| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 |
3481. Tankers we are not proud of you. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Maciej Szambelan wrote: Ghosts Chance wrote: i just kill the tanks instead of complaining on the forums.... its not exactly hard, its just now you have to actually FIGHT a tank rather then just slaughter it.... Yeah, ok but the game shoul...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2013.12.16 05:49:00
|
3482. Tankers we are not proud of you. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Faunher wrote: The problem is not the tankers... It's the hundreds of people running around with ridiculously accessible and effective militia tanks, who often have not a single skill point in vehicles. If we are going to be whining about an...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2013.12.16 05:46:00
|
3483. i'm sorry, I'm a fangirl. looking for channels, discussions. - in General Discussions [original thread]
virgindestroyer7 wrote: I've been playing DUST for a year and a half and i can't get enough of it. I love this community, I love the posts and discussions that need graphical calculators to determine well.. anything, and i love you trollololole...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2013.12.16 05:42:00
|
3484. Tankers we are not proud of you. - in General Discussions [original thread]
burning powers wrote: Tanks are being a constant problem and will kill Dust if they are continuing to litter the battlefield. now days we only see 5 tanks roaming the maps from the enemy or allied forces. This has what the game has become.. Onl...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2013.12.16 05:38:00
|
3485. Infantry again and again wanted CCP to fix vehicles - in General Discussions [original thread]
Borne Velvalor wrote: RydogV wrote: I don't know what folks are complaining about with tanks. Other than the redonkulous speed, they are totally kill-able. I have killed more tanks in the past few days than I had in the past few months. And ...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2013.12.16 05:37:00
|
3486. Infantry again and again wanted CCP to fix vehicles - in General Discussions [original thread]
Borne Velvalor wrote: Spkr4theDead wrote: The 1.7 patch is not a week old, and very few of them are happy with it. Guess what... these are the results of you constantly complaining about tanks. Now they're better, and all of you are still ...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2013.12.16 05:36:00
|
3487. Infantry again and again wanted CCP to fix vehicles - in General Discussions [original thread]
Atiim wrote: KING CHECKMATE wrote: ''Of course I have a brain, you need one to be a tanker.'' Not a lot in 1.7, there by the tank spam ''Why don't you try tanking for a week?'' I think you havn't been around a lot huh? My AV weapon...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2013.12.16 05:34:00
|
3488. Infantry again and again wanted CCP to fix vehicles - in General Discussions [original thread]
Vitharr Foebane wrote: RydogV wrote: I don't know what folks are complaining about with tanks. Other than the redonkulous speed, they are totally kill-able. I have killed more tanks in the past few days than I had in the past few months. And...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2013.12.16 05:13:00
|
3489. Infantry again and again wanted CCP to fix vehicles - in General Discussions [original thread]
RydogV wrote: I don't know what folks are complaining about with tanks. Other than the redonkulous speed, they are totally kill-able. I have killed more tanks in the past few days than I had in the past few months. And I am only running Advance...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2013.12.16 04:52:00
|
3490. Infantry again and again wanted CCP to fix vehicles - in General Discussions [original thread]
Atiim wrote: Spkr4theDead wrote: You were killed by a MLT missile from a dropship, and continued to use AV even though you called yourself a tanker. Your opinion is invalid. I was spider tanking that round, so the tank's fit had it's hard...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2013.12.16 04:48:00
|
3491. Infantry again and again wanted CCP to fix vehicles - in General Discussions [original thread]
KING CHECKMATE wrote: Spkr4theDead wrote: 34+ mil SP? Jeez, and I thought I had no life. You have no brain.Its different. You cant even tell you are mistaken. Even with all these people trying to explain it to you.Even TANKERS....An...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2013.12.16 04:47:00
|
3492. Infantry again and again wanted CCP to fix vehicles - in General Discussions [original thread]
Atiim wrote: Spkr4theDead wrote: You're not explaining yourself. I asked for an explanation. Why is wrong to squad with a tanker? I don't know, maybe it's because not everyone is a tanker. And maybe it's because I shouldn't have to be a...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2013.12.16 04:39:00
|
3493. Infantry again and again wanted CCP to fix vehicles - in General Discussions [original thread]
ReGnYuM wrote: Spkr4theDead wrote: ReGnYuM wrote: Flix Keptick wrote: ReGnYuM wrote: Tanker mentality is the reason why you don't let tankers balance gameplay. Especially Spkr threads.... * Regnum cringes Because infantry wit...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2013.12.16 04:37:00
|
3494. Infantry again and again wanted CCP to fix vehicles - in General Discussions [original thread]
KING CHECKMATE wrote: Spkr4theDead wrote: It's MLT and PRO. You still don't get it, do you. Will you be happy if MLT tanks cost 500,000 ISK? Not necessarily happy, but considering their effectiveness and the fact it might stop tanks spa...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2013.12.16 04:14:00
|
3495. Infantry again and again wanted CCP to fix vehicles - in General Discussions [original thread]
KING CHECKMATE wrote: Spkr4theDead wrote: So that means they should hold all the influence over CCP, and the small playerbase that are tankers should hold exactly none? That's not exactly fair, or balanced. Like AV was up until 1.7. Not ...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2013.12.16 04:13:00
|
3496. Infantry again and again wanted CCP to fix vehicles - in General Discussions [original thread]
Lance 2ballzStrong wrote: want to fight rock? OPs logic = bring a rock of your own Forget paper, what's balance?! Sad, coming from a heavy. I figure you'd understand it. But alas, infantry doesn't get it. I also moonlight as a PRO forger, ...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2013.12.16 03:53:00
|
3497. Infantry again and again wanted CCP to fix vehicles - in General Discussions [original thread]
ReGnYuM wrote: Flix Keptick wrote: ReGnYuM wrote: Tanker mentality is the reason why you don't let tankers balance gameplay. Especially Spkr threads.... * Regnum cringes Because infantry with OP rifles is better? Or maybe it's ju...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2013.12.16 03:45:00
|
3498. Infantry again and again wanted CCP to fix vehicles - in General Discussions [original thread]
Surt gods end wrote: You betrayed yourself. Cause those that know me here.. know I've PLAYED EVERY FPS GAME. *really. cause that's all he plays* Unreal. Arma. BF. warhark. PS2. ext (including every SOCOM. bad or good as they were) None neede...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2013.12.16 03:33:00
|
3499. Infantry again and again wanted CCP to fix vehicles - in General Discussions [original thread]
Seymor Krelborn wrote: Spkr4theDead wrote: The 1.7 patch is not a week old, and very few of them are happy with it. Guess what... these are the results of you constantly complaining about tanks. Now they're better, and all of you are still...
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2013.12.16 03:29:00
|
3500. Infantry again and again wanted CCP to fix vehicles - in General Discussions [original thread]
Keri Starlight wrote: Spkr4theDead wrote: I can easily take down that many. Earlier today, I took out 6 or 7 by myself. *clap clap clap clap clap* It's tough not having an entire squad of rooftop forge gunners to protect you.
- by Spkr4theDead - at 2013.12.16 03:25:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |