| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
561. I wasted my sp - in General Discussions [original thread]
We are not getting another vehicle respec. All the skill trees are open for future additions. No need to respec as they add new content.
- by The Attorney General - at 2014.02.15 02:01:00
|
562. is really going to reset the points sp - in General Discussions [original thread]
I support a full SP reset for the tear harvesting.
- by The Attorney General - at 2014.02.14 20:19:00
|
563. Minimum SP for a competitive fit - in General Discussions [original thread]
Would depend on role. Logis take at least 10. Tankers can be pretty competitive with maybe 3.5
- by The Attorney General - at 2014.02.14 19:37:00
|
564. CCP has finally decided what to do with 1.8 - in General Discussions [original thread]
I fully expect everything we have been led to believe might be in 1.8 will be delayed. Content release, but not everything promised so far, shortly before Fanfest. Maybe called 1.9 if they are nice enough to release a balance patch to tide every...
- by The Attorney General - at 2014.02.14 18:33:00
|
565. what is balanced vehicles vs av to you - in General Discussions [original thread]
Spkr4theDead wrote: You sound like infantry. Just a realist of what is balanced in a game. The only question that really matters, and it gets consistently ignored is how long should it take a single AV person to destroy a tank? When peopl...
- by The Attorney General - at 2014.02.14 15:38:00
|
566. what is balanced vehicles vs av to you - in General Discussions [original thread]
stlcarlos989 wrote: Tankers what it to take coordinated teamwork by AV to take them out which is fine but only if it takes coordinated teamwork to operate a tank. What I mean is remove large blasters, make small turrets easier to fit for tanks...
- by The Attorney General - at 2014.02.14 15:26:00
|
567. what is balanced vehicles vs av to you - in General Discussions [original thread]
Atiim wrote: How about Monday in Caldari FW? ok.
- by The Attorney General - at 2014.02.14 15:09:00
|
568. what is balanced vehicles vs av to you - in General Discussions [original thread]
Atiim wrote: Still have yet to be soloed by AV. Would you like to be the first? Sure
- by The Attorney General - at 2014.02.14 15:00:00
|
569. what is balanced vehicles vs av to you - in General Discussions [original thread]
voidfaction wrote: that is the team work for the whole battle not how it takes team work to drive the tank, shoot with the tank activate the modules, etc. I want to know why your dropsuit (tank) should only require 1 person to operate but mul...
- by The Attorney General - at 2014.02.14 14:47:00
|
570. what is balanced vehicles vs av to you - in General Discussions [original thread]
My current recommendations: Tanks: Nerf Blaster Range by 30% Reduce speed 3% Reduce Nitrous boost by 5% Reduce Gunloggi CPU/PG, number TBD Increase turning abilities of the Madrugar slightly, to slightly reduce the mobility disadvantage versus G...
- by The Attorney General - at 2014.02.14 14:45:00
|
571. I'm Sorry, But Someone Had To Say It... - in General Discussions [original thread]
Arkena Wyrnspire wrote: Press Secretary wrote: This poster is now under investigation for stealing popular players signatures. 'Popular'? Meh, my Press Secretary has been slipping lately. I'll smack that hoe shortly.
- by The Attorney General - at 2014.02.13 22:14:00
|
572. So CCP, You know there is a problem with tanks. What are you doing ... - in General Discussions [original thread]
Atiim wrote: An even match can last a very long time, and your hives might run out; and according to you it's not just one man in a fat suit. It's 3. And one of them can do the hives next time, or one guy can be greedy for WP. You still ...
- by The Attorney General - at 2014.02.13 22:13:00
|
573. So CCP, You know there is a problem with tanks. What are you doing ... - in General Discussions [original thread]
Atiim wrote: The Attorney General wrote: Monkey MAC wrote: Whats fair amd balanced setting? Where one MLT tank requires 2-3proto forges in a high up position, with infantry protection? They don't need infantry protection up high, an...
- by The Attorney General - at 2014.02.13 22:07:00
|
574. So CCP, You know there is a problem with tanks. What are you doing ... - in General Discussions [original thread]
Monkey MAC wrote: Whats fair amd balanced setting? Where one MLT tank requires 2-3proto forges in a high up position, with infantry protection? They don't need infantry protection up high, and 3 forges will keep ALL vehicles away, not j...
- by The Attorney General - at 2014.02.13 20:49:00
|
575. Tank Spam vs Protostomping - in General Discussions [original thread]
Ryme Intrinseca wrote: Yeah, tower forging is also OP. CCP should put fences up there. But should AV really have to revert to the scrubbiest of tactics to have a chance versus tanks? Shouldn't feet on the ground have a chance too? PS - This...
- by The Attorney General - at 2014.02.13 17:30:00
|
576. So CCP, You know there is a problem with tanks. What are you doing ... - in General Discussions [original thread]
Ryme Intrinseca wrote: And before anyone says '1.7 tanking IS HARD!!!!111', explain to me Duna's thousands of monthly kills at 88 KDR. Ambush stomping. Plus, he runs away when the tank gets popped. If they just removed vehicles from Ambu...
- by The Attorney General - at 2014.02.13 17:08:00
|
577. Tank Spam vs Protostomping - in General Discussions [original thread]
Ryme Intrinseca wrote: I have proficiency 5 forges. I rarely use them as they are far less effective than a militia rail tank. I find a forge to be much more effective at controlling an area than a MLT rail tank. The Forge is only out of...
- by The Attorney General - at 2014.02.13 17:06:00
|
578. So CCP, You know there is a problem with tanks. What are you doing ... - in General Discussions [original thread]
Ryme Intrinseca wrote: I don't think blasters themselves are a problem. They only seem like a problem now because you can ALWAYS get them in range, as there is no effective AV threat. Easy solution: buff AV. Maybe +30% damage for forges and +...
- by The Attorney General - at 2014.02.13 16:31:00
|
579. Tank Spam vs Protostomping - in General Discussions [original thread]
Thor Odinson42 wrote: You aren't seeing the bigger picture. Everything you said is true, but consider this. My AV suit costs around 250K. If I decide to deal with tanks I will lose at least two of them. In other words there is ZERO incentive...
- by The Attorney General - at 2014.02.13 16:20:00
|
580. Tanks? OP? I see QQ!!!!!!!!!!! - in General Discussions [original thread]
Soldier Sorajord wrote: To Tankers: Were you tanking pre 1.7? Were You proto? Were you happy getting two shotted by forge guns? Were you happy getting killed by ONE PERSON ? How much did your GOOD tanks cost? 1. Yes, tanking ...
- by The Attorney General - at 2014.02.13 16:09:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |