Pages: [1] 2 3 4 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Atiim
Living Like Larry Schwag
2190
|
Posted - 2013.12.17 19:40:00 -
[1] - Quote
And there you have it folks. They just won't stop will they?
Pilots have made it very obvious that they want AV removed from the game. They have already proven multiple times that they will stop at nothing until their precious vehicles can go 60/0 without trying.
AV has already been nerfed, and now they want to nerf AV weapons that fall under the Light Weapon category even further. You are not safe Swarm Launcher and Plasma Cannon Users. And I guarantee that it wouldn't be to far of a stretch to say that they will come for Forge Gun users in the near future as well.
They have also already stated how they believe that AV should be required to use teamwork, yet HAVs themselves shouldn't. And at the same time they try to justify that with reasons so idiotic that even a 7 year old child could disprove it if they tried long enough.
Remember when I said that if pilots ever got their wish, then PRO AV would be so worthless that nobody would ever want to use it over a Railgun? Remember when I said that if pilots ever got their wish, then DUST 514's matches would be determined by who has the most tanks on the field at the same time?
Well nobody listed, and here is the result of that. You have this POS build where everyone would rather use an HAV or go as far as to strap Explosives on their LAVs and kill themselves, then use Anti-Vehicle weapons for Anti-Vehicle purposes.
Do you want to play a game where the match is always decided by who has the most HAVs? Do you? If so, then by all means please do allow pilots to spew lies and BS everywhere about how AV is "fine".
And to those who say, AV is fine. Please post a link of you killing a pilot with an IQ greater than 5 while using Anti-Vehicle weaponry. I'd even pay AUR to see it.
If these pilots get there way with the second SL/PLC nerf, then I'm going to take a break. And no, you scrubs will not has my ISK. You don't even need it. That would go to my corp or KING CHECKMATE.
And to the non-AV infantry, I have all but one question. "How long will you allow Tanker's "Logic" to ruin the game for you(us)?
Also, I apologize in advance to the pilots who this does not encompass, as I am sure that this doesn't describe the ENTIRE community, as there is that small minority who actually want this game balanced.
On an additional note, can anyone for the life of me please tell my why anyone should use AV over a MLT HAV? I'll give 1m ISK to the first one who can actually come up with a good reason.
-HAND.
DUST 514 just went full COD.
Never go full COD.
|
Atiim
Living Like Larry Schwag
2190
|
Posted - 2013.12.17 19:43:00 -
[2] - Quote
Reserved.
DUST 514 just went full COD.
Never go full COD.
|
TheD1CK
Dead Man's Game
179
|
Posted - 2013.12.17 19:46:00 -
[3] - Quote
there isn't any reason to not go HAV my AV fit costs 80,000 ISK, I have to survive running at a tank,
while his fitting is cheaper than mine .....
I die 3 times in the attempt, even if I succeed I lose ....
|
Mobius Wyvern
Guardian Solutions DARKSTAR ARMY
4117
|
Posted - 2013.12.17 19:46:00 -
[4] - Quote
Atiim wrote:And there you have it folks. They just won't stop will they?
Pilots have made it very obvious that they want AV removed from the game. They have already proven multiple times that they will stop at nothing until their precious vehicles can go 60/0 without trying.
AV has already been nerfed, and now they want to nerf AV weapons that fall under the Light Weapon category even further. You are not safe Swarm Launcher and Plasma Cannon Users. And I guarantee that it wouldn't be to far of a stretch to say that they will come for Forge Gun users in the near future as well.
They have also already stated how they believe that AV should be required to use teamwork, yet HAVs themselves shouldn't. And at the same time they try to justify that with reasons so idiotic that even a 7 year old child could disprove it if they tried long enough.
Remember when I said that if pilots ever got their wish, then PRO AV would be so worthless that nobody would ever want to use it over a Railgun? Remember when I said that if pilots ever got their wish, then DUST 514's matches would be determined by who has the most tanks on the field at the same time?
Well nobody listed, and here is the result of that. You have this POS build where everyone would rather use an HAV or go as far as to strap Explosives on their LAVs and kill themselves, then use Anti-Vehicle weapons for Anti-Vehicle purposes.
Do you want to play a game where the match is always decided by who has the most HAVs? Do you? If so, then by all means please do allow pilots to spew lies and BS everywhere about how AV is "fine".
And to those who say, AV is fine. Please post a link of you killing a pilot with an IQ greater than 5 while using Anti-Vehicle weaponry. I'd even pay AUR to see it.
If these pilots get there way with the second SL/PLC nerf, then I'm going to take a break. And no, you scrubs will not has my ISK. You don't even need it. That would go to my corp or KING CHECKMATE.
And to the non-AV infantry, I have all but one question. "How long will you allow Tanker's "Logic" to ruin the game for you(us)?
Also, I apologize in advance to the pilots who this does not encompass, as I am sure that this doesn't describe the ENTIRE community, as there is that small minority who actually want this game balanced.
On an additional note, can anyone for the life of me please tell my why anyone should use AV over a MLT HAV? I'll give 1m ISK to the first one who can actually come up with a good reason.
-HAND.
So, wait, WHO was requesting another Swarm nerf?
Amidst the blue skies
A link from past to future
The sheltering wings of the protector
|
drake sadani
Namtar Elite Gallente Federation
103
|
Posted - 2013.12.17 19:46:00 -
[5] - Quote
TL;DR version ,
tank players say keep nerfing AV .
AV says boost us back so we don't get owned
tank players say use better tactics .
AV says maybe you should use better tactics tankers
tank players say we don't have to . we're tanks
while mommy AV and tanker daddy fight the little 514 gamers are not getting fed and are being neglected |
Yoma Carrim
Situation Normal all fraked up
134
|
Posted - 2013.12.17 19:48:00 -
[6] - Quote
Where is the link to the tread calling for a swarm nerf? As a tanker I would very much like to rip these idiots a new one.
I should not be able to passive shield regen through a friken AV Volley
When you turn a corner and find the entire enemy team.Oh Heck
Logi, Tanker, Heavy
|
TheBLAZZED
VENGEANCE FOR HIRE
160
|
Posted - 2013.12.17 19:48:00 -
[7] - Quote
What are you talking about? Link to tankers wanting another nerf pls |
Commander Tzu
L.O.T.I.S. Public Disorder.
85
|
Posted - 2013.12.17 19:49:00 -
[8] - Quote
You can't win the argument logically, so now you resort to using complete fabrications. I have not seen or heard a single vehicle user asking for another AV nerf. Obvious troll is obvious. |
Commander Tzu
L.O.T.I.S. Public Disorder.
85
|
Posted - 2013.12.17 19:50:00 -
[9] - Quote
drake sadani wrote:TL;DR version ,
tank players say keep nerfing AV .
AV says boost us back so we don't get owned
tank players say use better tactics .
AV says maybe you should use better tactics tankers
tank players say we don't have to . we're tanks
while mommy AV and tanker daddy fight the little 514 gamers are not getting fed and are being neglected
Tankers don't use tactics, right. So why were so many AV complaining when they got killed by the infantry the tank was working with? |
Knight Soiaire
BurgezzE.T.F Public Disorder.
3817
|
Posted - 2013.12.17 19:51:00 -
[10] - Quote
Tanks complaining about AV. AV complaining about HAVs.
We have once again, achieved Chromosone like vehicle balance.
Hopefully tomorrow's nerf is a big enough one to stop the complaining, but I'm hoping that CCP mess up again, and give HAVs warp like speeds, y'know, just for lolz.
Killmail :O
|
|
TheBLAZZED
VENGEANCE FOR HIRE
160
|
Posted - 2013.12.17 19:52:00 -
[11] - Quote
TheD1CK wrote:there isn't any reason to not go HAV my AV fit costs 80,000 ISK, I have to survive running at a tank,
while his fitting is cheaper than mine .....
I die 3 times in the attempt, even if I succeed I lose ....
My tank is 500k+. You kill me in 3 attempts, that'd be a win. But I still see your point. |
TranquilBiscuit ofVaLoR
F.T.U. IMMORTAL REGIME
875
|
Posted - 2013.12.17 19:52:00 -
[12] - Quote
Atiim, whoever told you they still want AV nerfed is a complete and utter dumbass.
don't even give credence to what they are saying. that person is a POS and the reason this game is not as good as it could be. i'm willing to bet even the majority of tankers would agree with this.
Tell me, how exactly DOES a biscuit gain Valor?
|
Vulpes Dolosus
SVER True Blood Public Disorder.
492
|
Posted - 2013.12.17 19:52:00 -
[13] - Quote
drake sadani wrote:TL;DR version ,
tank players say keep nerfing AV .
AV says boost us back so we don't get owned
tank players say use better tactics .
AV says maybe you should use better tactics tankers
tank players say we don't have to . we're tanks
while mommy AV and tanker daddy fight the little 514 gamers are not getting fed and are being neglected All the while Uncle Dropships is killing everyone.
Dropship Specialist
Kills- Incubus: 3; Pythons: 0; Other DS: 26; Tanks: 12 Gêå2
12/17
|
True Adamance
Scions of Athra
4984
|
Posted - 2013.12.17 19:55:00 -
[14] - Quote
Atiim wrote:And there you have it folks. They just won't stop will they?
Pilots have made it very obvious that they want AV removed from the game. They have already proven multiple times that they will stop at nothing until their precious vehicles can go 60/0 without trying.
AV has already been nerfed, and now they want to nerf AV weapons that fall under the Light Weapon category even further. You are not safe Swarm Launcher and Plasma Cannon Users. And I guarantee that it wouldn't be to far of a stretch to say that they will come for Forge Gun users in the near future as well.
They have also already stated how they believe that AV should be required to use teamwork, yet HAVs themselves shouldn't. And at the same time they try to justify that with reasons so idiotic that even a 7 year old child could disprove it if they tried long enough.
Remember when I said that if pilots ever got their wish, then PRO AV would be so worthless that nobody would ever want to use it over a Railgun? Remember when I said that if pilots ever got their wish, then DUST 514's matches would be determined by who has the most tanks on the field at the same time?
Well nobody listed, and here is the result of that. You have this POS build where everyone would rather use an HAV or go as far as to strap Explosives on their LAVs and kill themselves, then use Anti-Vehicle weapons for Anti-Vehicle purposes.
Do you want to play a game where the match is always decided by who has the most HAVs? Do you? If so, then by all means please do allow pilots to spew lies and BS everywhere about how AV is "fine".
And to those who say, AV is fine. Please post a link of you killing a pilot with an IQ greater than 5 while using Anti-Vehicle weaponry. I'd even pay AUR to see it.
If these pilots get there way with the second SL/PLC nerf, then I'm going to take a break. And no, you scrubs will not has my ISK. You don't even need it. That would go to my corp or KING CHECKMATE.
And to the non-AV infantry, I have all but one question. "How long will you allow Tanker's "Logic" to ruin the game for you(us)?
Also, I apologize in advance to the pilots who this does not encompass, as I am sure that this doesn't describe the ENTIRE community, as there is that small minority who actually want this game balanced.
On an additional note, can anyone for the life of me please tell my why anyone should use AV over a MLT HAV? I'll give 1m ISK to the first one who can actually come up with a good reason.
-HAND.
Who said this? They truly are stupid.
AV isn't all that bad, I claimed a few tanks on Harkon last night, AVed two MLT Soma with Remotes, and spend more time taking down other HAV in my Soma/Maddy.
Infantry is just there/around so I don't kill them unless they get in my way.
To a Texan like you, a hero is some type of weird sandwich, not some nut who takes on three Gunlogi.
Reference = ISK
|
Commander Tzu
L.O.T.I.S. Public Disorder.
85
|
Posted - 2013.12.17 19:56:00 -
[15] - Quote
TranquilBiscuit ofVaLoR wrote:Atiim, whoever told you they still want AV nerfed is a complete and utter dumbass.
don't even give credence to what they are saying. that person is a POS and the reason this game is not as good as it could be. i'm willing to bet even the majority of tankers would agree with this.
Only way he heard it from someone is if it came from one of the voices in his head, but I'm pretty sure he made it up; even they aren't crazy enough to say something like that. |
drake sadani
Namtar Elite Gallente Federation
106
|
Posted - 2013.12.17 20:03:00 -
[16] - Quote
Commander Tzu wrote:drake sadani wrote:TL;DR version ,
tank players say keep nerfing AV .
AV says boost us back so we don't get owned
tank players say use better tactics .
AV says maybe you should use better tactics tankers
tank players say we don't have to . we're tanks
while mommy AV and tanker daddy fight the little 514 gamers are not getting fed and are being neglected Tankers don't use tactics, right. So why were so many AV complaining when they got killed by the infantry the tank was working with?
i am simply tanking a large post and making it bite sized for people who cannot read lots .
personally i have seen tanks use tactics . but not often .
now i have seen four sicas working in tandem with shield hardeners to grief MLT players . pretty sure the MLT guys left after that |
Dengar Skirata
the third day Public Disorder.
39
|
Posted - 2013.12.17 20:04:00 -
[17] - Quote
AV was over nerfed, just like the flaylock. Think about it. Flaylock is OP, so we nerf flaylock and then buff other weapons by giving them aim assist. Nerfing the flaylock would have been fine, and buffing other weapons would have been fine, but instead CCP did both, and now look at the flaylock.
The same thing has happened to AV weapons. AV is OP, so we nerf it, and then buff vehicles. Nerfing AV would have been fine, and buffing vehicles would have been fine, but, once again, CCP overdid it, and look at AV vs vehicles now.
In my opinion, the vehicles are almost balanced, but not quite yet.
RIP flaylock RIP AV
// Author of the Dust Spec Ops Tactics Handbook
// Proud Member of the Templis Dragonaurs
// Caldari Loyalist
|
drake sadani
Namtar Elite Gallente Federation
106
|
Posted - 2013.12.17 20:07:00 -
[18] - Quote
Dengar Skirata wrote:AV was over nerfed, just like the flaylock. almost balanced, but not quite yet.
RIP flaylock RIP AV
flay what ? -_- |
Cosgar
ParagonX
8837
|
Posted - 2013.12.17 20:08:00 -
[19] - Quote
Like jerkass AV, there's jerkass tankers. We need to stop listening to the jerkasses for once.
I tried to put a level into Amarr Commando once, but got a server notification saying "Why?"
|
Commander Tzu
L.O.T.I.S. Public Disorder.
86
|
Posted - 2013.12.17 20:08:00 -
[20] - Quote
drake sadani wrote:Commander Tzu wrote:drake sadani wrote:TL;DR version ,
tank players say keep nerfing AV .
AV says boost us back so we don't get owned
tank players say use better tactics .
AV says maybe you should use better tactics tankers
tank players say we don't have to . we're tanks
while mommy AV and tanker daddy fight the little 514 gamers are not getting fed and are being neglected Tankers don't use tactics, right. So why were so many AV complaining when they got killed by the infantry the tank was working with? i am simply tanking a large post and making it bite sized for people who cannot read lots . personally i have seen tanks use tactics . but not often . now i have seen four sicas working in tandem with shield hardeners to grief MLT players . pretty sure the MLT guys left after that
TBH I saw a long post by Atiim and figured 90% was lies or total crap so I just read your helpful summary and responded to it as I would him =D. Anyway, I got completely ****** when I first started playing tanks in chromosome, I started with MLT and got killed by proto maddys/gunnis/AV and went negative for freakin ever until I got enough SP to really round out my fit. I stayed, and lots of other people did too. I agree the new player experience needs to be 1000x better, but we can't change the whole game to pander to the people who will quit as soon as they face an uneven team, which happens sometimes in every multiplayer PvP game. |
|
Commander Tzu
L.O.T.I.S. Public Disorder.
86
|
Posted - 2013.12.17 20:12:00 -
[21] - Quote
Dengar Skirata wrote:AV was over nerfed, just like the flaylock. Think about it. Flaylock is OP, so we nerf flaylock and then buff other weapons by giving them aim assist. Nerfing the flaylock would have been fine, and buffing other weapons would have been fine, but instead CCP did both, and now look at the flaylock. The same thing has happened to AV weapons. AV is OP, so we nerf it, and then buff vehicles. Nerfing AV would have been fine, and buffing vehicles would have been fine, but, once again, CCP overdid it, and look at AV vs vehicles now. In my opinion, the vehicles are almost balanced, but not quite yet. RIP flaylock RIP AV
Lol no offense but thats exactly what happened with Uprising, they nerfed tanks and then buffed AV so everything was ******. Honestly though wait for the speed changes tomorrow, without hardeners tanks are paper thin, when they run multi hardeners they have crap EHP and rep. So when they get slower: Tanks won't be able to get away as fast when their mods enter cooldown, and hardener tanks won't be able to get away from damage they are taking as fast so they will be whittled down to nothing. Unless you use a Forge gun, those things hurt like hell; I'm glad to see Heavies actually getting a role based on the fact they are supposed to be specialized AV. |
knight of 6
SVER True Blood Public Disorder.
850
|
Posted - 2013.12.17 20:15:00 -
[22] - Quote
what the kitten are you talking about? could you link something?
"God favors the side with the best artillery" ~ Napoleon
Ko6, scout, tanker.
CLOSED BETA VET
|
drake sadani
Namtar Elite Gallente Federation
107
|
Posted - 2013.12.17 20:15:00 -
[23] - Quote
Quote: TBH I saw a long post by Atiim and figured 90% was lies or total crap so I just read your helpful summary and responded to it as I would him =D. Anyway, I got completely ****** when I first started playing tanks in chromosome, I started with MLT and got killed by proto maddys/gunnis/AV and went negative for freakin ever until I got enough SP to really round out my fit. I stayed, and lots of other people did too. I agree the new player experience needs to be 1000x better, but we can't change the whole game to pander to the people who will quit as soon as they face an uneven team, which happens sometimes in every multiplayer PvP game.
certainly it happened to me a lot on many other games . but i had some kind of recourse to at least keep my head above water . right now the game is holding new players under the surface and drowning them .
any kind of recourse.
as a example .
i used to play battlefield .
bad comp and 3 .
we would get camped all the time . i would get killed 20 times in a row . but . i felt fine with that because every now and again i could take a guided rocket and put it in someones teeth .
or i could get away and do something besides die . it would be difficult. but i could do it .
the situation we have now is there is nothing you can do as a noob. you have a swam launcher that does nothing noticeable AV nades that somewhat help but you have to get in tankity tanks face . and we have a heavy forge but if yo go right into that you end up neglecting the skills you need to survive normal person to person combat |
Atiim
Living Like Larry Schwag
2196
|
Posted - 2013.12.17 20:35:00 -
[24] - Quote
Yoma Carrim wrote:Where is the link to the tread calling for a swarm nerf? As a tanker I would very much like to rip these idiots a new one.
I should not be able to passive shield regen through a friken AV Volley @work, but will link when I get the chance.
DUST 514 just went full COD.
Never go full COD.
|
Commander Tzu
L.O.T.I.S. Public Disorder.
89
|
Posted - 2013.12.17 20:39:00 -
[25] - Quote
Atiim wrote:Yoma Carrim wrote:Where is the link to the tread calling for a swarm nerf? As a tanker I would very much like to rip these idiots a new one.
I should not be able to passive shield regen through a friken AV Volley @work, but will link when I get the chance.
So, basically you're just as useless at work as you are on the forums? |
Benjamin Ciscko
The Generals General Tso's Alliance
393
|
Posted - 2013.12.17 20:40:00 -
[26] - Quote
Who said this? I am on the forums a lot maybe not as much as you Atiim nut I have not seen a single tanker request an AV nerf.
Tanker/Logi
Tanks almost fixed.
|
TranquilBiscuit ofVaLoR
F.T.U. IMMORTAL REGIME
882
|
Posted - 2013.12.17 20:41:00 -
[27] - Quote
Commander Tzu wrote:Atiim wrote:Yoma Carrim wrote:Where is the link to the tread calling for a swarm nerf? As a tanker I would very much like to rip these idiots a new one.
I should not be able to passive shield regen through a friken AV Volley @work, but will link when I get the chance. So, basically you're just as useless at work as you are on the forums? and you are?
Tell me, how exactly DOES a biscuit gain Valor?
|
Korvin Lomont
United Pwnage Service RISE of LEGION
367
|
Posted - 2013.12.17 20:54:00 -
[28] - Quote
Atiim wrote:And there you have it folks. They just won't stop will they?
Pilots have made it very obvious that they want AV removed from the game. They have already proven multiple times that they will stop at nothing until their precious vehicles can go 60/0 without trying.
AV has already been nerfed, and now they want to nerf AV weapons that fall under the Light Weapon category even further. You are not safe Swarm Launcher and Plasma Cannon Users. And I guarantee that it wouldn't be to far of a stretch to say that they will come for Forge Gun users in the near future as well.
They have also already stated how they believe that AV should be required to use teamwork, yet HAVs themselves shouldn't. And at the same time they try to justify that with reasons so idiotic that even a 7 year old child could disprove it if they tried long enough.
Remember when I said that if pilots ever got their wish, then PRO AV would be so worthless that nobody would ever want to use it over a Railgun? Remember when I said that if pilots ever got their wish, then DUST 514's matches would be determined by who has the most tanks on the field at the same time?
Well nobody listed, and here is the result of that. You have this POS build where everyone would rather use an HAV or go as far as to strap Explosives on their LAVs and kill themselves, then use Anti-Vehicle weapons for Anti-Vehicle purposes.
Do you want to play a game where the match is always decided by who has the most HAVs? Do you? If so, then by all means please do allow pilots to spew lies and BS everywhere about how AV is "fine".
And to those who say, AV is fine. Please post a link of you killing a pilot with an IQ greater than 5 while using Anti-Vehicle weaponry. I'd even pay AUR to see it.
If these pilots get there way with the second SL/PLC nerf, then I'm going to take a break. And no, you scrubs will not has my ISK. You don't even need it. That would go to my corp or KING CHECKMATE.
And to the non-AV infantry, I have all but one question. "How long will you allow Tanker's "Logic" to ruin the game for you(us)?
Also, I apologize in advance to the pilots who this does not encompass, as I am sure that this doesn't describe the ENTIRE community, as there is that small minority who actually want this game balanced.
On an additional note, can anyone for the life of me please tell my why anyone should use AV over a MLT HAV? I'll give 1m ISK to the first one who can actually come up with a good reason.
-HAND.
I am totally with you as I fought the same fight for quite some time now. But it seems tankers will only be happy when there is no more infantry on weapons :/.
|
Spkr4theDead
Red Star. EoN.
1509
|
Posted - 2013.12.17 21:03:00 -
[29] - Quote
For someone that calls himself a tanker, you sure don't mind cutting off your hands, feet, and nose because you don't like them.
I told you you weren't a tanker. You've never defended any build of them. You need to use AV to destroy vehicles instead of your own tank. I've completely stopped using forge guns since 1.7. I could probably delete 90% of my infantry fits because now all I want to do is tank.
Stop calling yourself a tanker.
Teamwork for thee, but no teamwork for me, such is the motto of the anti vehicle infantry.
|
Spkr4theDead
Red Star. EoN.
1509
|
Posted - 2013.12.17 21:04:00 -
[30] - Quote
TheD1CK wrote:there isn't any reason to not go HAV my AV fit costs 80,000 ISK, I have to survive running at a tank,
while his fitting is cheaper than mine .....
I die 3 times in the attempt, even if I succeed I lose ....
Sorry, CCP took out the no risk all reward aspect of AV.
And are you talking about MLT? Are you using PRO? Of course MLT will be cheaper than PRO.
Teamwork for thee, but no teamwork for me, such is the motto of the anti vehicle infantry.
|
|
|
|
|
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |