Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 :: [one page] |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |
DS 10
Ancient Exiles
1118
|
Posted - 2013.10.19 21:49:00 -
[1] - Quote
Zion Shad just asked if his BPO assets are safe in his inventory after BPOs were taken off the market. The reply was that they "aren't safe".
BETTER USE THEM WHILE YOU CAN. |
Magnus Amadeuss
Tal-Romon Legion Amarr Empire
97
|
Posted - 2013.10.19 21:51:00 -
[2] - Quote
The SOLE reason I bought some of the packs is for the BPOs.
|
hackerzilla
Defenders of the Helghast Dream
391
|
Posted - 2013.10.19 21:53:00 -
[3] - Quote
Aurum refund pl0x? |
DS 10
Ancient Exiles
1118
|
Posted - 2013.10.19 21:53:00 -
[4] - Quote
Magnus Amadeuss wrote:The SOLE reason I bought some of the packs is for the BPOs.
I'm sure there are a bunch of people that bought the anniversary pack mainly for all the Dust perks and BPOs. |
Nirwanda Vaughns
Molon Labe. RISE of LEGION
104
|
Posted - 2013.10.19 21:54:00 -
[5] - Quote
thats pretty bad timing for them to announce that seeing as the EVE box set comes with 7 bpos and is a big selling point. i'm not sure how they can say that bpos are bad for the economy they're always standard/militia grade so not really gamebreaking. personally i think it'd be awesome if you own a district we could build our own suits/reprocess salvage |
Zlocha
Tronhadar Free Guard Minmatar Republic
58
|
Posted - 2013.10.19 21:54:00 -
[6] - Quote
BPOs are very bad for the game especially when the trade btw chars is introduced |
Crimson Cerberes
Hammer Of Light Covenant of the Phoenix Alliance
67
|
Posted - 2013.10.19 21:55:00 -
[7] - Quote
Oh so freely given out T2 BPOs in eve can stay... but a few BPOs in dust and they have to go?
Do this and watch your playerbase plummit. |
IrishWebster
Molon Labe. RISE of LEGION
69
|
Posted - 2013.10.19 21:55:00 -
[8] - Quote
******* EXCUSE me? I BOUGHT my BPOs. With my literal, real life, HARD EARNED money. I'm usually the first tote the losers who always wine "I'm leaving if CCP does/doesn't do this," but I swear to God I'll never play another CCP game if they start taking away **** that I've already paid for. |
Iron Wolf Saber
Den of Swords
9552
|
Posted - 2013.10.19 21:55:00 -
[9] - Quote
Aurum refund may involve lawyers (on ccps end) so who knows. Not saying its impossible but there are a lot of options available. |
Patrick57
GunFall Mobilization Covert Intervention
816
|
Posted - 2013.10.19 21:55:00 -
[10] - Quote
Are you ******* kidding me? Is CCP really going to waste (maybe) THOUSANDS of people's moneys? My CEO (you know him DS :)) runs BPO suits 60% of the time. Not to mention some people paying $150 for the Amarr BPOs.
******* crazy CCP. Stupid idea. |
|
Spkr4theDead
Red Star. EoN.
1081
|
Posted - 2013.10.19 21:57:00 -
[11] - Quote
That would be a terrible decision. |
Arkena Wyrnspire
Turalyon 514 Turalyon Alliance
4015
|
Posted - 2013.10.19 21:57:00 -
[12] - Quote
Magnus Amadeuss wrote:The SOLE reason I bought some of the packs is for the BPOs.
Exactly. I will be incredibly pissed if these are removed. They're only worth as much as the cheapest gear, less in some cases. Yet T2 BPOs in EVE have remained for years and years, and those are far more damaging. |
Bright Cloud
Namtar Elite Gallente Federation
241
|
Posted - 2013.10.19 22:00:00 -
[13] - Quote
Yes refund the BPO's that ive bought for 30 AUR with 11.000 AUR each then we can talk. I wont accept a stack of regular weapons only pure AUR. Anything else is not debatable. |
KING CHECKMATE
AMARR IMPERIAL CRUSADERS
1906
|
Posted - 2013.10.19 22:02:00 -
[14] - Quote
DS 10 wrote:Zion Shad just asked if his BPO assets are safe in his inventory after BPOs were taken off the market. The reply was that they "aren't safe".
BETTER USE THEM WHILE YOU CAN.
HAHAHA i was JUST about to buy a 100$ PSN card to buy an Elite pack.
I read this.
Now im getting a Tattoo. LOL CCP ....the only real thing people want to buy and you say its not safe to have them? that htere is risk of removal? XD
hahahaa |
DS 10
Ancient Exiles
1118
|
Posted - 2013.10.19 22:02:00 -
[15] - Quote
Bright Cloud wrote:Yes refund the BPO's that ive bought for 30 AUR with 11.000 AUR each then we can talk. I wont accept a stack of regular weapons only pure AUR. Anything else is not debatable.
That's what I expect, but you never know what's going to happen. |
Spectral Clone
The Unholy Legion Of DarkStar DARKSTAR ARMY
249
|
Posted - 2013.10.19 22:02:00 -
[16] - Quote
If there is a BPO removal, all merc packs should be refunded to cash.
You cannot sell something and then change it, then you get problems with something called the law. |
Gorra Snell
The Unholy Legion Of DarkStar DARKSTAR ARMY
178
|
Posted - 2013.10.19 22:04:00 -
[17] - Quote
The general orneriness present in this thread was my initial reaction, too, but listening to the rest of his answer, I think it within the realm of possibility that he misunderstood the question. Midway in I think he said something like "of course you can still use the ones in your inventory", so he may have just been discussing the eventual removal of the Veteran/Elite packs, etc. |
Viktor Hadah Jr
Negative-Impact Cult of War
566
|
Posted - 2013.10.19 22:06:00 -
[18] - Quote
That's not cool ccp |
Magnus Amadeuss
Tal-Romon Legion Amarr Empire
99
|
Posted - 2013.10.19 22:06:00 -
[19] - Quote
Gorra Snell wrote:The general orneriness present in this thread was my initial reaction, too, but listening to the rest of his answer, I think it within the realm of possibility that he misunderstood the question. Midway in I think he said something like "of course you can still use the ones in your inventory", so he may have just been discussing the eventual removal of the Veteran/Elite packs, etc.
As I see it that is the only option they have, well aside from deciding that the current amount of players might be too high and they need to cut them in half.
|
Iron Wolf Saber
Den of Swords
9554
|
Posted - 2013.10.19 22:10:00 -
[20] - Quote
Spectral Clone wrote:If there is a BPO removal, all merc packs should be refunded to cash.
You cannot sell something and then change it, then you get problems with something called the law.
You cannot refund to cash, that's illegal according to sony. Highest level you can refund back to is PSN wallet. |
|
Spectral Clone
The Unholy Legion Of DarkStar DARKSTAR ARMY
250
|
Posted - 2013.10.19 22:12:00 -
[21] - Quote
Iron Wolf Saber wrote:Spectral Clone wrote:If there is a BPO removal, all merc packs should be refunded to cash.
You cannot sell something and then change it, then you get problems with something called the law. You cannot refund to cash, that's illegal according to sony. Highest level you can refund back to is PSN wallet.
I guess that will do then ;) |
Friendly Woodsman
Subdreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
108
|
Posted - 2013.10.19 22:13:00 -
[22] - Quote
I really hope he didn't understand the question, because if they try to change a product that they have already sold to someone, the law really will have a problem with that. Its called a "bait and switch", and it is illegal just about everywhere. I'm no lawyer, so I might be off on the legality of such a move, but I am a player that will never give money to someone who changes what they sold to me after the fact. |
xLT Green
Damage Core corp.
33
|
Posted - 2013.10.19 22:15:00 -
[23] - Quote
BPOs are my bread and butter. After the no more BPOs I have no need to spend any real money to get anything for this game if there isn't any thing to show for it scew boosters I want a gallentte assault suit BPO I will pay money for that |
Mors The Butcher
Matari Combat Research and Manufacture Inc. Interstellar Murder of Crows
6
|
Posted - 2013.10.19 22:17:00 -
[24] - Quote
I bought the elite and vetrin packs so if ccp doesn't give me aurm weapons or suits or a aurm redound I'm done with this game |
Nocturnal Soul
Immortal Retribution
861
|
Posted - 2013.10.19 22:18:00 -
[25] - Quote
Link to information please? |
THEAMAZING POTHEAD
Nyain San
416
|
Posted - 2013.10.19 22:19:00 -
[26] - Quote
You guys should read the EULA, it clearly states that by agreeing, you "have no interest in any time or items in game..." which is basically establishing that you cant sue them over stuff you purchased or time you invested if they decide to remove content or shut down servers on the grounds of thst by agreeing, you legally state you have no financial interest of anything you do or purchase in game.
Yeah, if you read a EULA, its basically them spitting all over your rights to cover their own asses. |
Rynoceros
Rise Of Old Dudes
1026
|
Posted - 2013.10.19 22:20:00 -
[27] - Quote
This would also mean that I would rightly deserve a respec for Dropsuit Command, since I have no other reason than the 'Sever' Logi to have SP in Minmatar fittings. |
DS 10
Ancient Exiles
1120
|
Posted - 2013.10.19 22:20:00 -
[28] - Quote
Nocturnal Soul wrote:Link to information please?
It was on the stream. No text format for me to link. Here's CCP's channel. The whole presentation should be posted soon. It's at the end during Q&A.
twitch.tv/ccp |
Patrick57
GunFall Mobilization Covert Intervention
820
|
Posted - 2013.10.19 22:21:00 -
[29] - Quote
THEAMAZING POTHEAD wrote:You guys should read the EULA, it clearly states that by agreeing, you "have no interest in any time or items in game..." which is basically establishing that you cant sue them over stuff you purchased or time you invested if they decide to remove content or shut down servers on the grounds of thst by agreeing, you legally state you have no financial interest of anything you do or purchase in game.
Yeah, if you read a EULA, its basically them spitting all over your rights to cover their own asses. Still, their player base will drop-severely. This would hurt their profits as well as their respect. |
KING CHECKMATE
AMARR IMPERIAL CRUSADERS
1909
|
Posted - 2013.10.19 22:21:00 -
[30] - Quote
THEAMAZING POTHEAD wrote:You guys should read the EULA, it clearly states that by agreeing, you "have no interest in any time or items in game..." which is basically establishing that you cant sue them over stuff you purchased or time you invested if they decide to remove content or shut down servers on the grounds of thst by agreeing, you legally state you have no financial interest of anything you do or purchase in game.
Yeah, if you read a EULA, its basically them spitting all over your rights to cover their own asses.
Yup and the problem is you cant play without agreeing, so ... yeahhh... f**** ovr... |
|
Marc Rime
Zumari Force Projection Caldari State
195
|
Posted - 2013.10.19 22:21:00 -
[31] - Quote
Lets all speculate wildly based on a two word third hand quote! |
Kal Kronos
L.O.T.I.S. Public Disorder.
81
|
Posted - 2013.10.19 22:23:00 -
[32] - Quote
Pretty sure the user agreement will cover CCP's ass on things like this, having played EVE they are pretty good working with thier paying customers. Even if they do scrap BPO's we will most definitely be compensated well. BPO's can't exist in DUST if we want a player to player market. We didn't have to train industry and manufacturing, so why in the hell should we have BPO's, they never should have put them in the game... |
Croned
B o u n d l e s s.
482
|
Posted - 2013.10.19 22:23:00 -
[33] - Quote
This is probably a misunderstanding, as BPOs that are militia-grade really have no effect on the economy. It's not possible for CCP to remove starter fits (as people would run out of ISK and be screwed), and there are probably more BPO items on a given starter fit than most people have purchased through Aurum. But, this only applies if these BPOs are equivalent to militia items (in damage and fitting stats). There could even be further disadvantages, such as less max ammo or something of the sort. |
Mors The Butcher
Matari Combat Research and Manufacture Inc. Interstellar Murder of Crows
6
|
Posted - 2013.10.19 22:24:00 -
[34] - Quote
Yup it's really bad for ccp they're is going to be a lot of anger directed at them now |
Iron Wolf Saber
Den of Swords
9555
|
Posted - 2013.10.19 22:25:00 -
[35] - Quote
Friendly Woodsman wrote:I really hope he didn't understand the question, because if they try to change a product that they have already sold to someone, the law really will have a problem with that. Its called a "bait and switch", and it is illegal just about everywhere. I'm no lawyer, so I might be off on the legality of such a move, but I am a player that will never give money to someone who changes what they sold to me after the fact.
Counter arguably, you bought a software product to which then gets patched to change entirely how it worked and was not what you originally agreed too. Apple's quicktime had such incident' it installed Itunes without permission, which then proceeded to directly wiping out my 12,000 song collection as they where not bought from itunes (nor could they even be bought anywhere) . My compensation from the massive lawsuit? 25 cents because the songs I had, had no value, which I am sure my portion of the taxpayer's cut of that bill was much more than that.
Real Bait and Switches are a bit more common these days, a company will sell a product on a lot, when you get to the store in question to be selling said product at an amazing price and the product in question isn't there but all the other products they want to try to buy are. The stupid little disclaimer at 'participating' stores only lets them get away with this.
As for what is in dust 514's case, I am not sure how to proceed because your money is only used to buy in game currency and you still have full value on that item. What you do with that currency is questionable. As for the other items is where details start gumming things up to the point it may just require a blank option to fix all of it. CCP Could arguably replace the BPOs with X number of copies of the same item for the aurum value would have been for individual copy purchases and argue equal value.
I mean how many people rose a massive amount of stink when ccp changed the stats on these bpos to be different? Changed skill requirements, attributes, performance the other things. All BPOs have been molested with patch updates already. What is the difference if they changed the attribute of the BPO form infinite runs to oh say 2500 runs. Or what if CCP Changed our BPOs to something that you can no longer equip but use as a means of producing your own suits instead?
Like I said anything is possible and in the air. |
lordjanuz
Norwegian Dust514 Corporation Top Men.
201
|
Posted - 2013.10.19 22:25:00 -
[36] - Quote
It has been confirmed at the round table, all BPO will be gone at some time. |
Sinboto Simmons
SVER True Blood Public Disorder.
1525
|
Posted - 2013.10.19 22:26:00 -
[37] - Quote
Zlocha wrote:BPOs are very bad for the game especially when the trade btw chars is introduced How is that bad? Sounds like an awesome way to make cash.... |
Borne Velvalor
BLACK-DRAGON-SOCIETY
779
|
Posted - 2013.10.19 22:29:00 -
[38] - Quote
I don't understand this. BPOs aren't bad for the game because they are all STD gear. They're just there for people who either want to save a miniscule amount of ISK or like the name/look of the item. Collectors collect them for fun and other players use them for fun. They aren't effective by any means when you could get a piece of STD gear for almost nothing.
Also, no, they aren't bad for the player market. It gives people with lots of ISK something to collect that is fairly harmless to the game balance. The more things to buy and collect, the better. I would like to see a reason for this before I pass judgement, however. Am I missing something here? Why would CCP remove items that people paid real money for that aren't disrupting the balance of the game? |
Pent'noir
Algintal Core Gallente Federation
142
|
Posted - 2013.10.19 22:30:00 -
[39] - Quote
That answer could mean many things, such as,
1. The skinweave's are going away, but the dragonfly,covanent, dren, and Templar stay. 2. They will all get changed to be more like eve where we need to manufacture them. 3. They are changing the weapon's to be standardized, like ps2 so there aren't a dozen names for the same weapon.
I don't see them removing, if I remember correctly they never removed the tech 2 bpo's in eve, but would give a bit of a temper tantrum if they did and I wasn't properly reimbursed.
Is there video of the presentation on youtube anywhere? Until they clearify what they meant, I'd recommend ppl looking for bpo's to not buy the packs. I hope the OP is trolling. |
Buzzwords
Deadly Blue Dots RISE of LEGION
489
|
Posted - 2013.10.19 22:30:00 -
[40] - Quote
just hopping on the "if existing BPOs are removed, will be upset" train.
and no, an aurum or even a psn wallet refund will not make it OK. |
|
Booby Tuesdays
Ahrendee Mercenaries EoN.
351
|
Posted - 2013.10.19 22:31:00 -
[41] - Quote
Is it possible that they will be moving to an EVE style BPO, where you need resources to make such fittings? All they would be changing is the free unlimited usages? |
Reav Hannari
Red Rock Outriders
1635
|
Posted - 2013.10.19 22:33:00 -
[42] - Quote
Here is my suggestion that I just posted on Twitter and I've mentioned before: add a per copy material cost to BPOs that is cheaper than the normal BPC versions and let us keep the unique skins. Eventually we'll have either EVE provided industry or some form of DUST side industry and the BPOs will not be so disruptive again. |
Magnus Amadeuss
Tal-Romon Legion Amarr Empire
103
|
Posted - 2013.10.19 22:33:00 -
[43] - Quote
Buzzwords wrote:just hopping on the "if existing BPOs are removed, will be upset" train.
and no, an aurum or even a psn wallet refund will not make it OK.
I agree... What I paid for was what was on the tin... a PERMANENT ITEM, thats what was advertised, that is what I purchased.
It no where said that it was a temporary item. |
Magnus Amadeuss
Tal-Romon Legion Amarr Empire
103
|
Posted - 2013.10.19 22:34:00 -
[44] - Quote
lordjanuz wrote:It has been confirmed at the round table, all BPO will be gone at some time.
Source? |
XxGhazbaranxX
Bannana Boat Corp
410
|
Posted - 2013.10.19 22:34:00 -
[45] - Quote
Whatever Happens CCP did a terrible terrible thing. They lead the consumer to BUY BPO's and pack because they where retireing them from market:
Original BPO retirement post
QUOTE:
"So donGÇÖt forget to take advantage of the in-game market now to secure items that you may need before they are gone from the in-game store!"
- CCP FRAME
Picture just in case CCP decides that the post is not good for them.
So CCP first encourages players to buy the BPO's; luring them to spend RL money to be able to buy them to then go ahead and say that BPO's are not safe. I smell a bad deal here.
The truth of the matter is that if CCP lead the consumers to buy BPO's when they could so that they would have them available, making some players spend money so they could have what would be an unobtainable item in the future, then to just even ponder about eliminating them is really bad business. I would even go as far as calling it a potential scam. I really hope that is not what CCP did here. If not they will not only lose my respect but they will also lose the game. |
Croned
B o u n d l e s s.
483
|
Posted - 2013.10.19 22:35:00 -
[46] - Quote
This really wouldn't affect the player market at all. You could just sell your actual BPO for a crapload of ISK. |
Centurion mkII
SVER True Blood Public Disorder.
138
|
Posted - 2013.10.19 22:36:00 -
[47] - Quote
This is a deal breaker for me. Remove my bpos without cash refund and I quit. |
Borne Velvalor
BLACK-DRAGON-SOCIETY
779
|
Posted - 2013.10.19 22:37:00 -
[48] - Quote
XxGhazbaranxX wrote:Whatever Happens CCP did a terrible terrible thing. They lead the consumer to BUY BPO's and pack because they where retireing them from market: Original BPO retirement postQUOTE: "So donGÇÖt forget to take advantage of the in-game market now to secure items that you may need before they are gone from the in-game store!" - CCP FRAME Picture just in case CCP decides that the post is not good for them. So CCP first encourages players to buy the BPO's; luring them to spend RL money to be able to buy them to then go ahead and say that BPO's are not safe. I smell a bad deal here. The truth of the matter is that if CCP lead the consumers to buy BPO's when they could so that they would have them available, making some players spend money so they could have what would be an unobtainable item in the future, then to just even ponder about eliminating them is really bad business. I would even go as far as calling it a potential scam. I really hope that is not what CCP did here. If not they will not only lose my respect but they will also lose the game.
I remembered them encouraging BPO purchases lately and didn't remember where. Thanks. |
XxGhazbaranxX
Bannana Boat Corp
411
|
Posted - 2013.10.19 22:39:00 -
[49] - Quote
Borne Velvalor wrote:XxGhazbaranxX wrote:Whatever Happens CCP did a terrible terrible thing. They lead the consumer to BUY BPO's and pack because they where retireing them from market: Original BPO retirement postQUOTE: "So donGÇÖt forget to take advantage of the in-game market now to secure items that you may need before they are gone from the in-game store!" - CCP FRAME Picture just in case CCP decides that the post is not good for them. So CCP first encourages players to buy the BPO's; luring them to spend RL money to be able to buy them to then go ahead and say that BPO's are not safe. I smell a bad deal here. The truth of the matter is that if CCP lead the consumers to buy BPO's when they could so that they would have them available, making some players spend money so they could have what would be an unobtainable item in the future, then to just even ponder about eliminating them is really bad business. I would even go as far as calling it a potential scam. I really hope that is not what CCP did here. If not they will not only lose my respect but they will also lose the game. I remembered them encouraging BPO purchases lately and didn't remember where. Thanks.
I posted a picture online just in case the post is removed. It's not the first time a post has been removed that makes CCP look bad. |
Fire of Prometheus
DUST University Ivy League
1176
|
Posted - 2013.10.19 22:40:00 -
[50] - Quote
This just a low shot CCP.....you really are going to hit players below the belt aren't you? |
|
Waruiko DUST
G I A N T EoN.
130
|
Posted - 2013.10.19 22:43:00 -
[51] - Quote
There is legal precedence for virtual items having real world value. It's outside the US I think though... I guess I'll go looking. |
calvin b
Molon Labe. RISE of LEGION
743
|
Posted - 2013.10.19 22:43:00 -
[52] - Quote
You take away the BPO's I paid for and I am gone. Taking away these from people who paid for them, would equal the death of this game. No one would spend another dime for fear that what they pay for today may not be here tomorrow. I expect full refund of all aurum I purchased if you do this. |
Yelhsa Jin-Mao
Mannar Focused Warfare Gallente Federation
40
|
Posted - 2013.10.19 22:47:00 -
[53] - Quote
I'm making my stand on this issue plain and simple people, IF CCP decide to remove my BPOs that I have purchased, I will be launching a legal action against CCP for breaching my consumer rights and failing to adhere to the contact of which they were party to when they sold me the packs. I'm not ******* about with this either guys. |
Mortedeamor
Internal Rebellion
496
|
Posted - 2013.10.19 22:47:00 -
[54] - Quote
KING CHECKMATE wrote:DS 10 wrote:Zion Shad just asked if his BPO assets are safe in his inventory after BPOs were taken off the market. The reply was that they "aren't safe".
BETTER USE THEM WHILE YOU CAN. HAHAHA i was JUST about to buy a 100$ PSN card to buy an Elite pack. FOR THE BPO!!!! I read this.Now im getting a Tattoo (or Pokemon Y, depends on what ocmes 1st XD). LOL CCP ....the only real thing people want to buy and you say its not safe to have them? that htere is risk of removal? XD hahahaa so was i |
Magnus Amadeuss
Tal-Romon Legion Amarr Empire
109
|
Posted - 2013.10.19 22:49:00 -
[55] - Quote
Yelhsa Jin-Mao wrote:I'm making my stand on this issue plain and simple people, IF CCP decide to remove my BPOs that I have purchased, I will be launching a legal action against CCP for breaching my consumer rights and failing to adhere to the contact of which they were party to when they sold me the packs. I'm not ******* about with this either guys.
Send me a mail if/when this happens as I too would like to participate.
Oh and you EULA warriors. Do you actually think EULAs aren't able to wave your consumer rights? Do a search on google about judges laughing at EULAs. |
Yelhsa Jin-Mao
Mannar Focused Warfare Gallente Federation
44
|
Posted - 2013.10.19 22:50:00 -
[56] - Quote
Centurion mkII wrote:This is a deal breaker for me. Remove my bpos without cash refund and I quit.
If they did that you have a legal right to hold CCP to account for failing to honor the agreement when you purchased the pack, and CAN sue. |
Borne Velvalor
BLACK-DRAGON-SOCIETY
780
|
Posted - 2013.10.19 22:53:00 -
[57] - Quote
TL;DR Thread: "You take away our BPOs, you take away our lives!" |
Yelhsa Jin-Mao
Mannar Focused Warfare Gallente Federation
44
|
Posted - 2013.10.19 22:54:00 -
[58] - Quote
Spectral Clone wrote:Iron Wolf Saber wrote:Spectral Clone wrote:If there is a BPO removal, all merc packs should be refunded to cash.
You cannot sell something and then change it, then you get problems with something called the law. You cannot refund to cash, that's illegal according to sony. Highest level you can refund back to is PSN wallet. I guess that will do then ;)
I'd use the redeemed money to buy PS4 games from the PSN market instead, all -ú169.97 that I put into DUST514. That's over $200.00 |
Waruiko DUST
G I A N T EoN.
130
|
Posted - 2013.10.19 22:54:00 -
[59] - Quote
Waruiko DUST wrote:There is legal precedence for virtual items having real world value. It's outside the US I think though... I guess I'll go looking.
Sources and sites on the subject. The Forbs and Springer article are likely most relevant
http://www.mysecurecyberspace.com/articles/statistics-trends/virtual-items-gaining-real-world-value.html
http://www.forbes.com/sites/oliverherzfeld/2012/12/04/what-is-the-legal-status-of-virtual-goods/
http://scholarship.law.duke.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1206&context=dltr
http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10660-006-5987-8#page-1 |
Spectre-M
The Generals EoN.
75
|
Posted - 2013.10.19 22:58:00 -
[60] - Quote
I thought they would bring in more BPOs to sell to make money. Whoever is in charge is trying to kill this game, cause if I lose what I've bought...goodbye. BPOs don't hurt the game, they make it more interesting and gives players a way to invest in a growing product they like.
I want BPOs for everything STD in the game with customizable skins. It's standard in all games to choose what colors you are and how you approach. Why else play? If you don't want to spend 20$ for a game to get some permanent gear than don't.
Would be nice to have a blue tag denying or confirming. Maybe even a CPM would do. |
|
Yelhsa Jin-Mao
Mannar Focused Warfare Gallente Federation
45
|
Posted - 2013.10.19 22:59:00 -
[61] - Quote
Iron Wolf Saber wrote:Friendly Woodsman wrote:I really hope he didn't understand the question, because if they try to change a product that they have already sold to someone, the law really will have a problem with that. Its called a "bait and switch", and it is illegal just about everywhere. I'm no lawyer, so I might be off on the legality of such a move, but I am a player that will never give money to someone who changes what they sold to me after the fact. Counter arguably, you bought a software product to which then gets patched to change entirely how it worked and was not what you originally agreed too. Apple's quicktime had such incident' it installed Itunes without permission, which then proceeded to directly wiping out my 12,000 song collection as they where not bought from itunes (nor could they even be bought anywhere) . My compensation from the massive lawsuit? 25 cents because the songs I had, had no value, which I am sure my portion of the taxpayer's cut of that bill was much more than that. Real Bait and Switches are a bit more common these days, a company will sell a product on a lot, when you get to the store in question to be selling said product at an amazing price and the product in question isn't there but all the other products they want to try to buy are. The stupid little disclaimer at 'participating' stores only lets them get away with this. As for what is in dust 514's case, I am not sure how to proceed because your money is only used to buy in game currency and you still have full value on that item. What you do with that currency is questionable. As for the other items is where details start gumming things up to the point it may just require a blank option to fix all of it. CCP Could arguably replace the BPOs with X number of copies of the same item for the aurum value would have been for individual copy purchases and argue equal value. I mean how many people rose a massive amount of stink when ccp changed the stats on these bpos to be different? Changed skill requirements, attributes, performance the other things. All BPOs have been molested with patch updates already. What is the difference if they changed the attribute of the BPO form infinite runs to oh say 2500 runs. Or what if CCP Changed our BPOs to something that you can no longer equip but use as a means of producing your own suits instead? Like I said anything is possible and in the air.
As well as potential legal actions |
Orenji Jiji
Seraphim Auxiliaries
268
|
Posted - 2013.10.19 23:01:00 -
[62] - Quote
So I came back to Dust and started playing daily and wanted to get Elite for my main and Vet for my alt... And CCP says what? Cool, no worries. MGS Legacy it is. KTHXBAI.
PS. Obligatory: "if you touch my SEVER or Dragonfly you're dead to me." |
Thurak1
Psygod9 D.E.F.I.A.N.C.E
322
|
Posted - 2013.10.19 23:02:00 -
[63] - Quote
Iron Wolf Saber wrote:Spectral Clone wrote:If there is a BPO removal, all merc packs should be refunded to cash.
You cannot sell something and then change it, then you get problems with something called the law. You cannot refund to cash, that's illegal according to sony. Highest level you can refund back to is PSN wallet. Right so its OK to accept cash but it can't be returned hu? Sounds like a win win for sony / ccp. Because if its returned to my sony wallet i highly doubt sony will give me some way of refunding the money back to my pocket. Blueprints in this game were the only thing i considered worth spending my money on. If those get pulled i dont want aurum back I want my cash. |
Dovallis Martan JenusKoll
Osmon Surveillance Caldari State
260
|
Posted - 2013.10.19 23:02:00 -
[64] - Quote
Iron Wolf Saber wrote:Spectral Clone wrote:If there is a BPO removal, all merc packs should be refunded to cash.
You cannot sell something and then change it, then you get problems with something called the law. You cannot refund to cash, that's illegal according to sony. Highest level you can refund back to is PSN wallet. Sony wants to claim everything as illegal, but state or country +éaws can trump Sony's declarations if a sale is equated to a scam. In other words CCP would take the bullet for trying to go back on paid content, because Sony would not want CCP to hit that kind of a road bump.
In other words CCP wants to do that for their game economy, but probably won't be legally able without jumping through a lot of hoops both to appease Sony and their buying customers. |
Lance 2ballzStrong
SyNergy Gaming EoN.
4115
|
Posted - 2013.10.19 23:04:00 -
[65] - Quote
Iron Wolf Saber wrote:Aurum refund may involve lawyers (on ccps end) so who knows.
Maybe I'm reading this wrong. If you mean refunding AUR to cash, then I see that being an issue.
Giving people AUR in return for taking away BPOs shouldn't require lawyers on CCP's part surely. It seems the logical thing to do, not to mention the RIGHT thing to do.
I don't have much BPOs in comparison to some people, but I'll still want my AUR back for them, because I bought them thinking I'll have them there as long as I wanted. You can't put something on the market, make people pay real money for it, then take it away without a refund lol
That's like putting out DLC, making people buy it, then say "oops! We didn't mean to put this out" and take it back from people and keep their money. Makes no sense.
|
Iron Wolf Saber
Den of Swords
9556
|
Posted - 2013.10.19 23:08:00 -
[66] - Quote
Lance 2ballzStrong wrote:Iron Wolf Saber wrote:Aurum refund may involve lawyers (on ccps end) so who knows. Maybe I'm reading this wrong. If you mean refunding AUR to cash, then I see that being an issue. Giving people AUR in return for taking away BPOs shouldn't require lawyers on CCP's part surely. It seems the logical thing to do, not to mention the RIGHT thing to do. I don't have much BPOs in comparison to some people, but I'll still want my AUR back for them, because I bought them thinking I'll have them there as long as I wanted. You can't put something on the market, make people pay real money for it, then take it away without a refund lol That's like putting out DLC, making people buy it, then say "oops! We didn't mean to put this out" and take it back from people and keep their money. Makes no sense.
From what I understand reversing an item transaction into Aurum on a mass scale would require the advice of the legal team.
Either way until a solution is found that is satisfactory the bpos shouldn't be removed until then. |
Dovallis Martan JenusKoll
Osmon Surveillance Caldari State
262
|
Posted - 2013.10.19 23:09:00 -
[67] - Quote
For people like me, the only reason I bought arum was for the BPOs. If they remove 90%of my purchase motivation... I'd literally have no reason to look in their arum store ever again. |
Lance 2ballzStrong
SyNergy Gaming EoN.
4115
|
Posted - 2013.10.19 23:11:00 -
[68] - Quote
Iron Wolf Saber wrote:Lance 2ballzStrong wrote:Iron Wolf Saber wrote:Aurum refund may involve lawyers (on ccps end) so who knows. Maybe I'm reading this wrong. If you mean refunding AUR to cash, then I see that being an issue. Giving people AUR in return for taking away BPOs shouldn't require lawyers on CCP's part surely. It seems the logical thing to do, not to mention the RIGHT thing to do. I don't have much BPOs in comparison to some people, but I'll still want my AUR back for them, because I bought them thinking I'll have them there as long as I wanted. You can't put something on the market, make people pay real money for it, then take it away without a refund lol That's like putting out DLC, making people buy it, then say "oops! We didn't mean to put this out" and take it back from people and keep their money. Makes no sense. From what I understand reversing an item transaction into Aurum on a mass scale would require the advice of the legal team. Either way until a solution is found that is satisfactory the bpos shouldn't be removed until then.
Ah, well eitherway I don't see CCP taking them away and not refunding people.
Curious to know what they'll do for people that bought merc packs and have a few AR, SMG and Dragonfly BPO's |
Mors The Butcher
Matari Combat Research and Manufacture Inc. Interstellar Murder of Crows
6
|
Posted - 2013.10.19 23:11:00 -
[69] - Quote
Iron Wolf Saber wrote:Lance 2ballzStrong wrote:Iron Wolf Saber wrote:Aurum refund may involve lawyers (on ccps end) so who knows. Maybe I'm reading this wrong. If you mean refunding AUR to cash, then I see that being an issue. Giving people AUR in return for taking away BPOs shouldn't require lawyers on CCP's part surely. It seems the logical thing to do, not to mention the RIGHT thing to do. I don't have much BPOs in comparison to some people, but I'll still want my AUR back for them, because I bought them thinking I'll have them there as long as I wanted. You can't put something on the market, make people pay real money for it, then take it away without a refund lol That's like putting out DLC, making people buy it, then say "oops! We didn't mean to put this out" and take it back from people and keep their money. Makes no sense. From what I understand reversing an item transaction into Aurum on a mass scale would require the advice of the legal team. Either way until a solution is found that is satisfactory the bpos shouldn't be removed until then.
I totally agree about that |
Yelhsa Jin-Mao
Mannar Focused Warfare Gallente Federation
45
|
Posted - 2013.10.19 23:11:00 -
[70] - Quote
Buzzwords wrote:just hopping on the "if existing BPOs are removed, will be upset" train.
and no, an aurum or even a psn wallet refund will not make it OK.
As the consumer you have a legal right to request a refund If CCP decides that they will NOT honor their side of the purchase agreement, regardless of whether they offer 10,000 BPCs, Aurmn, or a PSN refund, you can demand cash. |
|
Iron Wolf Saber
Den of Swords
9558
|
Posted - 2013.10.19 23:12:00 -
[71] - Quote
CCP Community team cooking up a message now. |
Knight Soiaire
P.O.I.N.T.L.E.S.S A.C.R.O.N.Y.M
2661
|
Posted - 2013.10.19 23:13:00 -
[72] - Quote
But I dont want the AUR.
I want the money I dropped on the pack back, I only bought it for the BPOs. |
Borne Velvalor
BLACK-DRAGON-SOCIETY
781
|
Posted - 2013.10.19 23:14:00 -
[73] - Quote
Iron Wolf Saber wrote:CCP Community team cooking up a massage now.
Good. We need something beyond Crowd Control Missives. |
Orca Amsel
Subdreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
528
|
Posted - 2013.10.19 23:16:00 -
[74] - Quote
Iron Wolf Saber wrote:CCP Community team cooking up a message now. Will this be out before monday? |
Borne Velvalor
BLACK-DRAGON-SOCIETY
781
|
Posted - 2013.10.19 23:18:00 -
[75] - Quote
Orca Amsel wrote:Iron Wolf Saber wrote:CCP Community team cooking up a message now. Will this be out before monday?
Yes. Were you talking about the last Monday of October 2015 or the first Monday of November 2016? |
Iron Wolf Saber
Den of Swords
9558
|
Posted - 2013.10.19 23:18:00 -
[76] - Quote
Orca Amsel wrote:Iron Wolf Saber wrote:CCP Community team cooking up a message now. Will this be out before monday?
No the CMP is prodding with a hot poker. |
Centurion mkII
SVER True Blood Public Disorder.
140
|
Posted - 2013.10.19 23:18:00 -
[77] - Quote
I want to predict CCP's response.
"Everything is subject to change standby soon tm for more information".
Or
"Everything is subject to change here is our reasoning for possibly making this choice stanby soon tm for more information". |
DS 10
Ancient Exiles
1122
|
Posted - 2013.10.19 23:19:00 -
[78] - Quote
Borne Velvalor wrote:Iron Wolf Saber wrote:CCP Community team cooking up a massage now. Good. We need something beyond Crowd Control Missives.
What is CCM? |
XxGhazbaranxX
Bannana Boat Corp
414
|
Posted - 2013.10.19 23:19:00 -
[79] - Quote
Alright. Let's say CCP refunds the arum of every in game bought item. What happens to those items that where bought with real money? The Dren Pack comes to mind. These special edition BPO's from the elite pack have no aurum equivalent since they are novelty items. Even Then, who are they to say what aurum price they should have, this in itself would be a random number created by them because they think it should have that price.
Alright I'm going to employ a tactic I did when the mass driver got nerfed without any reason I will always be posting a couple of facts so they are always there.
Whatever Happens CCP did a terrible terrible thing. They lead the consumer to BUY BPO's and pack because they where retireing them from market:
Original BPO retirement post
QUOTE:
"So donGÇÖt forget to take advantage of the in-game market now to secure items that you may need before they are gone from the in-game store!"
- CCP FRAME
Picture just in case CCP decides that the post is not good for them.
So CCP first encourages players to buy the BPO's; luring them to spend RL money to be able to buy them to then go ahead and say that BPO's are not safe. I smell a bad deal here.
The truth of the matter is that if CCP lead the consumers to buy BPO's when they could so that they would have them available, making some players spend money so they could have what would be an unobtainable item in the future, then to just even ponder about eliminating them is really bad business. I would even go as far as calling it a potential scam. I really hope that is not what CCP did here. If not they will not only lose my respect but they will also lose the game. |
Kevall Longstride
DUST University Ivy League
589
|
Posted - 2013.10.19 23:20:00 -
[80] - Quote
https://twitter.com/ccp_praetorian/status/391704802255589376
Direct answer from CCP Pretorian. Expect a forum response soon. |
|
|
CCP Logibro
C C P C C P Alliance
2947
|
Posted - 2013.10.19 23:21:00 -
[81] - Quote
One thing to clarify guys: The removal refers to removing any new sources of BPOs. At this stage there are no plans to remove any BPOs from anyone's inventories.
We are also looking at whether we want to put in place restrictions to things such as trading and exchange of BPOs. This has not been decided internally, but do be aware this is under discussion. CCP Logibro // EVE Universe Community Team // Distributor of Nanites // Patron Saint of Logistics
@CCP_Logibro |
|
XxGhazbaranxX
Bannana Boat Corp
414
|
Posted - 2013.10.19 23:21:00 -
[82] - Quote
Kevall Longstride wrote:https://twitter.com/ccp_praetorian/status/391704802255589376
Direct answer from CCP Pretorian. Expect a forum response soon.
Well that is what you call a Clusterfuck.
@DennieFleetfoot @CCP_Rouge @kanafchian @CCP_Logibro oops! Not what I meant and I was being a wee not cheeky. Forum response being prepared.
I hope this all gets smoothed over. I saw the torches being lit and the mob gathering their hoes :P
CCP Logibro wrote:One thing to clarify guys: The removal refers to removing any new sources of BPOs. At this stage there are no plans to remove any BPOs from anyone's inventories.
Goood man!! |
XxGhazbaranxX
Bannana Boat Corp
414
|
Posted - 2013.10.19 23:24:00 -
[83] - Quote
CCP Logibro wrote:One thing to clarify guys: The removal refers to removing any new sources of BPOs. At this stage there are no plans to remove any BPOs from anyone's inventories.
We are also looking at whether we want to put in place restrictions to things such as trading and exchange of BPOs. This has not been decided internally, but do be aware this is under discussion.
I can breathe again. Time to turn dust on and get on with my life or lack there of |
ADAM-OF-EVE
Svartur Bjorn
436
|
Posted - 2013.10.19 23:24:00 -
[84] - Quote
you have to watch out for ccp being vague with their answers. whats seems like a yes or a no might be a maybe or a twisting of the truth.
we all knew eventually all our gear will be produced in eve thats never changed. how and when this will happen is anyones guess but they are still going to come from bpo's. what ccp might be talking about is bpo's as we see them today will be gone. i.e we just run a suit off from one direct. ccp has to remove this feature for eve to produce these items for us meaning that our bpo's will be essentially useless dust side.
that is my take on it. there isn't really a need to compensate for something which you could sell or produce eve side.
or if thats not the case ccp should consider it |
Kevall Longstride
DUST University Ivy League
589
|
Posted - 2013.10.19 23:27:00 -
[85] - Quote
CCP Logibro wrote:One thing to clarify guys: The removal refers to removing any new sources of BPOs. At this stage there are no plans to remove any BPOs from anyone's inventories.
We are also looking at whether we want to put in place restrictions to things such as trading and exchange of BPOs. This has not been decided internally, but do be aware this is under discussion.
Good man. Don't like jumping on you all like this but it needed a rapid answer. Cheers. |
Centurion mkII
SVER True Blood Public Disorder.
140
|
Posted - 2013.10.19 23:27:00 -
[86] - Quote
CCP Logibro wrote:One thing to clarify guys: The removal refers to removing any new sources of BPOs. At this stage there are no plans to remove any BPOs from anyone's inventories.
We are also looking at whether we want to put in place restrictions to things such as trading and exchange of BPOs. This has not been decided internally, but do be aware this is under discussion.
Oh okay. My e rage has subsided. |
Viktor Hadah Jr
Negative-Impact Cult of War
573
|
Posted - 2013.10.19 23:29:00 -
[87] - Quote
CCP Logibro wrote:One thing to clarify guys: The removal refers to removing any new sources of BPOs. At this stage there are no plans to remove any BPOs from anyone's inventories.
We are also looking at whether we want to put in place restrictions to things such as trading and exchange of BPOs. This has not been decided internally, but do be aware this is under discussion.
Man a bit late i already see people in Dust channels talking about this... A Force 5 Ragenado is sweeping across Dust right now. |
Iskandar Zul Karnain
Hellstorm Inc League of Infamy
2016
|
Posted - 2013.10.19 23:29:00 -
[88] - Quote
lol I better close that help ticket!
>.< |
Iron Wolf Saber
Den of Swords
9560
|
Posted - 2013.10.19 23:30:00 -
[89] - Quote
... And to think I was going to issued a Muzzle first. |
DS 10
Ancient Exiles
1123
|
Posted - 2013.10.19 23:31:00 -
[90] - Quote
Title change number 3. Trying to keep it civil up in here. |
|
Chunky Munkey
Amarr Templars Amarr Empire
1846
|
Posted - 2013.10.19 23:36:00 -
[91] - Quote
Could they even legally do this? There is arguably no item of equivalent value to a BPO. |
crazy space 1
Unkn0wn Killers
1868
|
Posted - 2013.10.19 23:36:00 -
[92] - Quote
CCP Logibro wrote:One thing to clarify guys: The removal refers to removing any new sources of BPOs. At this stage there are no plans to remove any BPOs from anyone's inventories.
We are also looking at whether we want to put in place restrictions to things such as trading and exchange of BPOs. This has not been decided internally, but do be aware this is under discussion.
I'll have more details soon, just thought I should cut that concern off at the pass.
You guys are seriously turning the games direction around ! :D |
Friendly Woodsman
Subdreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
110
|
Posted - 2013.10.19 23:36:00 -
[93] - Quote
Well, I am really happy they responded so fast. I was about to have a breakout of feels over this. |
KING CHECKMATE
AMARR IMPERIAL CRUSADERS
1915
|
Posted - 2013.10.19 23:37:00 -
[94] - Quote
CCP Logibro wrote:One thing to clarify guys: The removal refers to removing any new sources of BPOs. At this stage there are no plans to remove any BPOs from anyone's inventories.
We are also looking at whether we want to put in place restrictions to things such as trading and exchange of BPOs. This has not been decided internally, but do be aware this is under discussion.
I'll have more details soon, just thought I should cut that concern off at the pass.
And i was really looking foward for another tat.... :/ |
Kane Fyea
DUST University Ivy League
2084
|
Posted - 2013.10.19 23:38:00 -
[95] - Quote
Chunky Munkey wrote:Could they even legally do this? There is arguably no item of equivalent value to a BPO. You accepted the EULA right? Well then yes. They can do it whether you like it or not. Although they do have to substitute it with item(s) of equal or greater value. |
Yelhsa Jin-Mao
Mannar Focused Warfare Gallente Federation
49
|
Posted - 2013.10.19 23:39:00 -
[96] - Quote
CCP Logibro wrote:One thing to clarify guys: The removal refers to removing any new sources of BPOs. At this stage there are no plans to remove any BPOs from anyone's inventories.
We are also looking at whether we want to put in place restrictions to things such as trading and exchange of BPOs. This has not been decided internally, but do be aware this is under discussion.
I'll have more details soon, just thought I should cut that concern off at the pass.
What do you mean, 'at this stage', we all know CCP changes their mind on just about everything, at least 3 times a day, so what's to say we won't be seeing an official announcement come 01/01/2014 stating all BPOs will be removed to make way for the player market. |
Vanu Commander
Chaos-Breaker
0
|
Posted - 2013.10.19 23:40:00 -
[97] - Quote
Iron Wolf Saber wrote:Spectral Clone wrote:If there is a BPO removal, all merc packs should be refunded to cash.
You cannot sell something and then change it, then you get problems with something called the law. You cannot refund to cash, that's illegal according to sony. Highest level you can refund back to is PSN wallet.
According to Sony? It's NOT illegal! That's their policy (and not to be confused with the law). EULA cannot event protect that either. It is simply a bait and switch tactic, which it is illegal (if not bait and switch, some form of it). You cannot promote something and people pay with hard earned cash then take it away without refund (psn wallet or aur are NOT refunds, thus you guys still keep the money). This is bullshit! |
Kane Fyea
DUST University Ivy League
2084
|
Posted - 2013.10.19 23:41:00 -
[98] - Quote
Yelhsa Jin-Mao wrote:CCP Logibro wrote:One thing to clarify guys: The removal refers to removing any new sources of BPOs. At this stage there are no plans to remove any BPOs from anyone's inventories.
We are also looking at whether we want to put in place restrictions to things such as trading and exchange of BPOs. This has not been decided internally, but do be aware this is under discussion.
I'll have more details soon, just thought I should cut that concern off at the pass. What do you mean, 'at this stage', we all know CCP changes their mind on just about everything, at least 3 times a day, so what's to say we won't be seeing an official announcement come 01/01/2014 stating all BPOs will be removed to make way for the player market. They can do that if they wanted to. If you don't trust them then don't buy products from them. |
Centurion mkII
SVER True Blood Public Disorder.
142
|
Posted - 2013.10.19 23:42:00 -
[99] - Quote
I think BPOs should be allowed to be traded. Maybe first restrict it then allow it later? This will mean more people with the BPOs quit so it wouldn't totally make the standard versions worthless. I see them as limited edition ships in eve online. |
Kane Fyea
DUST University Ivy League
2084
|
Posted - 2013.10.19 23:42:00 -
[100] - Quote
Vanu Commander wrote:Iron Wolf Saber wrote:Spectral Clone wrote:If there is a BPO removal, all merc packs should be refunded to cash.
You cannot sell something and then change it, then you get problems with something called the law. You cannot refund to cash, that's illegal according to sony. Highest level you can refund back to is PSN wallet. According to Sony? It's NOT illegal! That's their policy (and not to be confused with the law). EULA cannot event protect that either. It is simply a bait and switch tactic, which it is illegal (if not bait and switch, some form of it). You cannot promote something and people pay with hard earned cash then take it away without refund (psn wallet or aur are NOT refund, thus you guys still keep the money). This is bullshit! Well apparently the ps3 is still sony's property even though you bought it. Well that is according to sonys EULA. |
|
Raskutor
DUST University Ivy League
15
|
Posted - 2013.10.19 23:43:00 -
[101] - Quote
CCP Logibro wrote:One thing to clarify guys: The removal refers to removing any new sources of BPOs. At this stage there are no plans to remove any BPOs from anyone's inventories.
We are also looking at whether we want to put in place restrictions to things such as trading and exchange of BPOs. This has not been decided internally, but do be aware this is under discussion.
I'll have more details soon, just thought I should cut that concern off at the pass.
This is great news. However, one question still remains: the BPO's we currently own, while now being "safe"; will they maintain the same functionality? Meaning permanence. Or are you unable to answer that at this time?
The reason I ask is because the permanent feature of the BPO's is the only reason I had put money in the packs. |
Yelhsa Jin-Mao
Mannar Focused Warfare Gallente Federation
49
|
Posted - 2013.10.19 23:45:00 -
[102] - Quote
Kane Fyea wrote:Chunky Munkey wrote:Could they even legally do this? There is arguably no item of equivalent value to a BPO. You accepted the EULA right? Well then yes. They can do it whether you like it or not. Although they do have to substitute it with item(s) of equal or greater value. Also equivalent value has to be how much the BPOs cost (Not as a whole as a single BPO) so they could just give you AUR as you're refund.
As a consumer you have a legal right to request a refund, regardless of the alternatives they provide. If CCP decides that they won't honor the purchase agreement, and decide to change the terms, you can legally request a refund. CCP and Sony are do not have impunity from EU, US and UK consumer law, regardless of the EULA that theyes make you agree to. The final decision on the matter will ALWAYs rest in the hands of the courts. Btw I've just finished my 4 year studies, 3 of which was spent studying law, consumer rights, and business studies. |
Kane Fyea
DUST University Ivy League
2084
|
Posted - 2013.10.19 23:48:00 -
[103] - Quote
Yelhsa Jin-Mao wrote:Kane Fyea wrote:Chunky Munkey wrote:Could they even legally do this? There is arguably no item of equivalent value to a BPO. You accepted the EULA right? Well then yes. They can do it whether you like it or not. Although they do have to substitute it with item(s) of equal or greater value. Also equivalent value has to be how much the BPOs cost (Not as a whole as a single BPO) so they could just give you AUR as you're refund. As a consumer you have a legal right to request a refund, regardless of the alternatives they provide. If CCP decides that they won't honor the purchase agreement, and decide to change the terms, you can legally request a refund. CCP and Sony are do not have impunity from EU, US and UK consumer law, regardless of the EULA that theyes make you agree to. The final decision on the matter will ALWAYs rest in the hands of the courts. Btw I've just finished my 4 year studies, 3 of which was spent studying law, consumer rights, and business studies. So you get PSN money back if you decide to petition to get a refund in which your characters get wiped losing all the progress you made anyways so I doubt many people will do it unless they're planning on leaving dust. |
Yelhsa Jin-Mao
Mannar Focused Warfare Gallente Federation
50
|
Posted - 2013.10.19 23:49:00 -
[104] - Quote
Kane Fyea wrote:Vanu Commander wrote:Iron Wolf Saber wrote:Spectral Clone wrote:If there is a BPO removal, all merc packs should be refunded to cash.
You cannot sell something and then change it, then you get problems with something called the law. You cannot refund to cash, that's illegal according to sony. Highest level you can refund back to is PSN wallet. According to Sony? It's NOT illegal! That's their policy (and not to be confused with the law). EULA cannot event protect that either. It is simply a bait and switch tactic, which it is illegal (if not bait and switch, some form of it). You cannot promote something and people pay with hard earned cash then take it away without refund (psn wallet or aur are NOT refund, thus you guys still keep the money). This is bullshit! Well apparently the ps3 is still sony's property even though you bought it. Well that is according to sonys EULA.
No court would support an action by Sony to request the return of a PS3 that a consumer has purchased.
|
Yelhsa Jin-Mao
Mannar Focused Warfare Gallente Federation
50
|
Posted - 2013.10.19 23:51:00 -
[105] - Quote
Kane Fyea wrote:Yelhsa Jin-Mao wrote:Kane Fyea wrote:Chunky Munkey wrote:Could they even legally do this? There is arguably no item of equivalent value to a BPO. You accepted the EULA right? Well then yes. They can do it whether you like it or not. Although they do have to substitute it with item(s) of equal or greater value. Also equivalent value has to be how much the BPOs cost (Not as a whole as a single BPO) so they could just give you AUR as you're refund. As a consumer you have a legal right to request a refund, regardless of the alternatives they provide. If CCP decides that they won't honor the purchase agreement, and decide to change the terms, you can legally request a refund. CCP and Sony are do not have impunity from EU, US and UK consumer law, regardless of the EULA that theyes make you agree to. The final decision on the matter will ALWAYs rest in the hands of the courts. Btw I've just finished my 4 year studies, 3 of which was spent studying law, consumer rights, and business studies. So you get PSN money back if you decide to petition to get a refund in which your characters get wiped losing all the progress you made anyways so I doubt many people will do it unless they're planning on leaving dust.
If it gets me -ú169.97 (over $200) refunded, I would happily erase DUST514 from my PS3, and spend the money on PS4 titles instead. |
Kane Fyea
DUST University Ivy League
2084
|
Posted - 2013.10.19 23:51:00 -
[106] - Quote
Yelhsa Jin-Mao wrote:Kane Fyea wrote:Vanu Commander wrote:Iron Wolf Saber wrote:Spectral Clone wrote:If there is a BPO removal, all merc packs should be refunded to cash.
You cannot sell something and then change it, then you get problems with something called the law. You cannot refund to cash, that's illegal according to sony. Highest level you can refund back to is PSN wallet. According to Sony? It's NOT illegal! That's their policy (and not to be confused with the law). EULA cannot event protect that either. It is simply a bait and switch tactic, which it is illegal (if not bait and switch, some form of it). You cannot promote something and people pay with hard earned cash then take it away without refund (psn wallet or aur are NOT refund, thus you guys still keep the money). This is bullshit! Well apparently the ps3 is still sony's property even though you bought it. Well that is according to sonys EULA. No court would support an action by Sony to request the return of a PS3 that a consumer has purchased. You obviously don't know nothing about sony's cases against the people who first hacked their ps3s and released them publicly. I suggest looking at those cases since they were quite messed up. (Read into graf chokolo and geohots for the main cases but there are many others too) |
Kane Fyea
DUST University Ivy League
2084
|
Posted - 2013.10.19 23:55:00 -
[107] - Quote
Yelhsa Jin-Mao wrote:Kane Fyea wrote:Yelhsa Jin-Mao wrote:Kane Fyea wrote:Chunky Munkey wrote:Could they even legally do this? There is arguably no item of equivalent value to a BPO. You accepted the EULA right? Well then yes. They can do it whether you like it or not. Although they do have to substitute it with item(s) of equal or greater value. Also equivalent value has to be how much the BPOs cost (Not as a whole as a single BPO) so they could just give you AUR as you're refund. As a consumer you have a legal right to request a refund, regardless of the alternatives they provide. If CCP decides that they won't honor the purchase agreement, and decide to change the terms, you can legally request a refund. CCP and Sony are do not have impunity from EU, US and UK consumer law, regardless of the EULA that theyes make you agree to. The final decision on the matter will ALWAYs rest in the hands of the courts. Btw I've just finished my 4 year studies, 3 of which was spent studying law, consumer rights, and business studies. So you get PSN money back if you decide to petition to get a refund in which your characters get wiped losing all the progress you made anyways so I doubt many people will do it unless they're planning on leaving dust. If it gets me -ú169.97 (over $200) refunded, I would happily erase DUST514 from my PS3, and spend the money on PS4 titles instead. Then why not do it? People have done it before. |
Maken Tosch
DUST University Ivy League
4505
|
Posted - 2013.10.20 00:07:00 -
[108] - Quote
Kane Fyea wrote:Chunky Munkey wrote:Could they even legally do this? There is arguably no item of equivalent value to a BPO. You accepted the EULA right? Well then yes. They can do it whether you like it or not. Although they do have to substitute it with item(s) of equal or greater value. Also equivalent value has to be how much the BPOs cost (Not as a whole as a single BPO) so they could just give you AUR as you're refund.
There is a huge problem with giving AURUM as a refund.
Once upon a time just before the transition from closed beta to open beta,
Dust players were able to purchase Blueprint Originals (BPOs) at prices such as 100 AURUM per unit. Many players purchased only singular quantities such as one BPO for each module or weapon and then spent the remainder of their AURUM on things like 'NEO' dropsuits and boosters. But at the same time, there were a small number of players who decided to use all of their AUR strictly on purchased BPOs in vast quantities thinking they will one day sell them to other player for ISK once the secondary market arrives.
But once Dust 514 hit open beta, the prices of the BPOs skyrocketed to as much as thousands or tens of thousands of AURUM like you see right now. Then CCP put out an announcement stating that they will refund player assets including the refunding of BPOs in order to get the market in equal grounds. This was back in May 14 of this year. BPOs weren't getting removed from the market at this time. Only that the owners of the BPOs would be refunded AURUM at the new high price so they can purchase the BPOs back later on.
But then word leaked that some players had stockpiled large quantities of these BPOs. About as much as 50-100 units per unique BPO. These BPOs were bought at closed-beta prices (extremely cheap) and CCP was planning on refunding BPO owners at open-beta prices (expensive). If the owners were refunded, that meant that those few players will have the advantage of owning a lot of AURUM that is magically created out of thin air without cash involved which presented a huge financial and economic problem.
Imagine you bought a 500 units of BPOs at a price of 100 AUR a piece in closed beta. That cost you 50,000 AUR back then. Just a little bit more what you got from a regular AUR merc pack. Then CCP changes the prices to about 1000 AUR a piece and every get's refunded the AURUM at that price. Suddenly you get 450,000 extra AUR out of thin air. Now imagine the players that stockpiled as much as 1000 units. One players stocked up enough BPO to get an estimated 1-4 million AUR as a result.
Because of this, CCP changed their minds and let the current owners just keep their BPOs. |
Spectre-M
The Generals EoN.
77
|
Posted - 2013.10.20 00:10:00 -
[109] - Quote
DS 10 wrote:Zion Shad just asked if his BPO assets are safe in his inventory after BPOs were taken off the market. The reply was that they "aren't safe".
BETTER USE THEM WHILE YOU CAN.
EDIT: Shad confirmed with devs that BPOs will in fact be leaving the game once CCP figures out how to PAY YOU BACK for them.
EDIT 2: Jump to dev post to see what Logibro said about no plans to remove BPOs from inventories.
What's with these companies doing this crap. Microsoft pretty much tried to stab its player base in the back, then took it back when gamers got peeved. Gamer communities are like Conan, don't #@*! With them or they'll destroy you. Learn from Microsoft mistakes CCP, cause you seem to be doing similar things.
How are we supposed to bring in new players when they won't have access to stuff everyone else has? I for one, no longer trust you as a company |
Mors The Butcher
Matari Combat Research and Manufacture Inc. Interstellar Murder of Crows
6
|
Posted - 2013.10.20 00:11:00 -
[110] - Quote
You obviously don't know nothing about sony's cases against the people who first hacked their ps3s and released them publicly. I suggest looking at those cases since they were quite messed up. (Read into graf chokolo and geohots for the main cases but there are many others too) @ Kane Fyea
Well they sure hired the guy that hacked theyre net work |
|
Ghural
The Southern Legion The Umbra Combine
161
|
Posted - 2013.10.20 00:12:00 -
[111] - Quote
CCP certainly like taking stuff off their players. |
DS 10
Ancient Exiles
1125
|
Posted - 2013.10.20 00:18:00 -
[112] - Quote
Spectre-M wrote:DS 10 wrote:Zion Shad just asked if his BPO assets are safe in his inventory after BPOs were taken off the market. The reply was that they "aren't safe".
BETTER USE THEM WHILE YOU CAN.
EDIT: Shad confirmed with devs that BPOs will in fact be leaving the game once CCP figures out how to PAY YOU BACK for them.
EDIT 2: Jump to dev post to see what Logibro said about no plans to remove BPOs from inventories. What's with these companies doing this crap. Microsoft pretty much tried to stab its player base in the back, then took it back when gamers got peeved. Gamer communities are like Conan, don't #@*! With them or they'll destroy you. Learn from Microsoft mistakes CCP, cause you seem to be doing similar things. How are we supposed to bring in new players when they won't have access to stuff everyone else has? I for one, no longer trust you as a company
I think it was a miscommunication that was cleared up quickly. Stop being a baby. |
Yelhsa Jin-Mao
Mannar Focused Warfare Gallente Federation
51
|
Posted - 2013.10.20 00:19:00 -
[113] - Quote
Ghural wrote:CCP certainly like taking stuff off their players.
Yes, and yet they give us so little. So little SP, so little guidance in academy, so little ISK, so little reason to play on after reaching the SP cap, so little reason to trust them, and so little reason to believe DUST514 will survive past 2015. |
Protocake JR
Ancient Exiles
787
|
Posted - 2013.10.20 00:25:00 -
[114] - Quote
DS 10 wrote:Spectre-M wrote:DS 10 wrote:Zion Shad just asked if his BPO assets are safe in his inventory after BPOs were taken off the market. The reply was that they "aren't safe".
BETTER USE THEM WHILE YOU CAN.
EDIT: Shad confirmed with devs that BPOs will in fact be leaving the game once CCP figures out how to PAY YOU BACK for them.
EDIT 2: Jump to dev post to see what Logibro said about no plans to remove BPOs from inventories. What's with these companies doing this crap. Microsoft pretty much tried to stab its player base in the back, then took it back when gamers got peeved. Gamer communities are like Conan, don't #@*! With them or they'll destroy you. Learn from Microsoft mistakes CCP, cause you seem to be doing similar things. How are we supposed to bring in new players when they won't have access to stuff everyone else has? I for one, no longer trust you as a company I think it was a miscommunication that was cleared up quickly. Stop being a baby.
They've been wanting to get rid of BPO's for a while. I think they are still just figuring out how to do it with the least amount of backlash. |
Sam Tektzby
Better Hide R Die
3
|
Posted - 2013.10.20 01:15:00 -
[115] - Quote
Its funny how everyone is:"hey its my money", when respec boyos was:"hey i put my SPs in that skill" most of boyos was like" "just overcome and STFU" XD |
Tallen Ellecon
KILL-EM-QUICK RISE of LEGION
771
|
Posted - 2013.10.20 01:18:00 -
[116] - Quote
We really need to read up on our EULA.
|
Arrach Sarkal
PIE Inc. Praetoria Imperialis Excubitoris
7
|
Posted - 2013.10.20 01:21:00 -
[117] - Quote
Spkr4theDead wrote:That would be a terrible decision. CCP making terrible decisions? Perish the thought.
|
XxGhazbaranxX
Bannana Boat Corp
422
|
Posted - 2013.10.20 01:22:00 -
[118] - Quote
They should leave things as they are. Remove all BPO's from market and keep making worth while offers for aurum equipment. Maybe even introduce a system where you can go to an aurum fit generator and make your favorite fit and be able to buy a complete cusoum aurum suit and be able to restock it with rl money instead of having to do the aurum conversion while getting discount prices for fitting your whole suit aurum |
Rynoceros
Rise Of Old Dudes
1027
|
Posted - 2013.10.20 01:26:00 -
[119] - Quote
So if they're just removing all BPOs from Sales - not your Assets, I guess I'll throw down the funds for a Veteran Pack for the LAV. (Almost time to restock 3 Day Boosters anyways...) |
Amarrian Desperado
Tal-Romon Legion Amarr Empire
45
|
Posted - 2013.10.20 01:31:00 -
[120] - Quote
I would think that one way of handling this if it really is all that terrible for the in game economy is adding "cosmetic slots" to fittings and changing BPOs to unlimited-use possibly exclusive cosmetic modifications. Take your rare SVER mod and put it on a proto dropsuit AND your proto combat rfile. Go nuts!
What about the people who bought thousands of militia bpos at 30 aur a pop hoping to game the system for profit? ****, I don't know. Might be less trouble to leave them as is. I mean, its a finite number of free replacement tokens for the worst items in the game. EVE isn't falling apart because everyone can get rookie ships with civilian guns for free.
They were cute deals at 30 aur a pop, and completely stupid at 9k aur. You're saving what, 5,000 isk per full militia fit? You would have to be going out of your way to play as intentionally terrible as possible to lose any significant amount of isk in a match dying in militia fits. Who cares if there are a couple thousand of these things floating around as novelty items being traded between collectors with too much isk, like the civilian module BPOs in EVE? |
|
Tallen Ellecon
KILL-EM-QUICK RISE of LEGION
771
|
Posted - 2013.10.20 01:55:00 -
[121] - Quote
CCP Logibro wrote:One thing to clarify guys: The removal refers to removing any new sources of BPOs. At this stage there are no plans to remove any BPOs from anyone's inventories.
We are also looking at whether we want to put in place restrictions to things such as trading and exchange of BPOs. This has not been decided internally, but do be aware this is under discussion.
I'll have more details soon, just thought I should cut that concern off at the pass.
I'm okay with the idea of not trading BPOs and I'm sure a lot of other people are too if it means not removing them. I mean as much as I'd like to pawn off some extra dragonfly and toxin gear I can live with it being limited to my character (or my account). Most of my purchases have been for and driven by BPOs, and they make my kind of playstyle great. As someone who has put 200+ dollars into BPOs taking them out would be pretty fu%^ed up. |
Shion Typhon
Intara Direct Action Caldari State
310
|
Posted - 2013.10.20 02:00:00 -
[122] - Quote
Iron Wolf Saber wrote:Spectral Clone wrote:If there is a BPO removal, all merc packs should be refunded to cash.
You cannot sell something and then change it, then you get problems with something called the law. You cannot refund to cash, that's illegal according to sony. Highest level you can refund back to is PSN wallet.
Way to misquote.
Sony don't refund Station Cash to real money because its bought into a common pool across multiple games and it would interfere with the revenue modelling of those other games if one in the pool gave refunds. Not because its illegal. |
Pent'noir
Algintal Core Gallente Federation
143
|
Posted - 2013.10.20 02:17:00 -
[123] - Quote
The thing that keeps a FTP going is consumer confidence in that if you buy something, you will always have it for the life cycle of the game. Even if I took a couple years off and come back, i'd expect my character to be there and the items I bought to be there. |
Spectre-M
The Generals EoN.
77
|
Posted - 2013.10.20 02:31:00 -
[124] - Quote
DS 10 wrote:Spectre-M wrote:DS 10 wrote:Zion Shad just asked if his BPO assets are safe in his inventory after BPOs were taken off the market. The reply was that they "aren't safe".
BETTER USE THEM WHILE YOU CAN.
EDIT: Shad confirmed with devs that BPOs will in fact be leaving the game once CCP figures out how to PAY YOU BACK for them.
EDIT 2: Jump to dev post to see what Logibro said about no plans to remove BPOs from inventories. What's with these companies doing this crap. Microsoft pretty much tried to stab its player base in the back, then took it back when gamers got peeved. Gamer communities are like Conan, don't #@*! With them or they'll destroy you. Learn from Microsoft mistakes CCP, cause you seem to be doing similar things. How are we supposed to bring in new players when they won't have access to stuff everyone else has? I for one, no longer trust you as a company I think it was a miscommunication that was cleared up quickly. Stop being a baby.
Funny how it was you who made the mistake making me think they were being removed. Sorry for trusting a thing you say. Calling me a baby for believing what you said is pretty low, DS 10. Next time maybe you won't spread false information, then flame people who thought you knew what you were talking about.
Bravo! |
Bright Cloud
Namtar Elite Gallente Federation
243
|
Posted - 2013.10.20 02:56:00 -
[125] - Quote
BPO's should be tradable simply cause there is now a "limited pool" of them. People who bought multiple merc packs are getting punished for supporting this game. I do know for a fact that certain people bought merc packs as a preparation for player driven markets. There are plenty off SVER, RAVEN and Valor suits out there. And whats with weapons like the Exile or the Skinweave dropsuits? Those are BPO's aswell and have beeing handed out as event rewards. Everything in dust should be tradable. After all CCP allready got payd by the person who bought a BPO initially. CCP wouldnt "loose" money cause the item doesnt gets duplicated its just changing the owner. |
Winsaucerer
The Southern Legion The Umbra Combine
222
|
Posted - 2013.10.20 02:59:00 -
[126] - Quote
Just FYI, I think that BPO's are in general bad for the game. And I say this as someone who makes extensive use of BPO's, and who owns a lot. So if CCP were to find a way to remove already existing ones from the game, that would be great.
CCP Logibro wrote:
We are also looking at whether we want to put in place restrictions to things such as trading and exchange of BPOs. This has not been decided internally, but do be aware this is under discussion.
Good discussion to have, and you will need to deal with the fact that some of us have duplicates, and that your system allowed for purchase of duplicates, with knowledge of the sort of game CCP makes (that is, one that allows trading).
What would benefit me the most: Forced full refund of BPO's at the peak AUR price. Of course, this would upset many people who paid money just to get the BPO's and now are being forced to have AUR instead to buy other things they may have no interest in. They spent real money to get BPO's, and may have no interest in anything else.
What would maybe benefit many in the community the most: No new BPO's, but allow existing ones to freely be traded with players, so that players can in the future still get BPO's (I imagine there's enough BPO's around that the ISK price wouldn't be crazy high).
What is maybe the best option: Have a very generous optional trade-in scheme for any BPO, and prohibit any trading between players.
What is a terrible option: Disallow trade between players, and do nothing else. |
Magnus Amadeuss
Tal-Romon Legion Amarr Empire
118
|
Posted - 2013.10.20 03:19:00 -
[127] - Quote
Now that I have had time to calm down, and also that CCP Logibro sorted things out somewhat.
It would not bother me in the slightest if CCP locked BPOs to the player, and this is coming from someone with 3 caldari assualt BPOs and three assualt rifle BPOs
The biggest thing they must make sure of is that these BPOs cannot be used by a corp, like throw them in a corp locker and now everyone can use the BPO for a fitting. |
RydogV
Shadow Company HQ
455
|
Posted - 2013.10.20 04:03:00 -
[128] - Quote
CCP Logibro wrote:We are also looking at whether we want to put in place restrictions to things such as trading and exchange of BPOs. This has not been decided internally, but do be aware this is under discussion.
Well I for one would be somewhat dismayed if we were not allowed to put BPO items on the open market in the future. Especially since CCP made a point of offering so many items that were statistically similar to one another albeit with slight cosmetic changes. The removal of these items from the standard marketplace has already imposed a certain level of rarity and I do not see how their sale from player to player is going to have any significant impact on the game.
I mean we are talking about Militia and Basic gear here. These are not very expensive items when you buy their perishable versions. The amount in the game is now (or soon will be) fixed so what does it matter if I am using it or I sell it to someone else to use. BPO's were helpful to a degree in the early stages of character progression, but I rarely use them any more.
Seems only fair that other newer players should get a chance to pick up these things from other players. Especially since CCP will not be offering them any longer. |
Dakon Gerrien
Dead Six Initiative Lokun Listamenn
0
|
Posted - 2013.10.20 04:07:00 -
[129] - Quote
Just so folks don't have to sift through bits, from the EvE Vegas recording:
Based on the video [1], as best I can hear:
Quote: Zion Shad: Hey guys, I play under a name called Zion Shad and first I want to say, thank you. Todays Dust is the Dust I wanted back in closed beta. We have our corporate roles, we've got our corporate tax, everything's good. I'm loving the game, Y'know despite all the hiccups and stuff. I'm worried about my BPOs. I keep looking and there's none on the market, and I keep looking at my assets and they're still there. Are they safe, am I good?
CCP: They're not safe.
Zion Shad: They're not safe!? What kind of, err, is there gonna be some kind of reimbursement? What do you guys have planned for it? If you're going to eliminate the ones from the players, they're owning.
CCP: I can't really say, err, what our plans for that is because I don't know. We haven't decided basically. But BPOs are not good for the economy. We firmly believe that. We've seen a dip in the usage of other items. They're very convenient for you, but for the overall economy and the burn of ISK in the economy and stuff like that BPOs had a very negative impact. So we are retiring, or at least pulling them off the market but you can still use them and stuff like that, and maybe we'll take that a step, or steps, further, but we are compensating you with [a] rebalance of the item tree, adding in the Loyalty Points store items and stuff like that.
[1] Twitch rough EvE Vegas recording -- Time index 04:55:53-04:57:17 |
Rorek IronBlood
ZionTCD
766
|
Posted - 2013.10.20 04:25:00 -
[130] - Quote
DS 10 wrote:Zion Shad just asked if his BPO assets are safe in his inventory after BPOs were taken off the market. The reply was that they "aren't safe".
BETTER USE THEM WHILE YOU CAN.
EDIT: Shad confirmed with devs that BPOs will in fact be leaving the game once CCP figures out how to PAY YOU BACK for them.
EDIT 2: Jump to dev post to see what Logibro said about no plans to remove BPOs from inventories.
So I suppose that the new EP from ElectronicArts has already started to flaunt his authority, and power? So he is going to make Dust514 into a pay-to-win model. Bloody hell. I bet I know whom the woman behind him is too. I bet it is, Mintchiplol. Both of them are bad eggs to begin with. Dust514 was already circling the toilet bowl before either of them joined CCP, but this only proves how close to the final circle we are before we slide down the drain. Pathetic.
CCP can re-imburse my PlayStation Network (SEN) store wallet. I refuse to take AURum as a form of reparations. |
|
Aqua-Regia
MoIden Heath PoIice Department EoN.
438
|
Posted - 2013.10.20 04:53:00 -
[131] - Quote
If I can't trading and/or exchange BPO ....Delete..... I'm just going to stop playing this game and move on.
The BPO is like that one massively foul poop in a toilet that was not flush down, so someone can show it off like a trophy.
CCP don't flush the crap down |
Soldiersaint
Deepspace Digital
475
|
Posted - 2013.10.20 05:26:00 -
[132] - Quote
The Sver suit is practically the only suit i use and your going to take it away? CCP if you think your just going to take away bpo stuff and not see a serious withdraw of players you must be out of your freaking mind. That suit is seriously the only reason i even hop back on to this game. I do use other suits but nothing compares to my Sver. Taking away bpo gear will deal a serious blow to the amount of people who will still be willing to play this game. Dont do it! |
Lt Royal
Subdreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
1989
|
Posted - 2013.10.20 05:39:00 -
[133] - Quote
I think it would be lovely if they reimbursed us with the Second Decade Collector's Edition box set, which would make me really happy considering I'll have the Templar: Dropsuits, weaponry and uplink BPOGÇÖs......... oh wait. |
Killar-12
The Corporate Raiders Top Men.
1507
|
Posted - 2013.10.20 05:41:00 -
[134] - Quote
CCP Logibro wrote:One thing to clarify guys: The removal refers to removing any new sources of BPOs. At this stage there are no plans to remove any BPOs from anyone's inventories.
We are also looking at whether we want to put in place restrictions to things such as trading and exchange of BPOs. This has not been decided internally, but do be aware this is under discussion.
I'll have more details soon, just thought I should cut that concern off at the pass. So... what about making BPOs actual BPOs like in EVE? |
Green Living
0uter.Heaven
920
|
Posted - 2013.10.20 05:44:00 -
[135] - Quote
Good, I don't use them anyway. Hope the reward quenches my insatiable greed! |
Thurak1
Psygod9 D.E.F.I.A.N.C.E
324
|
Posted - 2013.10.20 06:26:00 -
[136] - Quote
Sam Tektzby wrote:Its funny how everyone is:"hey its my money", when respec boyos was:"hey i put my SPs in that skill" most of boyos was like" "just overcome and STFU" XD Yea things change a lot when dealing with fictional skill points that never had any sort of real dollar value and when dealing with things that might have cost people real cash at some point. Granted i know closed beta players got a lot of blueprints for free but many people have bought blueprints with real money. |
Aqua-Regia
MoIden Heath PoIice Department EoN.
440
|
Posted - 2013.10.20 06:36:00 -
[137] - Quote
Killar-12 wrote:CCP Logibro wrote:One thing to clarify guys: The removal refers to removing any new sources of BPOs. At this stage there are no plans to remove any BPOs from anyone's inventories.
We are also looking at whether we want to put in place restrictions to things such as trading and exchange of BPOs. This has not been decided internally, but do be aware this is under discussion.
I'll have more details soon, just thought I should cut that concern off at the pass. So... what about making BPOs actual BPOs like in EVE?
It take time and we don't have anymore time, at less for me.
Things I found out over the years EvE&Dust.
CCP keep trying to work on multiple projects. CCP take so long to finish anything. CCP delay projects that take to long. CCP end up moving to another project so nothing get finish. CCP said and promise a lot of things. CCP collaborative is funny, random, weak, and most of the time bad for them and us. CCP like to hold out till/after Fanfest to release any big contents. CCP do a good job in once in awhile. SOONGäó, SOONGäó, and SOONGäó |
BARDAS
DUST University Ivy League
679
|
Posted - 2013.10.20 08:21:00 -
[138] - Quote
Soooooooooo... I was going to buy an Elite pack next paycheck. Guess not because the BPO's are a big part of why I would be buying it. Guess I will get a 3DS XL instead. |
jerrmy12 kahoalii
REAPERS REPUBLIC
72
|
Posted - 2013.10.20 08:23:00 -
[139] - Quote
CCP Logibro wrote:One thing to clarify guys: The removal refers to removing any new sources of BPOs. At this stage there are no plans to remove any BPOs from anyone's inventories.
We are also looking at whether we want to put in place restrictions to things such as trading and exchange of BPOs. This has not been decided internally, but do be aware this is under discussion.
I'll have more details soon, just thought I should cut that concern off at the pass. bpo's should be tradeable |
DeeJay One
Guardian Solutions DARKSTAR ARMY
96
|
Posted - 2013.10.20 09:20:00 -
[140] - Quote
Killar-12 wrote: So... what about making BPOs actual BPOs like in EVE?
+1 But that would need the economies to be merged and real production happening. IMHO CCP should state that:
- BPO-s will behave the same as in EVE-O as production blueprints
- BPC-s will be introduced based on the same mechanic
- Before the full production opens (which as far as I understood will be sometime in 2014) BPO-s will be instantly manufactured by NPC entities at reduced prices for owners (eg. by using the restock mechanic) and the resulting products will be sellable on the P2P market as well as the BPO-s themselves. After the production opens the BPO-s will have to be manufactured at normal prices by corporations
- BPO-s shouldn't be available for direct AURUM purchases. Maybe a reintroduction as loot or NPC ISK BPO-s would be possible
IMHO this would result in most of the BPO's being distributed between DUST players in the short term and in the long term EVE will scoop the rest of them and normal production rules will apply if they will be available as loot (eg. for the higher tier items) or NPC production BPO's (say for militia items). It will mean that even if you own a SVER BPO you'll have to pay for that suit, but it will still result in a custom suit for you, for which you could sell the BPO if you don't need it anymore. Of course this will result in that suit being available on the market from other players, but as no one really sells items without a solid margin, you will still be able to manufacture and use them on the cheap.
STANDARD DISCLAIMER: This may have holes in it as I'm not an economist and just serves as my 2 PLN cents here. |
|
OZAROW
WarRavens League of Infamy
911
|
Posted - 2013.10.20 13:33:00 -
[141] - Quote
Kane Fyea wrote:Chunky Munkey wrote:Could they even legally do this? There is arguably no item of equivalent value to a BPO. You accepted the EULA right? Well then yes. They can do it whether you like it or not. Although they do have to substitute it with item(s) of equal or greater value. Also equivalent value has to be how much the BPOs cost (Not as a whole as a single BPO) so they could just give you AUR as you're refund. Yes but in the game these items are priceless an infinite, which means they have never ending life like that of a personal factory. You can buy the egg but I'd rather have the immortal chicken. |
Godin Thekiller
Hellstorm Inc League of Infamy
1236
|
Posted - 2013.10.20 13:36:00 -
[142] - Quote
CCP Logibro wrote:One thing to clarify guys: The removal refers to removing any new sources of BPOs. At this stage there are no plans to remove any BPOs from anyone's inventories.
We are also looking at whether we want to put in place restrictions to things such as trading and exchange of BPOs. This has not been decided internally, but do be aware this is under discussion.
I'll have more details soon, just thought I should cut that concern off at the pass.
Many people has bought up several copies of BPO's just to trade them. I have been setting up deals already so I can do just that. Don't take that away from me |
Crash Monster
Snipers Anonymous
1707
|
Posted - 2013.10.20 13:43:00 -
[143] - Quote
Did I miss a link somewhere or is this all really based on one persons out of context assumptions that we can't verify...
Oh wait, post 142 above mine translates the hyperbole into something that is probably closer to reality? |
Pent'noir
Algintal Core Gallente Federation
145
|
Posted - 2013.10.20 13:52:00 -
[144] - Quote
Crash Monster wrote:Did I miss a link somewhere or is this all really based on one persons out of context assumptions that we can't verify...
Oh wait, post 142 above mine translates the hyperbole into something that is probably closer to reality?
it was a question that was asked in the dust presentation at vegas, on page seven, someone was nice enough to give a recording of that question.
|
Den-tredje Baron
The Unholy Legion Of DarkStar DARKSTAR ARMY
233
|
Posted - 2013.10.20 14:16:00 -
[145] - Quote
Chunky Munkey wrote:Could they even legally do this? There is arguably no item of equivalent value to a BPO. Yes there is ....... the aurum you payed for it |
Kazeno Rannaa
BIG BAD W0LVES
257
|
Posted - 2013.10.20 14:28:00 -
[146] - Quote
Iron Wolf Saber wrote:Aurum refund may involve lawyers (on ccps end) so who knows. Not saying its impossible but there are a lot of options available.
Granted lawyers may get involved, only because of the fact they would be worried about a law suit due to the actual viability of being sued.
As for taking away our hard earned BPO's, even the suggestion of it just goes to show all the more reason for this player base to begin to leave.
The fact that the community has to find out through event's that are not posted or communicated to the community (i.e., only through rumor mill, which sucks, or through-third hand off comments)
The only way to make any money in this game is through the use of BPO, of which the majority that I have were given to me as rewards for sticking with this BETA for as long as I have. So what this means that all of us closed beta testers would get a slap in the face.
|
Kazeno Rannaa
BIG BAD W0LVES
257
|
Posted - 2013.10.20 14:29:00 -
[147] - Quote
Den-tredje Baron wrote:Chunky Munkey wrote:Could they even legally do this? There is arguably no item of equivalent value to a BPO. Yes there is ....... the aurum you payed for it
Actually with the closed beta testers being given BPO's as a reward for sticking with this broken ass game, there is no equivalent for the recovery of our time.
|
Dust Junky 4Life
Intara Direct Action Caldari State
72
|
Posted - 2013.10.20 14:36:00 -
[148] - Quote
CCP Logibro wrote:One thing to clarify guys: The removal refers to removing any new sources of BPOs. At this stage there are no plans to remove any BPOs from anyone's inventories.
We are also looking at whether we want to put in place restrictions to things such as trading and exchange of BPOs. This has not been decided internally, but do be aware this is under discussion.
I'll have more details soon, just thought I should cut that concern off at the pass.
Lock them from being traded/sold, problem solved. Then dust can finally move forward(trading). They chose to take advantage, let them sit on em for eternity. |
JL3Eleven
PFB Pink Fluffy Bunnies
1074
|
Posted - 2013.10.20 14:39:00 -
[149] - Quote
Dust Junky 4Life wrote:CCP Logibro wrote:One thing to clarify guys: The removal refers to removing any new sources of BPOs. At this stage there are no plans to remove any BPOs from anyone's inventories.
We are also looking at whether we want to put in place restrictions to things such as trading and exchange of BPOs. This has not been decided internally, but do be aware this is under discussion.
I'll have more details soon, just thought I should cut that concern off at the pass. Lock them from being traded/sold, problem solved. Then dust can finally move forward(trading). They chose to take advantage, let them sit on em for eternity.
What problems did you solve exactly? |
Crash Monster
Snipers Anonymous
1708
|
Posted - 2013.10.20 14:42:00 -
[150] - Quote
Kazeno Rannaa wrote:Actually with the closed beta testers being given BPO's as a reward for sticking with this broken ass game, there is no equivalent for the recovery of our time.
Beta testers got to play the game, influence it's evolution (not necessarily good or bad) and so far keep a lot of SP. I think they have been well remunerated for their time.
However, in general, nobody owes beta testers anything... they are beta testers... they donate time by choice. That era has been and gone. |
|
JL3Eleven
PFB Pink Fluffy Bunnies
1074
|
Posted - 2013.10.20 14:44:00 -
[151] - Quote
Crash Monster wrote:Kazeno Rannaa wrote:Actually with the closed beta testers being given BPO's as a reward for sticking with this broken ass game, there is no equivalent for the recovery of our time.
Beta testers got to play the game, influence it's evolution (not necessarily good or bad) and so far keep a lot of SP. I think they have been well remunerated for their time. However, in general, nobody owes beta testers anything... they are beta testers... they donate time by choice. That era has been and gone.
Some people had to pay to enter during beta fyi. |
CHICAGOCUBS4EVER
MoIden Heath PoIice Department EoN.
2066
|
Posted - 2013.10.20 15:38:00 -
[152] - Quote
BPOs should be locked to a character. Multiples of BPOs should have an option to be sold directly back to the 'market' for some pre-established value.
this will weed out a lot of the BPOs present in the game which is what CCP wants, as well as allow everyone to get back some or all of their investment.
many of us have multiple merc pack BPOs that have no use to us.
selling them in the player market would be another option, but since they are no longer available that would be quite a wild-card.
not opposed either way but the ability to get rid of something you have multiples of will need to be in place |
General John Ripper
MoIden Heath PoIice Department EoN.
3772
|
Posted - 2013.10.20 15:51:00 -
[153] - Quote
I want to sell my dren suits,. |
Necandi Brasil
DUST BRASIL S.A
388
|
Posted - 2013.10.20 15:53:00 -
[154] - Quote
Restrictions to BPO trades or removal of any of my items will make me stop playing and make a ticket asking for my money back. That is all,
|
Baltazar Pontain
Phantom Universe Task Force Orion Empire
17
|
Posted - 2013.10.20 19:00:00 -
[155] - Quote
I bought the eve online collectors edition because of the BPOs.
If CCP removes them....
I will never ever give you money again. You are branded as someone who tricks his customer in my eyes. And no one wants to trade with someone like that.
And it let me think of VALKYRIE and EVE Online....
Will you act there the same? Are you so greedy?
And what I hate the most. It is your game, your market. Did you that on purpose?
I mean you invent BPOs and after a half year (more or less) and even not in beta you' ll see that it is not good for the market...
COME ON!! |
Guilbert 515
United Pwnage Service RISE of LEGION
18
|
Posted - 2013.10.20 20:01:00 -
[156] - Quote
Gotta admit even thinking about removal of BPOs is in fact the worse thought ever came into mankinds brains :P
These BPOs purchased have an emptional as well as collectors value. And that value would diminish completely if its ristricted to the grade of a BPC, which has less to none value. It also shows that someone used to play this game since beta and supported it from the very beginning. Id rather have it like in eve, where an individual can build unlimited suits with the BPOs for a small sum of resources.
And why would you compare your decision with that of a ******** company like apple for christ sake? Just because a company is big and made bugs doesnt mean their decisions make any sence at all. CCP used to be a company that paves the way, not walk the road ******** companies build. Did you recruit personal from apple or EA ? Better get rid of those kind, seriously!
I hereby forward a vote of no confidence in whoever had that idea
|
Lynn Beck
Granite Mercenary Division
151
|
Posted - 2013.10.20 20:15:00 -
[157] - Quote
Personally i see why they need to remove bpo, as they are a loophole in the life cycle of isk. However, completely removing them would be a waste. Allow us to use the bpo as per usual. But it costs us normal iskto make the item. We have skinweave bpo, we make fitting with bpo. Fitting says invalid, because you didn't stock the bpo. Thus in theory, you could stock 400 copies of that sver bpo, and sell them on the market for better than what it cost to produce them, seeing as they are special edition. People keep bpo's, ccp doesn't remove them, thus alleviating people's rage. Tl:dr stfu they'll keep you quiet in due time. |
Zalifer Nakamoda
Osmon Surveillance Caldari State
82
|
Posted - 2013.10.20 20:35:00 -
[158] - Quote
I just want to say that removing BPO's is not at all cool.
They were sold to us, and were, for many people, one of the major reasons for purchasing a pack. The money I spend, was for BPO's. To take them away, is not cool.
Lock them to the accounts they are on, and don't sell any more, but don't take away the very thing I paid you money for. |
Kazeno Rannaa
BIG BAD W0LVES
259
|
Posted - 2013.10.21 07:27:00 -
[159] - Quote
Dust Junky 4Life wrote:CCP Logibro wrote:One thing to clarify guys: The removal refers to removing any new sources of BPOs. At this stage there are no plans to remove any BPOs from anyone's inventories.
We are also looking at whether we want to put in place restrictions to things such as trading and exchange of BPOs. This has not been decided internally, but do be aware this is under discussion.
I'll have more details soon, just thought I should cut that concern off at the pass. Lock them from being traded/sold, problem solved. Then dust can finally move forward(trading). They chose to take advantage, let them sit on em for eternity. Brilliant idea. I like that. Or take it and make it linked to EVE, the way it should be in that it is a production plan. Acquire resources and a manufacturing hub and have them made. Either way, take my BPO's, I leave for sure. |
Chibi Andy
Forsaken Immortals Top Men.
591
|
Posted - 2013.10.21 07:54:00 -
[160] - Quote
does that mean i will lose my skinweaves as well? i fought long and hard for those during the events back in closed beta |
|
Pent'noir
Algintal Core Gallente Federation
149
|
Posted - 2013.10.21 08:17:00 -
[161] - Quote
If they went in a route like eve, then i'd be okay with a bpo that is maxed researched because if I remember right, those take months to research if done in highsec. Although, i'd imagine this would not make the majority of bpo holders content. They bought something with the expectation of keeping it as they currently function.
I can think of a couple more possible solutions, but in every solution, there will be a population of bpo holders that get screwed. Even if they don't do anything and let them be traded, new comers get screwed because they were never given the chance to buy them and now must pay a couple 100 million isk for a militia/standard item. Although, in time, the bpo's will be left on inactive characters and they will have less and less impact on the economy. In my opinion, this is probably the best way to go as long as they retain their current function and can never be used to mass manufacture them for the market.
Although, I think they underestimate the bpo holders because if they are still using them with high sp, then i'd imagine they would be willing to use the free starter fits. They aren't that horrible. |
Kaze Eyrou
Turalyon 514 Turalyon Alliance
376
|
Posted - 2013.10.21 08:28:00 -
[162] - Quote
Pent'noir wrote:If they went in a route like eve, then i'd be okay with a bpo that is maxed researched because if I remember right, those take months to research if done in highsec. Although, i'd imagine this would not make the majority of bpo holders content. They bought something with the expectation of keeping it as they currently function.
I can think of a couple more possible solutions, but in every solution, there will be a population of bpo holders that get screwed. Even if they don't do anything and let them be traded, new comers get screwed because they were never given the chance to buy them and now must pay a couple 100 million isk for a militia/standard item. Although, in time, the bpo's will be left on inactive characters and they will have less and less impact on the economy. In my opinion, this is probably the best way to go as long as they retain their current function and can never be used to mass manufacture them for the market.
Although, I think they underestimate the bpo holders because if they are still using them with high sp, then i'd imagine they would be willing to use the free starter fits. They aren't that horrible. Part of me fears the whole debacle that CCP has to/still deal(s) with concerning tech II BPOs in EVE. However, these BPOs are certainly MUCH different since these just standard versus EVE considerable difference with their BPOs. |
Timothy Reaper
WASTELAND JUNK REMOVAL
478
|
Posted - 2013.10.21 09:48:00 -
[163] - Quote
I looked at how BPOs/BPCs work in Eve and, while I wouldn't mind things working like that in Dust, the change would have to be done gradually. This is for two reasons: (1) It requires many things which are not available to Dust Bunnies at this time and (2) many dust BPO owners would balk at all the work it requires. My suggestion would be to make BPOs something you use to make the suit, weapon, etc. for a small fee to cover material cost. Then you can either use the BPCs yourself or sell them on the market for a profit. I can think of many people who would buy vanity items or weapons and suits that have no skill prerequisites. |
Atom Heart Mother
Nazionali Senza Filtro
66
|
Posted - 2013.10.21 11:09:00 -
[164] - Quote
CCP Logibro wrote:One thing to clarify guys: The removal refers to removing any new sources of BPOs. At this stage there are no plans to remove any BPOs from anyone's inventories.
We are also looking at whether we want to put in place restrictions to things such as trading and exchange of BPOs. This has not been decided internally, but do be aware this is under discussion.
I'll have more details soon, just thought I should cut that concern off at the pass.
Do you mean you're going to open free market for players trade soon?
|
Jakobi Wan
Legions of Infinite Dominion
43
|
Posted - 2013.10.21 12:21:00 -
[165] - Quote
already saved the EULA... the day CCP takes away my blueprints i vow to forever make their lives hell.. they have not suggested that they will nor that they even can in the current terms and conditions. the EULA expresses they're feelings towards maintaining our accounts and the game as a whole.. what they'd be doing would contradict their own terms as lade out in the EULA so if they feel like going back on their own word they could but honestly i think bpos are their biggest seller so for those of you who dont like/use them maybe you should start showing some support for CCP AUR items are useless to me, i'm not soo impatient that i need to have proto suits @ advansed level or whatever weapon/equipment it is but i am so impatient (which is how most of my friends feel too)i refuse to play a game for half a day and still only barely have enough isk to stock up for PC battles... that would be obsurd to change unless CCP bumps pay-grades for public and factional contracts by 3fold at least |
Jakobi Wan
Legions of Infinite Dominion
43
|
Posted - 2013.10.21 12:25:00 -
[166] - Quote
Pent'noir wrote:If they went in a route like eve, then i'd be okay with a bpo that is maxed researched because if I remember right, those take months to research if done in highsec. Although, i'd imagine this would not make the majority of bpo holders content. They bought something with the expectation of keeping it as they currently function.
....
Although, I think they underestimate the bpo holders because if they are still using them with high sp, then i'd imagine they would be willing to use the free starter fits. They aren't that horrible.
i didnt pay hundreds of dollars to use starter fits... that would be a great injustice
CCP has a ethical obligation as an international business to uphold their own word and maintain their reputation... |
Pent'noir
Algintal Core Gallente Federation
150
|
Posted - 2013.10.21 12:50:00 -
[167] - Quote
Jakobi Wan wrote:Pent'noir wrote:If they went in a route like eve, then i'd be okay with a bpo that is maxed researched because if I remember right, those take months to research if done in highsec. Although, i'd imagine this would not make the majority of bpo holders content. They bought something with the expectation of keeping it as they currently function.
....
Although, I think they underestimate the bpo holders because if they are still using them with high sp, then i'd imagine they would be willing to use the free starter fits. They aren't that horrible. i didnt pay hundreds of dollars to use starter fits... that would be a great injustice CCP has a ethical obligation as an international business to uphold their own word and maintain their reputation...
I meant as in the effect of the economy if bpo's never existed or they took them away (neglecting backlash). I'm not advocating for them to be gone. I also have bought all the bpo packs. |
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 :: [one page] |