| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 [90] 100 200 |
1781. Blaster tanks are horribly unbalanced and the chief source of Infantry frustration. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Cat Merc wrote: Takahiro Kashuken wrote: Cat Merc wrote: Not really, I saw a shield tank eat up fire from 3 FG's, then a blaster came in and made toast from that tank. Also, while true the FG has more range, the tank can close that dist...
- by Takahiro Kashuken - at 2013.12.20 14:06:00
|
1782. Blaster tanks are horribly unbalanced and the chief source of Infantry frustration. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Cat Merc wrote: Not really, I saw a shield tank eat up fire from 3 FG's, then a blaster came in and made toast from that tank. Also, while true the FG has more range, the tank can close that distance, while the FG is fit on a slow suit that w...
- by Takahiro Kashuken - at 2013.12.20 14:02:00
|
1783. CCP - CHANGE VEHICLE RESTRICTIONS - in General Discussions [original thread]
Monkey MAC wrote: Tanks are pretty much immune to all but three infantry weapons, by percentage wise infantry should be immune to the same percentage of tank weapons. If your talking about equipment that the same as your active modules, im t...
- by Takahiro Kashuken - at 2013.12.20 13:55:00
|
1784. Blaster tanks are horribly unbalanced and the chief source of Infantry frustration. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Cat Merc wrote: Takahiro Kashuken wrote: Arkena Wyrnspire wrote: Takahiro Kashuken wrote: So a tank cannot have a turret which kills infantry effectively but yet infantry can have a weapon like the FG which can easily kill tanks/infant...
- by Takahiro Kashuken - at 2013.12.20 13:52:00
|
1785. Blaster tanks are horribly unbalanced and the chief source of Infantry frustration. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Arkena Wyrnspire wrote: Takahiro Kashuken wrote: So a tank cannot have a turret which kills infantry effectively but yet infantry can have a weapon like the FG which can easily kill tanks/infantry effectively??? Double standards much? Fran...
- by Takahiro Kashuken - at 2013.12.20 13:47:00
|
1786. CCP - CHANGE VEHICLE RESTRICTIONS - in General Discussions [original thread]
Monkey MAC wrote: Takahiro Kashuken wrote: Monkey MAC wrote: Takahiro Kashuken wrote: I have an idea also then We restrict how many infantry we are allowed also So only 1 protobear of any suit is allowed in Only 2 heavys are allo...
- by Takahiro Kashuken - at 2013.12.20 13:44:00
|
1787. Blaster tanks are horribly unbalanced and the chief source of Infantry frustration. - in General Discussions [original thread]
KAGEHOSHI Horned Wolf wrote: Takahiro Kashuken wrote: So a tank cannot have a turret which kills infantry effectively but yet infantry can have a weapon like the FG which can easily kill tanks/infantry effectively??? Double standards much? ...
- by Takahiro Kashuken - at 2013.12.20 13:40:00
|
1788. Blaster tanks are horribly unbalanced and the chief source of Infantry frustration. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Korvin Lomont wrote: Takahiro Kashuken wrote: So a tank cannot have a turret which kills infantry effectively but yet infantry can have a weapon like the FG which can easily kill tanks/infantry effectively??? Double standards much? Frankly...
- by Takahiro Kashuken - at 2013.12.20 13:28:00
|
1789. Swarms dont stop shields from recharging - in General Discussions [original thread]
Korvin Lomont wrote: Takahiro Kashuken wrote: So OP is an idiot Why are you shooting swarms at a gunlogi? Why are you shooting swarms at a gunlogi with its hardeners on? When swarms deal 80% damage at best to shields and the hardener ad...
- by Takahiro Kashuken - at 2013.12.20 13:23:00
|
1790. CCP - CHANGE VEHICLE RESTRICTIONS - in General Discussions [original thread]
Monkey MAC wrote: Takahiro Kashuken wrote: I have an idea also then We restrict how many infantry we are allowed also So only 1 protobear of any suit is allowed in Only 2 heavys are allowed and also 2 logis with 2 assault frames, the r...
- by Takahiro Kashuken - at 2013.12.20 13:21:00
|
1791. Blaster tanks are horribly unbalanced and the chief source of Infantry frustration. - in General Discussions [original thread]
So a tank cannot have a turret which kills infantry effectively but yet infantry can have a weapon like the FG which can easily kill tanks/infantry effectively??? Double standards much? Frankly its not my fault if everyone is assault and im in a...
- by Takahiro Kashuken - at 2013.12.20 13:20:00
|
1792. HP re-gen limit for vehicles - in General Discussions [original thread]
Assert Dominance wrote: a vehicle should only be able to be bombarded by AV and rep itself to certain point. example, if a tank is brought down to 30% of total HP, only 80% of total HP can be brought back in reps. or something along those lines...
- by Takahiro Kashuken - at 2013.12.20 13:14:00
|
1793. Discussion on balancing red line rail tanks - in General Discussions [original thread]
Does this also happen to snipers in the red zone?
- by Takahiro Kashuken - at 2013.12.20 13:13:00
|
1794. Yes, more tank QQ (copy & pasted from War Room) - in General Discussions [original thread]
lol idiot 1. dont fire when hardeners are up 2. If it was PC what the **** were your tankers doing? its a mlt tank that could have been alpha'd instead 3. dont fire when hardeners are up 4. sounds like he had a good fit Also 40% resistance =...
- by Takahiro Kashuken - at 2013.12.20 13:12:00
|
1795. CCP - CHANGE VEHICLE RESTRICTIONS - in General Discussions [original thread]
I have an idea also then We restrict how many infantry we are allowed also So only 1 protobear of any suit is allowed in Only 2 heavys are allowed and also 2 logis with 2 assault frames, the remaining 10spaces are 5 commandos and 5 scouts
- by Takahiro Kashuken - at 2013.12.20 13:09:00
|
1796. Swarms dont stop shields from recharging - in General Discussions [original thread]
So OP is an idiot Why are you shooting swarms at a gunlogi? Why are you shooting swarms at a gunlogi with its hardeners on? When swarms deal 80% damage at best to shields and the hardener adds on another 60% resistance to anymore incoming dam...
- by Takahiro Kashuken - at 2013.12.20 13:04:00
|
1797. Helpless little infantry - in General Discussions [original thread]
Darken-Sol wrote: I love how experienced tankers are saying MLT tanks are the problem. It shows a lack of integrity. Many have taken the stance of claiming to not kill infantry. They are trying to pin the blame on the ability to call in cheap M...
- by Takahiro Kashuken - at 2013.12.19 19:04:00
|
1798. The AV problem - in General Discussions [original thread]
Monkey MAC wrote: Takahiro Kashuken wrote: Monkey MAC wrote: First off, you realise the swarm launcher is caldari right? Its meant to be long range, about 250m would be about right! Secondly, invisibility, poor rendering may have been a ...
- by Takahiro Kashuken - at 2013.12.19 16:19:00
|
1799. Only Thing currently that merits my opinion. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Fox Gaden wrote: When skilling back into Vehicle Upgrades with my Heavy I noticed that the Armour and Shield skills donGÇÖt mention a 5% increase to Armour or Shield health. If that was taken out, then I think it should be put back in. The reas...
- by Takahiro Kashuken - at 2013.12.19 15:40:00
|
1800. LOLTank Brigade Wants Swarm Launchers Nerfed? Again?! - in General Discussions [original thread]
Thumb Green wrote: Commander Tzu wrote: drake sadani wrote: TL;DR version , tank players say keep nerfing AV . AV says boost us back so we don't get owned tank players say use better tactics . AV says maybe you should use better ta...
- by Takahiro Kashuken - at 2013.12.19 15:37:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 [90] 100 200 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |