Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
DUST Fiend
OSG Planetary Operations Covert Intervention
8683
|
Posted - 2013.12.12 18:18:00 -
[31] - Quote
Cost so much?
They're cheaper than an advanced suit
Vids / O7
|
Himiko Kuronaga
Fatal Absolution
2500
|
Posted - 2013.12.12 18:23:00 -
[32] - Quote
My advanced loadout comes out at 38k.
The super cheap ass version comes out to 28k.
a militia tank is a little around 50k.
So according to my budget, a tank is more expensive. |
Cosgar
ParagonX
8568
|
Posted - 2013.12.12 18:24:00 -
[33] - Quote
Tanks are actually way easier to kill than when CCP Blam! "rebalanced" them for Uprising. Have one AVer distract the tank and another to cover it's escape route when modules wear off. Everyone crying about OP tanks got spoiled by The crippled tanks in 1.0-1.6 and they need to adapt. REs and Proxy Mines could stand a slight buff though.
I tried to put a level into Amarr Commando once, but got a server notification saying "Why?"
|
Darken-Sol
BIG BAD W0LVES
793
|
Posted - 2013.12.12 18:24:00 -
[34] - Quote
Asirius Medaius wrote:pegasis prime wrote:
also havs now have nearly no passive bonuses like resistance or shield regen bonuses but we trade that of for being monsterous for 30 seconds at a time with 42 second sit out periods.
This is one reason in particular that I'm starting to lose interest in this game -- it's becoming less and less like EVE Online. They removed passive resistances and pretty much force everyone to either use active hardeners or a turbo to GTFO. If they had lowered the resistances on passives, sure, but they took them out completely instead. This only leaves us with one option for resists, and that deviates from the "Sandbox" type of gameplay that EVE Online brought me to love. With only one option, I feel rather bored with this game. Not to mention that they took out Enforcers...
generic tanks. Instead of armored core we got wall-e. |
Krom Ganesh
Holdfast Syndicate Amarr Empire
869
|
Posted - 2013.12.12 18:26:00 -
[35] - Quote
Himiko Kuronaga wrote:Use AV weaponry on actual tanks in real life and you will come to understand how entirely worthless they actually are.
Umm....
!
|
Ripley Riley
Incorruptibles
206
|
Posted - 2013.12.12 18:27:00 -
[36] - Quote
Himiko Kuronaga wrote: New Eden is a place dominated by large, powerful vehicles. It always has been. Anti-vehicle stuff is merely there to annoy them and force them to retreat. Don't like it? Too bad. Tooooo bad.
/Loads Imperial Navy MF into all eight of his Coercer's small turrets then proceeds to destroy your claim that large ships rule New Eden's sky
"I need not food nor water. Your tears alone sustain me." - Ripley Riley
|
Monkey MAC
Lost Millennium
1202
|
Posted - 2013.12.12 18:30:00 -
[37] - Quote
Lorhak Gannarsein wrote:See, this guy isn't a tanker but he gets it.
Is it really that hard?
I would be happy with prices being jacked back up; it'd help with the spam. As it is, you shouldn't be losing too many tanks anyway.
And you know what the funniest thing would be? If CCP leaves HAVs as they are.
Wouldn't that shit some people off... He is a tanker, he squads with Spkr4thedead all the time.
Also I like the bit where he says tanks are fun now, implying he drives tanks enough to have hated it before. You know what we want as an AVer, we at the very very least want tanks to **** off when we use AV, not charge in closer because they know they are invincible.
Tanks 514
I told you, I bloody well told you.
Monkey Mac - Forum Warrior of the Trees Lvl.1
|
The Attorney General
1598
|
Posted - 2013.12.12 18:30:00 -
[38] - Quote
Jack McReady wrote:aka biased tank driver in disguise
Yep, complete tool.
I thought Atiim was the worst example of the scrub parade, but you sir are the new front runner.
Mr. Hybrid Vayu.
|
Master Jaraiya
Ultramarine Corp
1384
|
Posted - 2013.12.12 18:31:00 -
[39] - Quote
Today, just for lols, I made a MLT Soma with a MLT Hardener, MLT Active Scanner, and MLT Fuel Injector (they are no longer bugged).
I went 11/1 (My 1 death was due to an RDV dropping a Tank on me after my initial spawn)
At one point, I pulled up to an objective (B on the new map with the Obelisk) and proceeded to wreak havoc. I was hit with 3 AV Nades, 2 FG Shots, and a Swarm Volley. This put me at half Armor. I Activated my Hardener and Fuel Injector and fled the scene, circled around by Delta, then to Alpha Where I was hit with a OB. I hit Hardener and Fuel Injector again and got out with more than 3/4 Armor.
The next match I called in my Soma, and began battling another HAV. I was hit with 3 Railgun Shots before I hit my Hardeners and Fuel Injectors, and Proceeded to flee, but continued to take Railgun fire from another HAV and an Rail Installation. Six Rail Blasts finally took my Soma down.
This was the first time I ever drove an HAV and I have no SP invested in Vehicles.
HAVs are ridiculous now.
"The true measure of a shinobi is not how he lives, but how he dies."
- The Toad Sage
|
Beren Hurin
Onslaught Inc RISE of LEGION
1889
|
Posted - 2013.12.12 18:31:00 -
[40] - Quote
crazy space 1 wrote:They cost less than my dropsuit...
This is the point. People are asking for tiericide, but cheap tanks making it harder for all infantry to survive means people are idiots if they want to run protosuits AND make isk. |
|
Surt gods end
Demon Ronin
1284
|
Posted - 2013.12.12 18:34:00 -
[41] - Quote
Himiko Kuronaga wrote:Otherwise they wouldn't cost so much. No, you are not entitled to be able to fight back 1v1. That would make the entire risk vs reward of using a tank pointless. The problem isn't the tank being OP. The problem is you being overly entitled.
Is the only true counter to a tank another tank? Yes. It is. And thats exactly how it should be. At least until other big vehicles come into play.
New Eden is a place dominated by large, powerful vehicles. It always has been. Anti-vehicle stuff is merely there to annoy them and force them to retreat. Don't like it? Too bad. Tooooo bad.
Sincerely,
A FORGE GUNNER who actually appreciates fun gameplay when he notices it.
While Dust still has Description of FPS in it. Not likely. it's not played as a RTS nor MMO. AV stuff is merely to annoy? You don't even believe that. LOL
A lot of tanks QQ lately. wonder why? could it be something might come for them in the horizon?
|
Himiko Kuronaga
Fatal Absolution
2500
|
Posted - 2013.12.12 18:35:00 -
[42] - Quote
So now we're linking wikipedia to make an argument? You're lucky I'm not your professor. You would have been ejected from almost any class at a respectable college for that.
But since we're playing the wikipedia game...
Quote:The M60A1 tanks of the U.S. Marines saw action during Operation Desert Storm in 1991, opposing Iraqi armor which included the T-54/T-59, T-55, T-62, Type 69, and T-72. The M60A1s were fitted with add-on explosive reactive armor (ERA) packages and supported the drive into Kuwait City where they were involved in a two day tank battle at the Kuwait airport with the loss of only one vehicle and no crew. They saw service with the United States Marine Corps, and the Saudi Arabian Army.
Quote:When the Abrams entered service in the 1980s, they operated alongside M60A3 within the United States military, and with other NATO tanks in numerous Cold War exercises. These exercises usually took place in Western Europe, especially West Germany, but also in some other countries like South Korea. During such training exercises, Abrams' crews honed their skills for use against Soviet soldiers, equipment and vehicles. However, by 1991 the USSR had collapsed and the Abrams had not been in any combat.
The Abrams remained untested in combat until the Gulf War in 1991. A total of 1,848 M1A1s were deployed to Saudi Arabia. The M1A1 was superior to Iraq's Soviet-era T-55 and T-62 tanks, as well as Iraqi assembled Russian T-72s, and locally produced copies (Asad Babil tank). The T-72s like most Soviet export designs lacked night vision systems and then-modern rangefinders, though they did have some night fighting tanks with older active infrared systems or floodlightsGÇöjust not the latest starlight scopes and passive infrared scopes as on the Abrams. Only 23 M1A1s were taken out of service in the Gulf[52] and one of these losses resulted in crew deaths from Iraqi fire. Some others took minor combat damage, with little effect on their operational readiness. Very few Abrams tanks were hit by enemy fire, and there was only one fatality, along with a handful of wounded as a result.
Yea, so much for the effectiveness of the mighty RPG. Strange that so few tanks took any real damage, considering how favored the RPG is... |
Takahiro Kashuken
Red Star. EoN.
1892
|
Posted - 2013.12.12 18:35:00 -
[43] - Quote
OP is spot on |
The Attorney General
1598
|
Posted - 2013.12.12 18:36:00 -
[44] - Quote
Master Jaraiya wrote:Today, just for lols, I made a MLT Soma with a MLT Hardener, MLT Active Scanner, and MLT Fuel Injector (they are no longer bugged).
I went 11/1 (My 1 death was due to an RDV dropping a Tank on me after my initial spawn)
At one point, I pulled up to an objective (B on the new map with the Obelisk) and proceeded to wreak havoc. I was hit with 3 AV Nades, 2 FG Shots, and a Swarm Volley. This put me at half Armor. I Activated my Hardener and Fuel Injector and fled the scene, circled around by Delta, then to Alpha Where I was hit with a OB. I hit Hardener and Fuel Injector again and got out with more than 3/4 Armor.
The next match I called in my Soma, and began battling another HAV. I was hit with 3 Railgun Shots before I hit my Hardeners and Fuel Injectors, and Proceeded to flee, but continued to take Railgun fire from another HAV and an Rail Installation. Six Rail Blasts finally took my Soma down.
This was the first time I ever drove an HAV and I have no SP invested in Vehicles.
HAVs are ridiculous now.
Complete fable.
Cool story bro.
You know people can do math right?
Mr. Hybrid Vayu.
|
Zene Ren
Bullet Cluster Legacy Rising
10
|
Posted - 2013.12.12 18:37:00 -
[45] - Quote
the real problem is this so called "wave of opportunity" time it is simply not visible or distinctive enough when i can attack the tank and actually do some dmg.... |
The Attorney General
1598
|
Posted - 2013.12.12 18:38:00 -
[46] - Quote
Zene Ren wrote:the real problem is this so called "wave of opportunity" time it is simply not visible or distinctive enough when i can attack the tank and actually do some dmg....
Shining tank = do not attack
Non shiny tank = attack.
How is this too difficult for people to understand?
Mr. Hybrid Vayu.
|
Master Jaraiya
Ultramarine Corp
1385
|
Posted - 2013.12.12 18:38:00 -
[47] - Quote
The Attorney General wrote:Master Jaraiya wrote:Today, just for lols, I made a MLT Soma with a MLT Hardener, MLT Active Scanner, and MLT Fuel Injector (they are no longer bugged).
I went 11/1 (My 1 death was due to an RDV dropping a Tank on me after my initial spawn)
At one point, I pulled up to an objective (B on the new map with the Obelisk) and proceeded to wreak havoc. I was hit with 3 AV Nades, 2 FG Shots, and a Swarm Volley. This put me at half Armor. I Activated my Hardener and Fuel Injector and fled the scene, circled around by Delta, then to Alpha Where I was hit with a OB. I hit Hardener and Fuel Injector again and got out with more than 3/4 Armor.
The next match I called in my Soma, and began battling another HAV. I was hit with 3 Railgun Shots before I hit my Hardeners and Fuel Injectors, and Proceeded to flee, but continued to take Railgun fire from another HAV and an Rail Installation. Six Rail Blasts finally took my Soma down.
This was the first time I ever drove an HAV and I have no SP invested in Vehicles.
HAVs are ridiculous now. Complete fable. Cool story bro. You know people can do math right? Yea because I would go through the trouble of making up such an elaborate story.
"The true measure of a shinobi is not how he lives, but how he dies."
- The Toad Sage
|
DUST Fiend
OSG Planetary Operations Covert Intervention
8684
|
Posted - 2013.12.12 18:39:00 -
[48] - Quote
I ******* hate militia vehicles, they should have never existed in the first place
Vids / O7
|
The Attorney General
1600
|
Posted - 2013.12.12 18:40:00 -
[49] - Quote
Master Jaraiya wrote: Yea because I would go through the trouble of making up such an elaborate story.
Clearly you would, because the math doesn't support the story you invented to try to prove your point.
Thanks for showing how far you are willing to go for your argument.
Mr. Hybrid Vayu.
|
Master Jaraiya
Ultramarine Corp
1385
|
Posted - 2013.12.12 18:45:00 -
[50] - Quote
The Attorney General wrote:Master Jaraiya wrote: Yea because I would go through the trouble of making up such an elaborate story.
Clearly you would, because the math doesn't support the story you invented to try to prove your point. Thanks for showing how far you are willing to go for your argument. You can do all the math you want to, but the fact is, this game isn't played with pencil and paper so your math really doesn't mean jack ****.
Do the math: Full Proto Heavy with HMG 2x Comp Damage Mods vs Advanced Gallente Assault with a Gek engaging at 30m. Who wins here on your paper game? I can guarantee we all know which on would come out on top in actual game play.
"The true measure of a shinobi is not how he lives, but how he dies."
- The Toad Sage
|
|
Ripley Riley
Incorruptibles
206
|
Posted - 2013.12.12 18:46:00 -
[51] - Quote
The Attorney General wrote:Clearly you would, because the math doesn't support the story you invented to try to prove your point. Thanks for showing how far you are willing to go for your argument.
^ Tankers get upset when you play their game mostly AFK and pull down 10.0 K/d
"I need not food nor water. Your tears alone sustain me." - Ripley Riley
|
Krom Ganesh
Holdfast Syndicate Amarr Empire
870
|
Posted - 2013.12.12 18:46:00 -
[52] - Quote
Himiko Kuronaga wrote:So now we're linking wikipedia to make an argument? You're lucky I'm not your professor. You would have been ejected from almost any class at a respectable college for that. But since we're playing the wikipedia game... Quote:The M60A1 tanks of the U.S. Marines saw action during Operation Desert Storm in 1991, opposing Iraqi armor which included the T-54/T-59, T-55, T-62, Type 69, and T-72. The M60A1s were fitted with add-on explosive reactive armor (ERA) packages and supported the drive into Kuwait City where they were involved in a two day tank battle at the Kuwait airport with the loss of only one vehicle and no crew. They saw service with the United States Marine Corps, and the Saudi Arabian Army. Quote:When the Abrams entered service in the 1980s, they operated alongside M60A3 within the United States military, and with other NATO tanks in numerous Cold War exercises. These exercises usually took place in Western Europe, especially West Germany, but also in some other countries like South Korea. During such training exercises, Abrams' crews honed their skills for use against Soviet soldiers, equipment and vehicles. However, by 1991 the USSR had collapsed and the Abrams had not been in any combat.
The Abrams remained untested in combat until the Gulf War in 1991. A total of 1,848 M1A1s were deployed to Saudi Arabia. The M1A1 was superior to Iraq's Soviet-era T-55 and T-62 tanks, as well as Iraqi assembled Russian T-72s, and locally produced copies (Asad Babil tank). The T-72s like most Soviet export designs lacked night vision systems and then-modern rangefinders, though they did have some night fighting tanks with older active infrared systems or floodlightsGÇöjust not the latest starlight scopes and passive infrared scopes as on the Abrams. Only 23 M1A1s were taken out of service in the Gulf[52] and one of these losses resulted in crew deaths from Iraqi fire. Some others took minor combat damage, with little effect on their operational readiness. Very few Abrams tanks were hit by enemy fire, and there was only one fatality, along with a handful of wounded as a result. Yea, so much for the effectiveness of the mighty RPG. Strange that so few tanks took any real damage, considering how favored the RPG is...
Hmmm.... Strange. I'm reading these quotes of yours yet I do not see the line "Modern battle tanks are invulnerable to all AV weaponry." Huh.
Oh hey, look at this from the articles I linked.
Quote:The US Army ranks the RPG-29 threat to armor so high that they refused to allow the newly formed Iraqi army to buy it, fearing it would fall into insurgent hands. (Source Link... because that's what you actually use for research)
As for the Javelin, clearly it must have some use as, well... the US military uses it.
!
|
Surt gods end
Demon Ronin
1284
|
Posted - 2013.12.12 18:47:00 -
[53] - Quote
I'll just leave this here for you TANKER GODS you.
Don't get me wrong, I don't hate tankers that went into tanking cause of drivers is what they wanted to be. But my stance has always been the same. NERDS THAT NEVER BOTHERED WITH ANY FPS GAME COMING IN AND PAWNING MY BROTHERS. and I saw this coming. Not all tankers share all you old tankers code of conduct.
The pendulum swung in your favor. It's your turn. But for how long it depends on you. nothing brings on a faster nerf to tanking then a tanker. |
The Attorney General
1606
|
Posted - 2013.12.12 18:58:00 -
[54] - Quote
Master Jaraiya wrote:The Attorney General wrote:Master Jaraiya wrote: Yea because I would go through the trouble of making up such an elaborate story.
Clearly you would, because the math doesn't support the story you invented to try to prove your point. Thanks for showing how far you are willing to go for your argument. You can do all the math you want to, but the fact is, this game isn't played with pencil and paper so your math really doesn't mean jack ****. Do the math: Full Proto Heavy with HMG 2x Comp Damage Mods vs Advanced Gallente Assault with a Gek engaging at 30m. Who wins here on your paper game? I can guarantee we all know which on would come out on top in actual game play.
The question you posed regarding a logi vs a heavy at 30m is hilariously bad, because I don't think you understand the argument you are trying to make.
On paper, the logi slays the fatty.
In game the logi slays the fatty.
Now, with that out of the way, let us examine your story, and look at how it is clearly not possible that what you related happened. Now, you could have gone the reasonable route and said that you blew it out of proportion, but no, you stuck by your story. So now we will rip it apart, and then you can try and tell me how that wasn't what you meant.
So, you pulled up to Objective Bravo, and were hit with three AV nades, 2 FG shots and a swarm volley, this put you at half armor.
Assuming everything is standard, with no damage mods, or prof:
AV nades: 750 DMG each, plus the 20% bonus to armor. 2700 HP lost
2 Forge shots 1200 damage each, +10 to armor = 2640
1 swarm volley 880, plus 20+ to armor = 1056
And then you turned your armor hardener on? Unless you were running two complex armor repairers, there is no way you could tank anywhere near that damage, but you said you had no vehicle SP.
The second part of your story is harder to disprove, because you could have just been stupid and not been able to count how many times you got hit, but it certainly was not six.
So yes, your story is false, and you should be ashamed for trying to tell it. Grow up and debate like a man instead of lying like a school child.
Mr. Hybrid Vayu.
|
Slag Emberforge
Immortal Retribution
266
|
Posted - 2013.12.12 19:08:00 -
[55] - Quote
DUST Fiend wrote:I ******* hate militia vehicles, they should have never existed in the first place
Is it because anyone can get in them to test their efficiency? That AV can get in them and get a feel for how they actually are?
Hmmm... Doesn't seem to take much thought on why a pro-HAV wouldn't like that. |
Master Jaraiya
Ultramarine Corp
1385
|
Posted - 2013.12.12 19:10:00 -
[56] - Quote
The Attorney General wrote:Master Jaraiya wrote:The Attorney General wrote:Master Jaraiya wrote: Yea because I would go through the trouble of making up such an elaborate story.
Clearly you would, because the math doesn't support the story you invented to try to prove your point. Thanks for showing how far you are willing to go for your argument. You can do all the math you want to, but the fact is, this game isn't played with pencil and paper so your math really doesn't mean jack ****. Do the math: Full Proto Heavy with HMG 2x Comp Damage Mods vs Advanced Gallente Assault with a Gek engaging at 30m. Who wins here on your paper game? I can guarantee we all know which on would come out on top in actual game play. The question you posed regarding a logi vs a heavy at 30m is hilariously bad, because I don't think you understand the argument you are trying to make. On paper, the logi slays the fatty. In game the logi slays the fatty. Now, with that out of the way, let us examine your story, and look at how it is clearly not possible that what you related happened. Now, you could have gone the reasonable route and said that you blew it out of proportion, but no, you stuck by your story. So now we will rip it apart, and then you can try and tell me how that wasn't what you meant. So, you pulled up to Objective Bravo, and were hit with three AV nades, 2 FG shots and a swarm volley, this put you at half armor. Assuming everything is standard, with no damage mods, or prof: AV nades: 750 DMG each, plus the 20% bonus to armor. 2700 HP lost 2 Forge shots 1200 damage each, +10 to armor = 2640 1 swarm volley 880, plus 20+ to armor = 1056 And then you turned your armor hardener on? Unless you were running two complex armor repairers, there is no way you could tank anywhere near that damage, but you said you had no vehicle SP. The second part of your story is harder to disprove, because you could have just been stupid and not been able to count how many times you got hit, but it certainly was not six. So yes, your story is false, and you should be ashamed for trying to tell it. Grow up and debate like a man instead of lying like a school child. Haha the Nades didn't even take me out of shield so that just blows your whole theory right out the window. The second FG shot took me into Armor and the Swarm volleys were hitting as I was activating my modules.
Like I said, you can do as much math as you want, but it doesn't mean a damn thing because this isn't Dungeons and Dragons with pen and paper where every thing works exactly according to your calculations.
Honestly though I couldn't care less if you believe me or not, it happened.
"The true measure of a shinobi is not how he lives, but how he dies."
- The Toad Sage
|
Atiim
Living Like Larry Schwag
1902
|
Posted - 2013.12.12 19:21:00 -
[57] - Quote
Vehicles are meant to wreck you.
However, that does not mean that they are meant to have theoretical invulnerability to AV weapons.
Something that with less than 200k SP can easily withstand and escape all forms of AV with ease? Seems balanced..
And I'm not even talking about the MLT NOS bug, as all vehicles can easily evade AV with not a care or consequence in the world without NOS.
The entitlement here is hilarious.
DUST 514 just went full COD.
Never go full COD.
|
DUST Fiend
OSG Planetary Operations Covert Intervention
8690
|
Posted - 2013.12.12 19:24:00 -
[58] - Quote
Atiim wrote:Vehicles are meant to wreck you. However, that does not mean that they are meant to have theoretical invulnerability to AV weapons. Something that with less than 200k SP can easily withstand and escape all forms of AV with ease? Seems balanced.. And I'm not even talking about the MLT NOS bug, as all vehicles can easily evade AV with not a care or consequence in the world without NOS. The entitlement here is hilarious. That's my main gripe. Why have SP when you can just run around in pubs with these things at no virtually no SP or ISK cost to speak of?
Maybe this is a secret buff to TTK and proto stomping
Vids / O7
|
Atiim
Living Like Larry Schwag
1902
|
Posted - 2013.12.12 19:27:00 -
[59] - Quote
The Attorney General wrote:Zene Ren wrote:the real problem is this so called "wave of opportunity" time it is simply not visible or distinctive enough when i can attack the tank and actually do some dmg.... Shining tank = do not attack Non shiny tank = attack. How is this too difficult for people to understand? LOL the "aura" on most vehicles won't render past 15m.
And how can you attack something when It easily flees with no effort or care whatsoever?
And no don't feed me the "It's only because of the MLT NOS glitch" bs. A vehicle with even basic or no NOS modules can still easily evade the area. The whole "waves of opportunity" argument is thrown out of the window when the vehicle can easily swim to safety after the wave has hit.
NOS/Afterburners need to be removed.
DUST 514 just went full COD.
Never go full COD.
|
The Attorney General
1615
|
Posted - 2013.12.12 20:52:00 -
[60] - Quote
Master Jaraiya wrote:
Honestly though I couldn't care less if you believe me or not, it happened.
Keep telling yourself that. Doesn't make it true. But thanks for the story.
Mr. Hybrid Vayu.
|
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |