Pages: 1 [2] 3 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
soulreaper73
PFB Pink Fluffy Bunnies
210
|
Posted - 2013.08.06 14:48:00 -
[31] - Quote
Iron Wolf Saber wrote:Soozu wrote:Iron Wolf Saber wrote:Soozu wrote:Game numbers are dropping... respecs would have kept more people playing. The people who got them had to learn about them through the forums and specifically request one via email, a thing most console players never knew about. The SP system is too long a grind for a console game... it is a good idea to sell them for ISK or something.... reprogram clone.... they'll never do it. They're not smart enough to stop catering to the Eve base. Excessively poor argument here you have no scientific proof that lack of Respecs are causing players to leave. That would be similar to me stating the lack of racial symmetry is the leading cause of hemorrhaging of players or there is no PVE mode. You want to know where most people quit? First 2-5 minutes and that is a known fact across the entire industry. Excessively amazing display of denial. Scientific proof? Get a grip man. 2-5 minutes... impressive sidestepping of the issue.. as those aren't the players we're discussing here at all. Do we dare add another hemorrhage scenario?? People like you appointed as CPM to speak for the rest of us and then speaking for yourself and a small select group instead? I don't see a CPM tag by your name either. Who died and make you community boss? I can find about hundreds players opposed to respecs in any form. What right do you have to tell them to STFU all up? I have to listen to both sides and I struck somewhere between the middle.
Completely unprofessional behavior from one of our CPM folks.
|
Iron Wolf Saber
Den of Swords
7003
|
Posted - 2013.08.06 20:17:00 -
[32] - Quote
XeroTheBigBoss wrote:
Do you even Dust?
I haven't seen you in game either. |
First Prophet
Valor Company Incorporated
786
|
Posted - 2013.08.06 20:44:00 -
[33] - Quote
Iron Wolf Saber wrote:XeroTheBigBoss wrote:
Do you even Dust?
I haven't seen you in game either. WHO ARE YOU PEOPLE |
Iron Wolf Saber
Den of Swords
7009
|
Posted - 2013.08.06 20:46:00 -
[34] - Quote
First Prophet wrote:Iron Wolf Saber wrote:XeroTheBigBoss wrote:
Do you even Dust?
I haven't seen you in game either. WHO ARE YOU PEOPLE
I know right? I mean I don't see many forum regulars in the game they're like a handful of folk. |
Billi Gene
The Southern Legion
213
|
Posted - 2013.08.06 21:27:00 -
[35] - Quote
soulreaper73 wrote:Iron Wolf Saber wrote:Soozu wrote:Iron Wolf Saber wrote:Soozu wrote:Game numbers are dropping... respecs would have kept more people playing. The people who got them had to learn about them through the forums and specifically request one via email, a thing most console players never knew about. The SP system is too long a grind for a console game... it is a good idea to sell them for ISK or something.... reprogram clone.... they'll never do it. They're not smart enough to stop catering to the Eve base. Excessively poor argument here you have no scientific proof that lack of Respecs are causing players to leave. That would be similar to me stating the lack of racial symmetry is the leading cause of hemorrhaging of players or there is no PVE mode. You want to know where most people quit? First 2-5 minutes and that is a known fact across the entire industry. Excessively amazing display of denial. Scientific proof? Get a grip man. 2-5 minutes... impressive sidestepping of the issue.. as those aren't the players we're discussing here at all. Do we dare add another hemorrhage scenario?? People like you appointed as CPM to speak for the rest of us and then speaking for yourself and a small select group instead? I don't see a CPM tag by your name either. Who died and make you community boss? I can find about hundreds players opposed to respecs in any form. What right do you have to tell them to STFU all up? I have to listen to both sides and I struck somewhere between the middle. Completely unprofessional behavior from one of our CPM folks.
wait a minute!?!!?.. CPM GET PAID??!?!
:P |
Iron Wolf Saber
Den of Swords
7017
|
Posted - 2013.08.06 21:30:00 -
[36] - Quote
Billi Gene wrote:soulreaper73 wrote:
Completely unprofessional behavior from one of our CPM folks.
wait a minute!?!!?.. CPM GET PAID??!?! :P
No no no that would disenfranchise the CPM even more making them partial to CCP and tell CCP nothing is wrong and that is the furthest thing in the world CPM does not need to do. |
dustwaffle
Gravity Prone EoN.
294
|
Posted - 2013.08.07 06:34:00 -
[37] - Quote
SYKO DIX wrote:dustwaffle wrote:SYKO DIX wrote:Ifmu ask why would anyone want to respecialize theirmsp. Well I only had one respec I jan. And I had no idea what the corp stuff was for. And I chose that skill and pump it up with about 3mil or 4mil sp. Transteller megacorp. Its useless to me period it just sounded nice at the time. Thats why. And if u ever played mag that games takes a primordial dookie on this game. Yet no one realy cared for fotm and players respected the commanders and so forth . IwIsh zipper could show these ego mongers something about console massfps , dammit there I go again. Btw the reasons of my respec statememnt is ninbiased I kinda like the idea of sticking with the first decision. But I dont like it cuz everyones leaving this broken sham of fps.still fun but its broke and its system is a sham You also had a respec in May, no? If you had no idea about the skills, you could read up on the bonuses of the skills? No I was out of country funeral . Very hard times I'm sorry for your loss if it was someone close.
But, the respec in May required NO effort on your part. After you got back, you would have had all your skillpoints refunded regardless. Also, regarding the descriptions/skill tree changed:
Quote:If you had no idea about the skills, you could read up on the bonuses of the skills? |
SYKO DIX
KILL ORDERS
5
|
Posted - 2013.08.07 06:39:00 -
[38] - Quote
dustwaffle wrote:SYKO DIX wrote:dustwaffle wrote:SYKO DIX wrote:Ifmu ask why would anyone want to respecialize theirmsp. Well I only had one respec I jan. And I had no idea what the corp stuff was for. And I chose that skill and pump it up with about 3mil or 4mil sp. Transteller megacorp. Its useless to me period it just sounded nice at the time. Thats why. And if u ever played mag that games takes a primordial dookie on this game. Yet no one realy cared for fotm and players respected the commanders and so forth . IwIsh zipper could show these ego mongers something about console massfps , dammit there I go again. Btw the reasons of my respec statememnt is ninbiased I kinda like the idea of sticking with the first decision. But I dont like it cuz everyones leaving this broken sham of fps.still fun but its broke and its system is a sham You also had a respec in May, no? If you had no idea about the skills, you could read up on the bonuses of the skills? No I was out of country funeral . Very hard times I'm sorry for your loss if it was someone close. But, the respec in May required NO effort on your part. After you got back, you would have had all your skillpoints refunded regardless. Also, regarding the descriptions/skill tree changed: Quote:If you had no idea about the skills, you could read up on the bonuses of the skills? This is what ive beentold but it never ga e me a reset I know it did t because if it did I would have 4mil sp in corp skill. |
Rogatien Merc
Red Star. EoN.
625
|
Posted - 2013.08.07 07:02:00 -
[39] - Quote
Know that cal logi thing?
... that happened because people with 15mil+ SP got a free respec due to the massive changes. People analyzed the patch notes and figured out what would be the best in their view, and this turned into lack of diversity (so i hear), cries of "OP!" and subsequent nerfing.
... future respecs will result in massive FOTM phases with the exact same thing occurring dude. The most interesting part of this game is going up against people with lots of different class types. FOTM is baaaad.
Hurts in the short term, but it will be good in the long-term.
At most a respec every 6-12 months based on character creation anniversary would at least spread out the respecs in the community and mitigate some of the FOTM'ness' because everyone wouldn't be respeccing at thesame time.
IMO |
KingBabar
Ancient Exiles Negative-Feedback
1042
|
Posted - 2013.08.07 09:18:00 -
[40] - Quote
Rogatien Merc wrote:Know that cal logi thing?
... that happened because people with 15mil+ SP got a free respec due to the massive changes. People analyzed the patch notes and figured out what would be the best in their view, and this turned into lack of diversity (so i hear), cries of "OP!" and subsequent nerfing.
... future respecs will result in massive FOTM phases with the exact same thing occurring dude. The most interesting part of this game is going up against people with lots of different class types. FOTM is baaaad.
Hurts in the short term, but it will be good in the long-term.
At most a respec every 6-12 months based on character creation anniversary would at least spread out the respecs in the community and mitigate some of the FOTM'ness' because everyone wouldn't be respeccing at thesame time.
IMO
Or the developer could do their jobs better and avoid FOTM stuff in the first place.... |
|
Iron Wolf Saber
Den of Swords
7030
|
Posted - 2013.08.07 09:24:00 -
[41] - Quote
KingBabar wrote:Rogatien Merc wrote:Know that cal logi thing?
... that happened because people with 15mil+ SP got a free respec due to the massive changes. People analyzed the patch notes and figured out what would be the best in their view, and this turned into lack of diversity (so i hear), cries of "OP!" and subsequent nerfing.
... future respecs will result in massive FOTM phases with the exact same thing occurring dude. The most interesting part of this game is going up against people with lots of different class types. FOTM is baaaad.
Hurts in the short term, but it will be good in the long-term.
At most a respec every 6-12 months based on character creation anniversary would at least spread out the respecs in the community and mitigate some of the FOTM'ness' because everyone wouldn't be respeccing at thesame time.
IMO Or the developer could do their jobs better and avoid FOTM stuff in the first place....
Can't do that. Players are much smarter than the Developers, Eve Online is constant living proof of that.
Current FOTM In Eve Sentry Drones, Everyone Deploys, Assist Commander's Ship, Commander goes down his target list, 4,000 Drones saw that ship in half. This is after many years of the sentry drone being regarded as one of not so useful drones and they barely been touched in just as long. Assist has also been in for the last year too or so and didn't got FOTM until recent.
The other thing though is that recent FOTMs haven't been nerfed by CCP late but by the players themselves, Fleet Doctrines that dictated how majority of a fleet should be comprised of getting beaten the ever living crap out of by a superior fleet doctrine nearly designed to counter that or just outperform it. . |
THE TRAINSPOTTER
ROMANIA Renegades C0VEN
67
|
Posted - 2013.08.07 09:37:00 -
[42] - Quote
yeah like CCP is gona shoot themself in the foot with the remaining ppl playing Dust
u made a mistake , asume it , be responsibile
u dont like it?
start a new character |
10mg PLUMBUM
M.O.R.T.I.F.E.R.U.M.
392
|
Posted - 2013.08.07 10:21:00 -
[43] - Quote
Iron Wolf Saber wrote:KingBabar wrote:Rogatien Merc wrote:Know that cal logi thing?
... that happened because people with 15mil+ SP got a free respec due to the massive changes. People analyzed the patch notes and figured out what would be the best in their view, and this turned into lack of diversity (so i hear), cries of "OP!" and subsequent nerfing.
... future respecs will result in massive FOTM phases with the exact same thing occurring dude. The most interesting part of this game is going up against people with lots of different class types. FOTM is baaaad.
Hurts in the short term, but it will be good in the long-term.
At most a respec every 6-12 months based on character creation anniversary would at least spread out the respecs in the community and mitigate some of the FOTM'ness' because everyone wouldn't be respeccing at thesame time.
IMO Or the developer could do their jobs better and avoid FOTM stuff in the first place.... Can't do that. Players are much smarter than the Developers, Eve Online is constant living proof of that. Current FOTM In Eve Sentry Drones, Everyone Deploys, Assist Commander's Ship, Commander goes down his target list, 4,000 Drones saw that ship in half. This is after many years of the sentry drone being regarded as one of not so useful drones and they barely been touched in just as long. Assist has also been in for the last year too or so and didn't got FOTM until recent. The other thing though is that recent FOTMs haven't been nerfed by CCP late but by the players themselves, Fleet Doctrines that dictated how majority of a fleet should be comprised of getting beaten the ever living crap out of by a superior fleet doctrine nearly designed to counter that or just outperform it. .
Dust 514 not Eve-online.
Eve is fully other game, there you paid for half a year and go sleep or drinking bear, In dust you spend you time, Eve is more than 10 years, DUST ?
You and others cant compare these 2 games.
|
Jaqen Morghalis
Abandoned Privilege General Tso's Alliance
286
|
Posted - 2013.08.07 10:27:00 -
[44] - Quote
10mg PLUMBUM wrote:Iron Wolf Saber wrote:KingBabar wrote:Rogatien Merc wrote:Know that cal logi thing?
... that happened because people with 15mil+ SP got a free respec due to the massive changes. People analyzed the patch notes and figured out what would be the best in their view, and this turned into lack of diversity (so i hear), cries of "OP!" and subsequent nerfing.
... future respecs will result in massive FOTM phases with the exact same thing occurring dude. The most interesting part of this game is going up against people with lots of different class types. FOTM is baaaad.
Hurts in the short term, but it will be good in the long-term.
At most a respec every 6-12 months based on character creation anniversary would at least spread out the respecs in the community and mitigate some of the FOTM'ness' because everyone wouldn't be respeccing at thesame time.
IMO Or the developer could do their jobs better and avoid FOTM stuff in the first place.... Can't do that. Players are much smarter than the Developers, Eve Online is constant living proof of that. Current FOTM In Eve Sentry Drones, Everyone Deploys, Assist Commander's Ship, Commander goes down his target list, 4,000 Drones saw that ship in half. This is after many years of the sentry drone being regarded as one of not so useful drones and they barely been touched in just as long. Assist has also been in for the last year too or so and didn't got FOTM until recent. The other thing though is that recent FOTMs haven't been nerfed by CCP late but by the players themselves, Fleet Doctrines that dictated how majority of a fleet should be comprised of getting beaten the ever living crap out of by a superior fleet doctrine nearly designed to counter that or just outperform it. . Dust 514 not Eve-online. Eve is fully other game, there you paid for half a year and go sleep or drinking bear, In dust you spend you time, Eve is more than 10 years, DUST ? You and others cant compare these 2 games.
He wasn't compring the two games, he was using an example from Eve to illustrate player behaviour.
Online players of multiplayer games are competitive, and will exploit any and every advantage to it's fullest, regardless of which game they're playing. |
Iron Wolf Saber
Den of Swords
7032
|
Posted - 2013.08.07 10:31:00 -
[45] - Quote
I was making a point in that something that was completely well outside of the FOTM mind set or potential was made into FOTM because someone saw some special synergy with it. and made it immediately far more viable.
This is slowly becoming League of Legends styled though because like I said earlier one doctrine was absolutely destroying the other. Which is why no FOTM has remain dominant enough lately which is how players are not only Killing FOTM but shifting the FOTM without developer intervention.
I myself is unable to think up of any possible counter to the current FOTM but I have a feeling its going to be something that starts with Stealth and ends with Bombers considering in the largest fight ever one massive squadron of them killed more ships than everything else there despite that the current FOTM was deployed heavily on one side. |
XeroTheBigBoss
TeamPlayers EoN.
835
|
Posted - 2013.08.07 11:13:00 -
[46] - Quote
Iron Wolf Saber wrote:XeroTheBigBoss wrote:
Do you even Dust?
I haven't seen you in game either.
I play more than enough! Rank like 170 or so! |
nosa skamrosa
RUST 415 RUST415
2
|
Posted - 2013.08.11 18:37:00 -
[47] - Quote
Once a year the respec is free (CCP meets the gamersGÇÖ interests due to constant game balance correction) - good idea |
Leovarian L Lavitz
Better Academy.
516
|
Posted - 2013.08.11 18:41:00 -
[48] - Quote
Iron Wolf Saber wrote:I draw the line there because I still want to force players to plan their soldier's growth more carefully.
EVE Online has access to reassigning their attributes which alters how fast they train up their skills which is pure passive but multiple disciplines in many different fields so some stats are combat oriented while others are leadership and more are more of industry or science. So a pirate that decides to retire from a life a crime and make a more honest living can shift the focus in mental training and pursue the new career faster.
Dust 514 has no such system nor no need for it since we only have one major discipline, the art of war. It's also another layer of confusion FPS players don't need.
However I do recognize that players still make not only mistakes but may need to shift strategies to the ever adapting battlefield. An untrainer booster would be a means of doing that by untraining an unused skill they can sling shot towards the next discipline far quicker than without that booster. Pricing of the booster should be the cheapest of the three and only counts down when its untraining an unburden level.
A full respec of a soldier is considered DEEP into Pay To Win territory under the category Favors the Rich and with the time limit idea even I seeing how fast things are turning around and how long things stay FOTM, so at the rate a free one is given out and purchasable ones as well makes it nearly no consequence to train the wrong things or FOTM.
Also it makes it cheaper to give away free Untrainer boosters. How do you feel about the un-implemented Skill Spike and Skill Clusters? |
Jack McReady
DUST University Ivy League
379
|
Posted - 2013.08.11 19:55:00 -
[49] - Quote
this is not eve. this is a FPS called dust and most importantly, it is for free. having the option for a respec for aurum once in a while is a valid way to earn money imho and could draw more people to actually stay in dust. |
CuuCH Crusher
Commando Perkone Caldari State
200
|
Posted - 2013.08.11 20:18:00 -
[50] - Quote
Make the cost half your Lifetime SP and people might consider it. There has to be a real cost to respecs. This will prevent FoTM. |
|
dday3six
Ahrendee Mercenaries EoN.
181
|
Posted - 2013.08.11 20:57:00 -
[51] - Quote
CuuCH Crusher wrote:Make the cost half your Lifetime SP and people might consider it. There has to be a real cost to respecs. This will prevent FoTM.
You can't soothe for butthurt over a difference of gamer idealogy (casual vs competitive) and call it compromise. If you don't want respecs in the game, then just say it. This "sure but punish them" tagline some put forth like it's an actual compromise is completely asinine, and reeks of self serving bias.
Oh, BTW CCP is a business, and FOTM is good for business, they took a page from Mass Effect 3 and use it to inflate sells. |
GET ATMESON
Robbing The Hood
99
|
Posted - 2013.08.11 21:12:00 -
[52] - Quote
gadya bingo wrote:Due to constant game balance correction and the introduction of new objects I suggest your introducing a new option of respec SP for AURUM:
Once a year the respec is free (CCP meets the gamersGÇÖ interests due to constant game balance correction) Once in X months the respec is fee-based (CCP earns) Once in 10 million SP (CCP motivates the gamers to remain in the game and maintains their interest).
Advantages for gamers: - Opportunity to find their own game style within the limit of gained SP - Opportunity to elicit the potential of new objects, which are being introduces in the game - Opportunity to avoid the loss of the distributed SP if the characteristics are pulled down due to balance correction.
Advantages for CCP: - This option will raise the interest in the game and return the fighters who have left the project - This option will earn the UNDERLYING profit from the existing offers for AURUM.
I tryed this idea and people said it would make the game "pay to win" |
Mobius Wyvern
Guardian Solutions DARKSTAR ARMY
3050
|
Posted - 2013.08.11 21:18:00 -
[53] - Quote
gadya bingo wrote:Due to constant game balance correction and the introduction of new objects I suggest your introducing a new option of respec SP for AURUM:
Once a year the respec is free (CCP meets the gamersGÇÖ interests due to constant game balance correction) Once in X months the respec is fee-based (CCP earns) Once in 10 million SP (CCP motivates the gamers to remain in the game and maintains their interest).
Advantages for gamers: - Opportunity to find their own game style within the limit of gained SP - Opportunity to elicit the potential of new objects, which are being introduces in the game - Opportunity to avoid the loss of the distributed SP if the characteristics are pulled down due to balance correction.
Advantages for CCP: - This option will raise the interest in the game and return the fighters who have left the project - This option will earn the UNDERLYING profit from the existing offers for AURUM. How about we just do what CPM Kain Spero said, and offer limited respecs for each major content release until all the assets are in?
That way no one gets stuck with something they don't want just because they started playing sooner, and no one gets burned by stat changes.
Problem solved. |
Heimdallr69
Imperfects Negative-Feedback
506
|
Posted - 2013.08.11 21:21:00 -
[54] - Quote
Tbh I would like it..eve doesn't like it then allow them to do the same |
Mobius Wyvern
Guardian Solutions DARKSTAR ARMY
3052
|
Posted - 2013.08.11 21:25:00 -
[55] - Quote
Heimdallr69 wrote:Tbh I would like it..eve doesn't like it then allow them to do the same The EVE community would throw a fit if you could spend AURUM to redo your skills.
That's part of what the whole uproar about Incarna was about that caused all those rights and dropped subscriptions.
Like I just said, do optional respecs for each major content update until they have everything in, and then stop doing them.
That way everyone has a fair chance at the assets since they should have been in the game in the first place before release.
As has been said many times before, respecs for AURUM is pay-to-win, and purchasable respecs of any kind are a one-way-ticket to never ending FotM spam. |
low genius
the sound of freedom Renegade Alliance
275
|
Posted - 2013.08.11 21:47:00 -
[56] - Quote
gadya bingo wrote:Due to constant game balance correction and the introduction of new objects I suggest your introducing a new option of respec SP for AURUM:
Once a year the respec is free (CCP meets the gamersGÇÖ interests due to constant game balance correction) Once in X months the respec is fee-based (CCP earns) Once in 10 million SP (CCP motivates the gamers to remain in the game and maintains their interest).
Advantages for gamers: - Opportunity to find their own game style within the limit of gained SP - Opportunity to elicit the potential of new objects, which are being introduces in the game - Opportunity to avoid the loss of the distributed SP if the characteristics are pulled down due to balance correction.
Advantages for CCP: - This option will raise the interest in the game and return the fighters who have left the project - This option will earn the UNDERLYING profit from the existing offers for AURUM.
no respecs. ever.
|
low genius
the sound of freedom Renegade Alliance
275
|
Posted - 2013.08.11 21:48:00 -
[57] - Quote
Iron Wolf Saber wrote:I am against a complete 'respec' partial respec or the ability to untrain things would be more preferable.
does this guy even play eve? untrain things? wth does that mean? |
low genius
the sound of freedom Renegade Alliance
276
|
Posted - 2013.08.11 21:50:00 -
[58] - Quote
Iron Wolf Saber wrote:I draw the line there because I still want to force players to plan their soldier's growth more carefully.
EVE Online has access to reassigning their attributes which alters how fast they train up their skills which is pure passive but multiple disciplines in many different fields so some stats are combat oriented while others are leadership and more are more of industry or science. So a pirate that decides to retire from a life a crime and make a more honest living can shift the focus in mental training and pursue the new career faster.
Dust 514 has no such system nor no need for it since we only have one major discipline, the art of war. It's also another layer of confusion FPS players don't need.
However I do recognize that players still make not only mistakes but may need to shift strategies to the ever adapting battlefield. An untrainer booster would be a means of doing that by untraining an unused skill they can sling shot towards the next discipline far quicker than without that booster. Pricing of the booster should be the cheapest of the three and only counts down when its untraining an unburden level.
A full respec of a soldier is considered DEEP into Pay To Win territory under the category Favors the Rich and with the time limit idea even I seeing how fast things are turning around and how long things stay FOTM, so at the rate a free one is given out and purchasable ones as well makes it nearly no consequence to train the wrong things or FOTM.
Also it makes it cheaper to give away free Untrainer boosters.
again, no math in the post. the respec in eve allows you to train specific skills 25% faster and 15% faster respectively. you also train all the skills you 'respeced' out of 15% slower... |
low genius
the sound of freedom Renegade Alliance
276
|
Posted - 2013.08.11 21:51:00 -
[59] - Quote
The Robot Devil wrote:DAMIOS82 wrote:Well i'm not one for constant respecs, but even the cpm can understand that most of us are beeing forced to spec into races we don't want, because ccp is not fast enough with deploying the different race suits and vehicles. I want to be all caldari and i can't because there is no caldari heavy or scout, so if i want to play them then i'm beeing forced into a different race. now offcourse beeing forced is a big word and i could choose to keep my skills for a later date, but that in its turn takes the fun away of beeing a heavy or a scout. If i was making constant mistakes in my choice of skills, then fare enough, i'll live with it. But this is not a mistake, this is the lack of all racial content. And upon release of the right stuff, i hope ccp and the cpm realises, that atleast 1 more respec is needed so that we all can choose the place we belong, whether its the caldari skills or any of the other three. When the racial line of an item is filled out then they should refund the SP from that particular skill tree. When all the heavies are out refund all heavy suit SP and the same for scouts and vehicles. Before and after that there should be no refunds.
this is something very similar to what eve does, and not a 'respec' exactly.
|
low genius
the sound of freedom Renegade Alliance
276
|
Posted - 2013.08.11 21:52:00 -
[60] - Quote
Beowulf Folkvar wrote:Screw CCP and screw this game. No new content, same boring maps, and lack of a matchmaking system. I'm just ganna wait till gta 5 comes out, then a lot of dust players will leave and it will be because of CCPs lack of listening to what players want and being flat out lazy. Its not that damn hard to fix the majority of these issues. If CCP wants to cater to eve players then fine you can lose the majority of your player base (console players). A simple respec would fix a lot of the complaining but they wont do it because its good business to sell boosters so we can skill into new gear due to all the bitching and moaning of OP weapons. So to the OP I wouldn't get your hopes up on any respec. Its just not good business for CCP. No money to be made in it for them
qq |
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 [2] 3 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |