Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Takahiro Kashuken
Red Star. EoN.
2161
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 16:28:00 -
[31] - Quote
Cat Merc wrote:You had to put all that effort with an expensive fit and three people, while I could have done it in a militia tank AND not lose my anti infantry capabilities This only proves one point: Tanker vs AV is EXTREMELY unbalanced effort wise
I did that with 2ppl mainly and after the field was cleared they didnt dare bring out any tanks so i went infantry/tank and killed infantry
Railgun killing infantry isnt as good as a blaster ever
Intelligence is OP
|
Atiim
Living Like Larry Schwag
3144
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 16:28:00 -
[32] - Quote
Takahiro Kashuken wrote: You are not forced
You can still solo
Your right you can still solo, if the tanker is AFK or has the IQ of a 2 year old child.
Though to be fair, that encompasses a vast majority of them.
CoD ----->
<----- WoT
Please AR and Tank scrubs, go to your respective games. Leave DUST alone!
|
Thumb Green
Titans of Phoenix Legacy Rising
640
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 16:31:00 -
[33] - Quote
Your word means nothing and all of your witnesses I've seen so far seem to either be your buddies or otherwise bias people.
It seems all you want to do is talk smack and make excuses. Can't be hassled to put a turret on your LAV so you can have someone ride along to prove you right? That just shows how afraid you are of being proven wrong.
CCP: Is it the most asinine way possible to do this? Yes. Then that's how we're doing it.
|
Takahiro Kashuken
Red Star. EoN.
2162
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 16:36:00 -
[34] - Quote
Atiim wrote:Takahiro Kashuken wrote: You are not forced
You can still solo
Your right you can still solo, if the tanker is AFK or has the IQ of a 2 year old child. Though to be fair, that encompasses a vast majority of them.
So then if they have the IQ of a 2 year old child why are most AV players not killing them?
Intelligence is OP
|
Takahiro Kashuken
Red Star. EoN.
2162
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 16:37:00 -
[35] - Quote
Thumb Green wrote:Your word means nothing and all of your witnesses I've seen so far seem to either be your buddies or otherwise bias people.
It seems all you want to do is talk smack and make excuses. Can't be hassled to put a turret on your LAV so you can have someone ride along to prove you right? That just shows how afraid you are of being proven wrong.
No its because my LAV is made to survive in case i pop up in front of a blaster tank and need to get away
If i use a weaker LAV my chances of surviving a tank encounter drop and i may die as a consequence all because im carrying a useless camera man just for you
Intelligence is OP
|
Xender17
Ahrendee Mercenaries EoN.
976
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 16:44:00 -
[36] - Quote
Atiim wrote:NAV HIV wrote:Let me know how this would help players who don't have a Heavy Suit or Heavy weapons but have specced into Full AV gear for medium and light suits. It wouldn't. See tankers have this "special" kind of logic that makes them believe that only heavies should be able to take out vehicles simply because their vehicle has the word HEAVY in it. On another note, if only heavies should kill "heavies"; then we need to nerf the Shotgun and Nova Knife. Whats to say the rules are the same with infantry and vehicles? The rules of combat are very different. Tanks are jump in jump out now. If a videogame followed one rule it would be very boring. Maybe CCP actually is intending heavies to take out tanks. That one of the major points of the class isn't it?
Prt SL, SCR, SR . ADV FGs, MDs, LaZor, KNs.
Gunnlogi, Falchion, Python, Caldari LDS. (+require)
Prt L. Am, Adv HVY, LGS
|
Thumb Green
Titans of Phoenix Legacy Rising
640
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 16:44:00 -
[37] - Quote
Well call in two LAV's then so the cameraman can easily follow you but I'm sure you will come up with an excuse not to do that as well.
CCP: Is it the most asinine way possible to do this? Yes. Then that's how we're doing it.
|
Atiim
Living Like Larry Schwag
3144
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 16:47:00 -
[38] - Quote
Takahiro Kashuken wrote: So then if they have the IQ of a 2 year old child why are most AV players not killing them?
They are.
It's the people who actually know how to drive that are theoretically impossible to kill with conventional AV.
But that's okay. Your "special" after all.
CoD ----->
<----- WoT
Please AR and Tank scrubs, go to your respective games. Leave DUST alone!
|
Atiim
Living Like Larry Schwag
3144
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 16:50:00 -
[39] - Quote
Xender17 wrote: Whats to say the rules are the same with infantry and vehicles?
Logic and Common Sense.
Otherwise we lead to what's called "double standards."
Xender17 wrote: The rules of combat are very different. Tanks are jump in jump out now. If a videogame followed one rule it would be very boring. Maybe CCP actually is intending heavies to take out tanks. That one of the major points of the class isn't it?
Then why use anything other than the Forge Gun?
Exactly.
CoD ----->
<----- WoT
Please AR and Tank scrubs, go to your respective games. Leave DUST alone!
|
Baltazar Pontain
Phantom Universe Task Force Die Fremdenlegion
56
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 16:57:00 -
[40] - Quote
Binding two people in proto stuff + vehicle to kill one guy in milita tank.
Can someone explain me why people think that is ok? |
|
Snagman 313
Carbon 7 CRONOS.
242
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 17:04:00 -
[41] - Quote
Takahiro Kashuken wrote:Snagman 313 wrote:Takahiro Kashuken wrote:Snagman 313 wrote:Looks at thread waves other mercs past.
"Nothing to see here folks just a Tanker saying he's running AV to prove it's fine, get back to work calling for a tank nerf!!!" If a tanker can run AV and kill tanks what does that say about the AV players? That my 88k Soma is awesome at mullering infantry and 79k Sica is better for knocking out other tanks than my double complex dmg modded Ishukone AFG AK.0 fit at 187k. I certainly didn't say I don't run HAVs just that I don't like the current amounts in Ambush and the Militia HAV effectiveness for the price thats all. I also won't deny that the Maddies and Gunnloggis needed a buff bad but honestly something needs to change. Your retort sir! I find that most mlt tanks which kill tanks are with the rail, high dmg/range and rof Using a blaster mlt tank is meh tbh but the dmg mods can make a big diff to any tank its just its defences can be meh, i can kill with a blaster but generally i have to get the jump on them and sometimes i have to run, with my alt i have no tank skills Even tho the tank is faster moving than your heavy, its why i used a LAV, can cover more ground and go through places that tanks cant and can easily get behind them without them seeing me and if you are a good driver you have no problem survivng most of the time As for ambush dont play it and its whoever spams the tank in 1st win since if they have the ground they will whack it before the bolas drops it
Definitely the Rail HAV is the best AV device at the moment IMO.
I don't really like to use the LAV for movement with my FG fit for that I have my sqd place uplinks in choke points and spawn quickly before bugging out. The problem with the LAV is than while you say it's it's easy to get around and behind them it is very visible to any Tanker with half a brain i.e big old RDV dropping something off hmmm wonder if it's a HAV.... nope LAV better watch out for Suicide LAV's and then the second you get out of it you're vulnerable to small arms fire whereas in the SIca you're immune and you just need to sneak around the redline until you get a shot at them or run away if they get a shot at you.
On that point it should be noted if you have to face off against an HAV you nearly always die as a FG user since you can't run away at any speed sure you might be lucky and hope your LAV doesn't get blown up but I doubt it.
Soooo Proto FG fit vs Sica I still take the FG fit most of the time because I refuse to give in and like it but in pubs grinding ISK vs the HAV swarm the only viable way to hunt HAVs and still make a profit is the SIca which I have no skills in.
And no major offence intended by the next statement but whatever, don't for a second think that because you went 1 night rolling AV against some single or double HAV teams that AV is fine come back when you encounter a full 4 or 5 Pro HAV convoy rolling in and out of a city murdering everyone while the rest of your team tries to do something with what AV they can field before the infantry murder them. Then keep encountering them match after match and then tell me AV is balanced, sure 1 or 2 clever tanker vs 3 or 6 clever AV is a great battle but 4 or 5 clever tankers and say 10 infantry camping spawns vs 12 or 15 AV and 1 infantry not so good.
But don't worry the Nerf is on it's way and those delicious WP's for vehicle damage will be a great addition to the AV team!!!
Closed Beta AV veteran
I drink because I play Dust
|
Goric Rumis
Dead Six Initiative Lokun Listamenn
284
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 17:35:00 -
[42] - Quote
This is going to be my one and only post in response to the least productive but most vocal person in the vehicle/AV debate:
Just because you can do it, doesn't mean it's balanced.
1. Just because you can do it, doesn't mean it's balanced. I know a dropship pilot who six months ago was able to stay in the air a whole game, move troops around, get kills, and never get shot out of the sky--and I saw him do it in Planetary Conquest, Factional Warfare, and pub matches. Does that mean dropships were balanced and pilots just needed to HTFU and adapt? I don't believe that, and I don't think I've ever seen anyone claim that.
2. Just because you can do it, doesn't mean it's balanced. Balance in a role-based game is predicated on the idea that a role that is strong in one way is weak in another. Therefore the question is not whether AV are capable of destroying tanks, it's a question of what they have to give up to do it, and whether they're being proportionately compensated for their weaknesses in their area of strength. Right now, people are using militia tanks and suicide LAVs because they're able to accomplish the job better without making sacrifices. Just because they could do the job with forge guns and swarm launchers doesn't mean it's the best way to get it done--and if you can get better results without sacrificing flexibility, why wouldn't you?
3. Just because you can do it, doesn't mean it's balanced. I want to emphasize this point because you seem to be under the delusion that what is possible must be balanced. Tankers didn't believe this in 1.6, despite many of them going multiple matches without being destroyed. There are scouts who run around in ninja fits with nova knives--they get kills, therefore they are balanced? I regularly go positive on my skill-less alt with starter fits, so obviously a starter fit is just as good as a proto. There's not a problem with the matchmaking system, people just need to learn to adapt.
4. And finally: Just because you can do it, doesn't mean you should. You talk about teamwork, but what you really mean is buddy-work. If I'm working on a team, and not just out to kill vehicles, I likely have a more important responsibility than chasing down tanks the whole game. Because while I'm off chasing one tank, me and my buddy are leaving the rest of the team defenseless against any other vehicle that decides to sidle up and give them hell. That's not teamwork, that's selfishness.
These are the reasons why your anecdotes and continuing posts are irrelevant. You're setting out to prove a limited point, with limited applicability, and pretending as though the results prove some universal truth.
But of course I'm doing this for the benefit of the people reading your threads, not for you yourself. You've already made up your mind, and wouldn't change it if I presented you with a thousand pages of hard, incontrovertible evidence. So to all of you who have any sense, I leave you this TL;DR:
Don't feed the troll. If you don't respond to his posts, they will just disappear into the archive. Let them.
The Tank Balancing Factor No One Is Discussing
|
Takahiro Kashuken
Red Star. EoN.
2162
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 17:44:00 -
[43] - Quote
Atiim wrote:Takahiro Kashuken wrote: So then if they have the IQ of a 2 year old child why are most AV players not killing them?
They are. It's the people who actually know how to drive that are theoretically impossible to kill with conventional AV. But that's okay. Your "special" after all.
So bad pilots are dying and good pilots are surviving so then whats the problem?
Intelligence is OP
|
Takahiro Kashuken
Red Star. EoN.
2162
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 17:45:00 -
[44] - Quote
Baltazar Pontain wrote:Binding two people in proto stuff + vehicle to kill one guy in milita tank.
Can someone explain me why people think that is ok?
Thats not just for milita tanks
That is my preferred setup to kill all tanks
Intelligence is OP
|
Monkey MAC
Lost Millennium
1487
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 17:46:00 -
[45] - Quote
Takahiro Kashuken wrote:Snagman 313 wrote:Looks at thread waves other mercs past.
"Nothing to see here folks just a Tanker saying he's running AV to prove it's fine, get back to work calling for a tank nerf!!!" If a tanker can run AV and kill tanks what does that say about the AV players?
The tanker is bull****ing It's like everytime we say that we take out a miltia tank and survive matches of worth of AV, you don't believe. Also its amazing that you think it reasonable to use teamwork, but at any point were you actually Assaulted by these tanks?
Did you actually kill them at a time where it made more of difference than just to the tankers wallet? How many did you get when it mattered?
By your OP - 0
Tanks 514
I told you, I bloody well told you.
Monkey Mac - Forum Warrior of the Trees Lvl.1
|
Takahiro Kashuken
Red Star. EoN.
2162
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 17:48:00 -
[46] - Quote
Snagman 313 wrote:Takahiro Kashuken wrote:Snagman 313 wrote:Takahiro Kashuken wrote:Snagman 313 wrote:Looks at thread waves other mercs past.
"Nothing to see here folks just a Tanker saying he's running AV to prove it's fine, get back to work calling for a tank nerf!!!" If a tanker can run AV and kill tanks what does that say about the AV players? That my 88k Soma is awesome at mullering infantry and 79k Sica is better for knocking out other tanks than my double complex dmg modded Ishukone AFG AK.0 fit at 187k. I certainly didn't say I don't run HAVs just that I don't like the current amounts in Ambush and the Militia HAV effectiveness for the price thats all. I also won't deny that the Maddies and Gunnloggis needed a buff bad but honestly something needs to change. Your retort sir! I find that most mlt tanks which kill tanks are with the rail, high dmg/range and rof Using a blaster mlt tank is meh tbh but the dmg mods can make a big diff to any tank its just its defences can be meh, i can kill with a blaster but generally i have to get the jump on them and sometimes i have to run, with my alt i have no tank skills Even tho the tank is faster moving than your heavy, its why i used a LAV, can cover more ground and go through places that tanks cant and can easily get behind them without them seeing me and if you are a good driver you have no problem survivng most of the time As for ambush dont play it and its whoever spams the tank in 1st win since if they have the ground they will whack it before the bolas drops it Definitely the Rail HAV is the best AV device at the moment IMO. I don't really like to use the LAV for movement with my FG fit for that I have my sqd place uplinks in choke points and spawn quickly before bugging out. The problem with the LAV is than while you say it's it's easy to get around and behind them it is very visible to any Tanker with half a brain i.e big old RDV dropping something off hmmm wonder if it's a HAV.... nope LAV better watch out for Suicide LAV's and then the second you get out of it you're vulnerable to small arms fire whereas in the SIca you're immune and you just need to sneak around the redline until you get a shot at them or run away if they get a shot at you. On that point it should be noted if you have to face off against an HAV you nearly always die as a FG user since you can't run away at any speed sure you might be lucky and hope your LAV doesn't get blown up but I doubt it. Soooo Proto FG fit vs Sica I still take the FG fit most of the time because I refuse to give in and like it but in pubs grinding ISK vs the HAV swarm the only viable way to hunt HAVs and still make a profit is the SIca which I have no skills in. And no major offence intended by the next statement but whatever, don't for a second think that because you went 1 night rolling AV against some single or double HAV teams that AV is fine come back when you encounter a full 4 or 5 Pro HAV convoy rolling in and out of a city murdering everyone while the rest of your team tries to do something with what AV they can field before the infantry murder them. Then keep encountering them match after match and then tell me AV is balanced, sure 1 or 2 clever tanker vs 3 or 6 clever AV is a great battle but 4 or 5 clever tankers and say 10 infantry camping spawns vs 12 or 15 AV and 1 infantry not so good. But don't worry the Nerf is on it's way and those delicious WP's for vehicle damage will be a great addition to the AV team!!!
I find the LAV is easier because the heavy is so slow and cumbersome, the LAV is also used as a quick escape and generally most pilots see a LAV and ignore it when it escapes and if they dont see it they think if may have been killed or even recalled
I cant use spawn points because if it goes up **** creek or the HAV sees me i cant excatly move fast and escape plus it puts me on the ground with infantry, at least a LAV can be a shield and escape point
Im doing this again for the next few nights, so far so good
Intelligence is OP
|
Takahiro Kashuken
Red Star. EoN.
2162
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 17:52:00 -
[47] - Quote
Monkey MAC wrote:Takahiro Kashuken wrote:Snagman 313 wrote:Looks at thread waves other mercs past.
"Nothing to see here folks just a Tanker saying he's running AV to prove it's fine, get back to work calling for a tank nerf!!!" If a tanker can run AV and kill tanks what does that say about the AV players? The tanker is bull****ing It's like everytime we say that we take out a miltia tank and survive matches of worth of AV, you don't believe. Also its amazing that you think it reasonable to use teamwork, but at any point were you actually Assaulted by these tanks? Did you actually kill them at a time where it made more of difference than just to the tankers wallet? How many did you get when it mattered? By your OP - 0
Pre 1.7 all proto AV did was at least 3k per shot swarms and 2k plus for a FG and mlt tanks were worse then than they are now so if they were that good i would have seen them in PC for example or even videos of the OP MLT tanks surviving pre 1.7 swarms
Also the tank kills were within the 1st 10mins, we spawned with proto FG suits at the start and got the LAV in and chased em down and got rid of them, won most of the game that night when we cleared the field
Intelligence is OP
|
Monkey MAC
Lost Millennium
1487
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 17:55:00 -
[48] - Quote
Takahiro Kashuken wrote:Monkey MAC wrote:Takahiro Kashuken wrote:Snagman 313 wrote:Looks at thread waves other mercs past.
"Nothing to see here folks just a Tanker saying he's running AV to prove it's fine, get back to work calling for a tank nerf!!!" If a tanker can run AV and kill tanks what does that say about the AV players? The tanker is bull****ing It's like everytime we say that we take out a miltia tank and survive matches of worth of AV, you don't believe. Also its amazing that you think it reasonable to use teamwork, but at any point were you actually Assaulted by these tanks? Did you actually kill them at a time where it made more of difference than just to the tankers wallet? How many did you get when it mattered? By your OP - 0 Pre 1.7 all proto AV did was at least 3k per shot swarms and 2k plus for a FG and mlt tanks were worse then than they are now so if they were that good i would have seen them in PC for example or even videos of the OP MLT tanks surviving pre 1.7 swarms Also the tank kills were within the 1st 10mins, we spawned with proto FG suits at the start and got the LAV in and chased em down and got rid of them, won most of the game that night when we cleared the field
Did I mention pre 1.7? No. So you killed a couple of mlt tanks, not doing anything, tben proceeded to pull out your own tanks nd stomp them? And you believe tanks are fine?
Tanks 514
I told you, I bloody well told you.
Monkey Mac - Forum Warrior of the Trees Lvl.1
|
Scout Registry
353
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 17:56:00 -
[49] - Quote
Takahiro Kashuken wrote: In the LAV was me and spkr
Taki: BFF? Spkr: BFF. |
Snagman 313
Carbon 7 CRONOS.
242
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 18:00:00 -
[50] - Quote
[/quote]
I find the LAV is easier because the heavy is so slow and cumbersome, the LAV is also used as a quick escape and generally most pilots see a LAV and ignore it when it escapes and if they dont see it they think if may have been killed or even recalled
I cant use spawn points because if it goes up **** creek or the HAV sees me i cant excatly move fast and escape plus it puts me on the ground with infantry, at least a LAV can be a shield and escape point
Im doing this again for the next few nights, so far so good[/quote]
Fair enough you got your way I've got mine but it's something you should consider I've been doing this for a while and AV is apparently a team sport.
If you come across treadnaughters in game be sure to get footage or at least names of the Tankers so the folks can check in or they won't believe you but I think if you ran ambush you might get a taste of a why they HAV nerf is being called for. Especially since I have such a huge amount of SP sunk into my AV gear whereas if I run my mlt Sica I do sooo much better and I'm a crap tanker TBH.
Closed Beta AV veteran
I drink because I play Dust
|
|
Takahiro Kashuken
Red Star. EoN.
2162
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 18:05:00 -
[51] - Quote
Monkey MAC wrote:Takahiro Kashuken wrote:Monkey MAC wrote:Takahiro Kashuken wrote:Snagman 313 wrote:Looks at thread waves other mercs past.
"Nothing to see here folks just a Tanker saying he's running AV to prove it's fine, get back to work calling for a tank nerf!!!" If a tanker can run AV and kill tanks what does that say about the AV players? The tanker is bull****ing It's like everytime we say that we take out a miltia tank and survive matches of worth of AV, you don't believe. Also its amazing that you think it reasonable to use teamwork, but at any point were you actually Assaulted by these tanks? Did you actually kill them at a time where it made more of difference than just to the tankers wallet? How many did you get when it mattered? By your OP - 0 Pre 1.7 all proto AV did was at least 3k per shot swarms and 2k plus for a FG and mlt tanks were worse then than they are now so if they were that good i would have seen them in PC for example or even videos of the OP MLT tanks surviving pre 1.7 swarms Also the tank kills were within the 1st 10mins, we spawned with proto FG suits at the start and got the LAV in and chased em down and got rid of them, won most of the game that night when we cleared the field Did I mention pre 1.7? No. So you killed a couple of mlt tanks, not doing anything, tben proceeded to pull out your own tanks nd stomp them? And you believe tanks are fine?
So not pre 1.7 a mlt tank can survive a bunch of matches? yes they can survive and that is OP now?
I killed more std tanks than mlt and yea when no more vehicles were in i either went infantry or pulled out my own tank and stomp the team because they had no AV or tanks since they were afraid that they would get popped again
Tanks are in alot better place than they used to be and im just riding this high before the drop, if mlt gets nerfed wont effect me i use std and proto stuff
If mods get nerfed i wont be too happy, if mods get changed ie mlt dmg mods do only 10%dmg and 1min cooldown and complex do 30%dmg and has a 45sec cooldown i could deal with so higher meta mods better bonuses and % etc
If railguns get nerfed to below dmg of a FG i wont be happy, same if they nerf range also since the turret is long range
If they nerf blasters then i wont be happy because it is a giant AR anyways
What prob will happen is that everything gets a nerf
Intelligence is OP
|
Surt gods end
Demon Ronin
1503
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 18:05:00 -
[52] - Quote
And I can still solo tanks. So what? so AV is ok right? NO. Most dumb up post I read in awhile. Sprk put you up to it? So what your saying is not that it takes TEAM to take out one tank BUT that if you have enough TIN CANS on the field then it makes up for the loss of the AV team?
So in the end it comes down to who can field in more tanks. AND THAT IS STUPID. This is not an RTS. |
Takahiro Kashuken
Red Star. EoN.
2162
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 18:07:00 -
[53] - Quote
I find the LAV is easier because the heavy is so slow and cumbersome, the LAV is also used as a quick escape and generally most pilots see a LAV and ignore it when it escapes and if they dont see it they think if may have been killed or even recalled
I cant use spawn points because if it goes up **** creek or the HAV sees me i cant excatly move fast and escape plus it puts me on the ground with infantry, at least a LAV can be a shield and escape point
Im doing this again for the next few nights, so far so good[/quote]
Fair enough you got your way I've got mine but it's something you should consider I've been doing this for a while and AV is apparently a team sport.
If you come across treadnaughters in game be sure to get footage or at least names of the Tankers so the folks can check in or they won't believe you but I think if you ran ambush you might get a taste of a why they HAV nerf is being called for. Especially since I have such a huge amount of SP sunk into my AV gear whereas if I run my mlt Sica I do sooo much better and I'm a crap tanker TBH.
[/quote]
I had the FG for months, i know how to use it
As for lolambush i dont play it, its all about who can call in as many tanks as possible in that mode because once they are in the enemy cant get anything in and if the same ambush tankers went into any other mode they would hammered off the map and lose so many tanks they would quit and go back to ambush
Intelligence is OP
|
Takahiro Kashuken
Red Star. EoN.
2162
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 18:10:00 -
[54] - Quote
Surt gods end wrote:And I can still solo tanks. So what? so AV is ok right? NO. Most dumb up post I read in awhile. Sprk put you up to it? So what your saying is not that it takes TEAM to take out one tank BUT that if you have enough TIN CANS on the field then it makes up for the loss of the AV team?
So in the end it comes down to who can field in more tanks. AND THAT IS STUPID. This is not an RTS.
It took 2ppl but i was in a 5man group, general communication between the 5 of us is OP because we called out stuff to each other like locations of tanks and infantry etc
And no your still wrong, i ve seen 6man squads each field a tank in skirmish/domo and still lose because the infantry got hammered and couldnt hack the points
Intelligence is OP
|
Surt gods end
Demon Ronin
1503
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 18:19:00 -
[55] - Quote
Takahiro Kashuken wrote:Surt gods end wrote:And I can still solo tanks. So what? so AV is ok right? NO. Most dumb up post I read in awhile. Sprk put you up to it? So what your saying is not that it takes TEAM to take out one tank BUT that if you have enough TIN CANS on the field then it makes up for the loss of the AV team?
So in the end it comes down to who can field in more tanks. AND THAT IS STUPID. This is not an RTS. It took 2ppl but i was in a 5man group, general communication between the 5 of us is OP because we called out stuff to each other like locations of tanks and infantry etc And no your still wrong, i ve seen 6man squads each field a tank in skirmish/domo and still lose because the infantry got hammered and couldnt hack the points
But your not seeing at HOW will this help retention? Force everyone to join a corp after acedemy? No **** that communication is the key to winning, and teamwork. that was true before tank spam. hence why prostomps happen.
But you can't force randoms to play a specific way. and that's why it's more then just if my proto ass self can solo tanks. so what if the new young ins are getting slaughter by em.
There already gimped the new players or mid tier players by us vets, and old clans. Now they are gimped more by tank spam. unless they themselves are forced to jump in a tank just to compete. And that's not cool. |
echo47
Minmatar Republic
165
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 18:20:00 -
[56] - Quote
Serious questions OP what was your fit? both lav and dropsuit
How many times did you die to infantry?
I would rather look bad and win, than look good and lose.
|
Surt gods end
Demon Ronin
1503
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 18:23:00 -
[57] - Quote
I'm not even mentioning that AV should still equal AV. Like in every other FPS game out there, Not named BF.
I would also say what I think about also players who never touched a FPS game, going into tanks so they die less. and killing my fellow FPS players. But that's more of my personel view. |
Takahiro Kashuken
Red Star. EoN.
2162
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 18:26:00 -
[58] - Quote
echo47 wrote:Serious questions OP what was your fit? both lav and dropsuit
How many times did you die to infantry?
Basic proto heavy - proto AFG, 2 enhanced dmg mods, 1 plate 2 reps and the LAV was proto overdrive and 2 complex light reps no turret
Died once to infantry, my fault i rolled the LAV and it ended up on the roof had to get out to flip and got gunned down apart from that no other deaths by infantry
Intelligence is OP
|
Takahiro Kashuken
Red Star. EoN.
2162
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 18:27:00 -
[59] - Quote
Surt gods end wrote:Takahiro Kashuken wrote:Surt gods end wrote:And I can still solo tanks. So what? so AV is ok right? NO. Most dumb up post I read in awhile. Sprk put you up to it? So what your saying is not that it takes TEAM to take out one tank BUT that if you have enough TIN CANS on the field then it makes up for the loss of the AV team?
So in the end it comes down to who can field in more tanks. AND THAT IS STUPID. This is not an RTS. It took 2ppl but i was in a 5man group, general communication between the 5 of us is OP because we called out stuff to each other like locations of tanks and infantry etc And no your still wrong, i ve seen 6man squads each field a tank in skirmish/domo and still lose because the infantry got hammered and couldnt hack the points But your not seeing at HOW will this help retention? Force everyone to join a corp after acedemy? No **** that communication is the key to winning, and teamwork. that was true before tank spam. hence why prostomps happen. But you can't force randoms to play a specific way. and that's why it's more then just if my proto ass self can solo tanks. not if the new young ins are getting slaughter by em. There already gimped the new players or mid tier players by us vets, and old clans. Now they are gimped more by tank spam. unless they themselves are forced to jump in a tank just to compete. And that's not cool.
Retention is a diff matter completely
The whole game is broken in various areas that new players dont like or cant deal with and its a still in beta and missing alot of content
Intelligence is OP
|
Stinker Butt
0uter.Heaven
334
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 18:38:00 -
[60] - Quote
average dedicated tankers are usually at the top of the leader board average dedicated AV players are at the bottom
that's not balanced
Please give tanks some balance
|
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |