make average. According to Lore Minmatar use cheap but RELIABLE weaponry. Anything ineffective and/or unreliable is discarded. The lfaylock is both unreliable and ineffective even when it does connect. This is a petition and discusion. I move for us to remove the flaylock and refund SP. All in favor just confirm it. DONT YOU EVER SAY STUFF ABOUT MY FLAYLOCK AGAIN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
there is no way you are unholylegion of dark star and using flaylocks. just stop.
Sou o Defendeiro dos derrubados_Pronto saberá justiça
|
D legendary hero
Ultramarine Corp
1405
|
Posted - 2014.02.01 01:23:00 -
[116] - Quote
Skihids wrote:A weapons respec with 1.8 will solve the issue.
People will dump the Flaylock and not look back.
Amen.
Sou o Defendeiro dos derrubados_Pronto saberá justiça
|
D legendary hero
Ultramarine Corp
1420
|
Posted - 2014.02.03 19:30:00 -
[117] - Quote
bump
Sou o Defendeiro dos derrubados_Pronto saberá justiça
|
Justin Tymes
Dem Durrty Boyz Renegade Alliance
668
|
Posted - 2014.02.03 19:41:00 -
[118] - Quote
Ludvig Enraga wrote:
So basically you want it to be an MD in the secondary slot?
Might as well. The Flaylol is only being used to finish off heavies right now, and Heavies are going to be conveniently immune to both weapons in 1.8 |
Egonz4
The Unholy Legion Of DarkStar DARKSTAR ARMY
30
|
Posted - 2014.02.03 19:42:00 -
[119] - Quote
D legendary hero wrote:Egonz4 wrote:D legendary hero wrote:Since, it is obvious from the responses of the community that Flaylocks are undesirable it should be removed and SP refunded. Observe:
- Flaylocks are despised by most of the community.
- Flaylocks fail to produce consistant results, and fail at their intendd use.
- their intended use was obscured because of the nerf.
- hitting targets is too hard because of the inconsitancy in splahs damage distribution and small radius
- Even prototype flaylocks cannot compete with a milita scambler pistol
The SP refund is deserved because Flaylocks are an entire field of SP that is useless. When tactical assault rilfes where nerfed, no SP was refunded because it was a field of Assault rifles. Therefore, you could simply switch to using std AR, breach and burst without investing more SP. Since very few if any are using flaylocks on their fits and the FLaylock is getting no kills (CCP has the information and charts and knows these numbers are in the 10s out of the 1,000s of players in DUST) it should just be removed. When the information for flaylocks is reviewed and compared to that of SMGs, nova knives and scramble pistols we can see that it doesn't even make average. According to Lore Minmatar use cheap but RELIABLE weaponry. Anything ineffective and/or unreliable is discarded. The lfaylock is both unreliable and ineffective even when it does connect. This is a petition and discusion. I move for us to remove the flaylock and refund SP. All in favor just confirm it. DONT YOU EVER SAY STUFF ABOUT MY FLAYLOCK AGAIN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! there is no way you are unholylegion of dark star and using flaylocks. just stop. Haha funny Me and Pyrex still love the Flaylock Nothing like shooting a mini rocket at someone's face
Shout out to us Unholy Legion veterans.
|
CaoticFox
Axis of Chaos
145
|
Posted - 2014.02.03 19:45:00 -
[120] - Quote
DeadlyAztec11 wrote:Or, buff the Flaylock. +2 cuz i still use them |
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |