| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 |
321. Help with intro into tanking - in General Discussions [original thread]
TBH just don't do it. I sunk 61mil SP into all vehicles and armor is the only viable one, half the modules you will not use or won't be able to fit, you get little investment for the SP required compared to infantry and it will cost you alot mor...
- by Takahiro Kashuken - at 2015.03.14 13:39:00
|
322. This ******* week... - in General Discussions [original thread]
TooMany Names AlreadyTaken wrote: LUGMOS wrote: Forced Death wrote: 50+ keys and no bpo... Same :/ Same :/ insane, isn't it? I've had more like 100+keys and all i have to show for it is a Quafe Shotgun BPO.
- by Takahiro Kashuken - at 2015.03.14 13:34:00
|
323. [Feedback] Vehicle Shield Modules Fitting Cost TOO High - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Doc DDD wrote: Well the Maddy now is better than the pre echo Gunlogi, so it is a fun tank to use, but again there is no balance, and when issues were brought up, all the number crunchers that didn't even log into the game sat on the forums cla...
- by Takahiro Kashuken - at 2015.03.14 13:07:00
|
324. Active module mechanics - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
It would greatly benefit all active modules for vehicles. I suppose that is why it falls to the bottom of the page, it is actually something good for vehicles instead of a nerf. Disclaimer: The above post is respectful, contains no ranting, ...
- by Takahiro Kashuken - at 2015.03.14 13:02:00
|
325. 2 x competent HAVs = win? - in General Discussions [original thread]
You mean teamwork and competent pilots are OP? We used to have that in chrome and uprising before it got nerfed into the ground. AHMG/AV nades wreck vehicles, SL/FG is still the same as before and PLC is still rare. Vehicle wise shield is wea...
- by Takahiro Kashuken - at 2015.03.14 12:59:00
|
326. God Bless AV - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Breach FG can OHK i used to do it before Echo vehicle changes and now that they have lower base HP and lower HP even when fitted with a plate or extender or course it is going to be easier. JLAV can OHK. 3 Proto AV nades can also outright kill a...
- by Takahiro Kashuken - at 2015.03.13 23:52:00
|
327. [Feedback] Vehicle Shield Modules Fitting Cost TOO High - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
61mil SP into vehicles and turrets and i still do not get 5% PG/CPU per level for electronices and enginnering. I cannot save PG/CPU on any modules and only on turrets but for 61mil SP invested it feels like i have gained barely anything where a...
- by Takahiro Kashuken - at 2015.03.13 23:49:00
|
328. HAV Question - in General Discussions [original thread]
Juno Tristan wrote: With the lowered base health of Tanks, was there a corresponding speed increase/shield recharge delay adjustment to offset the effect of plates/extenders? Nope. They lowered the shield regen rate amount for both vehicle...
- by Takahiro Kashuken - at 2015.03.13 23:38:00
|
329. To Rattati: The case for hardener limits - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Harpyja wrote: How about just add capacitors to vehicles? It will seriously fix so many problems and balance issues. If you want to run three hardeners at once, great! But don't expect them to all last as long as they will consume three time ...
- by Takahiro Kashuken - at 2015.03.13 23:26:00
|
330. "One giant vehicle nerf with more power to AV", you have g... - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Reinhard Manderfelt wrote: AV did not receive more options. We got one extra AV grenade. I've seen enough HAV's take one grenade to the front, and then they'll chicken off to their redline and let their Armour reps take over until they're ready...
- by Takahiro Kashuken - at 2015.03.13 23:23:00
|
331. To Rattati: The case for hardener limits - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
No The bastion module is not a hardener, it is much much more, it also enhanced your offensive weapons and stops the majority of remote weapons too but at 1 big risk, you cannot move at all. For this to be applied to DUST then this hardener would...
- by Takahiro Kashuken - at 2015.03.13 19:32:00
|
332. Poll: Dust Development Direction - in General Discussions [original thread]
It is a like farm but i will bite. Disclaimer: The above post is respectful, contains no ranting, contains no personal attacks, contains no trolling, contains no racism, contains no discrimination, contains no profanity, contains no spamming. T...
- by Takahiro Kashuken - at 2015.03.13 18:34:00
|
333. If you could describe Echo in one word... - in General Discussions [original thread]
Disappointment. Disclaimer: The above post is respectful, contains no ranting, contains no personal attacks, contains no trolling, contains no racism, contains no discrimination, contains no profanity, contains no spamming. This post is an opin...
- by Takahiro Kashuken - at 2015.03.13 18:14:00
|
334. "One giant vehicle nerf with more power to AV", you have g... - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Haerr wrote: I agree with almost everything in your post... +1 The complete lack of trolling is, how ever, jarring and not what I expect of the forums. I am not allowed to troll Almost is good enough, seems a few others also agree. Discl...
- by Takahiro Kashuken - at 2015.03.13 18:07:00
|
335. Active module mechanics - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
So no one wants this? Can anyone find a hole in this propsal? Disclaimer: The above post is respectful, contains no ranting, contains no personal attacks, contains no trolling, contains no racism, contains no discrimination, contains no prof...
- by Takahiro Kashuken - at 2015.03.13 18:05:00
|
336. Large Missiles might be a bit underpowered now. - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
It doesn't do the DPS. It doesn't have enough damage because it cannot be applied quickly enough so there is more chance of the target moving. If you increase the clip size then you get more chances to hit the target, if you give it more damag...
- by Takahiro Kashuken - at 2015.03.13 16:24:00
|
337. jihads are back in fashion like a bad 80s haircut. - in General Discussions [original thread]
That's not going to happen. They have all on ignoring calls to fixing the railgun and that has been going on for 3 years, do you really think they will fix something that is essentially a buff for vehicles? Disclaimer: The above post is resp...
- by Takahiro Kashuken - at 2015.03.13 16:20:00
|
338. Changes in DUST 514's fundamental vision and my thoughts on it - in General Discussions [original thread]
I feel that its fundamental vision is in tatters atm. Its link to EVE is next to non existant. Its skill tree nothing like what is in EVE, lots of useless skills which offer no bonuses just modules and unlocks. AV weapons are looking to becom...
- by Takahiro Kashuken - at 2015.03.13 15:37:00
|
339. Heavy shield hardener - in General Discussions [original thread]
General Mosquito wrote: Takahiro Kashuken wrote: Barely, both hulls got gutted to the bone regarding HP values anyways, AV can still easily make mincemeat out of both hulls without trying. The only reason for that is that they increas...
- by Takahiro Kashuken - at 2015.03.13 14:29:00
|
340. Heavy shield hardener - in General Discussions [original thread]
thomas mak wrote: Takahiro Kashuken wrote: Barely, both hulls got gutted to the bone regarding HP values anyways, AV can still easily make mincemeat out of both hulls without trying. Disclaimer: The above post is respectful, contains no...
- by Takahiro Kashuken - at 2015.03.13 14:26:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |