Because of aimbot, one day has passed and the vets already hate dust. We dont want to play this game when everyone is just as good as us because of an aim assist, that is not earned. Our millions of SP ahead of other players is now nonfactored because it only takes an AR to kill you now that they have near perfect accuracy, the delema only amplified with reduced strafe speed. The only way to play now is to stack EHP and outlast the enemy as you both kill each other almost instantly. Then after you win that gunfight, you loose your second because your almost dead.

some ppl say this game is now better because "it is forcing ppl to use tactics and cover"
You dont need aimbot to use tactics and cover, i dont understand how those in favor of aimbot can say this is a valid argument. This is an FPS, it should be assumed we are already using tactics and cover, expescially the better players of the game. No, we would not call ourselfs skilled if we did not use our brains and surroundings. The only difference with aimbot is its easier to shoot above or around the cover your hiding behind.

Dust has always been a game that rewards the skilled and intelligent players and those who have the most SP. Why should we set everyone on the same playing feild, setting everyone on par with everyone? Now, you do not need skill to play the game and it is okay if you are not as skilled as a player as the guy your shooting, the aim ''assist" will kill him as quickly as he kills you.

Yes, im saying someone with 4 mill SP and 2 months of playing time should continue to get blown away by someone with 22 mill SP and 10 months of gungame experience. The person with more experience has better aim, uses cover more efficiently, and has better gear than the noob but they come out almost even on gunfights. Is that balanced? It was before, when you, youknow. needed skill to win???

skill = dead

aimbot = win

Quick question for ya. How do you know your opponent is noob? With this new MM, shouldn't your opponents be similar skill, supposedly? Is it because they are using inferior gear? Maybe they have Prof 5 and just using cheaper gear?

Maybe it's just the improved hit detection that is outclassing you? I notice that I melt very quickly now. I'm sure the aim-assist plays a role, but since I'm not doing the shooting at myself, I can't be sure of my opponents aiming skill.

Personally, I think it is a perfect storm. CCP slowed the strafe speed, improved hit detection, and "fixed" the aim-assist. All these things combined make auto weapons extremely efficient. They probably could of done with fixing the hit detection and strafe speed, and left the aim-assist for another patch.

*Cough*Why not make scan profile dictate the power of aim assist?

so heavies will be hard to miss, but AA will perform poorly on scouts.*Cough*

Because of aimbot, one day has passed and the vets already hate dust. We dont want to play this game when everyone is just as good as us because of an aim assist, that is not earned. Our millions of SP ahead of other players is now nonfactored because it only takes an AR to kill you now that they have near perfect accuracy, the delema only amplified with reduced strafe speed. The only way to play now is to stack EHP and outlast the enemy as you both kill each other almost instantly. Then after you win that gunfight, you loose your second because your almost dead.

some ppl say this game is now better because "it is forcing ppl to use tactics and cover"
You dont need aimbot to use tactics and cover, i dont understand how those in favor of aimbot can say this is a valid argument. This is an FPS, it should be assumed we are already using tactics and cover, expescially the better players of the game. No, we would not call ourselfs skilled if we did not use our brains and surroundings. The only difference with aimbot is its easier to shoot above or around the cover your hiding behind.

Dust has always been a game that rewards the skilled and intelligent players and those who have the most SP. Why should we set everyone on the same playing feild, setting everyone on par with everyone? Now, you do not need skill to play the game and it is okay if you are not as skilled as a player as the guy your shooting, the aim ''assist" will kill him as quickly as he kills you.

Yes, im saying someone with 4 mill SP and 2 months of playing time should continue to get blown away by someone with 22 mill SP and 10 months of gungame experience. The person with more experience has better aim, uses cover more efficiently, and has better gear than the noob but they come out almost even on gunfights. Is that balanced? It was before, when you, youknow. needed skill to win???

I'm coming for you just for that

Also, Warlord (or anyone interested) sign up for the T-Dome

If you have skill wont aimbot just make things that much easier :-/ ?

AA would remain the same on a heavy but scouts wouldn't have AR's that lock on like closed beta swarm launchers.

The channel?

Sooo... just how many of these threads are you going to make?

Hating on heavies

This. How does one who claim to be skillful cannot beat the ones who uses aim assist?

That just mean that your reckless, "I am god with the aiming" playstyle must be adjusted.

What will you do?

Will you cry and moan?

Or will you adapt and overcome?

I am a vet of almost 2 years with 12 million sp, don't speak for me

the higher the RoF the more the sticky glue aiming helps, so the sticky should be lowered from 50% to 30% on lasers and HMG/ARs, while staying the same for pistols and other small weapons.

It's not game breaking...

yes, but you cant escape or deffend yourself from insaine accuracy. Everyone has it, now you do not need skill to be successful

acting like 5 year olds? your the one freaking out, im giving constructive feedback of the competitive players of dust

He never said he couldnt beat the person with aim assist - he said he couldnt fight the next guy immediately after because the scrub before him lander 100% of his bullets and left him at 50 armor